Renaissance Rehabilitation And Nursing Care Center
4975 Albany Post Road, Staatsburg, NY 12580 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (845) 889-4500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.6% | 14.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.8% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 19.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.7% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 13.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 78.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.8% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 1.70 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.41 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.8%CMS range 30.5–46.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 5.9–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 4.9–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.22 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from verbal and mental abuse. This was evident for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, on 01/25/2026, Certified Nurse Assistant #1 used vulgar/foul language and screamed at Resident #1 while providing care. This incident caused Resident #1 to experience mental distress which resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The undated facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property documented that an owner, licensee, administrator, licensed nurse, employee or volunteer of a nursing home shall not physically, mentally or emotionally abuse, mistreat or neglect a resident. Under abuse definition section 'A.' Abuse includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse. Verbal abuse is further defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of an identified intervention for two of three residents (Resident #9 and Resident #8) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 03/15/2025, Resident #9 who required two-person assistance for bed mobility was provided with one staff assist by a certified nurse assistant which resulted in a fall from bed and Resident #9 sustained a fracture to their right hip. On 11/26/2025, Resident #8, who was severely cognitively impaired and required close supervision for ambulation, walked unassisted and without monitoring and fell and fractured their right hip. These incidents resulted in actual harm to Resident #9 and Resident #8 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The facility assessment last reviewed 12/12/2025 documented in a chart addressing resident support/care needs on page five for activities of daily living that the goal is to foster a dignified environment that maximizes residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Survey, the facility did not ensure for three of six residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, and Resident #9) that were reviewed for abuse and falls, that all alleged violations involving abuse and injuries were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegations involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures. Specifically, on 03/15/2025, Resident #9 while receiving assistance for bed mobility fell out of bed and sustained a fracture to their right hip. On 11/26/2025, Resident #8, who required close supervision for ambulation, walked unassisted and without monitoring and fell and sustained a fracture to their right hip. On 01/25/2026, Resident #1 while receiving care was subjected to vulgar/foul language and was screamed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Survey the facility did not revise or update a resident care plan after a significant change was noted in the resident's psychosocial and physical wellbeing. This was noted for three of three residents (Resident #9, Resident #4, and Resident #1) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, on 02/02/2025 Resident #9 had a fall from bed and care plan for falls was never updated; on 11/20/2025 at 5:24pm Physical Therapist #1 documented that Resident #4 was voicing suicidal ideation upon evaluation, and this information was never addressed and there was no update to the care plan for Psychosocial well-being; and on 01/25/2026 after an incident of abuse Resident #1 voiced that they did not feel safe, and there was no update to the potential for victimization care plan. The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan Policy last reviewed/revised defined significant change in condition as a decline or improvement requiring an updated assessment and care plan revision. This policy further documented that the care plan must be updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Survey (2809204), the facility did not ensure that two of three residents reviewed for behavioral health (Resident #4 and Resident #1) were assessed and provided necessary services after making a suicidal statement and having a traumatic incident. Specifically, on 11/20/2025 at 5:24pm Physical Therapist #1 documented that Resident #4 was voicing suicidal ideation upon evaluation; and on 01/25/2026 Resident #1 experienced a situation and voiced that they did not feel safe.In the facility assessment last revision dated 11/17/2025 under Mental Health and Behavior it documented that the facility is dedicated to effectively managing medical conditions and medication-related issues that may contribute to psychiatric symptoms and behavioral challenges. This involved thorough assessment and ongoing monitoring to identify underlying factors influencing residents' mental health. The facility assessment further documented that to ensure the delivery of high-quality, safe, and effective care at all times that the facility is equipped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2582016, 2579539, 2574633), the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staffing to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident. Specifically, upon review of the staffing schedule for multiple days on all three shifts and for each floor for July and August 2025, the facility did not provide adequate numbers of Certified Nurse Aides to meet the needs of the residents.The findings are: The undated facility Staffing Policy documented the facility shall have sufficient staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility shall further assure that staffing levels enable each resident to receive treatments, medications, diets and other health services in accordance with individual care plans. The Facility assessment dated [DATE], and last reviewed by the Quality Assurance and Improvement Committee on 8/22/24 documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted on an abbreviated survey (2582016, 2579539, 2574633), the facility did not ensure that a Registered Nurse was on duty for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for four (4) of nine (9) weekends reviewed from 07/01/25 through August 31,2025. Specifically, no Registered Nurse worked during the 24-hour period on the following weekends 7/5/25 to 7/6/25, 7/12/25 to 7/13/25, 7/19/25 to 7/20/25 and 8/2/25 to 8/3/25. Additionally, during the times when no Registered Nurse was scheduled, two (2) residents (Resident #4 and #6) fell, another sustained a burn (Resident #7), and they were not assessed by qualified staff (registered nurse, physician or nurse practitioner) (See F684).Findings included:The undated facility Staffing Policy documented the facility will have sufficient staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2582016, 2579539, 2574633), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of quality for three of three residents (Residents #7, #6, and #4) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, 1) Resident #7 was not assessed timely by a registered nurse after being observed with three open wounds on the left thigh; 2) there was no documented evidence that Resident #6 with complaint of pain was assessed by a registered nurse prior to being transferred from the floor to bed after an unwitnessed fall; and 3) there was no documented evidence that Resident #4 was assessed by a registered nurse prior to being transferred from the floor to bed after an unwitnessed fall. The findings include: An untitled policy dated 10/02/2024 revealed when it is determined that a resident has had an accident or incident according to policy definition the nurse must notify the nursing supervisor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (2574633), the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision consistent with resident's needs to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #7) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #7 sustained an upper left lateral thigh burn on 04/12/2025 after they spilled a hot beverage. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the accident and implement interventions to prevent reoccurrence. Subsequently, Resident #7 sustained second degree burns on the left upper thigh on 08/04/2025 after placing their hot cup of coffee next to their thigh while self-propelling in their wheelchair. Additionally, the facility did not report either burn incident to the New York State Department of Health.The findings included:An untitled facility policy last dated 10/02/2024 documented: It is the policy of the Facility to promote and maintain a safe environment, and to maintain reports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (2579539), the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #3 was dependent on staff assistance for bathing and did not consistently receive showers twice per week per the resident's care plan and preference. The findings include: The policy and procedures on Activities of Daily Living/Maintain Abilities, revised 09/11/2024, stated that the facility was responsible for creating an environment that individualized each resident's quality of life. Staff across all shifts and departments were expected to understand and support principles of quality of life and honor each resident's preferences, choices, values, and beliefs. The facility also ensured residents were given appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to perform activities of daily living. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (2579539) from 10/28/2025 to 10/30/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents were provided with appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much bladder and bowel function as possible for one (1) (Resident #3) of three (3) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #3 was admitted with occasional incontinence of urine and bowel, was not provided services to maintain or improve incontinence. The resident expressed their preference not to wear adult briefs, was not trialed on a toileting program, and their incontinence episodes increased. The findings include: The policy and procedures on Activities of Daily Living/Maintain Abilities, revised 09/11/2024, stated that the facility was responsible for creating an environment that individualized each resident's quality of life. Staff across all shifts and departments were expected to understand and support principles of quality of life and honor each resident's preferences, choices, values, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (2582016) the facility did not ensure that pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals) met the needs of each resident for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medications., Specifically, Resident #1 was not administered six (6) doses of eszopiclone to treat insomnia. The finding include:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, Lupus anticoagulation syndrome, and insomnia.An admission Minimum Data Set, (an assessment tool) dated 08/08/2025 documented the resident's cognition was intact. The resident received hypnotic medication daily.The policy titled Administering Medications dated 03/2025, documented if a medication is missing / unavailable, the overflow/extra medication supply storage in the med room should be checked. if it is not there, the emergency box should be checked to see if it is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00352254 and NY00340278) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, it was determined the governing body did not establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility to ensure regulatory compliance. Specifically, the large elevator was not working consistently since the spring of 2024 and the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to address identified issues related to the large elevator being out of service. Findings include: The facility policy, 'Elevator Breakdown-Single Car Operation' last review April 2024 documented during downtime of one elevator car, the facility will continue to operate with as little impact as possible to resident convenience, quality of life, and provision of services. The Administrator and Maintenance Director/designee must be notified immediately upon awareness of elevator outage event with identification of specific elevator car…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00352254, NY00345799 and NY00340278) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This was evident for the entire facility. Specifically, the large elevator was out of order since the spring of 2024. The findings are: The facility policy, 'Elevator Breakdown-Single Car Operation' last review April 2024 documented during downtime of one elevator car, the facility will continue to operate with as little impact as possible to resident convenience, quality of life, and provision of services. The Administrator and Maintenance Director/designee must be notified immediately upon awareness of elevator outage event with identification of specific elevator car that is not operational. Downtime of larger elevator car will potentially impact meal delivery, evacuation processes, and movement of larger items that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident during environmental observations of resident Units 1 and 2. Specifically, on Unit 2, resident rooms were observed with sticky floors, garbage receptacles overflowing, garbage was strewn the floor, and soiled adult briefs were observed lying on floor; and on Unit 1, the floor near the nursing station and in front of the elevator was littered with garbage, and appeared stained and the Unit 1 dining room floor was observed with dried spills of coffee, and breakfast trays were still on tables at 12:35 PM. The findings are: During observations on 09/05/24 on Unit 1, at 10:12 AM debris was on floors by the Unit 1 nursing station with straws, paper, caps to bottles, and other particles of dust or dirt. The floor by nursing station in front of elevator appeared stained and dirty. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00346428), conducted 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure each resident remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 4 of 5 residents (#35, #161, #18, and #87) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #161 had falls on 6/29/24 and 7/4/24, was on an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication and there was no documented evidence of neuro-checks following falls on 6/29/24 and 7/4/24 and the resident was not sent to the hospital for evaluation, 2) Resident #35's shepherd's hook/enabler rail was loose and not functionable for over one month, 3)Resident #18 had a fall on 8/2/2024 and sustained a hip fracture and the fall care plan was not updated with new interventions to prevent recurrence of falls, and 4) Resident #87 had falls with major injuries on 2/8/24, 2/29/24 and 5/8/24 and the fall care plan was not updated with new interventions to prevent recurrence of falls. Findings include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00352254 and NY00340278) from 09/05/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, upon review of the actual staffing from April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024 and August 9, 2024 through September 9, 2024 on all three shifts for each unit, the facility did not provide adequate nurse staffing to meet the needs of the residents on multiple occasions during each of the months reviewed, based on the Facility-Wide Assessment. The findings are: The Facility-Wide assessment dated [DATE] and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Agency/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee on 8/22/24, stated the below facility resources were needed to provide competent resident support and care daily and during emergencies: Facility-Wide Assessment Staffing Plan:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, it was determined that the facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week per the regulations. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that a Registered Nurse had worked 4/12/24, 4/13/24, 4/27/24, and 5/18/24. Findings include: Review of the nurse staffing reports (report posted to inform residents and visitors of the number and hours of nursing staff working) for dates 4/1/24 through 6/30/24 and 8/9/24 through 9/9/24 provided by the facility Staffing, Human Resources and Payroll Coordinator, the facility did not have a Registered Nurse assigned to staffing for the facility's three shifts on 4/12/24, 4/13/24, 4/27/24, and 5/18/24. During an interview on 09/13/24 at 10:52 AM with the Staffing, Human Resources and Payroll Coordinator, they stated staffing minimums were based on recommendations from the Facility Report and New York State requirements and based on resident census.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure certified nursing aide performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides ( #8, #19, #20, #21, #22) reviewed. The findings are: During an interview on 09/09/24 03:45 PM with Director of Nursing/Staff Educator, they stated they are responsible for documentation of the Certified Nurse Aide annual performance reviews. The Director of Nursing/Staff Educator, was provided with a random sample of five Certified Nurse Aides, and documentation of their annual performance appraisals was requested. Review of Certified Nurse Aides (#8, #19, #20, #21 and #22) dates of hire provided by the facility, revealed all five of the Certified Nurse Aides had been working at the facility for more than one year. The Director of Nursing stated they have not completed annual performance appraisals for the Certified Nursing Aides since they started employment in November 2022. The Director of Nursing was not able to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, meat, mashed potatoes, milk, and super shake were not maintained within the acceptable temperature range for food safety during a dinner observation on 9/5/24. Additionally, perishable foods were not labeled and dated and nonperishable foods were expired during observations in the kitchen. The undated facility policy, Dietary Department -Food Temperatures documented it is the policy of the dietary department to take temperatures of all food items served to residents before the tray line begins. All parts of potentially hazardous foods requiring cooking will be heated to at least 170°F with the exception of poultry, pork, and roast beef. All poultry, poultry stuffing, stuffed meats, and stuffing containing meat will be heated so all parts are at least 165°F with no interruption of the cooking process. Pork and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00352254 and NY00331775) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to address identified issues related to the large elevator being out of service. Specifically, the large elevator was not working consistently since the spring of 2024 and was shut down in mid July 2024, and the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to address identified issues related to the large elevator being out of service which included but was not limited to food not being maintained at safe temperatures when served on the units, residents were eating on disposable plastic plates, approximately 10 residents who had previously been eating lunch in the main dining room on the main floor before the large elevator was shut down could no longer do so, and live music performances did not occur for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during a recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/13/2024, the facility did not ensure and/or maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Specifically, 1) The facility did not have a current Water Management Plan in place that defined potential areas of Legionella risk that was updated yearly, 2) infection control precautions were not properly implemented for residents with Covid-19 infection, 3) during administration of medication there was a breach in infection control practices with a glucometer, and 4) the facility was not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The findings are: 1. The undated policy on Legionella documented, It is the policy of Renaissance Rehabilitation and Nursing Center to comply with the New York State regulations on Legionella culture sampling and analysis. A request was made to the Director of Maintenance on 9/9/2024 at 8:45 AM to see the facility's Water Management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility could not provide documentation of tracking antibiotic use which included appropriate use of antibiotics and duration of antibiotic treatment. The findings are: The undated Antibiotic Stewardship Policy documented it is the policy of the facility to maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with the mission of promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics to track infections and reduce possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use. During an interview on 9/12/2024 at 10 AM, Registered Nurse Unit Manager #2 stated there were residents on antibiotics in July and August 2024. Registered Nurse Unit Manager #2 further stated they did not track the antibiotic use or report it. They stated they were not familiar with the term 'antibiotic stewardship'. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 3:00 PM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/13/2024, the facility did not ensure the Infection Preventionist completed specialized training in infection control prior to starting their role. Specifically, the facility designated Infection Preventionist was the Director of Nursing, and did not have documented evidence of completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The findings are: On 9/6/24 a request was made to see documentation of the Infection Preventionist's specialized training in infection prevention and control. A review of the training certificate provided, documented the Director of Nursing completed 4 hours New York State Infection Control Mandatory Training Certificate on 10/15/2023. On 9/09/24 at 3:25 PM during an interview, the Director of Nursing stated they did not have any other specialized training in infection control. 10NYCRR 415.19
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00340278, NY346428) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility could not provide evidence that training was provided annually to their staff on resident abuse prevention. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property included that the policy of the facility includes training employees, through orientation and ongoing sessions on issues related to abuse and prohibition practices. It documented that staff and volunteers will receive education about abuse upon first employment and annually after that. On 9/9/24 at 3:45 PM, during the staffing task, the surveyor requested from the Director of Nursing, the training logs of five sampled certified nurse aides. The Director of Nursing provided training logs for only for two of the five certified nurse aides. On 9/10/24 at 11:15 AM the Director of Nursing was asked to provide documentation of staff abuse prohibition and prevention training which had been completed in the past 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00346428) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 residents (Resident #161) reviewed for death, had the right to formulate advance directives. Specifically, Resident #161's Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment were completed by Resident #161 who presented with changes in cognition, and there was no documentation that the physician determined the resident's capacity at the time of the Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment completion. Findings include: 1) Resident #161 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, status post left above knee amputation, osteomyelitis and rheumatoid arthritis. The 5/21/24 Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form documented Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Intubate, send to hospital, trial intravenous treatment, trial feeding tube and antibiotics. The MOLST form was not signed and documented 'resident gave verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00346428) from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure that the designated representative of 1 of 3 residents (#161) reviewed for notification of change was promptly informed of a change in the resident's declining condition and change in advance directives. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the resident representative was promptly informed of the resident's change in advance directives to Do Not Hospitalize on [DATE] and was not notified until [DATE], and the resident expired on [DATE]. The finding is: Resident #161 was admitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, white matter disease, and delusional disorder. The [DATE] Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #161 had had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 that indicated resident cognition was intact. The [DATE] Social Work note documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that residents and/or their designated representative were fully informed of their right to an expedited review of a service termination. Specifically, residents who received Medicare Part A services did not receive timely notification (2-day notification) of the termination of services with the Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage form CMS-10123. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) (Resident #43) residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. The findings are: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 on 09/11/2024, revealed the resident last received rehabilitative services on 03/26/2024 and Resident #43's designated representative was given Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage via telephone to inform them of their right to an expedited review of a service termination on 03/25/2024, one day prior to the termination of services. On 9/12/24 at 6:02 PM, the Social Worker stated the reason why notice of non-coverage Notice to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00340278) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 7/30/2024 Resident #14 who was known to be physically/verbally abusive punched Resident #45 in the stomach, and new intervention of 30-minute safety checks were not initiated or carried out to prevent further abuse. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property included documentation that abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury or intimidation with resulting physical pain or mental anguish. Willful is defined as meaning the individual must have acted deliberately. The facility leadership will assess the needs of the residents and the facility to be able to identify concerns in order to prevent potential abuse. The 'overview of seven components' included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00346428) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse/neglect and were reported to The New York State Department of Health for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #161) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #161 went to a Vascular appointment on 6/24/24 and alleged abuse by a staff member when the provider inquired about a bruise on their forehead. The provider contacted the facility regarding the alleged abuse on 6/24/24 and spoke to the Social Worker and Nurse Practitioner who determined the bruise was from a fall and did not investigate or document the allegation until 7/2/24. The findings are: Resident #161 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, status post left above knee amputation, osteomyelitis and rheumatoid arthritis. The 6/14/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #161 was independent in cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that the resident and/or resident representative were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language that they understood for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #38 and #18) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, Resident #38 and Resident #18 were transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that a written notice of transfer/discharge was provided to the residents or the resident representatives. Findings include: The facility policy, 'Admission, Transfers, and Discharge; last revised November 26th, 2022, documented that when a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as possible. 1.Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that residents or resident's representatives were notified in writing of the facility policy for bed hold for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, the resident was transferred to the hospital and the facility was unable to provide evidence that written notice of the facility policy for bed hold was given to the resident or their representative. The findings are: The undated facility policy, Bed Hold and Return to Facility documented that it is the policy of the facility that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the state's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer. Residents and their representative will be provided with bed hold and return information at admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, retention of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00331775) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans to attain or maintain the resident highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #162) reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, Resident #162 did not have a care plan for dialysis. The findings are: The 10/2/21 Policy titles Comprehensive Care Plan documented the facility will utilize an interdisciplinary team approach to provide an individualized and comprehensive, resident assessment and care planning process to maximize and maintain every resident functional potential and quality of life. The team will update the comprehensive care plan to keep it current on an ongoing basis. Resident #162 had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, diabetes and obesity. The 3/25/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) documented Resident #162 was cognitively intact and had renal insufficiency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives, time frames and appropriate interventions for 2 of 5 residents (#87, #18) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #87 had falls on 2/8/24 and 2/29/24 and the fall care plan was not updated with new interventions to prevent recurrence of falls, and 2) Resident #18 had a fall on 8/2/2024 and sustained a hip fracture the fall care plan was not updated with new interventions to prevent a recurrence. The findings are: 1) Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses and conditions including other displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, subsequent for fracture with nonunion, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) dated 9/1/24 documented the resident's cognition was intact; the resident required partial to moderate assist for bed mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation during the recertification survey conducted from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that residents received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 3 of 6 Residents ( Residents #45, #66, #78) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, Resident #45, Resident #66, and Resident #78 who required staff assistance for personal hygiene and toileting did not receive morning cares in a timely manner. The findings are: An undated Facility Policy and Procedures titled: Quality of Care documented it is the policy of Renaissance and Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center to ensure that each resident receive and provided the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan or care, in accordance with State and Federal Regulations. Based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, the facility will ensure that the resident receives care, consistent with professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident #45 was not assessed and a care plan was not put in place in a timely manner for changes in the Resident's skin condition. Resident #45's diagnoses included cognitive communication deficiency, chronic kidney disease, and generalized anxiety disorder. The 8/12/24 Quarterly Minimum Date Set assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The annual Minimum Data Set documented the Resident no ulcers, wounds and skin problems. A resident care plan titled Wound Prevention / Skin Care Plan effective 10/12/2020 documented Resident #45 was at risk for impaired skin integrity, pressure wounds, ulcer, skin tears, etc. secondary to impaired mobility, vitamin deficiency dementia. The goals were the resident would maintain intact skin and would not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24/202, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #78 had care plan interventions and physicians order recommendations to offload heels while in bed; however, the resident was observed in bed with their heels resting directly on the mattress and there was no pillow on the mattress for the resident's feet. Findings include: Resident #78 had diagnoses which included osteomyelitis, dementia, and insomnia. The 6/27/24 admission Minimum Date Set assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 3, indicating the resident had severe cognitive deficits. The admission Minimum Data Set documented the resident was a risk for pressure ulcers. The Facility policy and procedure titled, Managing Skin Integrity (dated 10/2023) documented that nursing, in collaboration with the health care team will assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00331775) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure residents who required dialysis (a process that filters blood for the kidneys) received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #13 and #162) reviewed. Specifically, 1) Resident #13 had no dialysis communication book, and 2) Resident #162 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments. Findings include: The undated facility policy, title Dialysis documented, after dialysis monitor for and report hypotension ( low blood pressure) tachycardia ( fast heart rate) complaints of dizziness or light headedness or headache. 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses of end-stage renal (kidney) disease and dependence on renal dialysis and polycystic kidney adult type. The 5/13/2024 Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) documented the resident had intact cognition and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure timely identification and removal of expired medications. Specifically, two bags of IV Vancomycin had expiration dates of 7/17/24, one bag of IV Vancomycin had an expiration date of 7/18/24, one bag of IV Vancomycin had an expiration date of 8/7/24, and two bags of IV Vancomycin had expiration dates of 8/10/24 were located in the first floor unit medication room. The findings are: The facility policy last revised August 2023, 'Storage of Drugs' included documentation that discontinued drug containers shall be removed from the medication cart and marked to indicate that the drug has been discontinued. Discontinued drugs shall be disposed of in accordance with the procedures set forth in this manual under the section entitled disposal of drugs and supplies, and drugs should not be kept on hand after the expiration date on the label. On 09/09/24 at 02:55 PM in the 1st floor unit medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse #5, two bags of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/13/2024, the facility did not ensure that the attending provider documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, actions had been taken to address it. This was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the Medication Regimen Review for Resident #43 dated 4/26/2024 documented a recommendation from the consultant pharmacist for Enoxaparin 40 mg injection to be reviewed for a stop date and appropriate use based on diagnosis and patient mobility. The provider agreed with the recommendation and documented that the medication was discontinued; however, did not address the recommendation and did not document the plan in Resident # 43's medical record. The findings are: The undated facility policy for the Drug Regimen Review documented it is the policy of the facility that a licensed pharmacist will review the resident drug regimen including the resident chart at least once a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey from 9/5/2024 to 9/13/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medications used for anticoagulation. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, there was inadequate monitoring of an anticoagulant medication. The findings are: The undated facility policy for the Drug Regimen Review documented it is the policy of the facility that a licensed pharmacist will review the resident drug regimen including the resident chart at least once a month. The consultant pharmacist needs to conduct the medication regimen review more frequently depending on the resident condition, review of short stay residents and risk of adverse consequences. The licensed pharmacist will report in writing, any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director and the Director of Nursing to be acted upon. A Physician's Order dated 8/30/2024, documented Enoxaparin 40 milligrams (MG) inject 0.4 milliliters (ml) QD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00340278) from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, it was determined that the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 3 (Residents #38, #104, #89) of 23 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, 3 residents did not receive medications in accordance with the prescriber's orders and accepted health standards established by national boards and councils. This included but was not limited to antibiotic, antidiabetic pill, vitamin, supplement, antihypertensives, inhaler for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and antipsychotic which were not administered at the prescribed time on 9/5/24. The findings include The facility policy, 'Administration of Medications' last reviewed January 2024 documented that a licensed nurse will be responsible for passing medications to residents in accordance with techniques approved for use in the facility and compliance with New York State codes rules and regulations and with other applicable federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and professional standard of practice. Specifically, the 2nd floor unit south side medication cart was observed with expired 22-gauge insyte autogaurd needles which are used to administer intravenous medications. Findings include: The facility policy, 'Storage of Drugs' last revised [DATE] did not document the facility policy regarding the storage of medical supplies such as intravenous needles. On [DATE] at 4:34 PM, the 2nd floor unit south side medication cart was observed with three 22-gauge insyte autogaurd needles with expiration dates of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 4:39 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #4 stated the insyte autogaurd needles should not be on the medication cart. They stated the nurse who starts an intravenous line is responsible for checking that the insyte…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 9/5/24 to 9/13/24, the facility did not ensure that Certified Nurse Aides were provided the required 12 hours of training and/or annual in-services on dementia care management and resident abuse prevention, to ensure safe delivery of care. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide evidence that 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides ( #9, #19, #20, #21, and #22), reviewed for Nurse Aide training, were provided 12 hours of mandatory training. The Facility Assessment Tool Report, dated 7/1/24, documented: In accordance with New York State Department of Health requirements, in-service training is provided for Certified Nurse Aides sufficient to ensure their continuing competence. Training is at least 12 hours per year and includes dementia management and resident abuse prevention training. All staff receive annual training related to safety, emergency code and plans, and specific training required for their position. The findings are: During an interview on 09/09/24 at 03:45 PM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (301827) conducted from 10/3/2022-10/12/2022 the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 2 of 2 units (Units 1 and 2). Specifically,(1) the facility did not ensure that adequate housekeeping services were provided to maintain floors, bathrooms, and resident sinks on unit 2. the facility did not maintain an appropriate hot water temperature for the residents. The Findings are: The Policy and Procedure titled Housekeeping undated documented in order to prevent and control the spread of disease it is the objective of the housekeeping departments to present as far as possible aesthetic clean and contamination free surroundings for patients' visitors and personnel. An initial tour of the facility was conducted on 10/3/2022 between 9:30am and 12.00pm and the following was observed. The elevator on the second floor had strong smell of urine, room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 had garbage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (294084) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided for 2 of 20 residents interviewed and 7 of 10 residents who attended a group meeting (Resident Council) who expressed complaints regarding lack of sufficient staffing, delay in and not receiving care in a timely manner. Additionally, according to the Facility Assessment resident to staff ratios, Nurse and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) levels were frequently below the levels determined by the facility to be necessary to meet the needs of the residents. The findings are: During individual interviews conducted at various times during the initial phase of the survey from 10/03/22 through 10/12/22, 2 of 20 residents interviewed confidentially stated that the facility did not have sufficient staff and 7 of 10 residents who attended a group meeting (Resident Council) also complained of staffing concerns specifically at night or on the weekends. During a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure that 3 of 10 randomly reviewed Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNAs #5, #6 and #7, completed the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. In addition, 2 of 10 randomly reviewed CNAs, CNA #6 and CNA #7 recently hired, did not receive a facility orientation The findings are: Three of ten CNA training records reviewed lacked evidence that they were provided 12 hours of training annually to include abuse prevention as evidenced by the following: In an undated list provided on 10/12/22 CNA #5 was hired on 09/12/1994, CNA #6 was hired on 06/6/22 and CNA #7 was hired 8/12/22. Review of in-service sign-in sheets revealed there were no sign in sheets for CNA #5, #6 and #7. There was no evidence that CNA #5, #6, and #7 attended an in-service on abuse prevention during this year. During an interview with Staff Developer (SD) on 10/12/22 at 3:30 PM, SD stated that they did not have the required 12-hour mandatory trainings for CNA#5, #6, and #7. SD stated CNA #5 was hired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey conducted from 10//22-10/12/22 the facility did not ensure that residents were consistently offered and provided with evening snacks. Specifically, 7 out of 10 alert and oriented residents from 2 out of 2 units, that attended the resident council meeting stated that they were not offered a snack, or if they asked for a snack, they were not provided with an evening snack. The findings are: A resident council meeting was conducted on 10/04/22 01:36 PM 7 out of 10 residents in attendance stated they were not provided or offered evening snacks and if they asked for an evening snack, they were told by the staff that, no snacks were available, or that the pantry was closed for the night. The Residents stated snacks-were not offered between 6 PM and 8AM and they were told after dinner the pantry is locked and residents are not allowed to enter the pantry. Observations on 10/06/22 at 06:54 PM revealed the 1st floor pantry had 5 cookies and 5 puddings. Observation on 10/06/22 at 07:14 PM revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview conducted during the Recertification Survey conducted from 10/3/2022 -10/12/2022, the facility did not ensure proper maintenance of the unit pantry refrigerator according to professional standards for food safety. Specifically, a pantry refrigerator was not maintained in a sanitary condition in accordance with standards for food service safety. This was evident for 1 of 2-unit pantries (Unit 2). The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Between Meal Feeding undated documented rotation of stock and sanitation of the nursing pantry areas is the responsibility of the respective nursing units and Nutritional Services. The policy further documented procedures for cleaning and care of the nursing pantry area have been developed by Nutritional Services and are posted in each pantry. On 10/5/22 at 9:39 AM, a tour of the Unit 2 pantry with the RNC (Regional Nurse clinical) present revealed an unclean refrigerator with a few cans of ginger ale, a few cups of apple sauce and puddings for the residents. The freezer was observed with old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey conducted from 10/3/2022 -10/12/2022, the facility did not ensure that a Comprehensive Care Plan was developed to ensure treatment and services were provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #101) reviewed for pain management. Specifically, a pain management care plan was not developed for Resident #101 who was prescribed Neurontin and Tramadol for chronic pain syndrome. The Findings Are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) undated documented the CCP will include measurable goals to meet the resident's medical, nursing, psychosocial needs. Problems, strengths, or needs identified by members of the Comprehensive Care Plan team will be included in the CCP as appropriate. The policy further documented nursing will evaluate goal achievement within the expected date of goal achievement. Resident #101 had diagnoses including Atherosclerosis of Native Arteries of Extremities with Intermittent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey between 10/3/2022-10/12/2022 it was determined that the facility did not ensure that each resident and/or resident representative was offered the opportunity to be involved in the their care plan for one of four residents reviewed for care planning, Specifically, Resident #95 was not invited to participate in the care plan meeting with the interdisciplinary team. The Finding Is: The Policy and Procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan undated documented Responsibility of the Social Worker she will schedule initial quarterly annual significant change and Medicare Comprehensive Care Plan Meeting for each resident as appropriate. The Social Worker chairs and lead the meeting to ensure that all medical records for the resident being discussed are present at the meeting. Resident # 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Atherosclerosis of Aorta, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey conducted from 10/3/2022 -10/12/2022, the facility did not ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for Residents # 60 and #89 who were reviewed for ADL's. Specifically, 1. Resident #60 did not receive twice a week showers as per the care plan and unit shower schedule and 2. Resident #89 was observed wearing the same attire for multiple days, and a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP)was not revised timely to address the resident's refusals with ADL cares. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled ADL Support undated documented OBRA requires that nursing facilities care for residents in a dignified manner that promotes self-worth and physical, psychological, and emotional well-being. It is important to promote quality of life. 1. Resident #60 had diagnoses including Secondary Parkinsonism…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 10/3/22-10/12/22, it could not be ensured that the facility maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #51 and #42) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #51 received nutrition via G-Tube, had a significant weight loss, and was not reassessed by clinical nutrition staff until10/05/22 and Resident #42 was assessed for 19.69% significant weight loss in one month on 8/30/22 and orders for supplements were not added until 10/3/22. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure revised 9/2022 titled, Height and Weight Monitoring documented that if a weight change of (+) or (-) 5 lbs or more from the previous weight is evident, the Dietician will review the weights, ensure there is documentation on the resident's diet, assess and summarize their consumption and update the Physician/NP as needed, the purpose being to implement corrective actions and prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a Recertification Survey conducted from 10/03/22-10/12/22, the facility did not ensure that medical supervision was provided for 1 of 5 residents (#51) reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, the Physician and/or the Nurse Practitioner did not address the resident's significant unplanned weight loss between 7/7/22 and 8/25/22 of 8.6 pounds through the review date of 10/11/22. The finding is: Review of the facility's policy and procedure revised 9/2022 titled, Height and Weight Monitoring documented that if a weight change of (+) or (-) 5 lbs. or more from the previous weight is evident, the Dietician will review the weights, ensure there is documentation on the resident's diet, assess and summarize their consumption and update the Physician/NP as needed, the purpose being to implement corrective actions and prevent the weight change from progressing to a 5% weight change, evaluate and update the residents plan of care, make recommendations as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00302051) conducted from 10/3/22-10/12/22, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to assure the administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 residents (#70) reviewed for drugs and medications. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that an anxiety medication, was administered as ordered. Subsequently, the Resident did not receive Xanax on 9/23/22 and the resident's Medication Administration Record had Xanax documentation omissions on 8/21/22, 8/29/22, 9/23/22, and 9/28/22. The finding is: The Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Acute & Chronic Respiratory Failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 7/25/22 documented that resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, used to determine attention, orientation, and ability to recall information) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey ( NY 00301827, 00294084 and NY00302051) conducted from 10/3/2022- 10/12/2022, the facility did not ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 2 residents (Residents # 119 and #120) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers and 1 of 6 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for Medication Administration. Specifically, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation for turning and positioning task for (Residents #119 and #120) was incompete, and the Medication Administration Record documentation for Xanax administration for Resident #70 was incomplete. The Findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Pressure Ulcer Protocol: Prediction, Prevention and Treatment undated documented prevention strategies maybe implemented regardless of risk/score based on nursing judgement and [NAME]. The policy further documented pressure relief interventions will be instituted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIFTH AVENUE RENAISSANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 01/01/2018 |
| JFK ACQUISITION LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 40% | since 01/01/2018 |
| KOSCHITZKI, FAIGE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2018 |
| KOSCHITZKI, JACK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 20% | since 01/01/2018 |
| RAND, ARIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 01/01/2018 |
| RAND, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 01/01/2018 |
| RAND, LAWRENCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 01/01/2018 |
| RAND, PINCUS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 22% | since 01/01/2018 |
| ALBRECHT, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335404. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.