No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Loretto Health And Rehabilitation Center

700 East Brighton Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13205 · Non profit - Corporation · 583 certified beds · (315) 469-5570 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (315) 469-5570 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
888 E Brighton Ave Ste A · (315) 214-5430 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
4001 S Salina St · (315) 469-1701 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4141 S Salina St · (315) 492-1048 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 Comstock Ave · (315) 473-4330 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.8%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.3%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.9%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.501.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.561.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 459 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 181 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.7%CMS range 32.5–40.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.2–12.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization4.6%CMS range 3.1–7.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
37.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 583 beds and averages 514.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the abbreviated survey (2711290) conducted on 03/10/2026, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed (Resident #2). Specifically, for Resident #2:- The 11/28/2025 Hospital Discharge Summary documented several pressure ulcers and recommended treatments. There was no documented evidence that the resident's skin was assessed upon admission and treatment orders were not obtained timely. - On 12/05/2025, nursing noted eight unstageable pressure ulcers (base of wound obscured by non-viable tissue; true depth could not be determined until tissue removed), and there was no documented evidence that physician ordered treatments were obtained for three of the pressure ulcers. - On 12/16/2025, nursing noted 10 pressure ulcers and there was no documented evidence that physician ordered treatments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00367212/446001) surveys conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four (4) of fourteen (14) resident units ([NAME] Units 4, 5, 7, and 13) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #63 had dirty linens, and a soiled brief left at their bedside; Resident #187's room had a ceiling tile with a large brown stain and an unclean privacy curtain; Resident #314's room had a ceiling tile with a medium black stain; Resident #21's window shade had several brown spots; and Resident #373's wheelchair was unclean. Findings include:The 12/2018 Housekeeper job description documented job duties specific to housekeeping included cleaning walls and ceilings by washing, wiping, dusting, spot cleaning, disinfecting and deodorizing as instructed; and removing dirt, dust, grease, etc. from all surfaces using proper cleaning/disinfecting solutions.The facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025 - 8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #5, #63, and #510) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #5, #63, and #510 were transferred via a mechanical lift with assistance of one and not assistance of two as planned.Findings includeThe facility policy Transferring Residents with Assistive Devices, dated 4/1/2024 documented Physical and Occupational Therapy were responsible for evaluating the resident and updating the activities of daily living care plan for levels of assistance and transfer status. The mechanical total lift required assist of one of two staff to operate the lift and to assist the resident, per the plan of care. Certified staff were NOT able to make a determination to use a lesser mode of transfer (ex. resident was a total mechanical lift and staff decided to use a stand/pivot transfer). Certified staff were able to make a determination to use a higher mode of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for four (4) of thirteen (13) medication carts (4th floor cart [NAME] building, and 5th, 7th,and 6th floor [NAME] carts), two (2) of fourteen (14) treatment carts (2nd and 4th floor [NAME] carts) and one (1) of seven (7) medication storage rooms (5th floor [NAME] medication room). Specifically, the 5th and 7th floor [NAME] medication cart had undated and expired medications and biologicals; the 6th floor [NAME] medication cart was left unattended and unlocked; the 2nd and 4th floor [NAME] treatment carts were unlocked; and the 5th floor [NAME] medication room had expired medication. Findings include:The facility policy Drug and Biological Storage of Medications, dated 5/28/2024, documented medication carts and medication supplies were locked when they were not attended by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY002586082/iQIES 446001) surveys conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure food was served at palatable and appetizing temperatures in accordance with professional standards for food service for 9 anonymous residents and 2 of 2 test trays (8/27/2025 and 8/28/2025 lunch meals) reviewed. Specifically, the lunch meal test trays on 8/27/2025 and 8/28/2025 were not flavorful or served at palatable and appetizing temperatures; and 9 anonymous residents at the Resident Council Meeting stated the food was often cold, not flavorful, and overcooked. Findings: The facility policy Resident Meals, dated 1/2020, documented each resident received meals that were nourishing and palatable. Food and nutrition staff would monitor and audit food trays, so they were palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. A new tray would be issued if it was not. The undated facility policy Tray Service to Residents, documented the Dining Services Department would ensure food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for two (2) of two (2) kitchens (basement and second floor main kitchens), and four (4) of fourteen (14) kitchenettes ([NAME] 13, [NAME] 2, 3, and 4 kitchenettes) reviewed. Specifically, the basement and second floor kitchens had unclean areas, standing water, and appliances in disrepair; [NAME] 3 kitchenette had expired food; [NAME] 2 kitchenette had expired food and undated foods; [NAME] 4 kitchenette had expired food; and [NAME] 13 kitchenette had out of range refrigerator temperature and food, and incomplete temperature logs. Findings include:The undated facility policy Pantry / Freezer Temperature Control, documented it was necessary to monitor the temperatures of the pantry coolers and freezers regularly in order to insure that the food items served to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for seven areas (the basement and 2nd floor kitchen, and [NAME] units 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10. Specifically, pest control was not maintained for fruit flies in the basement and 2nd floor kitchen, and [NAME] units 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10.Findings include:The facility policy Pest Control Program, revised 10/5/2017, documented the facility would maintain an on-going pest control program to ensure the building was kept free of insects and rodents. The undated pest sighting/evidence log documented fruit flies/gnats were found throughout the facility between 6/6/2025 and 8/7/2025. The pest control vendor service invoices documented small flies were found throughout the facility from 5/31/2025-8/26/2025. The causes included trash in garbage cans, unclean floor drains, food debris in the dish machine, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00375455/iQIES 446000) surveys conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025 the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated to prevent further potential abuse and mistreatment for one (1) of eight (8) residents (Resident #50) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #50 sustained injuries of unknown origin with unexplained bruising to the head, shoulder, and upper chest that was not thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse or mistreatment. Additionally, the resident's injuries of unknown origin were not reported to the New York State Department of Health within 24 hours as required. Findings include: The facility policy Adverse Incidents and Incident Reports, dated 10/21/2024, documented an injury of unknown origin was an injury with no known incident of origin and after investigating, abuse or care plan violation could not be ruled out. Injuries of unknown origin were reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing, the Director of Nursing, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living including functional communication systems for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #63) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #63's primary language was not English, and they were not provided with translation services. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights and Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, dated 4/30/2024, the facility informed the resident of their rights and responsibilities in a language that was understandable to the resident. If the resident had limited English proficiency, their rights and responsibilities were presented in the resident's primary language. For foreign languages commonly encountered in the community, the facility provided the resident with written translations of their rights and responsibilities and if not common to the community, rights were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not provide ongoing programs to support each resident in their choice of activities for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #10) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #10 was not offered meaningful activities that included their interests and preferences. Findings include: The facility policy Recreation Goals and Objectives, updated 12/10/2019 documented the recreation department provided comprehensive recreational programming for all residents. A blend of diversional/therapeutic pursuits played a key role in providing a balance between fun/pleasure and restoration/maintenance of functional skills. It was the departments policy to provide opportunities for voluntary involvement in recreational interests/activities within both the facility and community. Resident #10 had diagnoses including autistic disorder, cardiac arrest (heart attack), and anoxic brain damage (brain is deprived…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #546) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #546's bilevel positive airway pressure machine (a noninvasive ventilator that helps with breathing) was not cleaned as ordered and had brown debris in the mask. Findings Include: The facility policy Bilevel positive airway pressure, Continuous positive airway pressure Trilogy, effective 2/2020 documented non-invasive ventilator support was provided to patients with compromised airways or chronic pulmonary/cardiac diseases. Use of the machine required a physician's order, and the respiratory therapist was notified when used. The facemask was cleaned daily with sterile water and left to dry. The tubing was cleaned weekly with sterile water and left to dry.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Residents #21) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #21 did not have their prescribed pain patch placed as ordered and they did not have the effectiveness of their pain treatment documented.Findings include:The facility policy Pain Assessment, Management, and Evaluation, dated 12/16/2024, documented the resident would receive appropriate and timely assessment, evaluation, and treatment with pain-relieving drugs, adjunctive drugs, and non-drug therapies as needed and in accordance with best practice standards. Pre-pain assessment and post administration pain assessment must be completed on all pain medications in the indicated areas. In the Electronic Medical Record when an order was written for a routine pain medication, the order automatically triggered a pre pain level to be documented. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis (treatment to filter waste products from the blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #7 and #336) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #7 and #336 did not have pre-and post-dialysis assessments as ordered. Findings include:The facility policy Dialysis Care, dated 4/2025, documented residents receiving dialysis were to have a care plan and all dialysis observations, assessments, and care must be documented in the medical record on each dialysis day prior to dialysis and upon return. The order set and template were to be added to the resident's orders which included the Dialysis: Daily Observation/Assessment and interfacility transfer report order. The Dialysis Observation/Assessment was completed on each dialysis day, prior to dialysis and upon return. 1) Resident #7 had diagnoses including end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 8/25/2025-8/29/2025, the facility did establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #282) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #282 was on enhanced barrier precautions and Certified Nurse Aides #56 and #57 did not wear proper personal protective equipment while performing care. Findings included:The facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program for Long Term Care Facilities, dated 10/30/2024, documented the program was to systematically identify and reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections among residents, visitors, and healthcare workers. Employees were to adhere to all policies and procedures related to infection control.The facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 1/28/2025, documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions were an infection control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024 the facility did not ensure resident rights to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records for 8 of 8 residents (Residents #1, #10, #133, #158, #305, #323, #325, and #397) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #1, #10, #133, #158, #305, #323, #325, and #397 identifying and personal information was posted in a public area visible to others. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Identifying Protected Health Information documented the facility was committed to ensuring the privacy and security of individual health information. To support this commitment, the facility would ensure that the appropriate steps were taken to properly identify and secure individuals' protected health information as required. Any health information relating to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of an individual or the provision of health care to an individual would be protected. During observations on 4/18/2024 at 10:33 AM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00321560, NY00336003, NY00320334, NY00318518, NY00315691 and NY00330793) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 6 of 14 resident units ([NAME] Units 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, and 13) reviewed. Specifically: - on [NAME] Unit 3, room [ROOM NUMBER]-W had overflowing laundry bags, the bathroom was visibly dirty and had a strong urine odor, and the room floors were sticky. - on [NAME] Unit 4, room [ROOM NUMBER]-W's alternating pressure mattress machine had a missing right hook to secure the machine, and a ceiling tile was missing. - [NAME] Unit 11 had sticky floors; room [ROOM NUMBER]-W had a dirty wall, and liquid and debris on the floor; and room [ROOM NUMBER]-W had a broken stone windowsill. - [NAME] Unit 8's and 13's common area ice and water machine had white dried matter along the grate/catcher plate, the table,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure information on filing grievances was available for 11 of 11 anonymous residents present at the Resident Council meeting. Specifically, 11 anonymous residents present at the Resident Council meeting stated they did not know how to file an anonymous grievance. Findings include: The facility policy, Complaint Management Policy dated 2/21/2022 documented all residents would be informed at admission of their right to file a grievance and the information would be posted throughout the facility. Complaints could be filed either in written or in oral format to any staff member. The Director of Nursing served as the grievance official. During a Resident Council Meeting on 4/15/24 at 2:04 PM, eleven anonymous residents stated they were unaware of who the facility grievance officer was. They were told they had to report their concerns to their social worker. They stated they did not always receive follow up on grievances expressed and did not feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00315691, NY00318518, NY00320334, NY00321560, NY00329469, NY00330471, NY00331762, and NY00332641) surveys conducted 4/15/2024 through 4/23/2024, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the residents medical and nursing needs for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #62, #150 and #201) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #201 did not have a comprehensive care plan developed to include outside privileges or smoking outside on facility grounds; Resident #62 did not have a positioning pillow, palm guard, or pressure reduction boots as planned; and Resident #150 was not wearing their pressure reducing heel boots as planned. Findings include: The 8/8/2022 facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning, documented the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00315691, NY00318518, NY00321560, NY00329469, NY00330555, NY00332641, NY00334153, NY00336003, and NY00338231) conducted 4/19/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 10 of 13 residents (Residents #62, 117, 124, 133, 150, 215, 305, 325, 384, and 414) reviewed. Specifically: - Resident #62 had unkempt hair, excessive facial hair, and unkept fingernails; - Resident #117 had unkept fingernails; - Resident #124 had unkept fingernails, greasy hair, and excessive facial hair; - Resident #150 remained in bed due to mechanical lift battery issues and was poorly positioned for meals; - Resident #133 was poorly positioned in bed for breakfast meals; - Resident #215 was not toileted as planned and had excessive facial hair; - Resident #305 was not toileted for over 5 hours; - Resident #325 had greasy hair and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/23/2023 -4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labelled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 5 of 12 medication carts ([NAME] units 3, 4, 8, 10, and 14) reviewed, and 1 of 6 medication rooms ([NAME] unit 5) reviewed. Specifically, the medication cart on [NAME] unit 3 had nicotine patches without resident labels; [NAME] unit 4 had expired medications; [NAME] unit 8 has insulin without a labeled open date; [NAME] unit 10 had inhalers not in the correct pharmacy box and without labeled open dates and unlabeled eye medications; [NAME] unit 13 had personal food items stored with resident medications; and [NAME] 5 medication room had a refrigerator with a significant amount of ice buildup. Findings include: The facility policy Over the Counter (OTC) Medications- Floor Stock dated 4/5/2019 documented that eye drops, nasal spray, and eardrops should be obtained from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330555) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 3 test trays reviewed (4/16/2024 and 4/18/2024 lunch meals). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility policy Food Temperature Control and Correction dated 1/1/2004 documented: - Proper food temperature control and safe food practices were essential to prevent contamination or spoilage that could cause infection or poisoning. - A temperature of 41 degrees or lower was required for all entrees, meats, vegetable, cereals, eggs, starches, soups, desserts, fruits, and milks. - The Dining Service Manager was responsible to record the temperature of all foods at the start of each tray line or meal services. Trayline temperatures should be taken 1 hour from the start of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 4 of 14 food preparation and pantry storage areas ([NAME] Unit 4, and [NAME] Units 4, 5, 6) and in the main kitchen. Specifically, the pantry storage areas on [NAME] Unit 4, and [NAME] Units 4, 5, 6 were soiled with food spills and the refrigerators were not cleaned of food debris and spills. Additionally, the main kitchen tray line had cold food tables with food items temperatures ranging from 40- 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Findings include: The facility policy Food Temperature Control and Correction dated 1/1/2004, documented the dining services management staff were responsible for checking temperatures before food serving starts. Serving of food would not begin until all foods were at the proper cold temperature. A temperature of 45 degrees or lower was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00321560, NY00315691, and NY00336003) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #384 and #414) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #384 sat in bed sheets soiled with vomit and was not cleaned in a timely manner and Resident #414 was not shaven, had unkept hair, and had an unclean room. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights & Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities reviewed 8/8/2022 documented residents would be treated with kindness, respect, and dignity. Resident rights included a dignified existence, to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity, self-determination, privacy and confidentiality, and equal access to quality care. The facility policy Quality of Life-Dignity dated 1/10/2023 documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced their sense…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2023, the facility did not ensure the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #31) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #31 was not able to use their bathroom sink to effectively perform activities of daily living. Findings include: The facility policy Quality of Life-Dignity dated 1/10/2023 documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self-esteem, and were treated with dignity and respect at all times. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the dominant side, kidney disease, and obesity. The 2/12/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact, had functional limitation in the upper and lower extremities on one side, and required substantial/maximum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #429) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #429 reported feelings of social isolation when they were not allowed to leave their room to attend activities, have meals in the dining room, or socialize with peers and family because their portable oxygen tank was empty and was not refilled. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Abuse Reporting dated 8/1/2023 documented the facility to prohibited mistreatment, neglect, or abuse. The facility would not tolerate or permit verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse including involuntary seclusion of residents. Involuntary seclusion was defined as separation of a resident from other residents in their room against the residents will or the will of the legal representative. The facility policy Portable Liquid Oxygen System dated 10/10/2029 documented the oxygen cylinders must be filled from the stationary reservoir when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00320334) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2023, the facility did not ensure the discharge needs of each resident were identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #429) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #429 did not have an active discharge plan, expressed interest in a lateral transfer to local nursing facilities, and was not updated on the status of a lateral transfer request. Additionally, Resident #429 was not invited to participate in the development of a person-centered care plan. Findings include: The facility policy Discharge Planning, revised 1/30/2015, documented the interdisciplinary care planning team and social worker would collaborate with the resident/designated representative regularly and reviewed the resident's potential for discharge to establish a projected discharge date . The social worker arranged and facilitated the resident/designated representative discharge planning meeting to discuss rehabilitation progress, clinicals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00318518, NY00318847, NY00320334, NY00331963, and NY00338231) the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 9 residents (Residents #117 and #323) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #117 was found on the floor between their bed and the wall due to the bed brakes not being locked; and Resident #323 had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors and propelled their wheelchair independently throughout the facility without an adequate supervision plan. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Abuse Reporting, dated 8/1/2023, documented each resident had the right to be free from all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The facility policy Off Unit/Leave of Absence, dated 10/2023, documented the resident must notify nursing on the unit and sign out in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00329469, NY00331762, NY00330471) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #168) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #168 did not receive adequate pain management following a fall with a hip fracture. Findings included: The facility policy Pain Assessment, Management, and Evaluation dated 8/24/2022, documented the interdisciplinary team identified residents in need of pain management and completed on-going assessments to control the resident's pain. All residents would have a pain assessment completed upon admission, quarterly, annually, and with a significant change. Resident #168 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, weakness, and osteoarthritis (degeneration of joints). The 10/22/2023 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, was independent with ambulation, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00336003) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skills necessary to care for residents' need, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 3 of 5 licensed nurses (licensed practical nurse Unit Manager #4, licensed practical nurse Unit Manager #33, and licensed practical nurse #34) reviewed. Specifically, licensed practical nurse Unit Manager #4 did not have timely online training, annual competencies, or documented orientation competencies completed; licensed practical nurse Unit Manager #33 did not have annual competencies, or documented orientation competencies completed; and licensed practical nurse #34 did not received annual competencies that covered key skill-set areas as outlined in the facility assessment. Findings include: The 4/2024 Facility Assessment Tool documented nurse competencies in the facility included: person-center care, activities of daily living, disaster planning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure certified nurse aide performance reviews were completed once every 12 months for 2 of 5 certified nurse aides (certified nurse aides #20 and #21) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence certified nurse aides #20 and #21 who had worked for the facility more than 12 months, had performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. Findings include: The facility policy Appendix A - [NAME] Code of Conduct, dated 5/2023 documented that each supervisor and manager was responsible for monitoring that their personnel were acting ethically and in compliance with applicable federal, state, or local statues, ordinances, executive orders, rules, regulations, judicial, or administrative decisions, ruling or orders, the facility's policies and procedures and the Code. All personnel were responsible for acquiring sufficient knowledge to recognize potential compliance issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain and or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #158) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #158 had a diagnosis of dementia and was not provided with preferred person-centered activities. Findings include: The facility policy Managing Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia, dated 4/29/2019, documented the facility was committed to ensuring that the needs of residents who experienced behavioral symptoms of dementia were met as much as possible. Behaviors often indicated unmet needs. Behaviors were no longer referred to as aggressive, disruptive, challenging, or difficult. Staff were to obtain history, favorite things, hobbies, personal interests to be included in non-pharmacological strategies and plans of care. A resident-centered plan of care would be developed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00330471 and NY00331762) surveys conducted 4/15/2024-4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure the medical provider was promptly notified of radiology results for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #168) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #168 had x-rays ordered by the medical provider, the radiology provider reported the results to the facility, and the results were not relayed to the medical provider timely. Findings included: The facility policy Radiology Services dated 1/2024, documented radiology services would be provided to all residents in a manner that prevented errors, assured accurate communication, and provided timely ordered service and timely results to the medical provider. The nurse confirmed the order for radiology or diagnostic test in the electronic medical record and notified the technician of an x-ray/diagnostic test by calling the radiology company contracted with the facility. The radiology technician conducted the x-ray/diagnostic test and then notified the charge nurse once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #127) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #127's urinary catheter drainage bag (collects urine) was not covered and was visible in the dining room and from the hallway while the resident was in their room. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Quality of Life and Dignity documented each resident would be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality by maintaining privacy for medical devices (urinary bags). Resident #127 had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The 7/20/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was totally dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had a suprapubic catheter (urinary tube placed through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 5 of 12 resident units (Units 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13), for 3 residents (Residents #148, 186, and 416), and for 2 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). Specifically, there were multiple unclean, stained, and damaged areas, furniture, and equipment throughout the facility and fruit flies were observed in a dining area. Resident #148 had an unclean wheelchair, linen, furniture, and sticky floors; and Residents #186 and 416 had unclean Broda (positioning) chairs. Additionally, resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had hot water temperatures at the sinks exceeding 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Findings include: The facility's undated Daily Housekeeping Task List included the following tasks: - stock toilet paper in resident bathrooms; - clean off resident bed tables; - wipe up any food crumbs or other debris on furniture; - mop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's nursing needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #264) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #264 was care planned to be dependent on 2 with transferring and was transferred by 1. Findings include: The facility's undated policy Resident's Care Assignment Sheet documented: - Nursing staff would follow the plan of care as indicated on the resident's care assignment sheet and notify the charge nurse immediately if the resident's care needs change. - Staff were to check the [NAME] and the dashboard for any changes or updates. - It was the responsibility of the Nursing Care Team to ensure that the plan of care was accurately followed for each resident. Resident #264 had diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), hemiparesis (one-sided weakness)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00299609, NY00300895, NY00293668, and NY00257181) conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 15 residents (Residents #8, 238, 264, and 386) reviewed. Specifically: - Resident #8 was not assisted with oral care and their toothbrush was observed on their bathroom sink unopened in a plastic wrapper. - Resident #238 was observed in the same clothing for 5 consecutive days. - Resident #264 was not toileted for more than 5 hours and was not supervised at meals as care planned. - Resident #386 was not assisted with meals and was observed eating independently and spilling food. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 1/21/20 documented residents who were unable to carry out activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22 the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #171) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #171 was on aspiration (inhaling food into lungs) precautions due to impaired swallowing and was observed consuming their meal in their room unsupervised with the door closed. Findings include: The undated facility policy Aspiration Precautions and Standards of Care documented aspiration precautions were the measures implemented to prevent or lessen the risk of food, fluids, or other ingested material from entering the respiratory tract. The standards of care to prevent aspiration did not include resident supervision during eating and/or drinking. Resident #171 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. The 7/29/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00299609) surveys conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 15 residents (Residents # 33 and#368) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #33 and #368 did not receive blood sugar (blood glucose) monitoring or insulin administration as ordered. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled Insulin Injection Preparation documented the purpose of insulin injections was to enhance glucose (blood sugar) utilization by all cells in the human body. The medication would only be administered with a physician order including the type of insulin, the dose, and the time frequency. A registered nurse (RN) or licensed practical nurse (LPN) were able to perform the injections. A post-procedure included recording the insulin administration on the medication administration record (MAR). The 8/2021 facility policy Medication Administration documented utilization of registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 9/19/22-9/23/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal test tray (Resident #355) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #355's replacement meal was not measured for an appropriate and safe internal food temperature range after being reheated and prior to being served to the resident. Findings include: The facility policy Foods Brought in By Family/Friends for the Intent of Resident's Consumption dated 11/10/21 documented all items that needed to be heated would be heated to the proper temperature before being served to the resident. Food would be heated to an internal temperature of 165 F (Fahrenheit) in the microwave oven, covered, and rotated so it heated evenly. During an observation on 9/21/22, Resident #355's lunch tray was used for testing and a replacement meal was ordered. At 12:45 PM the resident's replacement lunch tray was brought to the 9th…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MURRAY, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2014
BRENNAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2013
O'NEILL, VICKIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2009
TOWNSEND, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$60.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-28.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 6%Other / private 24%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,144per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$337per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335136. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next