Park Gardens Rehabilitation & Nursing Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 189.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.545 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 2Number of residents cited:1 Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure a resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #28) reviewed for Urinary Catheter out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, Resident #28's urinary catheter tubing was noted to be exposed and visible in the hallway during multiple observations. The findings are:The facility policy titled 'Dignity Policy' last reviewed 01/02/2026 stated the facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in recognition of a person-centered approach. The policy also stated employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity.Resident #28 has an active diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia.The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #28…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, facility did not ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 and Registered Nurse 2 failed to hold and continued to administer Midodrine 8mg to Resident #22 on several occasions, despite having received in-service regarding the protocol to hold Midodrine if systolic blood pressure is greater than 115mm/hg The findings are:The New York State Education Law Article 139, Section 6902 stated the practice of the profession of nursing includes the executing of medical regimens prescribed by a licensed physician. Section 6902 also states the nursing regimen shall be consistent with and shall not vary any existing medical regimen.Resident #22 had diagnoses which included Hypotension, Iron Deficiency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1 Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, 1). Resident #22 continued to receive Midodrine 8mg 1 tablet on several occasions when the blood pressure was higher than the required parameters as per the physician's order. The Midodrine protocol was to hold medication if the systolic blood pressure is greater than 115mm/hg and yet, Midodrine was not held on different occasions despite in-services received by medication nurses (blood pressure ranges from 120mm/hg to 142mm/hg), and 2). There was no comprehensive care plan developed to address management of hypotension (low blood pressure).The findings are:1. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included Hypotension, Anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1 Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure the attending physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the attending physician evaluated Resident #22's medication regimen and addressed irregularities as identified by the pharmacist. The findings are:Resident #22 had diagnoses which included Hypotension, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Anxiety Disorder, and Seizure Disorder.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #22 was cognitively intact, and required supervisory assistance with Activities of Daily Living.The Physician's Order dated 08/07/2025 documented Midodrine 5 milligram tablet, give 1 tablet every 8 hours for Hypotension (low blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1 Based on observations, record review, and staff the facility did not ensure that Medication Regimen Reviews performed by the Pharmacist were reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician in a timely manner. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #22) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, the attending physician did not act upon the pharmacist's recommendations dated 09/17/2025,10/30/2025, 11/28/2025,12/29/2025 and 01/31/2026 to address Midodrine that was not held for Resident #22 when systolic blood pressure was greater than 115mm/hg (millimeters of mercury) as per physician's order.The findings are:The facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review' dated 10/24/24 documented the Consultant Pharmacist (the pharmacist) shall review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly and report any irregularities to the Medical Director, the Director of Nursing and the Attending Physician. The policy further stated the Drug Regimen Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from 7/19/23 through 7/26/23, the facility did not ensure that the residents and their representatives received a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan (BCP). This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for the Baseline Care Plan out of 38 sampled residents. (Residents #177, #235, and #382). The Findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled 48-Hour Baseline Care Plan dated 4/15/19 documented that the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan summary for each new resident within 48 hours of admission. The Social Service Director/designee will print the 48-hour baseline care plan summary and review it with the resident/representative. The resident/representative signature will be obtained to verify the meeting and agreement with the plan. A signed copy will be maintained in the medical record. 1) Resident #235 was admitted with diagnoses that include a Left Lower leg Fracture and Lower Back pain.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from 7/19/23 through 7/26/23, the facility did not ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) were developed and implemented to meet resident needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #235 and #382) of 38 sampled residents. Specifically,1) Resident #235 did not have a CCP related to leg fracture and pain management developed, and 2) Resident #382 did not have a CCP related to bacteriuria, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) developed. The findings are: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 3/5/19 documented that the facility will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet a resident medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs, which are identified in the comprehensive assessments and leads to the resident's highest obtainable independence. 1. Resident #235 was admitted with diagnoses that include a Left Lower Leg Fracture and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/26/2023, the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans (CCP) were reviewed and/or revised after each assessment and as needed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #84 and #6) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #84's CCP related to dementia was not reviewed upon each assessment and 2) Resident #6's CCPs related to Advance Directives and cognitive loss/dementia were not reviewed and revised. The findings are: A facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning dated 3/5/2019 documented the facility will develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. Goals and objectives are reviewed and/or revised when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition and at least quarterly. 1) Resident #84 had diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease and anemia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #84 was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/26/2023, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with State and Federal laws. This was evident for 2 (Unit 4 and 6) of 5 units observed for medication storage. Specifically, 1) narcotics medications were not stored in a double-locked compartment in the medication cart on the 6th Floor, and 2) the Patient Narcotic's Log (PNL) did not match the narcotics medication count for Resident #5 on the 4th Floor. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 02/2023 documented controlled substances and other drugs subject to abuse are separately locked in permanently affixed compartments. The facility policy titled Controlled Substances dated 7/20/2019 documented the facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. The Director of Nursing (DNS) shall investigate any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-21 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during a recertification survey 04/14/2021-04/21/2021, the facility did not ensure that notice of the availability of the survey results in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public was posted. Specifically, the survey results were located in unlabeled wall-mounted racks in or near the day rooms and in the building lobby but there was no notice about the availability of results in these locations. This was observed on 4 of 5 resident units and in the facility lobby. The findings are: During multiple building observations conducted between 4/15/21 at 11:00 AM and 4/21/21 at 1:00 PM survey results were observed in a binder in the lobby area. There were no notices observed posted on any of the resident units about where the survey results could be located. On 04/16/21 at 02:41 PM, during the Resident Council meeting, residents were asked about the availability of survey results. 5 of the 6 residents in attendance stated they did not know where the results were located and 1 member stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY