The Pearl Nursing Center of Rochester
1335 Portland Avenue, Rochester, NY 14621 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (585) 504-0400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.2% | 14.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.5% | 19.5% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.0% | 12.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.2% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 6.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.4% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 13.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.3% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 9.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.70 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.3%CMS range 25.6–52.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 5.7–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 79.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 4.8–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: 2655452 and NY00386123/571480) completed on 12/11/2025, for three (3) (first, second, and third floors) of three (3) resident sleeping floors, the facility did not provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically: ambient temperatures were not maintained between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit ( F), supplemental heating devices in resident rooms were not functional and damaged, and automatic door opening features for handicap use were not functional. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled: 'Homelike Environment' included the policy statement that residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The policy also included facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized homelike setting to include comfortable safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: NY00371613/571460) completed on 12/11/2025, the facility did not ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for one (1) (Resident #1) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had medical orders for care of a peripherally inserted central catheter (used for long term intravenous (administered directly into the bloodstream through a vein) medication administration) and vital signs monitoring that were not documented on numerous opportunities, and the facility was unable to provide evidence these required services were completed as ordered.The findings include:The undated facility policy, Central Venous and Midline Catheter Flushing included, but was not limited to, flush catheters at regular intervals to maintain patency, an insertion site assessment should be done as part of the flushing process to monitor for complications, and to record in the resident's medical record the date, time and amount of flush administered, and the signature and title of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (ACTS Reference Number: NY00370341, Intake ID: Complaint 571451) from 09/08/2025 to 09/10/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one (1) of one (1) test tray. Specifically, food and beverages during the lunch meal on 09/09/2025 were served at sub-optimal temperatures. This is evidenced by the following:During a tray line and lunch time observation on 09/09/2025, the tray delivery cart was loaded in the main kitchen and sent to Residential Unit 1 at 12:13 PM. The final meal tray was passed to a resident on the unit at 12:39 PM and test tray temperatures were taken at that time by a New York State Department of Health Surveyor, with the Food Services Director present, using the surveyor's calibrated thermometer. The findings included:Roasted potatoes: 101.3 degrees FahrenheitHoney ham: 110.6 degrees FahrenheitCooked asparagus: 101.8 degrees FahrenheitBlack coffee: 127.3 degrees Fahrenheit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (ACTS Reference Number: NY00370341, Intake ID: Complaint 571451) from 09/08/2025 to 09/10/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) (Resident #9) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #9 was identified to be at risk for pressure ulcers, did not have care planned interventions in place to prevent skin breakdown, and later developed a pressure ulcer. Additionally, there was no documented evidence interventions to promote healing of the new pressure ulcer were implemented until three (3) days after the wound was first identified. This is evidenced by the following:The undated facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol included nursing staff and practitioners will assess and document each resident's risk factors for developing pressure sores such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: Complaint 2576858) conducted on 08/22/2025, it was determined for one (resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 72 resident rooms, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, there was mold and evidence of water leaks, wall, and floor damage in a resident bathroom. The findings are: Record review of the facility work order system from 05/01/2025 to 08/22/2025 revealed an entry for a ceiling tile that fell in the bathroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/02/2025 and was closed out on 07/03/2025. Additionally, there were entries for a clogged toilet in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/16/2025, 06/20/2025, and 08/14/2025. There were no other work order entries related to ceiling leaks in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] for this time period.During observations and interviews on 08/22/2025 at 1:30 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00360750), the facility did not ensure there was a system, supported by policies and procedures, to ensure there was an adequate number of staff in the facility at all times who were properly trained and/or certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - life saving measures performed when the heart and or lungs cease functioning). Specifically, the facility did not maintain an updated list of staff currently certified and/or trained in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and did not maintain evidence of nursing staff education and training related to the facility's policy for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. This was evidenced by the following: The facility policy Emergency Procedure-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, revised February 2018, included to obtain and maintain American Red Cross or American Heart Association certification in Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for clinical staff members who will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00360750), the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources efficiently and effectively. Specifically, the facility did not have a system in place to monitor and maintain a list of facility staff who were currently certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR [life saving measures performed when the heart and or lungs cease functioning]). This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Emergency Procedure-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, revised February 2018, included to obtain and maintain American Red Cross or American Heart Association certification in Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for clinical staff members who would direct resuscitation efforts, including non-licensed staff. Provide periodic mock codes (stimulation of an actual cardiac arrest) for training purposes and select and identify a cardiopulmonary resuscitation team for each shift in case of an actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, for three (first, second, and third floors) of three resident-use floors and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping or maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically: exhaust ventilation was not functional, plumbing fixtures were not maintained and/or working properly, hot water temperatures were not maintained between 90 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), lighting was not functional, light lenses and covers were missing, there were cracked and damaged tiles, doors and walls were damaged, a resident room lacked a means for securing valuables, there were resident care items stored on the floor, and there was an accumulation of bugs in stairwells. The findings are: Observations during the initial tour of the facility on 6/24/24 from 8:50 AM to 1:30 PM included the following: a) The exhaust ventilation in the following areas were observed to not be drawing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00319773), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (Residents #30 and #42) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility could not provide evidence that physician-ordered wound care treatments were provided as ordered. This is evidenced by the following: 1. Resident #30 had diagnoses including chronic ulcers of left leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-disease of the lungs causing difficulty to breath), and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set Resident assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #30 was cognitively intact and had a skin ulcer that required a dressing. Current Physician orders for Resident #30's left leg wounds included to clean the wounds with wound cleanser, apply zinc oxide to the macerated skin, cover it silver alginate (wound treatment often used for infected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey for one (Resident #42) of six residents reviewed, one of one basement laundry room and nine (Resident Rooms #106, 108, 111, 120, 122, 208, 220, 306, and 307) of nine resident rooms reviewed, the facility did not ensure the environment remained free from accident hazards. Specifically, for Resident #42, who was known to vape in their room, the facility did not ensure the resident was assessed for and care planned for the use of electronic cigarettes in the facility. The basement laundry room had a significant buildup of lint behind dryers creating a fire hazard and multiple resident rooms had water temperatures above 120 degrees Fahrenheit at points of use. This is evidenced by the following: 1. During an observation on 6/24/24 at 1:30 PM, there was significant buildup of lint behind the dryers in the basement laundry room. The lint was approximately one to two-inches thick and covered the top and rear surfaces of two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, for two (1st and 2nd floor units) of three residential care units reviewed, the facility did not ensure that an accurate reconciliation of all controlled substances (narcotic medications) was consistently completed. Specifically, the narcotic count logs which included reconciliation of narcotic medications at the end of each shift were not consistently signed to indicate the count had been done and the correct count of narcotic medications had been verified by two nurses. This was evidenced by the following: The facility policy Medication - Controlled Substances, dated April 2019, included that narcotics would be counted with two professional nurses and documentation that the count was completed and accurate would be completed at the beginning and end of each shift. Any discrepancy in a shift-to-shift count must be immediately communicated to the Director of Nursing. 1. Review of the second-floor south medication cart on 6/27/24 at 10:30 AM revealed that the Controlled Substance Inventory logs dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not properly maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, and resident care equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, laundry equipment was not maintained in proper working condition. The findings are: Observations in the basement laundry room on 6/25/24 at 8:40 AM included one of two dryers and one of three washing machines were not functional. When interviewed at this time, a housekeeping/laundry staff member stated that all of the laundry is done in-house, and it would help to have them all working. 10 NYCRR: 415.29, 415.29(b), 415.29(c)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that services were provided and/or arranged for the accepted standards of quality that should have been provided for two (Residents #9 and #70) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, lab services were not provided as recommended by pharmacy and ordered by the Physician. This is evidenced by the following: When requested, the facility was unable to provide any policies related to obtaining lab work or a blood draw protocol. 1. Resident #70 had diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), pneumonitis (inflammation of lung tissue), and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set Resident assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was moderately impaired cognitively and did not exhibit behaviors or refusals of care at that time. The current Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 2/16/24 revealed Resident #70 required tube feeding related to dysphagia and could not have foods or fluids by mouth. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00313302), it was determined that for one (Resident #10) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, the facility did not ensure that the residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #10 had received their antipsychotic medication (medications used to treat mental illness) on multiple days. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #10 had diagnosis that included paranoid schizophrenia (a type of mental illness), Crohn's disease (an inflammatory bowel disease), and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set Resident assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderate impairment of cognitive function and no refusals of care or behaviors at that time. Physician orders dated 12/15/23 through 3/22/24 included clozapine 300 milligrams to be given at bedtime for chronic paranoid schizophrenia. Physician orders dated 1/2/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Specifically, garbage and refuse were not contained within dumpsters and receptacles were not covered. The findings are: Observations during the exterior tour of the facility on 6/24/24 at 11:42 AM included three dumpsters with one uncovered located on the northwest corner of the property. Additionally, there was trash around and behind the dumpsters including, but not limited to: part of a lift chair, plastic gloves, various paper and plastic items, and an empty medication blister pack displaying a resident's name and drug information. During an interview following this observation, the Acting Director of Nursing was given the medication blister packet and stated that it should have been shredded, not put in the garbage. Observations on 6/27/24 at 9:24 AM included two of the three dumpsters were left with the covers open. 10 NYCRR: 415.29 (i)(1), 415.29(j)(6)(i), 415.14(h), Subpart 14-1.150
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that the facility did not ensure compliance with all applicable State codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with section 915 of the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code as adopted by New York State, which requires the use of carbon monoxide detection in a building that has fuel-burning appliances. The findings are: On 6/24/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, a carbon monoxide detector was observed in the basement kitchen above the prep sink area, and the kitchen was also observed to contain a natural gas-powered range. Further observations in the basement included natural gas boilers in the boiler room and a natural gas-powered generator in the generator room. Observations on 6/26/24 from 10:46 AM to 11:05 AM included carbon monoxide detectors located on the walls in the corridor on the second floor outside resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 6/26/24 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor requested a list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (complaint #'s NY00321305, NY00322131, NY00312328), it was determined that for three of three residents reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #3 did not receive multiple doses of Zonisamide (anti-seizure medication) and levothyroxine (thyroid hormone replacement medication). Resident #5 did not receive multiple doses of multiple medications including but not limited to Bactrim (antibiotic), Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) and levothyroxine. Resident #6 did not receive multiple doses of valproate (anti-seizure medication). This is evidenced by: The undated facility policy Prescribing and Ordering of Medications, documented that for new/re-admissions, hand write all orders utilizing pre-printed admission Physician's Order Sheets or send orders electronically. The facility Policy on Medication Reordering, dated 6/2/21, documented when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (complaint #NY00320053, #NY00321305, and #NY00322131) it was determined that for three (first, second, and third floors) of three resident use floors the facility did not properly maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, and resident care equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, the telephone and fax systems were not functional or not functioning properly. The findings are: During an interview on 8/23/23 at 8:48 AM Certified Nursing Assistant CNA #1 stated that they do not have phones up here (third floor) and if they need help, they have to take the stairs to get help. CNA#1 stated that they had an emergency a little over a month ago and had to run downstairs to get the nurse. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 9:12 AM Director of Nursing (DON) #1 and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #1 stated that the FAX machine is not working and that the phones went out when there was a bad rainstorm, and they are now into month two with no phone system. The ADON also stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (complaint investigations #NY00312328, #NY00320053, #NY00321305, #NY00322131) it was determined that for two (second and third floors) of three resident use floors the facility did not properly maintain the resident call system. Specifically, the nurse call systems were not functional.? The findings are:? During an interview on 8/23/23 at 8:37 AM Resident #4 stated that they have a tap bell, but no one ever comes, and it takes staff anywhere from one to two-hours to come to the room. Resident #4 also stated that staff yell out from nurse's station: who's ringing that bell and what do you want? During an interview on 8/23/23 at 8:48 AM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 stated that the call lights have been broken for three to four-months. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 9:03 AM a representative from an outside vendor stated that they were installing wiring for the call lights and would probably be done tomorrow. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (complaints #NY00323332, #NY00322131) it was determined that for 2 (Residents #3 and #6) of 13 residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and medical orders. Specifically, Resident #3 had insufficient monitoring of bowel function and a delay of treatment for complications and Resident #6 had insufficient monitoring and physician orders for bowel interventions were not followed in a timely manner. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Lab and Diagnostic Test Results/ Clinical Protocol Policy, revised November 2018, documented that the physician will identify, and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests, and the laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider, or other testing source will report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00312328), it was determined that for one (Unit two) of one unit reviewed for medication storage, the facility did not ensure that medications were properly supervised and secured. Specifically, a large number of prescription medications were unlocked and unsupervised in a resident's dresser drawer and a blister packet (28 pills) of a prescription medication was left unsecured and unsupervised on top of a medication cart with no nurse in sight. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Medication Storage reviewed on 1/3/23 documented that medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, or carts sufficient to size to prevent crowding. All medication in medication carts and treatment carts are locked. 1.In an observation and interview during a unit tour on 8/24/23 at 9:53 AM, a blister packet containing 28 pills of the medication Austedo (medication used to treat involuntary movements as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22 and complaint investigations (NY00299364, NY00269879, NY00281833, NY00282526, NY00283899, and NY00287604) it was determined that for three (first, second, and third floors) of three resident-use floors and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping or maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically: floors, walls, and ceilings were dirty and/or in disrepair, bathrooms and shower rooms were dirty and in disrepair, bathroom exhausts were not functioning, bathing fixtures were not provided at a ratio of one per 20 residents, plumbing fixtures were not maintained and/or working properly, there were ceiling and sewer leaks, heating units were dented and damaged, resident care items were stored on floors, hand sanitizer dispensers were empty, overhead lights were not functional, light lenses and covers were missing, and furniture and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that for five of five newly hired employees the facility did not implement written policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property related to screening prospective employees. Specifically, a nurse aide registry abuse screening was not completed for newly hired employees prior to starting work. The findings are: A review of the facility policy and procedure titled: 'We Care Health Centers Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy' included that the policy serves to provide protection for residents for their health and physical, emotional, and mental well-being; pre-employment screening includes that all individuals being considered for employment will be verified through the NYS Nurse Aide Registry. The policy also included that the State Nurse Aide Registry shall be queried as part of the hiring procedure for all unlicensed personnel positions. On 12/16/22 from 8:45 a.m. to 10:10 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that for two (Resident #46 and #87) of six residents reviewed for rehabilitation services, two (Residents #13 and #57) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and the facility's Infection Control and Prevention Program, the facility did not safeguard medical record information against loss or was readily accessible. Specifically, the facility could not provide Resident #46 and Resident #87's Physical Therapy records, could not provide monthly pharmacy reviews and recommendations, if any, for Resident #13 and Resident #57 and could not provide evidence of a consistent infection prevention program or an antibiotic stewardship program. This is evidenced by the following: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia, ankylosing hyperostosis (abnormal bone formation involving the ligaments of the spine) and a lumbar spinal cord injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey and complaint investigation #NY00283899 completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that the facility did not properly maintain the resident call system. Specifically, elements of the nurse call system were damaged and/or not functioning properly. The findings are: Observations on 12/12/22 from 9:51 am to 2:30 p.m. included the following: a) The nurse call station in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] did not illuminate above the door when pressed. In an interview at this time, Resident #60 stated that the call bell does not always work, and they have to yell to get staff assistance. b) The nurse call station on the wall in the second-floor shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] was pulled out from the wall and did not activate the light above the door when the string was pulled. c) The nurse call station in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] did not illuminate above the door when pressed. d) The nurse call stations on the walls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 12/16/22 it was determined that for one (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for choices, the facility did not allow each resident the right to make choices in regard to their bathing preferences consistent with their wishes. Specifically, the resident was not showered once weekly per their plan of care or stated preference. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, cellulitis left lower limb, and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 2/17/22, included that the resident was cognitively intact, was totally dependent on staff for bathing, required 2 assists of staff for transfers using a Hoyer (mechanical) lift for showering, was occasionally incontinent of urine, and that choosing their type of bathing was very important to them. Review of the current Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Bedside Care Plan revealed that the resident would like their showers one time a week on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (#NY00304062 and #NY00289336) completed 12/16/22 it was determined that for one (Residents #37) of four residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that alleged violations of abuse, mistreatment or neglect, including injuries of unknown injury and misappropriation of property were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, the facility did not initiate an investigation of the resident's missing cell phone or report the incident to the state agency. This was evidenced by the following: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, cellulitis of the left lower leg, respiratory failure, and morbid obesity. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/16/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. In an interdisciplinary team progress note dated 9/22/22, Social Worker #2 (SW) documented that they had followed up on Resident #37 when they reported they were missing a light blue iPhone, which went missing when the resident went to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22, the facility did not ensure written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative for three (Residents #200, #57, and #64) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or/or their representative upon discharge or as soon after as possible following hospitalizations. The findings are: Review of an undated facility policy and procedure titled, Bed Hold and Return to Facility, it states that residents and their representative will be provided a copy of the bed hold and return information at the time of admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave. 1. Resident #200 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of diabetes, depression, and end stage kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 10/3/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigations (#NY00300460), completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #46) of 36 residents reviewed for Professional Standards of Quality, the facility did not ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility as outlined in the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) met professional standards of quality. Specifically, there was lack of documentation that Resident #46's wound care treatments were administered as ordered by the medical team. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #46 had diagnoses of sepsis, gangrene (infected dead tissue) of the gallbladder, and obesity. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented that Resident #46 was cognitively intact, and had a surgical wound requiring wound care. Review of the current CCP revealed that Resident #46 had an impairment to skin integrity from surgery and interventions included to follow facility protocols for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, Resident #46 who had a history of keeping vaping materials in their room, was observed with vaping materials at bedside. Additionally, there was no evidence that any interventions had been done following the initial incident with the vaping materials. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (serious infection in the blood), gangrene (infected dead tissue) of the gallbladder, and obesity. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #46 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers and locomotion off the unit. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #46 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey completed 12/16/22, it was determined that the facility did not properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Specifically, garbage and refuse were not contained within dumpsters and receptacles were not covered. The findings are: Observations during the exterior tour of the facility on 12/13/22 at 8:18 a.m. included an uncovered 'roll-off' dumpster full of trash and garbage located on the northwest corner of the property. Additionally, there were four garbage dumpsters at this location and three were partially uncovered with bags of garbage heaped. Further observations around and behind the dumpsters included the following items on the ground: ripped open black bags of garbage, cardboard boxes, a white pair of crocs, plastic cups, plastic gloves, tires, lids, a shopping cart, aluminum cans, milk cartons, wrappers, green hose, and spray cans. 10NYCRR: 415.29 (i)(1), 415.29(j)(6)(i), 415.14(h), Subpart 14-1.150.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigations (#NY00288521, #NY00296879, and #NY00300460), completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #401) of six residents reviewed for Rehabilitation, the facility did not ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as ordered. Specifically, Resident #401 did not receive consistent physical therapy as ordered by a physician. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #401 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bilateral knee osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, and pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung). The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 11/11/22, documented that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the current Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revealed that Resident #401 was full weight bearing to the lower extremities, was non-ambulatory at the time, and required the use of a Hoyer (mechanical) lift for transfers. Review of a Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22 it was determined that the facility did not ensure compliance with all applicable State codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with section 915 of the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code as adopted by New York State, which requires the use of carbon monoxide detection in a building that has fuel-burning appliances. The findings are: On 12/14/22 at 9:21 a.m., records for inspection and testing of facility carbon monoxide detectors were reviewed. The logs included a monthly signoff including one dated 11/2/22 that listed the locations of carbon monoxide detectors in the following areas: laundry, kitchen, boiler room, and the clean and soiled work rooms on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floors. On 12/14/22 at 9:32 a.m. it was observed that a battery powered carbon monoxide detector was mounted to the wall in the third-floor clean utility room, and the device was marked with: 'Replace by 3/2021'. Additionally, there were no carbon monoxide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Standard Recertification Survey completed on 12/16/22, it was determined that the facility did not properly maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, and resident care equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, laundry equipment, a suction machine, and resident beds were not in proper working condition. The findings are: On 12/12/22 at 12:00 p.m. a crash cart with a suction machine was observed to be located in the first-floor lounge across from the nurse's station. While observing the cart it was noted that there was no glass reservoir to collect liquids attached to it. In an interview at this time, the records staff member at the nurse station was asked if this was the suction machine that would be used on this floor. The answer was yes. Observations in the basement laundry room on 12/12/22 at 2:55 p.m. included one of two dryers and one of three washing machines were not functional. When interviewed at this time, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for three (first, second and third floors) of three resident sleeping floors and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, there were dirty shower rooms, missing and stained ceiling tiles, water leaks, a dirty sit-to-stand lift, non-functioning light fixtures, a loose handrail, soiled resident items, and a broken heater cover. This is evidenced by the following: 1. Observations during the initial tour of the facility on 9/8/20 from 12:48 p.m. to 2:37 p.m. revealed the following: a. There was black, pink, and brown residue, mold, and mildew along the base of the floor and wall located in the shower stall of the third floor shower room closest to room [ROOM NUMBER]. b. The ceiling tiles in front of and inside the third floor clean and soiled utility room were stained brown and/or bowed. In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #83) of one resident reviewed, the facility did not provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident's needs and preferences directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity and well-being to the extent possible. Specifically, the resident was not toileted per their preferences. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #83 has diagnoses including a stroke, depression, and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 8/19/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assist of staff for toileting, and was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. The Comprehensive Care Plan and the current Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME] included that the resident had a self-care deficit related to a stroke, was able to be transferred using the APEX standing frame with extensive assist of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed, the facility did not provide the treatment and services in the resident's plan of care to maintain functional ability. Specifically, the resident was not consistently ambulated by staff per the resident's individualized plan of care. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #94 had diagnoses including depression, blindness in one eye, and recent cellulitis of the right knee. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 8/13/20, included that the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assist of staff for ambulation. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP), dated as last revised on 8/14/20, and the current Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME] included that the resident has limited physical mobility. Interventions documented in the ambulation section included contact guard up to 75 feet using a four-wheeled walker and wheelchair to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the Recertification Survey, it was determined that for one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed, the facility did not provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's care plan. Specifically, oxygen therapy was not provided per physician orders. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #95 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following an acute stay for hypoxic (low oxygen levels) respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 8/13/20, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was on oxygen. The hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], included the resident was being discharged on 5 liters of oxygen and to wean if possible. Physician orders, dated 8/5/20, included oxygen at 4 liters via nasal cannula continuous for respiratory failure. The Comprehensive Care Plan, dated as last revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-06-28 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey for eight (Residents #9, 22, 32, 36, 70, 78, 102, and 112) of eight residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans, the facility did not ensure that a Baseline Care Plan summary was provided to the residents and/or resident representatives. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide evidence that a written summary of their Baseline Care Plan (developed within 48 hours of admission and included minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the residents and that they were able to understand) had been provided to any of the residents and/or their representatives. This is evidenced by, but not limited to the following: The facility's policy, Care Plans - Baseline revised in March 2022, documented: A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. The resident and/or representative are provided a written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, it was determined the facility did not ensure that resident-identifiable information was kept confidential. This was observed on two (second and third floor residential care units) of three units and outside the facility by the garbage receptacle. Specifically, there were several observations of empty medication blister packets (a way to package medications) with resident identifiable information on them in open bins on the units and accessible to all staff, residents, and visitors. Additionally, a medication blister packet with resident identifiable information on it was observed outside the facility on the ground next to a garbage receptable also accessible to the public. The facility's undated policy, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Compliance and Resident Identification Information Destruction, documented that resident identification information included personal identification details and any other documents containing protected health information. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-28 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABRAMCZYK, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 10/04/2017 |
| ABRAMCZYK, NAFTOLI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 10/04/2017 |
| PLATSCHEK, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 10/04/2017 |
| SHAPIRO, SIMA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 10/04/2017 |
| WHEELER, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 10/04/2017 |
| SCHALLER, CHRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/07/2020 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335439. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.