Van Rensselaer Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 362 beds and averages 266.7 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 95 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated complaint survey (Case #NY00357407), the facility did not ensure personnels ability to provide emergency basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to residents requiring such care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel in accordance with the resident's advance directives and subject to related physician orders for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Resident #1's advance directive status was known during a significant change in the resident's respiratory condition on [DATE]. The facility failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a timely manner for a resident that was a full code and was in cardiopulmonary arrest (a resident without a pulse or respiration). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance for Resident #1 with the potential for serious harm to the health and safety of all residents in the facility and Substandard Quality of Care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, during a recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #59) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Specifically, for Resident #59, the facility failed to follow the Nurse Practitioner's readmission plan for the resident to have a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). The facility failed to notify the physician/nurse practitioner (NP) on multiple occasions for directions based on condition changes related to the resident's Foley catheter and urinary status, and did not obtain a urine specimen timely to determine the presence of an infection. urologisThis resulted in a hospitalization in the ICU for urosepsis (a disease that is caused by an infection in the urinary tract involving of an accumulation of pus-forming bacteria or their toxins in the blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed (Resident #143) and B1 unit. Specifically, staff failed to maintain discretion regarding resident conditions, used inappropriate and unprofessional language in resident care areas, interacted with a resident in a reprimanding manner during medication administration, and displayed non-dignified signage in a public area. These failures had the potential to cause emotional distress and negatively impact resident dignity and the facility environment.Findings include:Facility document titled, Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident in New York State published by the New York State Department of Health, documented residents had the right to be valued as an individual, to be treated with consideration, dignity and respect in full recognition of their self-worth. Residents had the right to be cared for in a manner that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the survey, the facility failed to provide effective maintenance services on seven (7) of seven (7) resident units. Specifically, several walls were in various states of disrepair. Findings include:During facility tours on 3/24/2026 through 3/27/2026 between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM, walls corners and baseboards were found to be in a state of disrepair at seven (7) of seven (7) of the active nursing stations and in seven (7) of seven (7) of the unit dining rooms. Walls in the following resident rooms walls were identified to be in a state of disrepair:A104A112A122B102A205A214A213 During interview, on 3/25/2026 at 1:45 PM, Director of Security #1 stated that the facility had focused on ensuring the safety of the residents when it came to prioritizing repairs and that the facility was currently undergoing renovations where almost all identified items would be replaced. 10 New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations 415.14(h)

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations were investigated, prevented, or corrected according to professional standards for two (2) (Resident #31 and #271) of 12 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #271 was found on the floor of their room with an injury of unknown origin; an investigation was started and closed without any documented statements from the resident or persons identifying how the injury occurred. Resident #31 reported a missing tote of clothing; an investigation was started and closed without a documented outcome. Findings include:The policy titled Abuse/Neglect revised 11/2024, documented investigations were to be completed for possible abuse or crime. Interviews were to be obtained from the resident and any person/s who may be able to provide information. The information is reviewed by nursing administration at the onset, during, and at the close of the investigation. The Director of Nursing or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented according to professional standards for three (3) (Residents #94, 132, and 192) of 41 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #94 did not have a care plan for Self-Administration of Medication, Resident #132 did not have a care plan for alcohol use, and Resident #192 had a care plan titled Nutrition with an intervention of lab draws yearly that was not implemented. Findings include:The policy titled Care Planning revised 07/2025, documented a comprehensive person-centered care plan would include detailed information and direction to meet an individual needs. The care plan was to have evaluation/monitoring notes with all changes and quarterly reviews. The policy titled Resident Alcohol Use last reviewed 11/12/2025, documented residents may consume alcohol in accordance with their rights, clinical condition, and individualized care plan. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were revised according to professional standards for one (1) (Resident #192) of 41 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #192 had a care plan titled Nutrition that was reviewed on 3/26/2026 but not revised to reflect the resident's current status. Findings include:Resident #192 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), hypertensive heart disease (elevated bloods pressure), and gout (inflammatory arthritis that causes pain and swelling in your joints). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/12/2025 documented the resident was usually understood, could usually understand others, and was severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 3/31/2026 at 11:45 AM, Dietitian #1 acknowledged they had reviewed the care plan on 3/26/2026 without revision despite no albumin levels being performed every 180 days. They stated the care plan should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary medications for three (3) (Resident #13, 31, and 231) out of seven (7) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #13 and #231 had psychotropic drugs ordered on 03/04/2026 with no end and or renewal date. Resident #13 also had scheduled pain management narcotics ordered two (2) times a day routine and every four (4) hours as needed with no end dates. Findings include: Resident #231 Resident #231 was admitted with diagnoses paraplegia (paralysis of lower extremities), Parkinsonism (a progressive movement disorder of the nervous system) and neuromuscular disfunction of bladder (when a problem with your brain, nerves or spinal cord causes you to lose control of your bladder).The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/15/2026, documented they could be understood, understand others, and was cognitively intact. Review of physician order by Nurse Practitioner #2 dated 03/19/2025, documented Oxycodone five (5) milligrams, give one and a half (1.5) tablets by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served following professional standards for food service safety in seven (7) of seven (7) resident unit nutrition rooms and the central kitchen. Specifically, several items were found without expiration dates and proper food cooling procedures were not followed.Findings include:During inspection in the central kitchen on 3/23/2026 between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM, the following items were found to be out of compliance with New York State food safety regulations:Cold, facility-made sandwiches were identified without proper expiration dates in the following areas:Sandwich prep station refrigerator in main kitchen;3A Dietary refrigerator;1B Dietary refrigerator;3B nutrition refrigerator.The temperature logs for the dietary refrigerators on all units were not completed for every day.No unit was able to provide temperature logs for resident-owned refrigerators.During kitchen tour a full-size kitchen pan filled with beef stew was identified in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and the facility did not ensure that resident identifiable information was not released to the public according to professional standards, complete and accurate for five (5) of five (5) units and one (1) (Resident #271) of one (1) resident. Specifically, a) narcotic count record books for five (5) of five (5) units were incomplete, b) for Resident #271, nebulizer tubing was labeled with date of 03/08/2026 and the treatment administration record was signed weekly for tubing changes through the remainder of 03/2026, and c) two (2) of two (2) laptop computers were left unattended on medication carts with resident identifiable information accessible. Findings include:A review of the narcotic count record book for unit A2 documented blank spaces forOncoming nurse did not sign for 03/23/2026 at 7:00 AM.A review of the narcotic count record book for unit A3 team 2 documented blank spaces forOncoming…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for one (1) (Resident #1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was left alone on the floor after fall for upwards of four (4) minutes after Certified Nurse Aide #1 physically abused them by causing the resident to fall from their wheelchair.This is evidenced by:Cross referenced to F600The facility's undated Resident Handbook, presented as the facility dignity policy, documented 'as a nursing home resident, you have the right to: dignity, respect and a comfortable living environment; quality of care and treatment without discrimination; freedom of choice to make your own, independent decisions; be informed in writing about services and fees before you enter the nursing home; the safeguard of your property and money; safeguards in admission transfer and discharge; privacy in communications; choose your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (Case #2591142), the facility did not prevent willful infliction of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment for two (2) (Resident # 1, and 3) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Specifically, the facility did not fully investigate an incident that occurred on 08/02/2025 when Certified Nurse Aide #1 lowered Resident #1 to the floor. Video footage captured on 08/02/2025 was viewed by facility staff on 08/14/2025 and showed abusive handling of Resident #1 that resulted in the resident falling to the floor and remaining unattended for four (4) minutes.This is evidenced by: The Facility's Abuse & Neglect Policy, updated on 04/03/2025, documented residents had the right to be free from neglect, verbal, sexual, physical or mental abuse, corporal punishment, exploitation and involuntary seclusion. Record review of the facility's abuse investigation dated 08/15/2025 through 09/03/2025 revealed Certified Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,645 — penalty dated 2025-01-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY