Silver Lake Specialized Rehabilitation and Care Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 278 beds and averages 188.1 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #105) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 06/04/2025, Resident #105, who had severe cognitive impairment and had a history of multiple falls, had an unwitnessed fall from a wheelchair when the resident was left in the hallway without supervision. Resident #105 sustained a head laceration and was transported to the hospital and subsequently diagnosed with a cervical fracture. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm to Resident #105 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings include:The facility policy titled Accident-Incident with a reviewed date of 01/2023 documented that accidents and incidents are to be written in a clear and concise manner describing the facts, equipment, hazardous conditions, deviant behavior and/or other factors involved pertaining to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident. This was evident for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care, and one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for Falls out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #91's Respiratory Care Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated after their Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, and 2.) Resident #105's Falls Comprehensive Care Plan interventions were not reviewed and updated after enduring multiple falls in the facility. See F-689.The findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plans-Comprehensive with a last reviewed date of 01/2026 documented that it is the facility's policy to develop an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency. This was evident for one (1) (Residents #105) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #105 had an unwitnessed fall on 06/04/2025 when they were observed on the floor with a laceration to the right eyebrow. The resident was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with a cervical fracture. Resident #105 was cognitively impaired and was unable to explain how the injury was sustained. This incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. See F-689. The findings include:The facility policy titled Abuse Investigations with a reviewed date of 01/2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #191) of one (1) resident reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, Resident #191 who had a documented allergy to Vancomycin was prescribed and administered Vancomycin for the treatment of pneumonia placing the risk at risk for an adverse allergic reaction.See F-755.The findings include:The facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 12/2023 documented that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed by the physician. The policy also documented that medication nurses must check and verify medication allergies prior to administering medications. Resident #191 had diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Seizure Disorder, Respiratory Failure, and Ventilator Dependence.On 04/09/26 at 11:33 AM, Resident #191 was observed in bed. The resident was on a ventilator and had a red allergy bracelet alert on the left wrist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications were dispensed in a safe manner and in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #191) of one (1) resident reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy identified and acted upon Resident #191's documented drug allergy to Vancomycin prior to dispensing, resulting in the delivery and administration of Vancomycin to Resident #191 with a known allergy to the medication.See F-684.The findings include:The facility failed to provide a policy related to pharmacy services.Resident #191 had diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Seizure Disorder, Respiratory Failure, and Ventilator Dependence. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/03/2026 documented that Resident #191 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on ventilator, and was dependent on performing activities of daily living. A comprehensive care plan for medication allergy was initiated for Resident #191…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2691440). the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse. This was evident for one (1) of seven (7) residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 12/11/2025 at 5:23:43 PM the facility's surveillance camera footage shows Certified Nursing Assistant #1 approach Resident #1 in the dayroom and pulled the dayroom table away from Resident #1's wheelchair. At 5:23:56 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed hitting Resident #1 on the back of their head with an open hand and Resident #1's head falls forward. At 5:24 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 pushed Resident #1's wheelchair to the dayroom exit door and stop. At 5.24.12 PM, at the dayroom exit door Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed taking items out of Resident #1's wheelchair when Resident #1 throw a cup of liquid on Certified Nursing Assistant #1. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 then hit Resident #1 on their upper arm two times with a white paper plate. The findings are:The facility's Policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (2691440), the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involved abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for judications in long term care facilities) . This was evident for one (1) out of seven (7) residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 12/11/2025 at 5:23:43 PM the surveillance camera footage shows Certified Nursing Assistant #1 approach Resident #1 in the dayroom and pulled the dayroom table away from Resident #1's wheelchair. At 5:23:56 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed hitting Resident #1 on the back of their head with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 12/06/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident for 4 of 4 resident floors (Floors 1, 2, 3, 4) reviewed for Environment. Specifically, 1) the 1st Floor had stained walls and curtains, missing and mismatched paint, missing baseboards, torn wallpaper, , and a dirty air conditioning (AC) unit, 2) the 2nd Floor had tables with mismatched and missing paint and rust, 3) the 3rd Floor had missing baseboards, mismatched and missing paint, and chipped and missing veneer on shelves , and 4) the 4th Floor had tables with mismatched and missing paint. The findings are: The facility policy titled Preventative Maintenance for Residents Rooms dated 1/2023 documented the Maintenance workers conducted one audit per floor each workday and completed the maintenance inspection checklist for that room. From 12/06/23 10:47 AM to 12/12/2023 at 10:39…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 12/06/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during review of the kitchen. Specifically, 1) a 5-pound container of expired cottage cheese was in the kitchen refrigerator, 2) the 3rd floor pantry contained expired honey-thickened juices, and 3) the 4th floor pantry had an expired quart of milk. The findings are: The facility policy titled Food, Supply Storage and Receiving dated 1/2023 documented all foods were labeled to ensure proper stock rotation and fresh food for the residents. During the initial observation of the kitchen refrigerator on 12/06/2023 at 09:30 AM, one container of 5-pound low fat cottage cheese with a use-by date of 11/3/2023. The 3rd floor pantry was observed on 12/08/2023 at 02:47 PM and contained 15 containers of 4-ounce honey-thickened apple juice with use-by dates of 7/2023, 9/2023, and 10/2023, 2 containers of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 12/6/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were maintained. This was evident for 1 (Resident #238) of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter out of 39 total sampled residents and the Main Dining Room (MDR). Specifically, 1) the Foley catheter (FC) tubing for Resident #238 was touching the floor, and 2) hand hygiene was not performed for multiple residents eating lunch in the MDR. The findings are: The facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 01/2023 documented FC tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. The facility policy titled Hand Hygiene- Hand Sanitizer dated 1/2022 documented use hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. 1) Resident #238 had diagnoses of myocardial infarction and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #238 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 12/11/23 at 08:11 AM, 11:02…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 12/06/2023 to 12/13/2023, the facility did not ensure that resident was cared for in a manner that maintained their dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #238) of 2 residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #238 had a Foley catheter (FC) bag that was exposed and in public view. The findings are: The facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 01/2023 documented the FC collection bag is kept inside a dignity bag cover at all times, except while providing care, to maintain resident dignity. Resident #238 had diagnoses of myocardial infarction and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #238 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 12/11/23 at 08:11 AM, 11:02 AM, and 12:16 PM, Resident #238 was observed in bed with their FC drainage bag exposed and visible from the hallway. The FC tubing connecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $953K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY