Our Lady Of Consolation Nursing and Rehabilitive C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 949 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 402 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.95 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 450 beds and averages 280.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 170 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately but no later than two (2) hours to the New York State Department of Health. This was identified for seven (7) residents of seven (7) residents: Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7 reviewed for abuse. Specifically, 1) Resident #1's Designated Representative alleged Resident #1 stated to them that their (Resident #1's) arm was twisted. 2) Resident #2 alleged that a certified nursing assistant was rough during care, violated their dignity and did not follow their plan of care during their transfer. 3) Resident #3 alleged that a certified nursing assistant was rough with them (and tossed them around during care. There was no documented evidence that the abuse allegations for Resident #1, Resident #2 or Resident #3 were reported to the New York State Department of Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Abbreviated Complaint Survey (Intake ID 2702583), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, or neglect were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for seven (7) residents of seven (7) residents: Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7 reviewed for abuse. Specifically, 1) Resident #1's Designated Representative alleged Resident #1 stated their (Resident #1's) arm was twisted and the allegation and the allegation was not thoroughly investigated. 2) Resident #2 alleged that a Certified Nursing Assistant was rough during care, violated their dignity and did not follow their plan of care during transfer and the allegation was not thoroughly investigated. 3) Resident #3 alleged that a Certified Nursing Assistant was rough with them (Resident #3) and tossed them (Resident #3) around during care and the allegation was not thoroughly investigated.The findings are: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID 2702583), the facility did not ensure each resident was served food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This was identified for two (2) of nine (9) residents, Resident #1 and Resident #8 who identified hot foods being served cold. Specifically, on 02/27/2026 during the lunch meal service on one unit (DePorres Unit) the lunch entree and vegetable were not served at a safe and appetizing temperature.The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Food Temperatures with a review date of February 2025 documented all hot foods must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 140 degrees Fahrenheit. A complaint intake (Intake ID 2702583) dated 12/29/2025 documented since admission all of Resident #1's meals were served cold. Resident #1 was discharged and was not available for interview. During an interview on 02/26/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure a comfortable environment for residents, staff, and visitors. This was identified on one ([NAME] Unit) of seven units observed during the Environmental Task. Specifically, during an initial tour on 6/25/2025 between 12:45 PM and 1:00 PM of the [NAME] Unit, elevated environmental temperatures between 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 87 degrees Fahrenheit were noted in resident rooms, hallways, and dining areas. The [NAME] Side corridor of the [NAME] Unit Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning Unit (HVAC) and the Package Terminal Air Conditioners (PTAKS) units in multiple resident rooms and the general use area were not functioning as intended. The finding is:The New York State Department of Health health alert for extreme heat event issued for the period of June 23, 2025 - June 25, 2025, indicated temperatures in the upper 90s with feels-like temperatures to 105 - 110 degrees Fahrenheit for the area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00359206 ) initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/2/2025 the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. This was identified on four ([NAME], [NAME], Deporres and [NAME]) of eight nursing units. Specifically, on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift, the [NAME] Unit, the [NAME] Unit, the Deporres Unit, and the [NAME] Unit were not staffed according to the levels specified in the Facility Assessment on 6/27/2025 to 6/29/2025 (Friday, Saturday, and Sunday).The findings are: The facility Departmental Staffing policy and procedure, last reviewed 4/2025, documented all departments will schedule their staff at par levels outlined in the Facility Assessment for all shifts, daily. Staffing may be adjusted per unit based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/2/2025, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This was evident during the Dining Observation task for one ([NAME] Unit) of seven units. Specifically, during the dining observation on the [NAME] Unit, the temperature of cold food items (tuna sandwich, turkey sandwich, and milk) was above acceptable standards for safe serving temperatures. In addition, there was no system in place to monitor the temperature of cold food items.The finding is:A facility policy and procedure titled Food Temperatures, reviewed 2/2025, documented that the Culinary Department will review and manage food temperatures to ensure the safety of food being served to residents. Any discrepancies in food temperatures will be managed to ensure compliance with regulatory directives. The Culinary Ambassador takes the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/02/2025, the facility did not maintain the cooling system in proper working conditions to provide a healthy, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, personnel, and the public. This was identified on one ([NAME] Unit) of seven units observed during the Environmental Task. The [NAME] Side corridor of the [NAME] Unit Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning Unit (HVAC) and the Package Terminal Air Conditioners (PTAKS) units in multiple resident rooms and the general use area were not functioning as intended. The finding is: The New York State Department of Health health alert for extreme heat event issued for the period of June 23, 2025 - June 25, 2025, indicated temperatures in the upper 90s with feels-like temperatures to 105 - 110 degrees Fahrenheit for the area where the facility is located. Federal Regulations S483.10(i)(6) Comfortable and safe temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/2/2025, the facility did not ensure that all completed Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services within 14 days of the resident assessment completion date. This was identified for one (Resident #57) of one resident reviewed for the Resident Assessment task. Specifically, Resident #57's two quarterly and one Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (PPS) discharge assessment was not transmitted within 14 days of the resident assessment completion date. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set Assessments, effective 5/1/2025, documented that each resident admitted to the facility will be assessed utilizing the Minimum Data Set tool as a means of improving resident care. The Minimum Data Set tool will be completed in accordance with the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/2/2025, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set Assessments.This was identified for one (Resident #187) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, based on the Resident #187's Comprehensive Care Plan and Fall Risk assessment, the resident utilized a chair alarm daily. The resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/11/2025, and a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], did not indicate the use of the chair alarm.The finding is:A facility policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set Assessments, effective 5/1/2025, documented that each resident admitted to the facility will be assessed utilizing the Minimum Data Set tool as a means of improving resident care. The Minimum Data Set tool will be completed in accordance with the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and regulatory directives. The Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/24/2025 and completed on 7/02/2025, the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #51) of two residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #51 was diagnosed with Legal Blindness, and the facility did not develop a visual impairment care plan with person-centered interventions to address the resident's needs. The finding is: The facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plan, reviewed on 3/2025, documented the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$141,980 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $141,980 — penalty dated 2026-03-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY