Verrazano Nursing And Post-Acute Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.68 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.79 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00314677), the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable. This was evident in 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (ulcers which occur on the skin surface due to prolonged pressure). Specifically, Resident #2, who was at mild risk for developing a pressure ulcer, was identified with a pressure ulcer on the sacrum (a bone located on the lower back) on 03/28/2023. The resident's pressure ulcer was not promptly assessed, and treatment was not started until 04/07/2023. Subsequently, on 04/10/2023, Resident #2 was assessed by the physician and diagnosed with a decubitus (Damage to a person's skin caused by constant pressure on an area for a long-time) ulcer infection. Additionally, a care plan to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00352315), the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for one (1) out of three (3) residents (Resident #3). Specifically, on 08/15/2024, when Resident #3 was leaving the facility for the appointment, Resident #3 told Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 they will inform the doctor at the clinic they were abused in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered the Pneumococcal and Influenza immunizations. This was observed in 5 of 5 residents (Residents #11, #23, #57, #84, #93) sampled for Immunizations out of a total of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #23 was offered or educated on the Influenza immunization, and there was no documented evidence that residents #11, #23, #57, #84, and #93 were offered or educated on the Pneumococcal immunization. The facility policy titled Conducting the Influenza Vaccination Program for Residents, last reviewed 08/25/2023, documented that all residents/representatives will be provided with education on the influenza vaccine at the start of the influenza season. The facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccinations for Residents, last reviewed 11/05/2024, documented that to prevent pneumonia infections and to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered the COVID-19 immunization. This was observed in 5 of 5 residents (Residents #11, #23, #57, #84, #93) sampled for Immunizations out of a total of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documentation related to the screening, administration or declination, and education on the COVID-19 immunizations for Residents #11, #23, #57, #84, and #93. The findings include: The facility policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Administration for Residents last reviewed 10/14/2024 documented that the facility will provide all residents and representatives with education regarding the COVID-19 vaccination. The resident/representative decision to accept or decline the COVID-19 vaccination will be documented in the COVID Vaccination Care Plan. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Cerebellar Stroke…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed. This was evident for 3 residents (Resident #28, #79, and #93) out of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, a diuretic care plan was not developed for Resident #28, a dialysis care plan was not developed for Resident #79, and a hospice care plan was not developed for Resident #93. The findings are: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning with effective date 1/26/2023 and last review date 10/16/2023 documented the facility utilizes an interdisciplinary team to provide an individualized comprehensive resident assessment and care planning process in order to maximize and maintain every resident's functional potential and quality of life. It also documented the interdisciplinary team is responsible for the overall supervision, training, consultation, and evaluation of the individual resident's care plan. 1) Resident #…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY 00342773), the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident for one out of four residents sampled for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, on 05/20/24 at 5:04 pm in the dining room, the facility's video footage showed Resident #1 threw a cup of water on Certified Nursing Assistant #1's back and Certified Nursing Assistant #1 turned around and slapped Resident #1 with an open right hand on the back of Resident #1's neck. The Registered Nurse Supervisor #2 assessed Resident #1 and there was no visible injury, no redness or discoloration to the skin. Resident #1 did not complain of pain. On 05/20/24 at approximately 7:10 pm, the Administrator called New York City Law Enforcement and New York City Police Officers arrived at the facility. The findings are: The Facility's Policy on Abuse Prevention reviewed 10/22, documented residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00322823), the facility did not ensure that the results of all investigations of alleged violations involving abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident. This was evident for 2 (Residents #4 and #5) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/26/2023, the facility received a report that Resident #5 inappropriately touched Resident #4. The facility submitted a Follow-up Investigation Report on 09/05/2023. The findings are: A Dear Nursing Home Administrator Letter (DAL: NH 22-20) dated 10/18/2022 regarding Facility Incident Reporting System stated that the notice was to inform the Administrator of changes in reporting of nursing home facility incidents as detailed in QSO-22-19-NH and effective on 10/24/2022. The guidance stated that in addition to an initial facility incident report that must be submitted following reporting timelines, nursing homes must submit to the New York State Department of Health the results of the facility investigation. Within 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00322823), the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident in 2 (Residents #4 and #5) of 4 residents sampled. Specifically, on 08/26/2023, the facility received a report that Resident #5 inappropriately touched Resident #4. The facility initiated an investigation but did not thoroughly investigate the allegation. The facility did not gather statements from staff members who may have potentially witnessed the allegation. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention with a last reviewed date of 10/2022 documented that if any staff was made aware of any alleged violation of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, the facility will thoroughly investigate the alleged violation, attempt to prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation is in progress and take appropriate corrective action. The facility policy on Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (NY 00311407), the facility did not ensure Preadmission Screening for individuals with mental disorders and individuals with intellectual disability was done prior to admission. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) sampled for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (a federal requirement to ensure that residents were not inappropriately placed in a skilled nursing facility). Specifically, Resident #1's Screen Form Department of Health-695 was dated 01/04/23. Level I was positive for serious mental illness but was not completed, and Resident #1 was not evaluated for Level II screening prior to admission to the facility. Resident #1 or the legal representative did not sign the Screen Form. The findings are: The facility policy entitled, Screen/Pre-admission Screening and Record Review Evaluation, not dated, documented it is the policy of the facility to be complaint with Department of Health 695 in completing or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00322823), the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for each resident. This was evident for 2 (Residents #4 and #5) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, a comprehensive care plan related to abuse was not developed for Resident #4 and Resident #5 following an allegation of sexual abuse. The findings are: A facility policy titled Resident Care Planning with a last revised date of 02/15/2023 documented that the facility's care planning / interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Panic Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set with assessment reference date of 09/01/2023 documented that Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Acquired Absence of Right Leg Above Knee and Major Depressive Disorder. The Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY 00311407), the facility did not ensure that an effective discharge plan was developed that focused on the resident's discharge goals, preparation of the resident to be an active participant in their care and effectively transition the resident to post-discharge care. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the community on 11/01/2023. A discharge care plan was not developed for Resident #1. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Care Planning-Baseline Care Plan and Comprehensive Care Plan with review date 02/12/23, documented the facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven days of completion of the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$130,902 in federal fines across 13 penalties.

• $69,518 — penalty dated 2024-04-16
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $11,645 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY