No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

134 Great East Neck Road, West Babylon, NY 11704 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 300 certified beds · (631) 422-4800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (631) 422-4800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 29 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
501A W Montauk Hwy · (631) 818-6000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
575 Montauk Highway · (631) 321-9055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
575 W Montauk Hwy · (631) 321-9046 · Call to confirm hours
Park
622 Albin Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
200 Great East Neck Rd · (631) 587-1150

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms60.3%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.2%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.541.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 634 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 305 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.5%CMS range 47.6–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 7.6–11.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 6.4–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.05
RN hours/ resident / day
0.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
38.2%
Total nursing turnover
39.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 300 beds and averages 281.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-19)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during an Abbreviated Survey (2625704), the facility did not ensure that each resident's clinical condition demonstrated the need for an indwelling urinary catheter in the absence of clinical indications for use and did not document the provision of counseling to assist the resident in understanding the clinical implications and risks associated with the use of a urinary catheter for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Specifically, Resident #1 received a urinary catheter insertion after the resident requested a catheter due to urinary incontinence. There was no documented clinical indication for the catheter and there was no documented education regarding clinical implications and risks.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Justification for Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheter dated 10/2021 documented it is the policy of the facility that an indwelling urinary catheter may be inserted after assessment of the resident. Assessment will be based on valid clinical indications consistent with evidence-based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not maintain equipment for respiratory care, such as oxygen equipment, in accordance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. This was identified for two (2) (Resident #200 and Resident#142) of five (5) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, during an observation on 09/14/2025, the oxygen tubing for Resident #142's and Resident #200's oxygen concentrator and nebulizer machines were not changed since 08/25/2025.The findings are:The facility's policy titled Care of Nebulizer Equipment, last reviewed on 09/05/2025, documented to administer treatment via nebulizer as ordered by the physician and to maintain the cleanliness of the equipment. Change the tubing, mouthpiece, and reservoir every seven (7) days, and label.The facility 's policy titled Care of Oxygen Equipment, last reviewed on 09/05/2025, documented that to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the initial Kitchen tour and during the Dining Task observation of the lunch meal on 09/14/2025. Specifically, 1) several frozen food items in the walk-in freezer were stored undated and with open packaging; and 2) the facility did not monitor the temperature of cold food items. The findings are: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage/Dating Procedures, effective date May 2023, documented that food is stored in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local regulations regarding sanitary storage conditions. Perishable storage: all food items are dated upon receiving. All food is re-dated once opened with the open date. All food not in the original container is stored in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (2569298), initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident had the right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that are significant to them. This was identified for one (Resident #78) of four Residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #78 wanted a shower on their scheduled shower day; however, Certified Nursing Assistant #6 gave a bed bath against the resident's wishes.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Resident's Rights and Organizational Ethics, dated 11/2016 and last reviewed 09/05/2025, documented that the facility shall ensure that all residents are afforded the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, respect, full recognition of their individuality, consideration, and courtesy in treatment and care of personal needs. All employees shall be in-serviced on Residents' Rights upon hire and annually thereafter. Each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #225) of two (2) residents reviewed for Skin Conditions. Specifically, Resident #225 was identified with two skin tears to the left forearm on 09/11/2025. Registered Nurse #5 applied the treatment to the skin tears; however, there was no documented evidence of the skin assessment and physician orders for the wound care treatment until 09/16/2025.The finding is:The Facility policy titled Non-Pressure Related Skin Ulcer/Wounds, reviewed on 09/05/2025, documented [the facility will] conduct assessments of wounds and document the clinical basis or underlying conditions contributing to the ulceration. The policy for non-pressure ulcers will emphasize prevention, assessment, treatment, documentation, education, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (# 2569298) initiated on 09/14/2025 to 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent Accidents. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #78) of five (5) residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #78 was assessed to require two-person assistance for bath/shower and bed mobility as per their plan of care. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 provided a bed bath to Resident #78 by themselves, without assistance from another staff member.The finding is:The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated 11/2018 and reviewed 09/05/2025, documented that Individualized care plans are based on an accurate assessment of the resident's self-performance and the amount and type of support being provided to the resident.The facility policy titled Care Planning Process, dated 07/2022, documented that the purpose of the Care Plan is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that nurse staff posting data was posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Specifically, the facility entrance lobby was observed on 09/14/2025 at 09:00 AM with the Daily Staff Posting dated 09/12/2025. There were no Daily Staff Postings for 09/13/2025. The finding is:During an observation on 09/14/2025 at 09:00 AM, a Daily Staff Posting dated 09/12/2025 was observed near the facility reception area. During an interview on 09/14/2025 at 01:29 PM, the Registered Nurse Supervisor #3 stated they were responsible for posting the Daily Staff Posting sheet at the front desk reception area. Registered Nurse # 3 stated that they did not work on 09/13/2025 and stated there was no excuse why the posting for actual staff was not posted for 09/13/2025.During an interview on 09/18/2025 at 02:37 PM, the Director of Nursing stated the Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure that the attending Physician acted upon a consultant Pharmacist's drug regimen review recommendation regarding the use of a as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one (1) (Resident #12) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the consultant Pharmacist recommended to consider having a stop date for Xanax ([NAME]-anxiety) medication that was ordered as needed (PRN) basis by the resident's Physician. A decision to agree or disagree to the recommendation was not documented by the Physician. The physician orders did not document a stop date on physician orders and continued prescribing Xanax on an as needed basis.The finding is:Resident #12 was admitted with diagnoses including Insomnia (difficulty falling asleep), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey on 09/14/2025 and completed on 09/18/2025, the facility did not ensure call bells were within reach for each resident at their bedside. This was identified for one (Resident #201) of one resident reviewed for call systems. Specifically, on multiple occasions, the call bell was not within Resident #201's reach while in bed. The finding is:The facility's policy titled Call Light, last reviewed 09/05/2025, documented every call light shall be attached to the resident's bed within easy reach of the resident.Resident #201 was admitted with diagnoses including Ogilvie syndrome (acute dilatation of the colon in the absence of any mechanical obstruction in severely ill patients), Intellectual Disabilities, and a history of Falls. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The Minimum Data Set documented that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024 the facility did not provide each resident access to personal and medical records pertaining to themselves, upon an oral or written request, in the form and format requested by the individual. This was identified for one (Resident #222) of one resident reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, Resident #222 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on 7/13/2024 and requested a copy of their hospital Discharge Summary, which was received by the facility upon the resident's return from the hospital. The facility did not make the requested discharge summary available to Resident #222 within the required timeframe. The finding is: The facility policy titled, Medical Record Request Policy last revised on 3/2023 documented that if an individual should request a release of medical records from the facility, the individual shall be referred to the Social Worker who shall provide the Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00339563) initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure each resident transferred to the hospital and discharged from the facility had documentation in the medical record of the attempts made by the facility to meet the needs of the resident before the resident was discharged to the hospital. This was identified for one (Resident #413) of three residents reviewed for death and the facility did not ensure each resident had documentation from a Physician of the necessity to transfer or discharge the resident. This was identified for two (Resident #413 and #414) of three residents reviewed for death. Specifically, Resident #413 suffered a cardiac arrest (occurs when the heart suddenly and unexpectedly stops pumping) in the facility and attempts of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of an automated external defibrillator were not documented in the resident's medical record.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs was implemented as identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #71) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #71 had a physician's order to drain fluids from the abdominal cavity on the 7:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift via a Peritoneal (abdominal) Pleurex catheter (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into the abdominal cavity to drain fluid) due to the diagnosis of Ascitis (a condition where fluid builds up in the abdomen between the lining of the abdomen and the abdominal organs). A review of the resident's medical record from 7/1/2024 to 7/12/2024 and from 8/1/2024 to 8/3/2024 revealed no documented evidence that the abdominal fluid was drained as per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024, the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team to reflect each resident's preferences and status after each assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #116) of two residents reviewed for Communication. Specifically, Resident #116's comprehensive care plan for Communication documented that the resident was hard of hearing in the left ear. The comprehensive care plan was not updated to indicate the resident used a hearing aid and preferred keeping the hearing aid at the bedside. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Care Planning Process, effective 7/2022 documented the facility shall have a care planning process that is person-centered, which includes integrating assessment findings in care planning, providing services to attain or maintain the resident's highest physical, mental, and psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00333364) initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, personal, and oral hygiene. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and one (Resident #132) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, 1) on 8/7/2024, Resident #5's fingernails on both hands were observed to be long and dirty, with a brown substance under the nails and 2) on 8/2/2024, Resident #132's right palm was observed with dark crusty flakes and a musty odor was detected coming from their right hand. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living, effective 11/2018, documented the facility will provide the necessary care and services based on the comprehensive assessment of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) The facility's policy and procedure titled, Air Mattress last revised in 10/2023 documented that the selection of the air mattress will be based on the individual's specific needs, including mobility levels, weight, and any pre-existing medical condition. The Wound Care Coordinator will conduct a monthly audit of the resident's weight and assessment of the staff's knowledge of operating the equipment. The operation manual for the low air loss alternating pressure relief air mattress documented instructions that included determining the patient's weight and setting the control knob to that weight setting on the control unit. -Resident #94 was admitted with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Type 2 Diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated Resident #94 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #94 had one Stage 4 (defined as full-thickness tissue loss with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00333364) initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of range of motion. This was identified for one (Resident #132) of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Specifically, Resident #132 had a physician's order for right hand Therapy Carrot (a nonsurgical device that helps position contracted hands) to be worn at all times. On 8/1/2024 and 8/2/2024 the resident was observed not wearing the right-hand Therapy Carrot as ordered by the Physician. The finding is: The facility's policy for Application and Management of Splint/Brace/Immobilizer dated 11/2017 documented the nursing staff is responsible for following the wearing schedule for the device and must complete a skin inspection every shift at a minimum unless ordered otherwise.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/01/2024 and completed on 8/08/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's receives adequate supervision and the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #28) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #28 was observed on 8/1/2024 with an Albuterol inhaler on their overbed table. There was no staff present in the vicinity. Additionally, Resident #28 did not have a physician's order for the use of the Albuterol inhaler or an order to self-administer medications. The finding is: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that Resident #28 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/01/2024, and completed on 8/08/2024 the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for two (Resident #42 and Resident #71) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1) Resident #42 had a physician's order to continuously receive oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute. The resident was observed receiving an inaccurate amount of oxygen on 8/1/2024 and 8/7/2024. 2) Resident #71 had a physician's order for oxygen to be administered at 2 liters per minute via a nasal cannula. The resident was observed receiving an inaccurate amount of oxygen on 8/1/2024 at 10:30 AM and 2:34 PM. This is a repeat deficiency. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy dated 6/2017, documented the physician's order specifies the concentration, type, and duration of the (oxygen)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024 the facility did not ensure that outside professional services were furnished timely. This was identified for one (Resident #222) of one resident reviewed for Dignity and for one (Resident #150) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, 1) Resident #222 was readmitted from the hospital on 7/13/2024 with a diagnosis of Traumatic Subarachnoid Hematoma (brain bleed). The hospital discharging physician recommended a follow-up with a Neurosurgeon within a week. The recommended consult was not completed as of 8/7/2024 when it was brought to the facility's attention by the Surveyor. 2) Resident #150 was admitted to the facility in November 2023. A physician's order dated 11/14/2023 documented that the resident was to be seen by the Psychiatrist for the Initial Evaluation. The Psychiatry consult/evaluation was not completed until 8/6/2024 when it was brought to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024, the facility did not ensure medical records for each resident were complete and accurately documented. This was identified for one (Resident #90) of three residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #90 had a physician's order for a finger stick blood glucose monitoring every morning. The Medication Administration Record did not include the finger stick blood glucose level results and the Vital Signs record had inconsistent documentation of the finger stick blood glucose level results. The finding is: The policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 7/2013 documented findings (of finger stick blood glucose levels) shall be documented in the medical chart. Resident #90 was admitted with diagnoses including Spinal Stenosis, Dementia, and Type two Diabetes Mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2024 and completed on 8/8/2024 the facility did not ensure that an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infections was maintained. This was identified for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, during a dressing change observation of Resident #6's sacral wound, Registered Nurse #15 did not change their gloves and did not wash their hands after cleansing the sacral wound and before applying the treatment. The finding is: The facility's Hand Washing Protocol dated 11/2017 documented to perform hand hygiene before and after each resident/patient contact. The facility's Clean Dressing Change policy and procedure dated 5/2024 documented to cleanse the wound while maintaining an aseptic technique, pat dry with a clean gauze, and then perform hand hygiene. [NAME] (put on) clean gloves before applying a dressing as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00332930) initiated on 8/01/2024 and completed on 8/08/2024, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This was identified for two (Resident #131, Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, the toilets that were mounted to the walls in Resident #131 and Resident #5's bathroom did not have appropriate support and reinforcement. The toilets were observed with wooden blocks underneath the toilet to provide support and reinforcement. The findings are: The facility policy titled Room and Unit Maintenance dated 9/2021 documented to maintain rooms and units within the facility in a manner that provides a safe, homelike environment. -Resident #131 was admitted with diagnoses of Morbid Obesity, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY 00292215) initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/2022, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. This was identified for one (Resident #399) of one resident reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, Resident #399 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the baseline care plan developed for the Gastrostomy (G) tube did not include use of an abdominal binder. A baseline care plan for the use of the abdominal binder was not developed until 3/3/2022. The finding is: The policy titled: Baseline Care Plan, effective date 11/2016, documented that the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission, which include, but is not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/2022, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. This was identified for one (Resident #105) of three residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #105 had documented Physician's Orders on 6/6/2022, 8/16/2022, and 10/22/2022 to have a bilateral breast mammogram which was never completed. The finding is: The facility's policy titled: Laboratory, Radiology and Other Diagnostic Services, last revised in August 2018, documented to provide, or obtain radiology and other diagnostic services only when ordered by a medical provider. Resident #105 has diagnoses which include Peripheral Vascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) The facility policy entitled, Laboratory, Radiology and other diagnostic services, dated 8/2018 documented that the facility will provide radiology services only when ordered by a medical provider. The licensed nurse must ensure to pick up orders made by the Physician/Physician extenders. A stat order must be transcribed as soon as the nurse is made aware of the request. The licensed nurse will ensure to properly fill out the requisition form and must call the appropriate service provider immediately. A follow up call must be made by the licensed nurse to the appropriate service provider to ensure that stat order was received and acknowledged. The licensed nurse must document in the medical record any communication made with the appropriate provider. Resident #186 was admitted with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Respiratory Failure and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #186 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/2022, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #57) of four residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #57 had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and was observed receiving four liters of oxygen via a nasal cannula without a Physician's order. The finding is: Resident #57 was admitted with diagnoses that include Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Congested Heart Failure. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The resident had no behavioral symptoms. The MDS documented the resident received oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/2022, the facility did not ensure that Radiology services to meet the resident's needs were provided timely as ordered by a Physician. This was identified for one (Resident #105) of three residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, 1) Resident #105 had documented Physician's Orders dated 6/6/2022, 8/16/2022, and 10/22/2022 to have a bilateral breast mammogram which was never completed; and 2) as a result of the mammogram not being completed, a Physician's order for bilateral breast ultrasound due to breast pain and to rule out breast mass was obtained on 10/27/2022. The bilateral breast ultrasound was not performed until 5 days later on 11/1/2022. The findings are: The facility's policy titled: Laboratory, Radiology and Other Diagnostic Services, last revised on August 2018, documented to provide or obtain radiology and other diagnostic services only when ordered by a medical provider.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/2022, the facility did not ensure that radiology services were obtained only when ordered by a Physician, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner. This was identified for one (Resident #186) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #186 received radiology services of an abdominal and chest x-ray without a Physician/Physician Assistant/Nurse Practitioner's order. The finding is: The facility policy entitled Laboratory, Radiology, and other diagnostic services dated 8/2018 documented that the facility will provide radiology services only when ordered by a medical provider. The licensed nurse must ensure to pick up orders made by the Physician/Physician extenders. A stat order must be transcribed as soon as the nurse is made aware of the request. The licensed nurse will ensure to properly fill out the requisition form and must call the appropriate service provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification initiated on 12/12/2022 and completed on 12/16/22 the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and COVID-19 infection. This was identified on 1 of 5 units. Specifically, 1) On the Legrange Unit, a Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) sign was not observed for a resident who was COVID-19 positive; 2) a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #5) did not utilize appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering a COVID-19 positive resident's room and did not discard all of the used PPE prior to leaving the COVID-19 positive resident's room. The finding is: The facility policy titled Cohorting for COVID-19 last updated 9/10/2021 documented that for positive cohorts full PPE is required, including gloves, gown, N-95 mask, and eye protection. The policy further documents Transmission-Based Signage for Droplet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASSENA CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BANGER, LISAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2005
CARILLO, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 02/01/2005
CARILLO, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2005
DEBENEDICTIS, PASQUALEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 02/01/2005
OSTREICHER, DVORAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 02/01/2005
SOLOVEY, ALEXIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 02/01/2005
DEROSA, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$39.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$9.7M
Related-party expense26% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 19%Other / private 20%

This home reported $9.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$409per resident / day
operating cost
$12,421per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$439per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335681. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next