Samaritan Keep Nursing Home INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 272 beds and averages 254.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the survey (Complaint #756448), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one (1) of three (3) residents (Residents #3) reviewed. Specifically, on 03/24/2024 at approximately 12:00 AM, Resident #3 was zip tied (a fastener with a locking, self-snagging nylon strap used to secure items) to the able riser (enabler bar) on their bed by Licensed Practical Nurse #7, for approximately 45 minutes to one (1) hour. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Non-Compliance for Resident #3 and placed all residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:The facility policy Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, Involuntary Seclusion and Misappropriation of Property, revised 02/10/2023, documented abuse was the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Involuntary seclusion was confinement to his/her room against the resident's will. In addition to orientation, all employees should be in-serviced annually regarding: the appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the abbreviated and extended surveys (NY00319112 and NY00294178), the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1, 2, and 3). Specifically, Residents #1, #2, and #3 were reportedly found by staff engaging in sexual activity, indicative of inadequate supervision of these residents with impaired cognition who reside on a secured unit. On three separate occasions, Resident #1 was found to be engaging in sexual acts with 2 other residents (Residents #2 and 3). Appropriate supervision interventions were not put in place to prevent recurrence, resident care plans were not updated or were not updated timely, and staff were not trained to prevent recurrence or how to provide appropriate supervision. On 7/18/2023, while onsite, a surveyor observed an unsupervised wandering resident on the secured unit enter Resident #1's room. This failure to provide adequate supervision places at risk the 38 residents of the secured unit who lacked decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated and extended surveys (NY00294178 and NY00319112), the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to attain and or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents diagnosed with dementia for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 had severe dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), was on thickened liquids and puree diet consistency, wandered on the unit and ingested thin liquids resulting in aspiration pneumonia (inhalation of food/fluids into the lungs). Following an incident of wandering and ingesting thin liquids on 5/18/2023, nursing progress notes documented the resident was wandering, obtaining, and drinking thin fluids and/or eating regular consistency foods on 12 occasions between 5/25/2023 and 7/14/2023. There was no documented evidence of medical or speech therapy evaluation following the multiple incidents of ingesting thin liquids or regular consistency foods. The resident's care plan remained unchanged,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #184 and #257) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #184 and #257 had their side rails removed and there was no documented evidence they were provided with education, a therapy evaluation, side rail alternatives, or an opportunity to discuss their concerns prior to the side rails being removed. This resulted in a decline in bed mobility for Residents #184 and #257. Findings include:The facility policy Bed Rail Use - Side Rails, Assist Rails, Transfer Rails, Bed Enablers, revised 09/03/2025, documented assignment of a bed rail would be considered only after all non-bed rail alternatives are attempted; side rails may only be considered to treat a resident's medical symptoms or as an assistive device to assist with mobility and transfer of residents; the resident/representative will be provided education on the risks versus the benefits of using the device so that the resident/resident representative can make an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined a resident's ability to safely administer their own medications, if clinically appropriate, for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #133) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #133 had a medication cup at their bedside containing one white round pill and one half of a round white pill. There was no documented evidence of assessments and/or physician orders for the residents to safely self-administer medications.Findings included:The facility policy Administration of Medication Guidelines, last reviewed 04/02/2025, documented the nurse was personally responsible for every drug they administered. They stayed with the resident until they swallowed the drug, and medications were not left with the resident, except with a doctor's order.The facility policy Self-Administration of Medications, created 02/18/2026, documented residents who desired to self-administer medication would be allowed to do so under guidelines in the policy. Residents were evaluated for desire and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing and promote wound healing for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #281) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #281 was admitted with a Stage 2 (partial thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer and did not have admission orders for wound care.Findings include:The facility policy Wound Care and Pressure Injury Prevention and Treatment, last reviewed 02/11/2026, documented the facility would implement a systemic interdisciplinary process for the prevention, identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of wounds and pressure injuries to ensure pressure injuries were prevented and that existing wounds received appropriate and timely treatment. The nurse managers were responsible for performing comprehensive wound and skin assessments, initiating/updating care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #215) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #215's elopement safety interventions of 30 and 60-minute safety checks and wander guard tag checks were not completed as planned/ordered. Findings include:The facility policy Elopement Prevention, revised 01/11/2023, documented the assigned nurse would check the resident every shift to ensure the wander guard tag was in place and had a blinking red light indicating it was functioning properly. The facility policy Elopement - Resident Evaluation for Potential, revised 02/16/2024, documented elopement precautions would be addressed on the care plan, implementing measures as indicated.The facility policy Increased Supervision-Visual Monitoring Checks and 1 to 1, revised 10/11/2021, documented a resident on increased supervision would have a staff person assigned to do a visual check on the resident within consecutive 30 or 60-minute intervals as necessary; interventions would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to provide the necessary services and treatment for indwelling urinary catheter use for two (2) of six (6) residents (Residents #1 and #13) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 did not have a provider recommended voiding trial completed; and Resident #13 had an indwelling urinary catheter with a history of bladder infections and did not receive assistance with changing between their urinary collection leg bag (a small, wearable, and discreet receptacle used to collect urine) and a large capacity urinary collection bag. Findings include: The facility policy Foley Catheter, revised 04/21/2015, documented the facility ensured all residents with an alteration in urinary continence had been assessed and provided the interventions that best meet their needs and the physician's order would be checked for an appropriate medical justification. There was no documented policy addressing care and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter. 1)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (1) of four (4) Residents (Resident #197) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #197 had significant weight loss, was not assisted with meals as care planned, and there was no documented evidence a medical provider addressed the resident's weight loss.Findings included:Resident #197 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and abnormal weight loss. The 01/29/2026 quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, required supervision/touching assistance with eating, and had a 5% or weight loss in the last month or 10% more in the last 6 months and was not on a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen.The 08/19/2025 Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 11/18/2025, documented the resident had inadequate oral intake related to decreased appetite and sleeping during meals as evidenced by poor recorded intakes and significant weight loss of 11 pounds in 90 days. The goal was to consume adequate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #257) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #257 had a bilevel positive airway pressure machine (non-invasive mechanical ventilator that keeps airway open when sleeping) that was not cleaned per professional standards; was not maintained with water in the reservoir; did not have an order for supplemental oxygen use when used; was not documented as administered on the medication administration record; and there was no documented evidence of ongoing assessment of the resident's respiratory status, response to the therapy, documentation of the equipment settings or when to use the equipment.Findings include:The facility policy CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) BIPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) Therapy, revised 06/01/2021, documented the facility would provide bilevel positive airway pressure therapy in accordance with physician orders,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required dialysis (a process that filters blood during kidney failure) received services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #13) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #13 received dialysis at a community-based dialysis center, and the facility did not perform ongoing assessments of their condition or monitor for complications before and after dialysis treatments and there was inconsistent communication between the dialysis center and the facility. Findings include: The facility policy Dialysis, revised 03/01/2023, documented communication with the dialysis team would be maintained to ensure quality care of the resident; the purpose of the communication book was to share information/ask questions, not requiring immediate responses with the dialysis center; the unit manager/designee was responsible for writing in the communication book; and the resident would be monitored for such things as signs of fluid retention or dehydration,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for two (2) of seven (7) medication carts (8th floor and 4th floor medication carts); one (1) of four (4) medication rooms (4th floor medication room); and one (1) of seven (7) treatment carts (3rd floor treatment cart) reviewed. Specifically, one medication cart on the 8th floor was unlocked and unsupervised; one medication cart on the 4th floor contained pre-poured, unlabeled medications; the 4th medication room refrigerator contained an open, undated multi-dose tuberculin purified protein derivative vial; and the 3rd floor treatment cart was unlocked and unattended.Findings included:The facility policy Storage of Medications, last reviewed 02/10/2026 documented medication supply was only accessible to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medication rooms, carts,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received and the facility provided a diet in a form designed to meet individual needs for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #241) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #241 received a whole regular brownie instead of a pureed brownie as ordered; and the resident's person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan did not include the ordered altered food consistency. Findings include:The facility policy Altered Consistency-Texture Modified Diet-Dysphagia difficulty swallowing) Management, reviewed 04/02/2025, documented residents received food and fluids in a consistency that was safe, palatable, and met their nutritional needs, in accordance with physician orders, clinical assessment, and regulations of the New York State Department of Health. Texture-modified diets and fluid consistencies were implemented as clinically indicated and reduced the risk of aspiration, choking, and malnutrition, while resident rights and preferences were honored. Food texture level Pureed (Level 1) was homogeneous,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,020 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,020 — penalty dated 2026-02-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $958K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY