Epic Rehabilitation And Nursing At White Plains

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 496 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 258 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 68% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 151.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #112 and #182) reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, 1) Resident #112 received their daily 9 AM medications at approximately 2:30 PM on 04/13/2026 including the medications Isosorbide Mononitrate and Valsartan (blood pressure pills) for hypertension, Torsemide (water pill) for congestive heart failure, Trelegy Ellipta (inhaler) and Albuterol nebulizer medicine for asthma and 2)for Resident #182 with a history of urinary tract infection and reported complaints of urinary tract symptoms, urine was not collected timely for urinalysis/culture as per the 11/29/2024 physician order. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that the physician was notified when staff were unable to collect the urine on 11/29/2024 and 11/30/2024.The findings include: The July 2019 Policy for Medication Administration Schedule documented that medications shall be administered according to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they implemented interventions correctly and consistently including adequate supervision consistent with the Resident's needs, goals, care plan, and physician's orders to prevent accidents for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #112) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that every one-hour monitoring when in bed was implemented as per physician order prior to an 8/25/2025 fall, no documented evidence that Resident #112 was always kept in a supervised area when awake as per comprehensive care plan prior to an 8/31/2025 fall, and no documented evidence that Resident #112 was out of bed to their wheelchair on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift as per comprehensive care plan prior to a 03/27/2026 fall. Additionally, the Director of Nursing did not investigate whether or not interventions were consistently implemented to prevent falls. The findings included: The Policy for Falls-Clinical Protocol dated 7/2019 documented, the physician will help identify individuals with a history of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2686442) the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) out of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for consultations. Specifically, Resident #1 had a gastroenterology consult on 08/07/2025 and was recommended to start on the Linzess (a medication for chronic constipation). Licensed Practical Nurse #1 received Resident #1 at the facility following the consultation and documented there were no recommendations. There was no documented evidence that Resident #1 was ever ordered the Linzess (a medication for chronic constipation).The findings are:The facility Orders for Consultants policy dated 07/2019 documented the Attending Physician shall ultimately be responsible for accepting and applying consultation recommendations and orders. All residents who have a consultation will have the consultation report reviewed by the nurse manager/supervisor within…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2686442) the facility did not ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for consultations. Specifically, Resident #1, who had a known history of chronic constipation, had a gastrointestinal consultation on 08/07/2025 and was ordered to start on the medication Linzess (a medication for chronic constipation). Nurse Practitioner #2 saw Resident #1 on 08/17/2025 and documented they reviewed the consultation services, but there was no documented evidence of the medication being ordered for the resident. The facility also did not have the consultation documentation on the resident's record or available for review.The findings are:The facility Orders for Consultants policy dated 07/2019 documented Attending Physicians shall ultimately be responsible for accepting and applying consultant recommendations and orders. The Attending…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00329183) from 10/3/2024 to 10/11/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain their highest practicable wellbeing in accordance with the facility assessment. This was evident on 2 (5th Floor and 4th Floor) of 4 resident units. Specifically, 6 of 6 Certified Nursing Assistant personnel files contained no evidence of practical competency in basic nursing skills and activities of daily living, and 4 of 4 licensed nursing personnel files did not contain competency assessments of medication management. The findings are: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented every staff member had knowledge competency in abuse, resident rights, identification of condition change. Additional training for all staff included dementia/behavioral management. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00329183) from 10/3/2024 to 10/11/2024, the facility did not ensure a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months, and regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews. This was evident on 1 (5th Floor) of 4 resident units. Specifically, 6 of 6 Certified Nursing Assistant personnel files contained no evidence of performance evaluations and inservice based on the results of performance evaluations. The findings are: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented every staff member had knowledge competency in abuse, resident rights, identification of condition change. Additional training for all staff included dementia/behavioral management. Nursing has additional training for basic nursing skills, activities of daily living, skin and wound care, and medication management. Competencies were based on current standards of practice, may include return demonstration,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Surveys (NY00329183) from 10/03/24 to 10/11/24, the facility did not ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 (Resident #202 and #96) of 9 residents reviewed for Medication Administration. Specifically, 1) Resident #202 was administered Lasix (diuretic) 20 milligrams and Losartan (antihypertensive) 100 milligrams without a physician's order, which resulted in the need for blood pressure monitoring every 30 minutes and intravenous fluids. 2) Resident #96 was about to receive a 4 milligram dose of Tizanidine (muscle relaxant) instead of the physician ordered 2 milligram dose during a medication observation that was stopped by the surveyor. The findings are: The facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 7/2019 documented individual administering the medication must check the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/03/24 to 10/11/24, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and professional standard of practice for 2 (Residents #12 and #96) of 8 residents reviewed for Medication Administration; and Medication and Treatment carts were observed unlocked. Specifically, 1.) Resident #12 was found with physicians ordered ipratropium nasal spray and an albuterol sulfate inhaler in their room on their bedside table. 2.) Resident #96 was found with 2 Trelegy inhalers, a Flonase nasal spray, an ipratropium nasal spray, an albuterol sulfate inhaler, and a triamcinolone acetonide ointment, and 3) the 5th Floor Medication Cart and Treatment Carts were left unlocked and open in the hallway accessible to residents, visitors, and unlicensed staff. The findings are: The facility policy titled Storage of Medications dated 7/2019 documented that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/03/24 to 10/11/24, the facility did not ensure that infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained by 3 of 4 nurses (Registered Nurse #3 and Licensed Practical Nurse #2 and Licensed Practical Nurse #1) during the medication administration observation. Specifically, 1) Registered Nurse #3 did not practice hand hygiene or sanitize vital signs equipment between residents, and touched a resident's eye lid with the eye dropper during administration. 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #2 did not practice hand hygiene or wipe down the blood pressure cuff prior to doing the resident's blood pressure and before placing it back into the vital signs machine basket. 3) Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was observed preparing Resident #98's medications and their long hair was observed going inside the medication cart, medication cups, and the nebulizer treatment box. Findings include: 1) During a medication administration observation on 10/08/24 at 8:38 AM, Registered Nurse #3 went…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 10/3/2024 to 10/11/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, several nursing staff on the Dementia unit were observed without identification badges. The findings are: The facility policy titled Identification Badge dated 1/20/2020 documented all staff were required to wear an identification badge while in the facility. The facility policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity dated 7/2019 documented staff shall keep the resident informed and oriented to their environment. On 10/03/2024 at 12:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #13 was observed walking from the 5th Floor Nursing Station across the resident lounge area and towards the Dayroom. Certified Nursing Assistant #13 was observed without an identification badge and when approached, stated they forgot their badge in their bag. Certified Nursing Assistant #13 turned around towards the Nursing Station and returned wearing an identification badge. Certified Nursing Assistant #15 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPIC HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY