St Josephs Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a safe clean, comfortable, environment for three (3) of six (6) residents (Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #33,) reviewed for Environment. Specifically, 1) wheelchairs for Resident #20 and Resident #25 were soiled, the walls in Resident #25's room had holes/dents/ unfinished paint and exposed caulk and Resident #33's wheelchair had torn fabric edges, soiled/worn padding on the armrests, and 2) the end cap on the radiator in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not affixed leaving an exposed sharp edge.The findings included:The policy for Wheelchair Cleaning and Disinfection last reviewed 11/03/2025, documented the facility committed to maintaining a clean and sanitary environment to reduce the risk of infection transmission. All wheelchairs will be cleaned and disinfected on a routine monthly basis using a standardized tracking and identification process.The policy for Corrective Maintenance Requests dated 05/01/2025 documented methods for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2796313), the facility did not ensure that residents knew how to file a grievance or were informed of the response to the grievance for 12 of 12 residents (Resident #11, Resident #29, Resident #34, Resident #13, Resident #20, Resident #24, Resident #25, Resident #8, Resident #35, Resident #41, Resident #14, Resident #26) interviewed during resident council and one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #17). Specifically, 1) Residents interviewed during resident council were not aware of the grievance process and there was no documented evidence listing the grievances and response to grievances; 2) Resident #17's representative had multiple concerns and grievances regarding Resident #17's plan of care that were inconsistently addressed and documented. The findings included:1)The facility Grievances policy dated 11/2016 documented the purpose as supporting each resident's right to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2796313 and 2725477) the facility did not ensure that residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary assistance with toileting for one (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #27 and #17) reviewed for activities of daily living and other residents that expressed a delay in call bell times during the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, Resident #27 was not provided toileting assistance as needed to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. 2) Resident #17 was observed with their call bell on and not receiving care timely. 3) Other residents expressed concerns with not getting needs met due to delays in response to call bells, and delays were observed. Findings include:The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, last revised 04/2018, documented the facility shall ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2796313), the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and/or care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #17) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #17 was not scheduled to have a follow up appointment with the cardiologist within the time frame indicated on the patient hospital discharge instructions. Findings include:Resident #17 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, occlusion and stenosis of the left carotid artery (blockage of the artery supplying blood to the brain on the left side), and myocardial infarction (heart attack).The Patient Discharge Instructions dated 02/05/2026 documented schedule follow up with cardiology within one (1) month. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented moderately impaired cognition and the resident and family were involved in assessment and goal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received necessary respiratory care, including oxygen therapy, in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders for one (1)) of three (3) residents (Resident #9) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, oxygen was not administered at the correct flow rate per physician order for Resident #9. Findings include:The policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration, last revised 06/26/2025, documented the purpose was to ensure safe oxygen administration according to the physician's order.Resident #9 had diagnoses of chronic atrial fibrillation (long-term irregular heartbeat), congestive heart failure (fluid buildup in the lungs), and heart failure (the heart not pumping blood as effectively as expected).The Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment and received oxygen therapy.The physician order dated 12/23/2025 documented oxygen at two (2)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage and refuse. Specifically, the recyclables front load dumpster was missing one lid, and one bag of food garbage was lying on the ground behind the kitchen loading dock.The findings are:The policy titled Waste Handling, Storage, Transportation and Disposal dated 10/01/2024, documented outside trash containers must be covered at all times and rodent resistant to mitigate the risk of vermin issues. Inspect areas and containers, including compactors to make sure all are properly cleaned and maintained.During an observation of the garbage area on 03/30/2026 at 01:32 P.M., the recyclables front load dumpster had one of its two lids missing which prevented the recyclable materials from being secured. One plastic bag of kitchen garbage was on the ground behind the kitchen facility loading dock. During an interview on 03/30/2026 at 01:35 P.M., the Food Service Director stated they were not aware of the missing lid on the recyclables front loading dumpster. The bag of garbage should have been placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that soiled linens were handled, stored, processed, and transported to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically soiled linen carts were observed stored both overflowing and closed on the unit hallway adjacent to the clean linen cart. There were bagged soiled linens observed on the floor and open bags with exposed soiled linens in the soiled utility room.The findings included: The policy titled Soiled Linen Handling dated 10/01/2024 documented linen hampers should not be overfilled with soiled linens. Soiled linen carts are taken to the holding area after placing soiled linens in the cart. During an observation on 03/27/2026 at 11:06 AM an open overflowing soiled linen cart was stored in the hallway adjacent to the clean linen cart along the wall next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 03/27/2026 at 11:22 AM of the soiled utility room, bagged soiled linens were on the floor and soiled linens were exposed and coming…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NY