No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Van Duyn Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

5075 West Seneca Turnpike, Syracuse, NY 13215 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 513 certified beds · (315) 449-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Flagged for abuse9 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$783,273 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (87) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $783,273 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-13)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4850 Broad Rd · (315) 492-5915 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
401 W Seneca Tpke · (315) 492-4034 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4915 Grolier Rd · (913) 773-5710 · Call to confirm hours
Park
711 W Seneca Tpke · (315) 492-9471 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4962 W Seneca Tpke · (315) 469-4673

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.9%14.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.8%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%19.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.1%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.2%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.3%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.4%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%6.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%19.5%21.2%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.9%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.481.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.981.361.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.1%CMS range 24.1–39.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 10.0–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.8–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
42.7%
Total nursing turnover
34.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 513 beds and averages 429.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-13)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2025-12-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

87 citations, most serious first. The 26 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's head was forcefully pushed backward by Certified Nurse Aide #2 during care resulting in scratches and redness to Resident #1's face. The facility's failure to protect residents from abuse resulted in harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care for Resident #1 and placed all 418 residents in the facility at risk for the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.Findings include: The facility policy Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation Policy, revised 02/2026, documented residents were to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property to prioritize the emotional, physical, and psychological well-being of all residents in accordance with federal and state guidance. The willful infliction of injury, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the survey the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's care plan documented the resident was to have no male caregivers. During the night shift (11:00 PM-7:00 AM) on 02/03/2026, male Certified Nurse Aide #2 was assigned to provide 1:1 supervision for Resident #1. On 02/04/2026 at 7:00 AM Certified Nurse Aide #2 was witnessed by Certified Nurse Aide #1 abusing Resident #1. The facility's failure to ensure comprehensive care plans were implemented resulted in harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care for Resident #1 and placed all 418 residents in the facility at risk for the likelihood of serious physical and psychological harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death. Refer to: F 600 Findings include:The facility policy Care Planning/Care Conference Policy, revised 01/27/2026, documented the facility utilized a person-centered approach to care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of verbal behaviors of using racial slurs directed at others and had multiple physical behaviors directed toward others, including the following:-on 09/10/2025 Resident #1 threw coffee at staff, hitting another resident. -on 09/30/2025, Resident #1 hit Resident #3 in the face. -on 11/10/2025, Resident #1 refused medications and started swinging at staff. -on 12/24/2025, Resident #1 threw a glass vase at staff. -on 12/25/2025, Resident #1 hit Resident #2 in the head with a wheelchair leg rest. There was no documented evidence effective/adequate interventions were put into place after each incident to protect residents from potential abuse by Resident #1. The facility's failure to protect residents from abuse resulted in potential for harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care and placed all 456 residents in the facility at risk for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #11) reviewed. Specifically, on [DATE] between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM, Resident #11 had labored breathing and an oxygen saturation level (amount of oxygen in the blood) of 40 percent (normal is 95 -100 percent). The oxygen flow rate was increased to 10 liters per minute without a physician order and the resident's oxygen saturation level dropped to 26 percent on 10 liters of oxygen. The physician was not notified of the resident's significant change in respiratory status. Emergency Medical Services was not called until 6:00 AM, the resident was transported to the hospital and presented to the Emergency Department at 6:30 AM with respiratory distress and a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (high levels of carbon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #11) reviewed. Specifically, on 11/25/2025, Resident #11's respiratory complaints were not appropriately addressed, and physician's orders were not followed. On 11/26/2025, Resident #11 was not adequately monitored when they exhibited respiratory distress and were left unsupervised while waiting for Emergency Medical Services arrival. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care for Resident #11 and placed all residents with potential changes in health status at risk for serious harm, serious impairment, serious injury, or death. Findings include: Findings include:Cross-referenced to F695: Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning Cross-referenced to F580: Notification of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, Etc.) The undated facility policy Respiratory Care, documented the facility would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for elopement. Specifically, Resident #2 who was cognitively intact and had a history of suicidal ideations, opioid dependence, and mental health disorders, eloped from the facility on 02/24/2025 at an unknown time. Resident #2 was allegedly last seen by facility staff on 02/24/2025 at 2:00 PM and the resident's absence was not discovered until 5:45 PM. The resident was contacted via telephone by law enforcement on 02/25/2025 at 12:11 AM after the facility called emergency services to report the resident missing on 02/24/2025 at 11:16 PM. The resident would not disclose their location to law enforcement and did not return to the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Resident #2 and placed all residents identified at risk of elopement and/or leaving the facility against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the extended recertification and abbreviated (NY00376311) surveys conducted 4/6/2025 - 4/18/2025, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to choose activities and health care services consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care and the right to participate in social and community activities for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #50 and #162) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #50 and #162 were Deaf and were not provided their preferred method of communication and thus were unable to communicate their needs and preferences to staff, socialize with other residents, or participate in meaningful activities. This resulted in actual psychosocial harm to Resident #50 that was Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. Findings include: The facility policy Language Assistance, last reviewed 7/2021, documented each resident's language access needs would be reviewed and monitored during their comprehensive care plan review and conference. Language assistance would be provided through use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025 - 4/18/2025, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for six (6) of eight (8) residents (Residents #160, #417, #425, #461, #485, and #790) reviewed. Specifically: - Resident #485 was on contact precautions for clostridium difficile (a resistant contagious bacterium) colitis (inflammation of the colon) and droplet precautions for COVID-19 (a contagious respiratory disease) and did not have the appropriate isolation precaution signs, precautions were not consistently followed, and contaminated laundry items were not separated from general population laundry. - Resident #790 tested positive for COVID-19 on 4/4/2025 and isolation precaution signs were not observed on 4/6/2025. - Resident #417 tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-13 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00322098 and NY00323044) the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfers or discharges from the facility for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and 2). On 9/11/2023, immediate jeopardy was identified during an abbreviated complaint survey. Concerns rising to the level of immediate risk to resident health and safety include the provider's failure to provide a safe and orderly discharge for Residents #1 and 2 which had the potential for serious harm for both residents. Residents #1 and 2 were discharged to the Department of Social Services (DSS), which is not a dischargeable location, without a plan for shelter or services; without a discharge plan; without notice, and without following the proper 30-day notice requirements. Both were homeless following discharge, one is currently residing in a homeless shelter, both are without their prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 60 residents reviewed. The facility failed to provide oversight, monitoring, and effective communication between staff and practitioners. Specifically, Resident #118 did not have a hematology consultation that was ordered and laboratory tests were completed 14 days after they were ordered. This resulted in actual physical harm for Resident #118 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled, Continuity of Care, revised 05/2025, documented quality of care was a fundamental principle that applied to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-05-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests to meet the needs of its residents for one (1) (Resident # 118) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, the laboratory test ordered for Resident #118 on [DATE] and [DATE] were not completed as ordered. The laboratory test was not completed until it was ordered for a third time on [DATE], which resulted in critical levels requiring hospitalization for a blood transfusion. This resulted in actual physical harm for Resident #118 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: Cross-referenced to F656: Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan Cross-referenced to F684: Quality of Care The undated facility policy and procedure titled, Request for Diagnostic Services, documented all requests for diagnostic services must be ordered by the resident's attending physician. All orders for diagnostic services must be entered into the resident's medical record and signed by the attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, from 12/15/2025-01/30/2026 Resident #1 had acute medical complaints including urinary symptoms. Urinalysis reports on 12/19/2025 and 01/01/2026 were not adequately addressed by nursing and medical; the resident was treated multiple times with a cephalosporin (antibiotic) without obtaining a urine culture and sensitivity; and a urology consult was not reviewed. The resident continued with frequent complaints of not feeling well and was hospitalized on [DATE] and admitted to the intensive care unit for urosepsis (life threatening response to a urinary tract infection) and metabolic acidosis (acid build up in the blood). This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.Findings include: The facility policy Physician Visits, revised 05/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the survey the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #2 had an active physician order for a 1:1 supervision safety watch (for prior smoking violations and behavioral symptoms directed toward others) that was not implemented when the resident was readmitted from a hospital stay on 01/15/2025. Subsequently, on 01/17/2025 Resident #2 was found with a self-inflicted laceration to their neck and superficial vertical cuts to both wrists. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #2 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include:The facility policy 1:1 Supervision, revised 07/2023, documented when a staff member was assigned to provide 1:1 supervision, they would: -Stay within the required distance of the resident at all times unless relieved by another staff member.-Report to the charge nurse before breaks and at the end of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00374160) surveys conducted 4/6/2025 - 4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #170 and #335) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #170 and #335 were continent (able to control bladder and bowel), placed in incontinence briefs, and were told by staff to urinate/defecate in the briefs instead of using the toilet and/or bedpan. This resulted in psychosocial harm to Residents #170 and #335 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy Dignity and Respect, last reviewed 8/2023 documented residents had the right to be treated with dignity, respect, and consideration at all times. Staff should ensure residents were treated as individuals and encourage them to participate in programs and services of their choice and protect them from any kind of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00325460) surveys conducted 4/6/2025 - 4/18/2025, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed (Residents #274 and #461). Specifically, Resident #274 was not provided a wound vacuum machine (vacuum assisted closure using negative pressure to assist in wound healing) or the back-up wet to dry dressing treatment as ordered; and Resident #461 did not receive timely follow-up care for their dehisced wound (a surgical incision that reopens) This resulted in harm to Resident #461 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy Change in Resident Condition, reviewed 12/2022, documented the nursing supervisor would notify the medical provider when there was a change in the resident's condition. All physician's or practitioner's orders would be followed. The nursing supervisor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00351636), the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5, who was not competent to give consent, was sexually assaulted by Resident #4. The facility's failure to protect residents from sexual abuse resulted in harm past non-compliance, that was not Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #5. Findings include: The facility policy Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Involuntary Seclusion and Misappropriation of Property revised 1/20/2023, documented residents in the facility were to be free from abuse neglect and exploitation. All staff are in-serviced annually and upon hiring on prevention of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property and will report abuse immediately. Abuse is a willful act of verbal abuse, sexual abuse, nonconsensual sex contact of any type, physical abuse, and mental abuse. Resident #4 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0638 — widespread
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of each resident's quarterly review assessments for 17 of 19 residents (Resident #s 25, 82, 115, 141, 184, 203, 211, 225, 255, 263, 275, 284, 356, 369, 383, 394, and 396) reviewed during the Resident Assessment Facility Task. Specifically, the residents' Quarterly Minimum Data Sets (a resident assessment tool) were not completed within 92 days after the previous Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment and/or not signed off as completed within 14 days of the assessment start. Findings include:Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services require the Minimum Data Set Assessments to be completed within 14 days of the assessment start date, quarterly every 92 days, and annually within 366 days of the most recent comprehensive assessment. 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment Reference Date for Resident #396 was 03/24/2026 and signed as completed by the Assessment Coordinator on 04/16/2026, more than 14 days after the start of the assessment. The previous Quarterly Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to properly store food items according to professional standards for food safety. Specifically, on 05/05/2026, the main kitchen had opened, undated and/or unlabeled food items with no use by date; areas were visibly dirty; one handwashing sink was not maintained; and on 05/12/2026, the automatic dishwasher final rinse temperature was observed at 178 degrees Fahrenheit and was documented as not meeting or exceeding final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit from 05/01/2026 through 05/11/2026. This was observed in the main kitchen and had the potential to negatively impact all residents, staff and visitors who consume facility-prepared food. Findings include:Record review of Vendor #2 Summary of Service dated 03/19/2026 revealed dishwasher machine service was initiated on 03/12/2026 when the facility reported the final rinse was not reaching 180 degrees Fahrenheit. It documented a service on 03/19/2026, where Vendor #2 found an issue with the booster and was submitting a repair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Specifically, (a.) on 05/05/2026, a live cockroach was in the kitchen storage room. The kitchen storage room and main kitchen adjacent to the room were visibly soiled and unkept with discarded garbage substances. (b.) on 05/11/2026, ants and a spider were observed alive within the facility's first floor Northern bathroom. This was noted in the main kitchen and on the first floor. Findings include: Cross reference to F-814, Dispose Garbage & Refuse Properly.Policy and procedure titled, Insect and Rodent Control, last revised 05/2025, documented after staff observed a possible insect or rodent and immediately updated the sighting log with specific time and locations, Pest Control Vendor #1 would follow up with deep cleaning of specific areas and applied preventative measure as necessary, and update the sighting log with date of inspection, treatment results and follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a manner that promoted dignity and respect for three of eight residents (Resident #207, #230, and #241) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, staff did not intervene to maintain Resident #207's dignity when the resident's hands were visibly soiled with bodily waste and then ate their pudding with their soiled bare hands; Resident #230's dignity was not maintained when staff pulled the resident up by their pants. During observations on 05/06/2026, 05/08/2026, and 05/12/2026, two residents (Resident #76 and #136) were observed being transferred by their arms and pants without the use of a gait belt. Resident #241's dignity was not maintained when staff referred to the resident as a feeder. Additionally, general observations revealed that care and services provided failed to promote dignity and respect. Findings include: Cross reference for F609. The Policy and Procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during survey, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. Specifically, on 05/07/2026, Resident #118's recessed light had no light bulb. On 05/05/2026, Resident #27's room walls were dirty, and Resident #126's overbed table had a full, odorous urinal on it. Observations on 05/05/2026 noted sticky floors including Resident #118's room door and floor, the 7th floor nurses station floor, and the 3rd floor common area/core floor. Findings include:Facility housekeeping in-service training, revised 03/2016, documented resident rooms were cleaned to ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infection and bacteria and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. Steps in the daily cleaning of a resident room included emptying wastebaskets, cleaning and dusting all horizontal surfaces, cleaning and dusting all vertical surfaces, dust mop the floor, and damp mop the floor. It further documented that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was maintained in working order and readily accessible to permit residents to summon staff assistance for three of three residents (Resident #86, #353, and #162) reviewed for accessibility of resident call systems and for one resident (Resident #241) identified during observations. Specifically, on 05/06/2026, Resident #86 was observed with a nonfunctioning call light located out of reach on the bedside table and in need of repair. On 05/05/2026 and 05/11/2026, Resident #353 and Resident #162's call bells were observed as not being within reach. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for delayed staff response and urgent care needs. Findings include:Resident #162 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of encounter for screening for other bacterial diseases, muscle weakness, depression. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/25/2026, documented that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure restraint use was monitored and implemented in accordance with a physician order and resident needs for one of one resident reviewed for restraints (Resident #13). Specifically, Resident #13 was observed wearing a physician-ordered harness seatbelt during mealtimes that was not released as required. Findings include: Resident # 13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of contracture (permanent shortening of muscles, tendons, ligaments or joints that limited range of motion), anoxic brain damage (brain damage caused from brain not receiving oxygen), Cerebral Palsy (neurological disorder that effects body movement). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 04/07/2026 documented Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent for activities of daily living. The Restraint Minimization policy dated 04/04/2020 (revision date of 06/02/2025)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse. Specifically, Resident #230 reported to a Registered Nurse Supervisor an allegation of abuse, stating that Certified Nurse Aide #18 abruptly rolled them over and pulled them up by their pants and threw them in their wheelchair. Findings include:Cross reference to F550, Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights.The facility policy titled, Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation, last revised 02/27/2026, documented it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property to prioritize the emotional, physical, and psychological well-being of all residents in accordance with federal and state guidance to through the following: Facility shall ensure that all staff are educated on the prevention, identification, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #118 and #248) out of three residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #118 received medications for unspecified anemia, iron deficiency, and dry eye syndrome and a care plan was not developed and implemented for the diagnoses; and (b.) Resident #248 was involved in a resident-to-resident physical altercation on 01/20/2026 at 6:50 AM, and a comprehensive care plan for abuse was not developed and implemented. Additionally, Resident #248 had oral surgery on 01/21/2026 and a care plan was not developed and implemented. Findings include: Cross-referenced to F770: Laboratory Services The Policy and Procedure titled, Care Planning/Care Conference Policy, reviewed 02/19/2026, documented the facility utilized a person-centered approach to care planning. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised timely for two (Resident #379 and Resident #162) out of 60 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Specifically (a), Resident #379's care plan for psychotropic drugs was not revised when the medication Risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) was reduced from 0.25 milligrams twice daily to once daily on 01/07/2026, nor was the care plan revised when this medication was discontinued for the resident on 03/26/2026; (b) Resident #162's nutrition care plan was not revised when the resident lost their upper denture, requested ground meat instead of a regular consistency meal due to difficulty chewing their food. Findings include: Cross Referenced: F790 Routine/Emergency Dental Services The facility policy titled Care Planning/Care Conference Policy, last revised 01/27/2026, documented that it was the policy of the facility to utilize a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure ongoing provision of programs to support residents in their choices of activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for two (Resident #3 and #243) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 and Resident #243 both required the use of a mechanical lift to get out of bed, and were not provided with meaningful, accommodating activities to maintain their highest quality of life. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled, Activities/Therapeutic Recreation Program Policy revised 01/2026, documented, It is the policy of Van Duyn Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing (VDC) to provide a structured and individualized program of activities and therapeutic recreation that meets the interests and enhances the quality of life the residents residing at the facility. Van Duyn Center aims to ensure that each resident has the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent for two (Resident #230 and #245) of five residents observed during medication administration with 33 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 6.06 percent.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Self-Administration of Medications reviewed 01/2026, documented in order to maintain residents high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team (or equivalent) has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time), physical, and visual ability to carry out this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine and/or emergency dental services, including assistance in obtaining dental evaluation and treatment for two of three residents (Resident #155 and #162) reviewed. Specifically, (1.) Resident #155 was discovered to have a broken front tooth by family and was not referred to dental services to rule out any potential issues/problems. (2.) On 04/15/2026, Resident #162 was known to be missing upper dentures but their diet was not adjusted to account for this factor until five days later on 04/20/2026, when a dental consult documented to adjust diet as needed. Resident #162's full upper denture impressions were not completed until 05/10/2026. The delay in dental follow-up and denture replacement had the potential to impact the resident's ability to chew, nutritional status, and overall oral health. Findings include: The facility policy titled In-House Dental Services Coordination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs for one (Resident #412) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure overall systems were established for documentation of all meals by nursing staff and were being maintained according to standards of practice and facility policy when they failed to document breakfast, lunch, and dinner for Resident #412 between the dates of 11/01/2025 through 11/30/2025. Findings include:Resident #412 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region (a serious infection of the bones in the spine,) acute and subacute infective endocarditis (a life-threatening infection of the heart's inner lining or valves,) and Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, without complications (a disease that affects how the body uses blood glucose (sugar). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 11/04/2025 documented that they could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to provide drinks, including water and other liquids, consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for one (Resident # 118) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #118 received water and ice per their preference to maintain hydration. Findings include: Resident #118 Resident # 118 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of unspecified anemia (low levels of healthy red blood cells and can cause tiredness, weakness, and shortness of breath), urinary tract infection, and adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that manifests as weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/26/2026, documented the resident was cognitively intact, was able to make themselves understood, and usually understood others. The Policy and Procedure titled, Nourishment Program Policy and Procedure, dated 10/06/2025, documented it was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Specifically, on 05/05/2026, three garbage receptacles located within the main kitchen had no liners and contained refuse. One of the garbage cans was next to a wall that had dried, liquified spatter covering approximately two square feet of the wall above it. Additionally, dirty garbage lids were observed in the main kitchen storage utility room. This was observed in the Main Kitchen during the initial tour. Findings include: Cross reference to F-925, Maintains Effective Pest Control Program.Policy and procedure titled, Insect and Rodent Control, last revised 05/2025, documented the purpose of pest control was to prevent entry into the facility and reduce the threat of infection and disease; to provide a safe and sanitary environment; and to maintain the appearance of the facility. It further documented, equipment was to be properly cleaned on a daily basis following Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policies and procedures. Proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection prevention and control practices were followed for one of eight residents (Resident #138) reviewed for infection control practices. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide # 6 failed to remove personal protective equipment prior to exiting the room of Resident #138 who was on special contact droplet precautions and the facility failed to provide a receptacle for disposable of used personal protective equipment inside the resident's room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents through increased risk of transmission of infectious agents. Findings include:The policy and procedure titled, Covid 19 Action Plan, revised on 03/06/2020, documented health care personnel should wear personal protective equipment for suspected or confirmed COVID infection including respirator with N95 filters (face mask used to filter airborne particles), gown, gloves, and eye protection. The policy and procedure titled, Transmission Based Precautions, revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident of staff abuse toward a resident was immediately reported to the State Agency, law enforcement, and the Administrator for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #1 witnessed Certified Nurse Aide #2 abuse Resident #1, and the incident was not reported to facility Administration, law enforcement, and New York State Department of Health until approximately five (5) hours after the incident occurred. Additionally, the required five (5)-day investigative report was not submitted until 12 days following the witnessed abuse. Refer to: F600 Free from Abuse and Neglect F656 Develop/ Implement Comprehensive Care Plan. Findings include: The facility policy Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation, revised 02/2026, documented the facility recognized all allegations of abuse, with or without injury, as falling into the immediate reporting category. All employees reported allegations of abuse immediately, but no later than two (2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-03 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective compliance and ethics program that is likely to be effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil, and administrative violations and promoting quality of care. Specifically, the facility failed to create and promote a program contact to which individuals may report suspected violations, as well as an alternate method of reporting suspected violations anonymously without fear of retribution. Findings include:The undated and unsigned facility policy Code of Conduct documented all affected individuals were to abide by standards outlined in the Code of Conduct and to conduct all business in a manner consistent with the facility policies set forth in the Code of Conduct and Compliance documents. Illegal acts or unethical conduct was not acceptable, staff were to perform duties with honesty and integrity, and supervisors and managers were responsible for ensuring that the affected individuals within their supervision were acting ethically and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure incidents of abuse were reported to the State Agency as required for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, on 09/10/2025 Resident #1 threw coffee at staff and subsequently hit another resident seated at the table; on 09/30/2025 Resident #1 hit Resident #3 on the cheek when Resident #3 attempted to take food from Resident #1's plate. The facility failed to report the resident to resident altercations to the New York State Department of Health as required. Findings include: The 09/2024 revised facility policy, Reporting and Monitoring Accidents and Incidents, documented the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Director of Investigations or designee was responsible to review all incidents for alleged abuse, mistreatment or neglect, injury of unknown origin or resident elopement. All incidents involving alleged abuse, mistreatment or neglect, injury of unknown origin, misappropriation of resident property, or resident elopement, must be reported to Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 exhibited escalation of behavioral symptoms including resident-to-resident altercations, and physical and verbal abuse directed toward others and there was no documented evidence of a comprehensive care plan addressing the resident's behavioral symptoms with specific interventions to be implemented. Findings include:Cross Reference to F 600 Free from Abuse and NeglectCross Reference to F 609 Reporting of Alleged violations The facility policy Care Planning/Care Conference, revised 05/20/2025, documented care plans should reflect person-centered care with resident specific interventions. Care plans are to be updated/initiated at the time of any change in the resident's status, needs, goals, and/or interventions. Resident #1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect were thoroughly investigated for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, on 02/24/2025, Resident #2 left the facility undetected, was last seen by staff at 2:00 PM, and their absence was not discovered until 5:45 PM. Resident #2 left the facility without their required oxygen and did not receive their medications or evening meal as ordered. There was no documented evidence of a thorough investigation when Resident #2 eloped from the facility on 02/24/2025. Findings include:Cross reference to F689: Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices and F 600 Free from Abuse and NeglectThe facility policy Reporting and Monitoring Accidents and Incidents revised 09/2024, documented to report and investigate any accident/incident involving a resident of the facility to rule out or report abuse, mistreatment or neglect as a cause of the incident, to the New York State Department of Health. All incidents would be reviewed for alleged abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that it provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) (Resident #11) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Resident #11 was administered four (4) liters of oxygen as prescribed, when assessed by the Respiratory Therapist for shortness of breath during the evening shift on 11/25/2025. This is evidenced by: Cross-referenced to F580: Notification of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, Etc.) Resident #11:Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of respiratory failure (condition where there's not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), unspecified whether with hypoxia (level of oxygen in the blood becomes dangerously low) or hypercapnia (level of carbon dioxide become dangerously high), obstructive sleep apnea (breathing is interrupted by the airway blocking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a survey, the facility failed to ensure it maintained medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, and that medical records on each resident were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for one (1) (Resident #11) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documentation in the medical record of [a.] an assessment of Resident #11 by Registered Nurse #8 when the resident had respiratory and mental status changes on 11/26/2025, [b.] the resident's response to oxygen treatment provided by Registered Nurse #8 and Licensed Practical Nurse #4 on 11/26/2025, and [c.] the resident's vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and temperature) on 11/26/2025. This is evidenced by: Cross-referenced to F580: Notification of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, Etc.)Resident #11:Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of respiratory failure (condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for seven (7) of seven (7) anonymous residents reviewed. Specifically, seven (7) anonymous residents stated staff use foul language, ethnic slurs and laugh at other residents in the hallways and around residents, making them feel uncomfortable.Findings include:The facility policy Dignity and Respect last revised 05/2025, documented residents had the right to be valued as an individual, to be treated with consideration, dignity and respect in full recognition of their self-worth. Residents were to be treated in a manner that enhanced their quality of life, free from humiliation, harassment or threats. Staff were to ensure residents were treated as individuals, provided residents with safe, clean and comfortable surroundings. The undated facility policy Code of Conduct documented that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services on five (5) of five (5) resident units. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that resident rooms and common areas were clean and in good repair.Findings include: During observations on 12/03/2025 from 10:11 AM through 3:00 PM, on 12/04/2025 from 8:31 AM through 9:16 AM, on 12/05/2025 from 8:33 AM through 1:30 PM, on 12/08/2025 from 9:41 AM to 10:34 AM, and on 12/10/2025 at 10:53 AM: Strong urine odors were detected in rooms #555, #566 (two (2) observations), and #671 and in the north elevator lobby area. The toilets in rooms #572, #558, #655, and #671 were soiled with black or brown stain marks in the bowl. The soap dispenser located within the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] was broken, and no soap was available. The paper towel dispenser was empty in rooms #565 and #568. The bedding had brown stains in room [ROOM NUMBER] (two (2) observations). The bedside table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality. Specifically, medication pass times were broad and carried a risk of over medicating or under medicating five (5) (Residents #1, 7, 11, 98, and 527) of five (5) residents reviewed. This affects all residents receiving medication at the facility. The findings are:Cross reference F 842: Resident Records - Identifiable InformationThe Policy and Procedure titled General Medication Administration dated 05/2025, stated scheduled medications requiring specific time increments for administration were to be administered no more than one (1) hour before or one (1) hour after the ordered time. These medications include but are not limited to insulins, oral antihyperglycemic agents, antibiotics, pain management medications, anti-seizure medications, anti-hypertensives, thyroid medications, and warfarin therapy.The Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration Times revised 05/2025, stated medications would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for six (6) (4th floor North Medication Cart C and D; 5th floor North Medication Cart A; 6th floor North Medication Cart C and D; 6th floor North Treatment cart used as a medication cart) of ten (10) medication carts reviewed, and five (5) (3rd floor North Medication Room; 4th floor North Medication Room C and D; 6th floor North Medication Room C and D) of nine (9) medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, (a.) five (5) insulin pens were not labeled and or dated; (b.) medication room refrigerator temperatures were not recorded; (c.) narcotic books were not reconciled each shift; (d.) narcotics were not secured in a double lockbox until use. (e.) a narcotic was not signed out upon administration; (f.) Loose pills were found in medication cart; (g.) three (3) multi-use vial medications had no resident name, open and or expiration dates; (h.) two (2) separate cups of pre-poured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) meals reviewed (lunch meal on 12/08/2025 and breakfast meal 12/09/2025). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal of 12/08/2025 and breakfast meal on 12/09/2025. Additionally, seven (7) anonymous residents during a resident council meeting and seven (7) residents (Resident's #4, 121, 175, 211, 238, 277, 493) separately interviewed stated the food did not taste good and was cold. Findings include:The 09/2025 revised facility policy Fine Dining Policy and Procedure documented the Certified Nursing Aides would serve the residents their food per meal ticket and would ensure the tray was accurate. The United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service guide provided by the facility stated hot food would be held at 140 degrees Fahrenheit or warmer and cold food would be held at 40 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for five (5) of five (5) resident unit kitchens and the main kitchen. Specifically, the automatic dishwashing machine was not sanitizing, the chemical sanitizer for manual equipment washing was too concentrated, and equipment and surfaces were not clean and/or in good repair. Findings include:During observations in the main kitchen on 12/03/2025 at 10:07 AM: The automatic dishwashing machine final rinse was zero (0) parts per million of chlorine. The automatic dishwashing machine information data plate stated that the final sanitizing rinse is to be 180 degrees Fahrenheit and provided no instruction for chemical sanitizing. The concentration of quaternary ammonium compound sanitizing chemical utilized in the manual sanitizing of food contact equipment was five hundred (500) parts per million when measured at 68 degrees Fahrenheit. The label directions on the sanitizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Specifically, the trash compactor loading area was unclean and heavily soiled. Findings include:During an observation on 12/03/2025 at 10:40 AM, the trash compactor and loading dock area (part of the refuse disposal area) were heavily soiled with black drip marks below the compactor access portal, splash marks and discoloration on the walls, and cobwebs throughout the area. During an interview on 12/08/2025 at 3:45 PM, Director of Environmental Services #1 stated that they would thoroughly clean the trash compactor and loading dock area. 10 New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations 415.14(h)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, administration failed to ensure residents' rights to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Administration failed to ensure that their infection prevention and control program was developed and implemented to prevent the spread of infectious diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, and visitors.Findings include:Refer to F584 Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike environment-S/S-FRefer to F880 Infection Control Prevention-S/S-FRefer to F804 Food Nutritive Value/Appearance, Palatability/Prefer Temperatures-S/S=F Refer to F812 Food Procurement Storage/Prepare/Serve in Sanitary Conditions-S/S=F The facility job description Administrator, undated, documented the Administrator reports to the Corporate Chief Operating Officer and directs all aspects of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, (a.) documentation for oxygen tubing for Resident #143 was not kept in an accurate and professional record; and (b.) full access to medical records was not granted on request as required by regulation.The findings include:The facility Policy and Procedure titled Oxygen Therapy dated 04/04/2024 stated oxygen tubing was to be changed every two (2) weeks per order and was to be labeled, dated, and documented in the administration record.The Policy and Procedure titled General Medication Administration dated 05/2025 stated all medications and treatments should be documented as administered at the time they are given. Resident #143Resident #143 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (when the respiratory system cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body) with hypoxia (when oxygen is insufficient at the tissue level to maintain adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility did not implement systems that ensured the care and services it delivered met acceptable standards of quality in accordance with recognized standards of practice. The facility had repeat deficiencies in the areas of Resident Rights (F550), Self-Administration of Medications (F554), Self-determination (F561), Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment (F584), Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans (F656), Quality of Care (F684), Label/Storage of Drugs and Biologicals (F761), Food Nutritive Value/Appearance, Palatability/Prefer Temperatures (F804), Food Procurement Storage/Prepare/Serve in Sanitary Conditions (F812), and Infection Prevention and Control (F880). Findings includeRefer to F550 Resident Rights- S/S-ERefer to F554 Self-Administration of Medications- S/S-DRefer to F561…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) (Resident #11 and Resident #336) of two (2) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #11 and Resident # 336 were observed with their urinary drainage bag on the floor without a barrier separating the floor from the drainage bag; the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not functioning for the duration of the survey, and the resident (Resident #5) in room [ROOM NUMBER] was on enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, Resident's #11, #64, #467, #478, #542, and #651 were diagnosed with influenza and multiple unvaccinated staff were observed in resident areas not wearing a facemask or wearing a facemask improperly.Findings include:The facility policy Infection Control revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented to ensure a resident's nursing needs were met for three (3) (Residents #1, #7, and #98) of 38 residents reviewed. Specifically, a.) Resident #1's comprehensive care plan for dementia was not person-centered and there were no care plan addressing activities, b.) Resident #7's comprehensive care plan did not address the use of anticoagulants, and insulin, and c.) Resident #98 did not have a care plan initiated for oxygen use. Findings include: The facility policy titled Care Planning/Care Conference, last reviewed 05/20/2025, documented the purpose of the comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed for each resident to include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. The comprehensive care plan should reflect person-centered care with resident specific interventions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide ongoing programs to support each resident in their choice of activities for two (2) (Resident #15 and #163) of two (2) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #15 was not offered meaningful activities that included their interests and preferences, and Resident #163 was not included in activities of their preference. Findings include:The facility policy Activities/Therapeutic Recreation Program Policy effective 10/2025 documented the facility provided a structured and individualized program of activities and therapeutic recreation that meets the interests and enhances the quality of life for residents residing at the facility. Each resident had the opportunity to engage in meaningful activities designed to promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with their comprehensive care plan, preferences, and abilities. Resident #15 had diagnoses including cerebral palsy (group of movement disorders), cortical blindness (vision loss from damage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility received the appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain mobility and prevent complications for two (2) (Residents #15 and #301) of two (2) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #15 did not consistently receive a hand device (palm guard) to right hand and Resident #301 did not consistently receive a rolled cloth to left hand for hand contractures (shortening of the muscles, tendons, and skin) to prevent complications per Occupational Therapy recommendations and as ordered by the physician.Findings include: The facility policy titled Splints revised 11/2025, documented the Occupational Therapy department will evaluate the resident to determine need for splinting and determine type of splint to be used. An order recommendation will be written stating instructions to nursing staff on application, length of time it is to be worn, and precautions.Resident #15 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the survey, the facility failed ensure residents who required dialysis services, received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) (Resident #14) of one (1) resident reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, Resident #14 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and/or after dialysis treatments. Findings include:Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer work as they should), status post sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), and congestive heart failure (long-term condition that happens when your heart cannot pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 11/28/2025, documented resident was cognitively intact, could be understood, and understand others. The facility's policy and procedure titled; Dialysis, reviewed 08/2025, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed five (5) percent for two (2) (Resident #303 and Resident #352) of five (5) residents observed during a medication pass for a total of 28 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 10.71 percent. Findings Include:The facility's policy and procedure titled General Medication Administration last reviewed 05/2025, documented medications will be administered by a Licensed Practical Nurse or a Registered Nurse. All medications will be administered and documented using the Electronic Medical Record. Check all resident orders carefully before administering the medications. Keep the basic rules of safe administration in mind: right drug, right resident, right time, right dose, right route, review for allergies, and review expiration date of medication. Avoid distractions when administering medications. Carefully check the resident's identification band before administering any medication. Do not leave medications at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment on three (3) of five (5) resident units. Specifically, strong urine odors were detected in several areas throughout the facility. Findings include: During observations on 12/03/2025 from 10:11 AM through 3:00 PM, on 12/04/2025 from 8:31 AM through 9:16 AM, on 12/05/2025 from 8:33 AM through 1:30 PM, on 12/08/2025 from 9:41 AM to 10:34 AM, and again on 12/10/2025 at 10:53 AM, strong urine odors were detected in rooms #555, 566 (two (2) observations), and 671 and in the north elevator lobby area on the third floor. During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 3:01 PM, Director of Environmental Services #1 stated that they would contact the nursing department to help investigate the odors. 10 New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations 483.90(i)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine a resident's ability to safely administer their own medications, if clinically appropriate, for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed (Resident #314). Specifically, Resident #314 was observed on 12/03/2025 and 12/05/2025 with a bottle of unprescribed Clinical Treat Anti-Fungal Powder (treats fungal or yeast infections of the skin) NDC #5332916979 sitting on their bedside table in their room. There was no documented evidence of an assessment in the medical record and/or a physician order for the resident to self-administer the medication. The finding is:The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Self-Administration of Medications revised 08/2020, documented in order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team (or equivalent) has determined that the practice would be safe for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant for one (1) (Resident #211) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #211 was not provided with food items recommended by the nutritionist's meal plan and resident's preferences, requiring the resident to purchase recommended items from an outside source. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Resident Orientation Handbook, documented residents have the right to be offered choices and allowed to make decisions and to receive services with reasonable accommodations for individual needs and preferences. Resident #211 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer of the lymphatic system), pain, and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 09/24/2025 documented the resident was cognitively intact, could be understood and understands others. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised 11/04/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to file a grievance and/or prompt efforts were made to resolve grievance for one (1) (Resident #380) of three (3) residents reviewed for grievances. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a grievance was filed, an investigation was conducted, and/or a grievance was resolved when Resident #380's responsible party reported to staff the resident was missing a new pair of sneakers and multiple clothing items. The finding is:The policy titled Lost or Missing Items, review/revision dated 05/16/2025, documented the facility will review and investigate all lost and missing items and unauthorized use or removal of resident's property. Upon noting a loss, the staff receiving the complaint or designee will initiate the missing items report form and include all known information about the item. Staff will follow the checklist on the missing item form to search for the item. If the item is not found, staff will notate that on the form, and the form will be forwarded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (1) (Resident #1) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was observed to have an old bandage on their left forearm with no documentation in the resident's medical records.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder affecting movement), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids), and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/10/2025 documented the resident was understood, could understand others and was cognitively intact.During an observation on 12/04/2025 at 9:54 AM, a bandage was noted on Resident #1's left forearm dated 12/01/2025. Resident #1 stated they did not know what was under the bandage but that it might be a skin tear.During an observation on 12/05/2025 at 11:47 AM, the bandage was noted to still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' physician orders for one (1) (Resident #143) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #143 was observed with oxygen tubing dated [DATE] and not changed as ordered. The finding is: The facility policy Oxygen Therapy Policy and Procedure revised [DATE] documented nasal cannula or OxyMask were labeled and dated when set up. Nasal cannulas or OxyMasks were changed every two (2) weeks or as needed if visibly soiled. When the nasal cannula or OxyMask was changed it was labeled, dated, and documented in the administration record. Resident #143 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (tissues do not get enough oxygen to function properly), pneumonia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00361295), the facility did not ensure they provided or obtained routine and emergency medications and biologicals in order to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and 4). Specifically: Resident #2 had physician orders for Lithium (psychotropic medication for mood stabilization), the Lithium was not obtained timely and as a consequence, the resident had a low Lithium blood level. Resident #4 was a newly admitted and had physician orders for Sevelmer and cinacalcet ( for kidney disease) and the medications were not obtained timely (11 days). Findings include:The 9/2018 facility policy, “Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications,” documented medications and related products were received from the pharmacy on a timely basis. Medications were reordered based on estimated refill date and the pharmacy prescription label, or at least 3 days in advance to ensure adequate supply was on hand. The refill order was called in, faxed, sent electronically, or otherwise transmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00358079) survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for five (5) of five (5) resident floors (3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th floors). Specifically, the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th floors had unattended and unlocked treatment/medication carts; the 3rd, 4th, and 7th floors had medication refrigerators without daily temperature monitoring; the 3rd, 5th, and 6th floors had medications without open dates; and the 4th and 7th floors medication rooms had an excessive number of discontinued medications. Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medications, dated 8/2020, documented all medications dispensed by the pharmacy were stored in the pharmacy container with the pharmacy label. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial was initially broken, the container or vial would be dated. If a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen, and 1 of 2 (Northwest Unit) kitchenette nourishment areas. Specifically, food was held at the improper temperature for service during two (2) meals observed that could have affected all residents, eight (8) of nine (9) handwashing sinks were not properly equipped in the food production and service areas and improper handwashing was observed. Findings include: The facility policy, Fine Dining Policy and Procedure, dated revised 3/2025, did not document temperatures of meals during service. The undated facility Meal Service Food Temperature Log documented the hot food items measured should have been between 135 and 155 degrees Fahrenheit. If they fell below the standard they were to reheat the item to 165 degrees Fahrenheit and document the corrective action. The facility policy, Hand Washing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four (4) of six (6) resident units (Units 3 North and South, Units 4 North and South, Units 6 North and South, and Unit 7) reviewed. Specifically, several residents' rooms and common living areas were unclean, had scraped or cracked walls, dirty soiled linens left on the floors, dirty tables and chairs, several pieces of paper trash collecting on resident floors, and there were unpleasant/offensive odors. Findings include: The facility policy Dignity and Respect, dated 8/2023 documented staff must ensure they provided residents with a safe, clean, and comfortable room and surroundings. Units 3 North and South The following observations were made on 4/6/2025: - at 9:30 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had a scraped wall behind the bed, the wall under the base board was crumbling, there was a hole cut out for an electric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 4 of 6 residents (Residents #27, #167, #274, and #419) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #27 had an order not to receive straws due to oral phase dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and was observed using straws; Resident #167 had medications left at their bedside; Resident #274 had a used needle and vacuum from a blood draw disposed of in the trash can in their room; and Resident #419 sustained a burn after using a microwave independently to heat food. Findings include: The facility policy Standard Precautions, revised 6/2019, documented used disposable needles would be placed in appropriate puncture-resistant containers located as close as practical to the area in which the items were used. The facility policy, Reheating of foods, effective 1/8/2020 documented food would be reheated to appropriate temperatures for resident satisfaction and to ensure food safety by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for three (3) of three (3) meals reviewed (Lunch meals on 4/6/2025 and 4/8/2025). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 4/6/2025 and two (2) lunch meals on 4/8/2025. Additionally, 12 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting and six (6) residents (Resident #80, 160, 285 336, 355, and 425) interviewed stated the food did not taste good and was cold. Findings include: The undated facility Meal Service Food Temperature Log documented holding temperatures were hot beverages and soups greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit; hot food items greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit, and cold food and beverages 45 degrees Fahrenheit or less. If hot food temperatures fell below standards, it must be reheated to 165 degrees F and hold temperature for 15 seconds. During an interview with Resident #336…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted from 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for three (3) of five (5) (Resident #306, 336, and 704) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #306 was missing food items including their nutritional supplements at meals; Resident #336 was missing food items at meals; and Resident #740 was missing food items including their nutritional supplements at meals. Additionally, 12 anonymous residents during a resident council meeting and five (5) residents (Resident #80, 160, 210, 355, and 480) interviewed stated their meal trays were frequently missing food items. Findings include: The facility policy Fine Dining, revised 3/2025 documented certified nurse aides would serve residents their food per their meal ticket and ensure proper accuracy. Nursing staff would be assigned to deliver and monitor the residents with room trays. 1) Resident #306 had diagnoses including dementia and failure to thrive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for the administrative area and for 3 of 7 units (3rd, 4th, and 6th floors) reviewed. Specifically, there were fruit flies observed in the administrative area, and the 3rd, 4th, and 6th floors. Findings include: The facility policy, Insect and Rodent Control, revised 3/2020 documented to prevent insect and rodent entry into the facility, the facility would ensure proper cleaning of the facility daily per Centers for Medicare and Medicaid policies and procedures, proper food storage in the facility, ability to identify rodent infestation and notify proper personnel when a rodent infestation was identified. An outside vendor was contracted to manage insect and rodents at the facility and vendor books would be placed at the nursing stations for staff to update and report any sightings. The vendor would follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure the interdisciplinary team determined a resident's ability to appropriately self-administer medications for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #50) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #50 had medications in their room they stated they could self-administer. Findings include: The facility policy, Self-Administration of Medications, revised 8/2020, documented if the resident desired to self-administer medications, the interdisciplinary team conducted an assessment of the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process. Resident #50 had diagnoses including deafness, pain, and atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in the arteries). The 3/4/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised 12/30/2024 documented the resident's cognition, psychosocial, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property/funds for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #50 and #102) reviewed. Specifically, Activity Aide #5 had possession of Resident #50's money; and Resident #102 had multiple bags of deposit cans redeemable for cash removed from their room and did not receive the deposit money. Findings include: The 10/2028 facility Staff Member Handbook documented the expectation was all staff members would conduct themselves in a professional manner that would contribute to the provision of the highest quality of care for the residents and the safety and security of residents. Just cause for discipline, up to and including termination would include but not be limited to: accepting gratuities (except for in kind gifts of a minimal value, e.g., baked goods) from residents, family members, supplies, or vendors. 1) Resident #50 had diagnoses including deafness, and non-speaking. The 3/4/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one (1) of nine (9) residents (Resident #50) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not complete a timely investigation when they were notified a facility staff member was in possession of Resident #50's money (see F 602) and did not report the incident to the New York State Department of Health as required. Findings include: The facility policy Reporting and Monitoring Accidents and Incidents, revised 9/2024 documented all incidents were reviewed for alleged abuse, mistreatment, neglect, injury of unknown origin, misappropriation of resident property, or resident elopement and must be reported to Administration immediately. The incident report system was used to document, assess, investigate and develop interventions for any accident/ incident that involved a resident. A description of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025 - 4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of resident assessments reflective of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Det assessment for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #200) reviewed. Specifically, the most recent Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment inaccurately documented the resident as nonverbal and severely cognitively impaired. Findings include: The facility policy Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised 6/24/2016, documented all personnel who complete any portion of the Minimum Data Set Assessment, tracking form, or correction request form must sign assessment certifying the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Resident #200 had diagnoses cancer of the mouth and throat with absence of larynx (voice box) and had a tracheostomy (a hole created in the neck into the windpipe). The 2/18/2025 Minimum Data Set Assessment documented the resident had absence of spoken word, was sometimes able to express ideas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #372) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #372 did not have their wheelchair leg rests applied or included in their care plan as recommended by physical therapy. The facility policy Care Planning/Care Conference, issued 8/7/2024 documented the Comprehensive Care Plan should describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical needs and preferences and how the facility would assist in meeting those needs and preferences. The facility policy Wheelchair Transporting (Leg Rest), 2/2017 documented wheelchair leg rests must be used for all residents at all times unless otherwise care planned. Resident #372 had diagnoses including edema (swelling caused by fluid), gout (a type of arthritis), and rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for five (5) of five (5) resident units (Units 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed. Specifically, direct care staff wore electronic earbuds; were scrolling or talking on their personal phones in resident care areas; and were observed in the breakroom for extended periods longer than documented break/mealtimes or at the end of their shifts. Additionally, 12 of 12 residents present at the Resident Council Meeting complained staff did not answer their call bells timely, were rude, and made them feel disrespected. Findings include: The facility Staff Member Handbook, revised 10/2018, documented staff were permitted one 15-minute break for each 7.5 hours of work per day and a half hour meal period during a shift that lasted more than six hours. Cell phones were not to be used during working hours and may only be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00374160) surveys conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two (2) of five (5) residents (Residents #160 and #336) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #160 and #336 were not provided with oral hygiene or hair care. Findings include: The facility policy Hygiene/Grooming, revised 3/2023, documented personal hygiene, skin integrity, personal dignity, and a feeling of well-being was maintained for each resident. Residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living received a partial bed bath daily. Residents were provided the opportunity for a bed bath, shower, or whirlpool once a week unless otherwise indicated in their plan of care. Resident hygiene included hair care, nail care, foot care, and mouth care. 1) Resident #160…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing of pressure ulcers for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #71 and #114) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #71's and #114's physician orders for alternating air mattresses (a specialty mattress providing air flow to relieve pressure) did not include individualized settings and the mattresses were not monitored to ensure appropriate settings for the resident's current weights. Findings include: The Alternating Air Mattress Manual documented it was recommended the pressure-selector knob was set to firm or pressed auto firm on the touch panel each time the mattress was first inflated. Thereafter the air mattress was easily adjusted to the desired firmness according to the patient's weight. 1) Resident #71 had diagnoses including left sided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two (2) of two (2) Residents (Residents #306 and #740) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #306 had significant weight loss and did not receive fortified cran-apple juice, Magic Cups (fortified frozen dessert) and double portioned entrees as planned; and Resident #740 had significant weight loss and planned preferred food items for weight maintenance were missing from their meal trays. Additionally, Resident #306 was not assisted with eating in a dignified manner. The facility policy Comprehensive Nutritional Assessment, revised 9/2023 documented the Registered Dietitian or designee helped identify nutritional risk factors and recommended nutritional interventions based on the individual's medical condition, needs, desires, and goals. The facility policy Fine Dining, revised 3/2025 documented certified nurse aides would serve residents their food per their meal ticket and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted [DATE]-[DATE], the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Residents #179) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #179 did not have their prescribed pain patch placed as ordered and the pain patch was signed as administered. Findings include: The facility policy Pain Management Program, effective [DATE] documented pain would be managed and assessed to promote optimal functioning and maintain quality of life. The facility Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, revised 11/2021, documented the nurse administering medication was responsible to administer the right medication to the right resident in the right dose at the right time, using the right method of administration and the right method of documentation. Resident #179 had diagnoses including pain, morbid obesity, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not provide on-going assessment and monitoring of bed rails (side rails) for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #41) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #41 had bed rails on both sides of the bed and did not have an order for bed rails, a comprehensive care plan that included the use of bed rails, regular maintenance inspections for entrapment, or regular assessments to ensure the bed rails remained appropriate. Findings include: There was no documented evidence of a facility policy for the use of bedrails. Resident #41 had diagnoses including quadriplegia (weakness or paralysis of arms and legs), reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. The 2/27/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent for all activities of daily living, and did not reject care. The Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 1/29/2024 and revised 12/8/2024, documented the resident was dependent for activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, was reviewed by the medical provider for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #322) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #322 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with sliding scale insulin (the amount of insulin administered was based on the blood glucose readings) instructions that were not initiated, the resident's finger sticks (blood glucose readings) were not consistently done as ordered and there was no evidence the provider was aware. Subsequently, the resident was readmitted to the hospital with hyperglycemia (above normal blood glucose levels). Findings include: There were no documented facility policies on Admission/readmission medical orders. Resident #322 had diagnoses including diabetes and end stage kidney disease. The 10/9/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-04-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification surveys conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #1098) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1098 was administered lispro insulin (a fast-acting insulin) and was not provided food. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, last revised 11/2021, documented when medications were ordered before or after meals, assure the medicine was given correctly in relationship to meals Resident #1098 had diagnoses including diabetes. The 4/1/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition, required set up assistance for eating, and received insulin injections daily. The Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 3/31/2025, documented the resident had diabetes with hyperglycemia. Interventions included monitor for signs and symptoms of high glucose levels and insulin shock. The 4/1/2025 Nurse Practitioner #23's orders documented a glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00358079 and NY00376311) surveys conducted 4/6/2025-4/18/2025, the facility did not assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency dental care for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #102 and #336) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #336 did not receive their dentures as planned and Resident #102 was not scheduled for an outside dental consult for a tooth extraction as recommended by the in-house dentist. Findings include: 1) Resident #336 had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), obesity, and dehydration. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff with activities of daily living, did not have broken natural teeth, or mouth pain/discomfort with chewing. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised 4/14/2025 documented an activities of daily living deficit. Interventions included dependency on one staff for assisting with oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00325653) the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 2 of 4 nursing floors (4th and 5th floors) reviewed. Specifically, there was evidence of cockroaches on the 4th and 5th floors. Findings include: The facility policy Pest Control revised 8/2019 documented work orders will be placed for maintenance to address areas that may facilitate pests access or harbor growth, for example, unsealed cracks or holes in walls/doors, or low grout that collects food debris and water. An approved pest control contractor comes into complete routine preventative treatments at prescheduled times. Staff will report pest sightings via the pest sighting logs. Sightings will report the type, number, and location of pests noted. If a pest situation is reported, maintenance may treat the area and will request the contractor come in as soon as possible to treat the areas identified. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00323044, NY00322098) the facility did not ensure that the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman received a written notice of transfer or discharge at least 30 days before the resident was transferred or discharged for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and 2). Specifically, Residents #1 and 2 were issued facility-initiated discharge notices and the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman were not provided the notifications. Findings incude: The Discharge Planning policy revised 3/2018 did not contain any information related to notification of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman when residents were discharged . On 9/11/2023 at 4:08 PM, the Administrator stated there were no other polices related to any aspect of discharges, including discharge planning, notices, or facility-initiated discharges. 1) Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), personal history of self-harm, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. The 7/15/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that meals were provided at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community, nor did the facility provide suitable, nourishing alternative snacks for residents waiting for meals. Specifically, dinner service on 05/11/2026, on the 4th floor took over two hours to complete, resulting in residents sitting at tables waiting for food while others ate, and the snack pantry was found to be without nourishing options. This was evident for all residents on the 4th floor. Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled, Fine Dining, last revised on 09/2025, documented that mealtimes have a positive impact on the resident's physical, psychological, emotional, and social well-being. Mealtimes will be as follows: breakfast at 7:30 AM, lunch at 12:00 PM, and dinner at 5:30 PM. A document titled, Meal Times, stated the mealtimes for breakfast were 7:30 AM through 9:00 AM, lunch at 12:00 PM through 1:30 PM, and dinner at 5:30 PM through 7:00 PM. Review of a photograph…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$783,273 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $190,450 — penalty dated 2026-05-13
  • $238,135 — penalty dated 2025-12-15
  • $158,555 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
  • $9,620 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
  • $186,513 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-18 for 43 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KOENIG, URIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST60%since 12/22/2010
STEIF, EFRAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL40%since 08/15/2017
AUGENSTEIN, JACKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2013
WUERTZER, AMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/14/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$40.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$11.1M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 3%Other / private 25%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $11.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$382per resident / day
operating cost
$11,603per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next