Betsy Ross Rehabilitation Center, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00321876), the facility did not provide an environment free of hazards or adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 sustained a burn to their right foot when unit helper #1 transported them in their wheelchair with a carafe of hot coffee resting between their feet. Additionally, after the resident sustained the burn, licensed practical nurse #2 applied toothpaste to the burn without a physician's order. This resulted in actual harm of a second-degree burn (partial thickness skin damage with blistering) to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The 7/2019 Safety and Supervision policy documented the facility strived to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety, supervision, and assistance to prevent accidents were facility-wide priorities. The Safety of Hot Liquids policy dated 2019 documented residents were to be evaluated for safety concerns and potential for injury…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of one (3) resident (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 was diagnosed with COVID-19 and multiple staff were observed in Resident #5's room not wearing appropriate proper personal protective equipment and not performing hand hygiene upon exiting the room.Findings include:The facility policy COVID-19, last reviewed 12/15/2025, documented transmission-based precautions should be used when caring for residents who were documented or suspected to have communicable diseases or infections that can be transmitted to others. They would ensure adherence by staff to always choose proper personal protective equipment and dispose of it properly. Eye protection (i.e. goggle or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face) worn during all resident care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00362225 and NY00365339) surveys conducted 6/24/2025-6/30/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (1) of two (2) resident units (Memory Care Unit). Specifically, the Memory Care Unit J, K, and L pods, had stained and sticky floors, unclean walls, and unclean shelving. Findings include: The facility policy Environmental Cleaning, Resident Equipment and COVID-19, revised 2/2025, documented the facility would ensure daily cleaning and disinfection of commonly touched environmental surfaces with disinfectant to decrease environmental contamination. The undated facility Monthly Room and Area Deep, Clean Sheet documented: - on Saturdays, all the shower rooms and common areas should be cleaned. - on Sundays, the kitchenette, small dining rooms and common areas should be cleaned. The following observations were made on the Memory Care Unit: - on 6/26/025 at 9:09 AM, a medication cart was parked outside of the K pod sitting room. The wall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2025-6/30/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical needs for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #52) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #52 was hospitalized for sepsis (system wide infection) and discharged to the facility with physician orders for antibiotics and their care plan was not reviewed and updated to include the recent diagnosis for infection and antibiotic usage. Findings include: The facility policy Care Plans- Baseline, last revised 6/2025, documented the comprehensive care plan would describe the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Additionally, the assessments of residents were ongoing, and care plans were revised as the information about the residents' condition changed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00372184) surveys conducted 6/24/2025 - 6/30/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #200) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #200 received an ordered enteral feeding (feeding provided through a tube in the stomach). Findings include: The facility policy Tube Feedings, revised 6/2025, documented the Registered Dietitian would evaluate the resident for enteral feedings and complete a Tube Feeding Prescription Form. A new form would be prepared for each change. It was the responsibility of the nursing department to follow the prescriptions. Enteral nutrition was provided as ordered. Enteral nutrition was provided consistent with current standards of practice. Nursing would confirm orders for enteral nutrition were completed. The facility policy Administering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2025-6/30/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis (used to filter waste products from the blood) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #75) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #75 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and there was inconsistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: The 4/11/2024 facility document Nursing Facility Dialysis Agreement, documented emergency and non-emergency change in a resident's medical condition would be immediately communicated by the party having primary knowledge of the change to the other party. The facility policy Hemo-Dialysis - Resident Care, revised 6/2025, documented there would be on-going communication between the interdisciplinary team and the dialysis unit. The exchange of information required to care for the resident was provided through the use of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2025-6/30/2025, the facility did not review the risks and benefits of bed rails or obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails with the resident or resident representative for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #19) reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #19 there was no documented evidence the risks and benefits of bed rail use were explained, consents were obtained prior to bed rail use, or a comprehensive care plan for the use of bed rails was initiated. Additionally, the facility did have documented evidence of inspections of bed frames, mattress, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program. Findings include: The 5/20/25 revised facility policy, Bed Side Rails, documented the facility's regular maintenance program would include regular inspections of all bed systems (e.g. rails, frames, mattresses, and operational components). The facility would conduct regular bed inspections, utilizing an interdisciplinary, team-based approach to risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/24/2025-6/30/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of (2) two meals reviewed (Lunch meals on 6/26/2025 and 6/27/2025). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 6/26/2025 and 6/27/2025. Findings include: The facility policy Dietary- Food Handling Program, revised 10/2024, documented hot food was to be cooked and held for service and must maintain a temperature above 135 degrees Fahrenheit and checked every half hour prior to service. Cold foods must maintain a temperature colder than 40 degrees Fahrenheit. During an observation and interview on 6/24/2025 at 12:22 PM, Resident #76 was sitting in the J-pod common area with family. The family stated the food delivery was usually late, they had not tried the resident's food, and the food did not look appetizing. During an interview on 6/24/2025 at 2:18 PM, Resident #72 stated the food was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted November 27, 2023, to December 1, 2023, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 resident Wings (Wings 1 and 2) reviewed. Specifically, hot water temperatures were measured above 120 degrees Fahrenheit in resident rooms on Wings 1 and 2; and multiple ceiling tiles and a wall with water damage were left uncorrected on Wings 1 and 2. Findings include: The facility policy Water Temperature Testing was requested on November 30, 2023. The policy provided was signed by the Administrator as reviewed on November 30, 2023. The date of the previous review was unknown. The policy documented the procedure was established to ensure that hot water at fixtures accessible to residents shall not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit at any time. The maximum temperature limit adjustment should have been adjusted to limit the hot water to the required temperature at or below 120 degrees Fahrenheit to prevent scalding, approximately 110…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted November 27, 2023, through December 1, 2023, the facility did not store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, potentially hazardous foods were not cooled properly; there were unclean kitchen surfaces; and the dishwasher temperatures were not within acceptable range. Findings include: The facility policy Nutrient Retention of Foods dated June 2019, documented the facility will endeavor to prepare and serve food in such a manner as to conserve the nutritive value of foods. Food to be prepared and refrigerated before service will be chilled to storage temperature in 2 hours or less. Improper cooling: During an observation on November 28, 2023, at 11:40 AM a large bin of cooked pasta labeled 11/28 was covered with foil in the walk-in cooler. The pasta's temperature was measured at 78 degrees Fahrenheit. At 12:53 PM, the pasta was measured at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on November 28,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (New York 00326569) surveys conducted November 27,2023 through December 1, 2023, the facility did not ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances that residents may have for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #28 had a verbal interaction with a staff member, and the facility did not update the resident on the outcome of the grievance. The facility policy, Grievances effective date 1/31/2022, documented complaints or grievances would be made orally or in in writing and could be anonymous in nature. The grievance would be handled within a reasonable expected time frame for completing review of the grievance with a proper resolution being communicated to the resident, family, designated representative/grievant within 10 days. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease of the central nervous system) and anxiety disorder. The 9/1/2023 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,254 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY