Lutheran Center At Poughkeepsie Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 557 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 305 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 142.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and consistent with resident needs to prevent accidents for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #9, Resident #8) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 03/25/2026, Resident #9 left the facility though an alarmed fire door, staff did not respond for over three (3) minutes to the alarm, and the resident fell in the parking lot and was found bleeding with abrasions to their forehead, nose and knees. 2) Resident #8 was at high risk for falls and care planned to be in the dining room in view of staff. On 04/07/2026, the resident fell in the dining room and sustained a large bump on the forehead while the certified nurse aide providing supervision was looking at their phone and out the window. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #8 and #9 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy Elopement / Wandering, last reviewed 12/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-12-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable for one (1) out of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, on 08/20/2025, Resident #1 was assessed as having a blanchable area of moisture associated skin damage to their coccyx/buttocks, was dependent for bed mobility, had no interventions implemented and was later diagnosed with an unstageable pressure ulcer. Additionally, Resident #1 had functional limitations with an order to have their feet offloaded while in bed, which was not consistently done resulting in a deep tissue injury to the resident's right heel. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are:The facility Pressure related Injury Prevention and Treatment and Wound Management…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the survey, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #147) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection, one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #13) reviewed for Position/Mobility, and one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #12) reviewed for Anticoagulation. Specifically, 1) Resident #147 was exhibiting symptoms of a urinary tract infect, urine samples for testing were not collected as ordered and the antibiotic was started prior to the sample collection; 2) Resident #13 was evaluated and waiting for a fitting for new orthotics which was delayed due to untimely follow up by the facility; 3) Resident #12 refused to continue their anticoagulant. There was no documented evidence that education was provided on the possible effects of discontinuation, or that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2625335), the facility did not ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments. Specifically, Resident #1 had a Physical Therapy evaluation in the facility on 08/22/2025 and was found to require maximum assistance for bed mobility. However, an admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 as dependent for bed mobility on their functional assessment. The findings are: The facility did not have a policy related to the Minimum Data Set assessment.Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Dementia, Unspecified Intracapsular fracture of right femur and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. An Admission/Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. The resident had impairment to the lower extremity on one side and required a walker or a wheelchair for locomotion. The resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2625335), the facility administrator did not ensure they used its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, during an abbreviated survey, the facility did not provide requested facility policies to the Surveyor on-site. The Director of Nursing stated there is no documented facility policy for the following: Braden scale assessments, skin observation, admission assessments or a Minimum Data Set Assessment policy.The findings are: During an interview on 10/9/2025 at 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing stated they do not have a policy related to Braden scale assessments and it is a Corporate issue. The Director of Nursing stated they are doing their best and will try to address all these issues brought up during the onsite survey. The Director of Nursing stated the facility does not have a skin observation policy or an admission assessment policy. They were not sure if the facility has a minimum data set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345910, NY00358013), the facility did not ensure the residents right to be free from abuse for 2 out of 3 residents (Residents #1 & #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 6/19/2024, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 was observed on video surveillance engaging in a verbal altercation with Resident #1 and taunting them in the dining room. Certified Nurse Assistant #1 was also observed engaging in a shoving match at a table in the dining room with Resident #1. Resident #1 and Certified Nurse Assistant #1 later engaged in a physical altercation at the nurse's station where Resident #1 was seen grabbing Certified Nurse Assistant #1 by their shirt and Certified Nurse #1 and Resident #1began tussling; (2) on 10/4/2024, Resident #3 reported Physical Therapy Assistant #2 was verbally aggressive with them causing them to lose sleep and endure psychological distress requiring antianxiety medication intervention. The findings are: The facility Abuse Prohibition Protocol last revised 3/2024 documented each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00345910, NY00333580, NY00358013) the facility did not ensure the report of the results of an investigation to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law within 5 working days of the incident or report an allegation of abuse within the regulatory timeframe for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) On 6/19/2024 Certified Nurse Assistant #1 was observed on video surveillance engaging in a verbal altercation and the pushing and pulling of a table back and forth with Resident #1. Review of the 5-day investigative conclusion submission revealed it was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 7/25/2024; (2) On 2/13/2024 Resident #2 reported alleged inappropriate contact by Certified Nurse Assistant #3. Review of the 5-day investigative conclusion submission revealed it was not submitted until 3/6/2024; (3) On 10/6/2024 Resident #3 reported to the social worker that Physical Therapy Assistant #2 spoke to them in a manner that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00333580), the facility did not ensure that each residents had the right to a dignified existence and each resident was cared for in a manner and environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, during an observation on Unit 1 South on 1/6/2025 Certified Nurse Assistant #2 was standing over Resident #4 while assisting them with their meal in the alcove in the hallway. The findings are: The facility Resident Rights policy last revised 9/2024 documented the facility strives to make sure that each resident is afforded a dignified existence, is treated with respect and dignity, and receives care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life. Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00345910, NY00358013), the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to ensure services were provided to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, #3) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) On 6/19/2024 Certified Nurse Assistant #1 was observed on surveillance footage engaging in a verbal altercation and taunting Resident #1. Certified Nurse Assistant #1 and Resident #1 then engaged in a physical tussle at the nurse's station. Review of Resident #1's care plans revealed they did not have an abuse, victim, or potential victim care plan initiated until after the incident on 6/19/2024; (2) Resident #3 reported that on 10/4/2024 they had a verbal altercation with Physical Therapy Assistant #2 which led them to become angry and suffer mental anguish. Review of Resident #3 care plans revealed they did not have a risk to be victimized care plan before and after the verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity in an environment that promotes maintenance of their quality of life for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #49, and #116) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, 1. Resident #49 was observed on several occasions wearing a food-stained gown; 2. signs that were visible to staff and visitors detailing how to feed Resident #116 were placed above the bed. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Rights and revised 11/2023 documented the facility strives to make sure each resident is afforded a dignified existence, is treated with respect and dignity and receives care in a manner and environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life. 1. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism. The 12/5/23 Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey process from 1/30/2024 through 2/6/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported no later than 24 hours even if the events did not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures. Specifically, the facility did not report 3 resident-to-resident altercations involving Resident #126 as the victim. Findings include: Resident #126 was admitted to facility with the following diagnoses and conditions: schizoaffective disorder, unspecified intellectual disability, and suspected adult neglect or abandonment. The 10/25/23 quarterly minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) documented Resident #126's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired and displayed other behaviors such as hitting/scratching self, pacing and disrobing in public. The accident/incident report dated 8/14/23 documented Resident #126 was in their wheelchair in the hallway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00326854), the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of three residents (Resident # 24 and #62) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1. staff did not ensure that Resident #24 received the correct meal texture based on physician order; and 2. the plan of care for Resident #62 was not implemented resulting in the resident sustaining a fall with major injury. The findings are: The revised 9/2023 policy entitled, Feeding-at Risk Residents, documented that assigned staff were to distribute trays and verify all food and liquids provided matched the meal ticket to ensure correct diet and food consistency. The education hand-out entitled, Proper distribution of Meal Trays and Set Up for Residents, directed nurse to check and compare consistency of meal to the meal ticket included before tray served. 1. Resident #24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $858K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY