Masonic Care Community Of New York

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 297.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated (iQIES incident #2607732) survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for two (2) of five (5,) residents (Residents #1 and #3) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 was at risk for elopement and exited the facility undetected on 09/03/2025 and 10/25/2025; and Resident #3 left the facility grounds on 07/25/2025, undetected, on their motorized scooter and was found two (2) hours later at a fast-food restaurant approximately four (4) miles away. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Resident #1 and #3 and placed all 59 residents with exit-seeking behaviors at risk for serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death. The facility policy Elopement Risk Screen, revised 07/2011, documented staff would monitor a resident's whereabouts to ensure they remained within the facility. In the event of an elopement or elopement attempt, staff notified the Nurse Manager or supervisor. The policy did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to exercise their rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States to include sending and receiving mail and to receive letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility for all 296 of 296 residents residing in the facility. Specifically, mail was not delivered to residents promptly to include Saturdays.Findings include: The facility policy Resident Mail, last reviewed 9/2025, documented incoming mail would be sorted and distributed daily. The mail was to be given to the resident or placed in a secure location and not opened by staff unless requested or authorized to do so.The facility policy Resident [NAME] of Rights, last reviewed 05/2020, documented residents had the right to send and receive mail promptly and unopened.During an anonymous resident meeting on 03/31/2026 at 3:07 PM, 13 out of 13 anonymous residents stated they only received mail Monday through Friday, and never on Saturdays.During an interview on 04/03/2026 at 10:44…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2722137) the facility failed to ensure routine and emergency drugs and biologicals were provided to two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #14 and #247) reviewed. Specifically, three (3) doses of Resident #14's alprazolam (used to treat anxiety) were not administered due to the medication not being available from pharmacy; and Resident #247 was not administered five different medications (diltiazem, methimazole, nadolol, hydralazine, and lisinopril) between February 2026 and March 2026 due to the medications not being available from pharmacy. Findings include:The facility policy Medication Administration, revised 10/2025, documented if a medication was not available at the time it was to be administered, the nurse was to notify the neighborhood manager or supervisor. The neighborhood manager or supervisor would explore alternate methods for obtaining the medication such as the emergency medication supply, contacting the pharmacy, or contacting medical for alternate medication. The facility policy Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to choose activities and health care services consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care and the right to participate in social and community activities for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #133 and #281) reviewed and for 13 of 13 anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting. Specifically, Residents #133 and #281 and 13 anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting expressed their displeasure with not being able to go outside on facility grounds without supervision.Findings include: The facility policy Resident [NAME] of Rights, last reviewed 05/2020, documented residents had the right to make choices about aspects of their life that were significant to them. The facility would meet their individual needs and preferences to the extent possible, except where health and safety of the residents would be endangered. Residents had the right to participate in the development of their person-centered plan of care. During a resident meeting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for five (5) of eleven (11) medication carts ([NAME], [NAME], Westchester, Manhattan, and Placid Neighborhoods) reviewed. Specifically, the Placid Neighborhood narcotic box contained 30 morphine (opiate) syringes and 57 lorazepam (anti-anxiety) syringes belonging to a deceased resident; the Manhattan Neighborhood medication cart contained one (1) morphine syringe without a resident's name on the label; the Westchester Neighborhood medication cart contained three (3) pre-poured medication cups; the [NAME] Neighborhood medication cart contained expired eye drops and a nasal spray that was not labeled with an open date; and the [NAME] Neighborhood medication cart had expired and undated nasal sprays.Findings included: The facility policy Medication Administration, revised 10/2025, documented controlled medications were placed in the double…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) test trays (the 03/30/2026 lunch meal and the 04/01/2026 lunch meal), 13 of 13 anonymous residents during a resident meeting, and one (1) resident (Resident #11) reviewed. Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during lunch meals on 03/30/2026 and 04/01/2026; 13 anonymous residents during a resident council and Resident #11 stated the food was cold. Additionally, multiple meal trays were observed sitting for 30-60 minutes prior to resident consumption; and the facility did not have a procedure in place to ensure food was properly re-heated on the resident units to the required temperatures. Findings include: The facility policy Taste and Temperature Control, revised 05/2023, documented cold food such as milk, juice, and ice cream, should be refrigerated or on ice during meal service to maintain proper temperature. There was no documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness in one (1) of one (1) main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had unlabeled/undated prepared and leftover food; and dishwashing machine temperatures were not monitored routinely. Findings include:The facility policy Mechanical Wear (ware) washing, revised 05/2023, documented warewashing temperatures would be taken and recorded in the supervisor monitoring log during each meal period. Food Storage During an observation and interview on 03/30/2026 at 9:56 AM, the following was observed in the main kitchen:-two pans of prepared and cooked food in the reach-in cooler, identified by Food Service Director #6 as leftover hashbrowns and ground chicken, were not labeled or dated; -one pan of prepared and cooked food in the walk-in cooler, identified by Food Service Director #6 as leftover kielbasa, was not covered, labeled, or dated; -three pans of prepared and cooked food in the walk-in cooler, identified by Food Service Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #30, #190, and #288) reviewed. Specifically, staff stood over Residents #30, #190, and #288 while assisting them with feeding.Findings include:The facility policy Resident Dignity, revised 09/2025, documented the facility ensured all residents were treated with dignity and provided residents with a dignified dining experience. 1) Resident #30 had diagnoses including Alzheimer disease and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 12/31/2025 Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required substantial/ maximum assistance with eating, and received a mechanically altered diet. The Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 08/13/2024 and revised 03/31/2026, documented the resident required substantial/ maximum assistance with eating.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined a resident's ability to safely administer their own medications, if clinically appropriate, for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #299) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #299 had a large bottle of acetaminophen (pain reliever), a tube of Neosporin (antibiotic ointment), a bottle of antacids, loperamide gel capsule (antidiarrhea medication), and a medication cup with several different pills in their room. There was no documented evidence of assessments and/or physician orders for the resident to safely self-administer medications. Findings included:The facility policy Medication Administration, revised 10/2025, documented nurses were to remain with the resident until medications were swallowed. They were not to leave medication with the resident to be taken later unless it was ordered by medical and care planned. The facility policy Self-Administration of Medication Program, last reviewed 12/2025, documented if a resident requested to self-administer medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #77 and #16) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #77's person-centered comprehensive care plan did not include the use of oxygen; and Resident #16's person-centered comprehensive care plan did not include the use of psychotropic (used to treat mood/ behaviors) medications.Findings include:The facility policy Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Plans, revised 09/2025, documented a person-centered care plan would be developed by the interdisciplinary care team to ensure services were being provided to assist the resident in achieving/maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. The person-centered Interdisciplinary care plan would be completed in conjunction with the medical data set assessment by day fourteen from admission and would be reviewed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing of pressure ulcers for two (2) of five (5) residents (Residents #16 and #304) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #16's and Resident #304's pressure relieving interventions were not implemented as planned; and Resident #16 had conflicting wound care orders signed off as completed and wound care recommendations by the wound care provider were not implemented. Findings include: The facility policy Skin and Wound Care Policy and Procedure, reviewed 8/2025, documented the facility established a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach for prevention, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of all wound types. Certified Nurse Aides were responsible for floating heels and managing offloading devices per the resident's care plan. The licensed practical nurses were responsible for implementing wound and prevention orders, performing ordered dressing changes within scope, and documenting wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$88,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $88,433 — penalty dated 2025-11-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY