Willow Point Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 265 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 300 beds and averages 254.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-03-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/18/2024-3/29/2024, the facility failed to vaccinate eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccination (a vaccination developed to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications of pneumonia) for 44 of 245 residents who consented to the pneumococcal vaccine. Specifically, from 9/5/2023 through 3/25/2024, Residents #12, #14, #17, #18, #24, #27, #31, #43, #45, #57, #63, #74, #82, #95, #102, #103, #108, #109, #117, #118, #126, #129, #134, #165, #173, #177, #186, #192, #213, #214, #215, #216, #219, #222, #224, #226, #229, #235, #484, #533, #585, #586, #587, and #633 consented to and had medical orders to receive the pneumococcal vaccine and did not receive it. Subsequently, 7 of the 44 residents (Resident #24, #95, #109, #126, #215, #229, and #484) were diagnosed with pneumonia and one resident (Resident #95) was hospitalized twice for the treatment of pneumonia. Additionally, a request to purchase the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Hcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00314754, NY00319010, NY00320020, NY00327419, NY00331182, and NY00334923) surveys conducted 3/18/2024-3/29/2024 the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 4 of 10 residents (Residents #114, #174, #191, and #213) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #114, #191, and #213 were subjected to physical aggression and sexually abusive behaviors by Resident #174 and the facility failed to develop or implement strategic interventions for Resident #174 to protect other residents from victimization. Subsequently, Resident #174 pushed Resident #114 causing Resident #114 to sustain a hip fracture; Residents #174 and #213 were found in sexually inappropriate situations three times; and Resident #174 pushed Resident #191 causing them to hit their head against a wall causing an abrasion. This resulted in harm to Residents #191 and #114 that was not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: The facility policy Abuse Prevention modified 3/2019 documents the facility would not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/09/2025-6/13/2025, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for one (1) of one (1) main kitchen reviewed. Specifically, the main kitchen had dented cans in use; dishes were not air dried; food was not discarded in a timely manner; and food was stored less than 18 inches from the ceiling. Additionally, food was uncovered while being transported through the North Lower Level hallway. Findings include: The facility policy Dented Cans, revised 4/2023, documented there was a designated place in the storeroom for dented cans, which were then destroyed to prevent the use of spoiled or contaminated food. The Food and Nutrition Services Department does not use foods in dented or damaged cans. The facility policy Dishware Storage, revised 5/2023, documented dishware would be stored appropriately to prevent food soil, dust, or any other debris from adhering to the surface. After coming out of the dish machine,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/9/2025-6/13/2025 the facility did not ensure resident rights to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical records for four (4) of four (4) residents (Residents #1, #93, #141, and #208) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #1, #93, #141, and #208 identifying and personal information was posted in a public area visible to others. Findings include: The facility policy Corporate Compliance Code of Conduct, revised 7/2018, documented all employees had the responsibility of protecting the confidentiality of resident information. Employees should not reveal in any form of communication (verbal, written, fax, electronic) any personal or confidential information such as diagnosis or treatments. The facility policy Resident Rights, revised 3/2018, documented resident medical, social, and financial records would be released only to those staff members who needed them. During observations on 6/10/2025 at 12:37 PM, 6/11/2025 at 10:31 AM, and at 12:36 PM personal identifying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/9/2025 - 6/13/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to include services provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #197) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #197 did not have a care plan for anticoagulant (blood thinner) use. Findings include: The facility policy Care Plans, revised 2/2002, documented the interdisciplinary team met after each admission of a resident and on a regular basis to evolve a comprehensive plan of care which would best meet the individual needs of the resident. The comprehensive care plan was developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission and included goals, medications, treatments, and diet and was reviewed with the residents and/or their representative and documented in the electronic medical record. Resident #197 had diagnoses including stroke and pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lung). The 6/5/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00371020) surveys conducted 6/9/2025-6/13/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two (2) of six (6) residents (Residents #127 and #226) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #127 and #226 were not provided with facial grooming/shaving care. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, last revised 3/2015, documented the facility provided residents with Activities of Daily Living care and support in accordance with current standards of practice, State and Federal regulations, and based on the resident's assessed needs, personal preferences, and goals of care. Facial hair was groomed per the resident's preference and/or needs. 1) Resident #127 had diagnoses including Pick's disease (a form of dementia), depression, and anxiety. The 3/28/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00344862) surveys conducted 6/9/2025-6/13/2025, the facility did not ensure accommodation of resident food preferences for two (2) of two (2) (Residents #127 and #195) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #127 and #195 were missing preferred food items on their meal trays. Findings include: The facility policy Food Preferences, revised 5/2023, documented resident food and beverage preferences were obtained upon admission and periodically as needed to assist Food and Nutrition Services department in providing preferred food and beverages to enhance/maintain quality of life and nutritional status. 1) Resident #127 had diagnoses including Pick's disease (a form of dementia), mild protein calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 1/4/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required set up assistance with eating, was unable to speak, weighed 95 pounds, had an unplanned 5% or more weight loss, and received a mechanically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/9/2025-6/13/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during one (1) of four (4) lunch meal observations. Specifically, during the lunch meal observation on 6/11/2025 Food Service Aide #27 did not perform hand hygiene after removing their gloves. Findings included: The facility policy Hand Hygiene, revised 5/2025 documented hand hygiene would be performed at a minimum after handling trash, handling soiled linen or supplies, and after contact with blood, bodily fluids, and visibly contaminated surfaces. During a lunch meal observation on the North Lower Level on 6/11/2025 at 12:31 PM, Food Service Aide #27 was serving the lunch meal. While plating a resident tray, they dropped a towel on the floor, picked up the towel with their gloved hand and continued serving the meal without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00339000), the facility did not promote and facilitate the resident's right to self-determination through support of resident choice, including the resident's right to choose activities and health care services consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 refused care and staff continued to provide care following multiple refusals. Findings include: The undated Resident Rights policy documented each resident had the right to be treated with dignity and respect in recognition of their individual preferences; to refuse treatment and be free from abuse. Resident #1 had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. The 3/5/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognitive function and did not exhibit behavioral symptoms. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with dressing, bathing, hygiene, and required moderate assistance with transfers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00339000), the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse, including but not limited to corporal punishment and any physical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, licensed practical nurse #4 pushed multiple wet washcloths into the resident's face when the resident declined to receive care and certified nurse aides #5 and 6 held the resident's hands while licensed practical nurse #4 provided care that the resident declined. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Policy, modified 3/20/2019, documented the facility will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff members and residents will be provided with appropriate clinical care and treatment and will be cared for according to the individualized care plan. Resident #1 had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. The 3/5/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00339000), the facility did not ensure all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated and did not ensure further potential abuse was prevented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, - certified nurse aide #5 witnessed alleged abuse by licensed practical nurse #4 towards Resident #1 and did not report the alleged abuse immediately resulting in licensed practical nurse #4 continuing to have access to residents for the remainder of the shift while the investigation was pending. - Statements from staff, given the facility, documented additional potential abuse and those allegations were not investigated. - The resident was not assessed by a qualified professional timely following allegation of abuse. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Policy, modified 3/20/2019, documented the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, or abuse are reported immediately to the Administrator. The facility shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/18/2024-3/29/2024, the facility did not ensure that licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing care and related services to assure residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well- being for each resident for 4 of 4 licensed nurses (licensed practical nurses #31, #45, #48, and registered nurse #51) reviewed. Specifically, licensed practical nurses #31, #45, #48 and registered nurse #51 did not receive routine competency evaluations that covered key skill-set areas including accessing venous access devices, vacuum assisted wound closure devices (wound VACs), hand hygiene, and medication administration. Deficiencies were identified in the areas of Parenteral/IV (intravenous) fluids (F694), Free from Significant Medication Errors (F760), Quality of Care (F684), and Infection Control (F880). Findings Include: The Facility Assessment for 2023 documented annual in-services and competencies were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$166,364 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $166,364 — penalty dated 2024-03-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY