Roscoe Regional Rehab & Residential H C F

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 71.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-08-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00371177/803531, NY00331127/803522) from 08/21/2025 to 08/25/2025, the facility did not ensure that the facility had sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Specifically, the staffing of certified nurse aides from 07/26/2025 to 08/28/2025 during the night shift were at minimal levels on 24 of 34 shifts. The staffing of certified nurse aides on the evening shift, during the same period, fell below the minimum for a portion of the shift on 24 of the 34 shifts. The staffing of nurses on the night shift during the same period were at minimal levels for 26 of 34 shifts. Additionally, residents, family members, and staff expressed concerns about low staffing, long wait times in response to call bells, and delays in receiving care. The findings are:The Facility Assessment last reviewed 11/29/2024 documented the maximum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 08/25/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect for four (4) residents (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #64, Resident #74) observed during dining. Specifically, during dining observations for lunch in the main dining room on 08/25/2025 and 08/26/2026, staff did not serve all residents sitting at tables together, and residents were observed waiting while other residents at the same table were eating and finishing their meals. The findings are:The facility Dining Room Service Policy last reviewed 11/2019 had no documented evidence of serving instructions by table in the dining room. During an observation in the main dining room on 08/25/2025 at 12:42 PM, Resident #11, Resident #9, and Resident #38 were sitting together at the same table. Resident #38 was finishing their lunch, Resident #9 was not eating but had been served their food, and Resident #11 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review during the recertification survey from 08/25/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #7 and #76) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically 1) for Resident #7, treatments recommended by the wound care physician were not ordered and there was no documented evidence that the treatments were administered, and 2) for Resident #76, the physician's order to offload their heels was not implemented as evidenced by observation.The facility policy titled Documentation of Pressure Ulcer and Chronic Wounds last revised June 2023 documented that the Assistant Director of Nursing (or skin nurse as designated by the Director of Nursing) will be the official baseline and subsequent reference point for all skin wound assessments and the provider will be updated the new skin issues and or change in condition. The facility policy titled Medication /…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 08/25/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #18 and #4) reviewed for accidents and hazards. Specifically, 1) there was no documented evidence Resident #18 received frequent rounding or that adequate interventions were implemented following a fall on 05/04/2025 and the resident fell again on 05/06/2025 resulting a right hip fracture, and 2) Resident #4 had unwitnessed falls on 08/23/2025 and 08/24/2025 and there was no documented evidence that care plan interventions were updated after the falls, neurological checks were not completed for 48 hours after the 08/24/2025 fall as per facility policy, and there was no documentation of a visual assessment by a registered nurse or physician after either fall. Findings include: The facility policy titled Accident/Incident Investigation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey from 08/21/2025-08/25/2025, the facility did not ensure that the menus were followed for five (5) of 13 residents (Resident #65, Resident #19, Resident #29, Resident #44, and Resident #33) observed during dining. Specifically, 1) Resident #65 had requested a vegetarian diet and received meat items during meals, 2) Resident #19 did not receive cranberry juice as specified on their meal ticket and received soup that was not on their meal ticket; 3) Resident #29 received pureed tuna salad rather than pureed grilled cheese as specified on their meal ticket; 4) Resident #44's lunch meal ticket listed tomato soup on multiple occasion and tomato soup was not observed on the resident's food tray, and 5) Resident #33 received a baked potato rather than rice as specified on their meal ticket.The findings included: A facility policy titled Food Preferences, revised 03/2010, documented: It is the responsibility of the dietitian/diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification survey from 08/21/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, during observations of the main kitchen refrigerators and the North and South unit refrigerators, unlabeled, undated, and improperly dated food was discovered. The findings are:The facility policy, Food Receiving and Storage, last revised 12/2012 documented that food and nutrition products are inspected upon receipt and stored under proper conditions of sanitation, temperature, light, moisture, ventilation, and security. All opened items will be labeled and dated and discarded after three days once opened. All non-potentially hazardous foods/temperature controlled for safety food items will be labeled and dated and discarded after five days once opened.The facility policy, Food and Fluids Brought in for Residents by Family and Friends, last reviewed 3/21/21 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey from 8/25/25 to 8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that resident grievances were acted on promptly, or responded to, for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #42) investigated for personal property. Specifically, Resident #42 reported a missing blanket and clothing to the Unit Manager/Assistant Director of Nursing and did not receive the results of the investigation or replacement of the items. Additionally, the facility ensure an inventory of the resident's personal property was conducted on admission or when items were brought in.The findings included:The facility policy titled Loss/Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 06/28/2023, included: The facility shall exercise reasonable care for protection or resident's property from loss or theft. A Lost or Damaged Property Report is initiated by Nursing or Social Work. Written statements and other pertinent information are attached to the Lost Property Report. The facility policy titled Inventory and Release of Resident's Personal Property, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey from 08/25/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident, consistent with resident rights that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's needs for two (2) of five (5) residents (Resident #28 and Resident #5) reviewed for unnecessary medications and medication regimen review. Specifically, Residents #28 and #5 were on anticoagulant therapy and there was no documented evidence that a care plan to address the risk of bleeding was developed with measurable objectives, goals and interventions. The findings include: The facility policy, Interdisciplinary Care Planning, last reviewed 4/15/2024 documented that at a minimum the initial care plan consists of Advance Directives, Transfer, Bed Mobility, Ambulation, Falls, Smoking (if applicable), Skin Integrity: At Risk, Elopement, Bladder, Bowel, and Nutrition/Feeding. All remaining focuses are entered within 24 hours of admission and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 08/25/2025 to 08/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that necessary assistance and care were provided to carry out activities of daily living for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #37) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #37 was observed lying in bed with urine soiled adult brief, pants and sheets. The findings included:A facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised 10/2023 documented: Each resident will receive, and the facility will provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. If a resident refuses care or has a change in condition, the certified nurse aide will alert the licensed nurse/nurse supervisor prior to the end of shift.Resident #37 had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00331127/803522)) from 8/25/2025 to 8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for medications. Specifically, Resident #85 had a physician's order for Levothyroxine Sodium Tablet 125 mcg by mouth daily, and there was no documented evidence that the resident received the medication as ordered on 12/30/2023. The findings are:The Policy and Procedure titled Medication Treatment Administration, last revised 6/2024, documented that all drugs and medications must be charted as administered by signature or initials in the Electronic Medical Treatment Administration record. Resident #85 had diagnoses including Adult Failure to Thrive, Hypertension, and Hypothyroidism.The Five-Day Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY