Park Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 190.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2026-05-08 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to update the electronic medical record with a resident's Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) after returning to the facility from a hospitalization. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for advanced directives. Specifically, Resident #1 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/ Do Not Intubate (DNI) order in place dated [DATE]. On [DATE], the resident was hospitalized and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:47 PM, Resident #1 was found to be unresponsive. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 both could not locate the resident's advanced directive/code status in the Electronic Medical Record and initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation against Resident #1's wishes and Emergency Medical Service was called and continued cardiopulmonary resuscitation until the resident was pronounced deceased . This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY00335621), the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident to prevent an accident. This was evident in 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #3) sampled for accidents. Specifically, on 03/11/24 at 9:50 am Resident #3 was assisted into a bathroom toilet stall by Certified Nursing Assistant #3, who was assigned to provide 1:1 monitoring of Resident #3. At 10:35 am, Resident #3 exited from the toilet stall and was noted with a linear laceration measuring 1 centimeter above their left eye. Subsequently, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 12:12 pm and was diagnosed with a Left Proximal Humerus Fracture (breaking the bone in the upper arm). This resulted in actual harm to Resident #3 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Resident Monitoring and Visual Checks dated 07/12/22 was last reviewed on 01/19/23. The policy states that all residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible and systematically organized. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for Advanced Directive. Specifically, Resident #1 had Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/ Do Not Intubate (DNI) order in place dated [DATE]. On [DATE] the resident was hospitalized and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:47 PM, Resident #1 was found to be unresponsive. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 both could not locate the resident's advanced directive/code status in the Electronic Medical Record and initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation against Resident #1's wishes and Emergency Medical Service was called and continued cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation until the resident was pronounced deceased . Findings are:The facility Policy on Advance Directive title Advance Directive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews during the Recertification survey it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the maintenance and housekeeping services provided, were maintained a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior on two (3S, 3N) of five resident units. This was evidenced by soiled, stained, torn, or broken furniture, dusty and soiled air conditioners, soiled, stained torn wallpaper, stained ceiling tiles, resident sinks and corridor bathrooms in disrepair, soiled torn clean linen cart covers. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure, titled Environmental Services dated 04/25/25 stated it is the policy of this facility to ensure all resident rooms are comfortable, cleaned and sanitized according to set standards to maintain a safe sanitary and comfortable homelike environment. The resident has a right to a safe clean comfortable and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. This includes Housekeeping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification survey, the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. This was evident for 2 (Elevator A and Elevator B) of 2 elevators. Specifically, during the Resident Council meeting, nine of nine residents complained of frequent elevator breakdowns. In addition, during the Recertification survey, the elevators were observed to shake, rattle, and bounce during use.The finding is:The facility policy titled Elevator Policy dated 12/10/2024 stated the purpose of this policy is to ensure the safe and proper operation of the elevators and to conform to regarding inspection and maintenance of elevators to ensure resident, staff and guest safety.On 08/19/2025 at 10:00 AM, and during multiple observations throughout the survey, Elevators A and B bounced when in motion, and shook and rattled before they came to a stop. On 08/21/2025 at 3:30 PM, during the Resident Council meeting, nine (9) of (9) residents reported frequent elevator issues and breakdown. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that an effective pest control program was in place. This was evident for one (Unit 3 N) of five units and the 1st Floor Conference Room. Specifically, multiple flies, gnats, and roaches were observed during the initial and subsequent tours of the Pantry Room, corridors, resident bathrooms, and Nurse Station on Unit 3 N and the 1st floor Conference Room. The finding is: The facility policy titled Procedure in the event of Pest Sightings or Complaints dated 04/23/24 stated the facility is to ensure residents environment is clean, safe and pest free. All staff to document of sightings of pest in the pest book. The following observations of Unit 3N were made on 08/19/2025 at 10:40 AM, 08/20/2025 at 9:15 AM, and 08/26/2025 at 09:00 AM and at other times throughout the survey: 1. Pantry Room:a) Multiple live and approximately eight (8) dead roaches were observed throughout the refrigerator, floor, and underneath the pantry sink. 2. Corridor: a) multiple observations of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Abbreviated Survey (NY00337011), the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from physical and verbal abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident in 2 out of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, 1) On 03/25/24 between 5:00 am and 6:00 am, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 reported that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 hit Resident #1 on their left cheek with a closed fit and used profanity at Resident #1 on 03/24/24 during care between 4:00 am and 5:00 am. 2) Certified Nursing Assistant #1 also reported on 03/25/24 at 8:00 am that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 roughly washed Resident #2's testicle and hit Resident #2 on their hand with a lotion bottle during peri-care on 03/24/24 between 4:00 am and 5:00 am. The findings are: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Abuse Prevention, last review date of 12/29/23, documented that the resident had a right to be free…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F609 S/S E Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00337011), the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse was reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation was made if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to New York State Department of Health and to local law enforcement. This was evident in 2 out of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Specifically, 1) On 03/25/24 between 5:00 am and 6:00 am, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 reported that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 hit Resident #1 on their left cheek with a closed fit and used profanity at Resident #1 on 03/24/24 during care between 4:00 am and 5:00 am. The facility did not report the abuse allegation to the New York State Department of Health within two hours and did not notify local law enforcement timely. 2) Certified Nursing Assistant #1 also reported on 03/25/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00337011), the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. This was evident in 2 out of 6 residents sampled (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Specifically, 1) On 03/25/24 between 5:00 am and 6:00 am, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 reported that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 hit Resident #1 on their left cheek with a closed fit and used profanity at Resident #1 on 03/24/24 during care between 4:00 am and 5:00 am. Resident #1's care plan was not reviewed and revised to reflect the allegation of abuse. 2) Certified Nursing Assistant #1 also reported on 03/25/24 at 8:00 am that they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 roughly washed Resident #2's testicle and hit Resident #1 with a lotion bottle on their hand during peri-care on 03/24/24 between 4:00 am and 5:00 am. Resident #2's care plan was not reviewed and revised to reflect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00337011), the facility failed to maintain clinical records that are complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was evident in 2 out of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 03/25/24, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 reported that they witnessed Certified Nurse Assistant #2 being verbally and physically abusive to Resident #1 and Resident #2. There were no assessments documented in Resident #1 and Resident #2's medical records prior to New York State Department of Health Surveyor's onsite visit on 04/02/24. Additionally, there were no physician's assessments documented in Resident #1 and Resident #2's medical record. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Documentation in the Medical Record with the last review date of 04/13/22, documented that the objective to ensure that the facility was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 10/26/2023 to 11/2/2023, the facility did not ensure accuracy of resident assessments. This was evident for 2 (Resident #100 and #170) of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #100's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment did not document the resident's diagnosis of schizophrenia and depression, and 2) the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for Resident #170 documented the resident's planned discharge as an unplanned discharge. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Assessment Using the MDS dated [DATE] documented the facility will conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity. 1) Resident #100 had diagnoses of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #100 was cognitively intact and diagnosed with depression and schizophrenia. The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #100 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 10/26/2023 to 11/2/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #121) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #121 was observed without a soft helmet in place when out of bed in accordance with Physician's Order (PO). The findings are: A facility policy titled Adaptive Equipment dated 1/2/2021 documented the nursing department and the rehabilitation department will monitor care and proper use of the adaptive device. Nursing will document the use of these devices on the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) accountability record. Resident #121 was diagnosed with vascular dementia and schizophrenia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #121 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive to total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$9,318 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-05-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY