Wesley Health Care Center INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 330 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 146 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 356 beds and averages 276.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, (a) the facility had an outbreak of COVID 19 that started 7/11/2024 and continued through the survey with 174 (6 admitted w/Covid) resident positives and 100 staff positives and positive residents located in all units throughout the facility; during this time the facility kept COVID negative roommates in the same room with COVID positive roommates, specifically Resident #627 was left in the room with Resident #266 when they were COVID positive, Resident #73 was left in the room with Resident #66 when they were COVID positive, and Resident #55 was left in the room with Resident #265 when they were COVID positive. Resident #627, Resident #73, and Resident #55 all became COVID positive after being left in the room with positive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 8 of 8 resident unit kitchenettes. Specifically, the area of the resident kitchenettes was not clean, and open containers were not appropriately labeled when they were opened. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Area and Equipment Cleaning revised January 2024 documented that the kitchen staff have procedures in place for daily and weekly cleaning of all areas and equipment and documenting on the equipment cleaning log and master cleaning schedule. During an observation on 11/15/2024 at 10:15 AM, the [NAME] 3 unit resident kitchenette toaster had food particles on the catch tray, the counters had food particles on them, the sink area had substance in the basin of the sink, and the microwave shelving unit had food particles on them. None of the areas were appropriately cleaned.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (NY00356338), the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 (Resident #s 6 and 33) of 7 residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, for (a.) Resident #6 was left to soil themselves because staff did not attend to the resident in a timely fashion, leaving the resident feeling humiliated on more than one occasion. Resident #33 was not assisted with the consumption of their observed meal in a dignified manner. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Promoting Dignity and a Safe Environment Guidelines, dated 03/12/2024 documented it was designed to provide a safe, respectful, and dignified environment for all residents. A facility policy titled Feeding a Resident, dated 11/12/2024 documented under section 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was screened for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission for 1 (Resident #243) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documentation that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, New York State Department of Health form 695) was completed for Resident #243 by a qualified screener prior to admission to the facility. This is evidenced by: Resident #243 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer that spread to other parts of the body), secondary malignant neoplasm of bone (cancer that spread to the bone from the prostate), and difficulty walking. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 8/29/2024 documented that the resident was able to be understood, understand others, and was somewhat cognitively impaired. There was no documented evidence that Residents #243 had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review completed prior to admission to the facility as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for 1 (Resident #68) of 39 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #68, the Comprehensive Care Plan for Respiratory Therapy was not reviewed and revised to include changes in the resident's respiratory status when resident was not using oxygen. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy Program dated 4/18/2023 documented the facility was to provide respiratory therapy assessment and treatment to those residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function, for whom a provider's order has been written. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system has an extreme response to an infection that may lead to organ failure or death),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it provided an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 1 (Resident # 80) of 2 residents reviewed for activities. Specifically, Resident #80 was not provided with activities that met the residents' preferences and cognitive abilities. This is evidenced by: The Policy titled General Activity/Life Enrichment Program Guidelines dated 03/01/2024 document the facility would provide activities, social events, and schedules that were compatible with the resident's interests, physical and mental assessment, and overall plan of care. The Policy documented activities were offered 7 days a week and should provide ongoing supportive program of the resident's psychosocial needs. Resident #80…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that were following professional standards of practice, for 3 (Residents #'s 49, 53, and 68) of 6 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Specifically, (a) for Residents #49, 53, and 68, their supplemental oxygen tubing was not dated and labeled to reflect when the tubing was changed; and (b) supplemental oxygen was not provided as ordered by the physician for Resident #68. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy Program dated 4/18/2023 documented the facility was to provide respiratory therapy assessment and treatment to those residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function, for whom a provider's order had been written. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure (a condition where you do not have enough in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were accurately documented and completed for 1 (Resident #68) of 39 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #68 staff was observing and verifying every four hours that the resident's oxygen nasal canula was in place and the resident was using the oxygen as prescribed by the physician. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy Program dated 4/18/2023 documented the facility was to provide respiratory therapy assessment and treatment to those residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function, for whom a provider's order has been written. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune system has an extreme response to an infection that may lead to organ failure or death), rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition when muscle fibers die and release…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00241321), the facility did not ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #1, who was assessed with open areas on the right and left coccyx/inner buttock upon admission on [DATE], the facility did not implement their policy and procedure for the prevention and treatment of skin issues that included weekly pressure injury assessment and tracking for a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the residents coccyx/buttocks, as documented on the 48 Baseline Care Plan dated 5/2/2019. The electronic medical record (EMR) did not include documentation of weekly assessments and monitoring the characteristics and measurements of the wound(s) and did not ensure a care plan was developed that included intervention and treatment strategies for the healing of and prevention of infection in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0777 — isolated
  Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00241321), the facility did not ensure it promptly notified the ordering physician of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #1 who was admitted for rehabilitation following a fall with a right hip fracture, the facility did not promptly notify the physician (MD) #1 of x-ray results dated 5/21/2019, that documented the possibility of interval development of fracture until 6/6/2019. This is evidenced by: Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of routine healing of a closed fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur (hip), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; cancer of the blood and bone marrow) not in remission, and diabetes with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes). The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 5/9/2019, documented the resident was cognitively intact. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY