Williamsville Suburban, L L C
193 South Union Road, Williamsville, NY 14221 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 220 certified beds · (716) 276-1900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $43,973 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-24)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.4% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 61.6% | 19.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.8% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 13.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.4% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.6% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.3% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.7% | 13.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 17.2% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 20.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.9%CMS range 28.5–56.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.1–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 78.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.6–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 220 beds and averages 208.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00331630), the facility did not ensure residents had the right to be free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, on 1/16/2024 resident to resident physical abuse occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #2. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #1's arm and aggressively threw Resident #1 down to the floor. Resident #1 experienced pain; sustained a compression fracture (small breaks in the spine) of T2 (the upper aspect of thoracic region (middle section of spine) and fractures (break) of the left elbow and hip. Resident #1 was subsequently transferred to the hospital. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that is not immediate jeopardy. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of Residents with a review date of 2/23 documented that each resident has the right to be free from physical abuse. Residents will not be subjected to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during complaint investigations (2657322, 26853730) the facility did not ensure that food and drink was palatable, attractive and served at an appetizing temperature for two (2) (North and South) of two (2) buildings and at optimal temperatures for one (1) (second floor South) of one (1) test tray. Specifically, during the lunch meal, food and beverages were served at suboptimal temperatures and were not palatable. Residents #3, #4, #6, #7, #11, #13, and #17 were involved. The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Food Preparation and Service dated 06/26/2018 documented food service employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices, and the danger zone for food temperatures is between 41 degrees Fahrenheit and 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Therefore, cold foods must be maintained at 40 degrees or below, and hot foods 136 degrees or above.The Complaint/Incident Investigation Report, dated 12/05/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #2637850) the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This affected the Main Kitchen and two (2) (Second Floor and Third Floor) of two (2) unit nourishment refrigerators in the South Building and the Main Kitchen and four (4) (A Wing, B Wing, C Wing, and D Wing) of four (4) unit nourishment refrigerators in the North Building. Specifically, there were issues with personal coats hanging in food and single service item storage areas, soiled and dusty surfaces, broken wall tiles, improper thawing of meats, unnecessary persons in food preparation areas without hairnets, undated/ outdated/ unlabeled refrigerated foods, food labeled Keep Frozen stored in refrigerator for unknown time, soiled bench style can opener, cases of food and single service items stored on the floor, food service workers without hair nets or beard nets while working on tray line, raw meat stored on the top shelf of a walk-in cooler above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #'s 2637850, 2657322, 2676432, 2680267) the facility did not ensure that there were housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for two (2) (North Building and South Building) of two (2) resident buildings. Specifically, there were torn and stained privacy curtains in resident rooms; walls, floors, and baseboards that were soiled, discolored and/or in disrepair. Shower rooms with soiled furnishings and loose toilet seats, stored unlabeled opened personal care items; soiled and in disrepair floors, broken blinds, wall board in disrepair and separating from the wall, stained ceiling tiles and a rusty ceiling tile grid. Additionally, soiled linens were observed on floors of shower room and in resident rooms.The findings are:The undated facility document titled General Housekeeping Procedure documented the purpose was to prevent the spread of bacteria and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #2637850) the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, two (2) (South Building and North Building) of two (2) resident buildings had waste that was not properly contained outside in closed dumpsters. Garbage and loose debris were observed on the ground around the dumpsters, which created potential feeding and harborage areas for pests. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, issued 06/26/2018, documented garbage and rubbish containing food wastes will be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to vermin, storage areas will be kept clean at all times, and outside dumpsters will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. 1a. Observation on 12/18/2025 at 9:05 AM revealed there were two (2) garbage dumpsters located outside of the South Building. Both dumpsters contained bagged garbage, and both had open lids and sliding doors. A second observation of the South Building's exterior garbage storage area on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #2655726) the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for two (2) (Residents #8 and #9) of five (5) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #8 was not provided with morning care and Resident #9 was not provided with timely incontinent care. The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living dated 11/18/2024 documented the facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The facility will provide care and services for hygiene-bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene.The facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #2680267) completed on 12/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) (Resident #7 and #8) of two (2) residents reviewed. Specifically, there was lack of ongoing evidence of skin assessments and lack of evidence the treatment was completed as ordered (#7) and there was a delay in obtaining an order for completing dressing changes and lack of evidence flushes were completed as ordered (#8). The findings are: The policy titled Wound Care dated 12/01/2017, documented the purpose was to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Documentation should be recorded in the resident's medical record: any change in the resident's condition, all assessment data (wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound, any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure and the signature and title of the person recording the data. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey during a Complaint Investigation (#2657322) the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one (1) (Resident #4) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 with a history of expressing sadness and making negative statements was not provided a Psychiatry consult, consistent with prior Psychiatry recommendations. The finding is:The policy titled Behavior Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring dated 11/01/2019, documented the facility would provide and residents would receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health services would be provided by qualified staff who had the competencies and skills necessary to provide appropriate services to the residents.During an interview on 12/19/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review completed during an Abbreviated Survey (#2655726) the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (2) (Resident #8 and Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, Resident #8 was on enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms, including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment (gowns) during hands-on care while bathing, performing catheter care, changing brief, and changing linens; Certified Nurse Aide #7 did not change their gloves and perform hand hygiene prior to handing clean brief, bed remote after performing fecal incontinent care (Resident #9). The findings are:An undated policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00365545 and #NY00373162) the facility did not ensure that there were housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for one (Second Floor) of two resident floors in the South Campus and one (C Wing) of four resident wings in North Campus. Specifically, there were dirty and sticky floors; stain ceiling tiles; window blinds with missing or damaged slats; residue (substance/film) on the surface in shared bathroom sink; room labeled detailed- full clean with debris on floor, in drawers, on bed frame, and bathroom sink; bedpans, wash basins on floors in shared bathrooms (Second Floor-South Campus); window blinds with missing or damaged slats; soiled, damaged fall mat; soiled wall and toilet seats in resident rooms (C-Wing). The findings are: The policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting Resident's Rooms dated 11/1/2017, documented that resident rooms housekeeping surfaces…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00365545) completed 5/7/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (Residents #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was unshaven with facial hair longer than ¼ inch. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living dated 11/18/24, documented the facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The facility will provide care and services for hygiene-bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene. The facility policy and procedure titled Quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00353284, #NY00329150) during the standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide care for all residents. Specifically, one of one facility reviewed for sufficient staffing the facility did not meet their assessed minimum staffing levels for Certified Nurse Aides on 8/24/2024, 9/8/2024, 9/16/2024, 9/22/24, 10/5/2024, 10/6/2024, and 10/20/2024 to meet the needs of the residents. The finding is: Refer to F 677 Activities of daily living care for dependent residents. The policy and procedure titled Nursing Department Staffing dated 2/17/2021 documented the facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population. It documented that Certified Nurse Aides are available on each shift to provide the needed care and services of each resident as outlined in the resident's comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for one of one infection control program reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not provide documentation showing that antibiotics were being monitored and tracked to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This involved Resident #84. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review & Surveillance of Antibiotic Use & Outcomes, dated 8/2018, documented that Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form, and all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the Infection Preventionist. All Antibiotic starts will be reviewed by the Infection Preventionist within 48 hours to determine if continued therapy is justified, justified with needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #84) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices during care. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide's #2, 4, 5, and 6 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during care activities for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions who had an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and a stage IV pressure ulcer. The findings are: The undated policy and procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions documented enhanced barrier precautions are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents. Enhanced Barrier Precautions employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00332426) during a standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made to the facility's Administrator and the State Survey Agency for one (Resident #62) of five residents reviewed. Specifically Resident #62 was found to have an injury of unknown source to their forehead, and it was not reported within the required timeframe. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of Residents, reviewed 2/29/24, documented that if abuse is suspected, personnel will report their observation to their supervisor immediately and without delay, and the Administrator, Director of Nursing or designee will notify the appropriate state agencies per state regulations. 1. Resident #62 had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, status post fractured hip, and disorientation (a mental state of confusion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (Residents #71 and #127) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, issues involved unkempt long, dirty, jagged fingernails (#71, #127). In addition, Resident #71 had presence of unwanted facial hair. Additionally, the 3rd floor Bath & Shower Sheet dated 10/23/24 for #71 was inaccurately documented, that care had been provided. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living created 2/13/23 documented a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living would receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The policy and procedure titled Care of Fingernails issued 6/26/18 documented nail care was to include daily cleaning and regular trimming on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted the Standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not ensure that residents who had an indwelling (foley) catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services to manage catheters for one (Resident #84) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #84 was symptomatic for a urinary tract infection, and the foley catheter drainage bag was not draining to gravity below their bladder. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Catheter Care: Urinary revised on 4/30/24 documented the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The position of the urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder. Resident #84 had diagnoses which included anxiety, stage IV pressure ulcer (most severe type of pressure ulcer and involves full-thickness tissue loss that exposes bone, tendon, or muscle), and urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard Survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for the storage of controlled drugs for one (A Wing North Building) of three medication rooms observed for medication storage. Specifically, three bottles of liquid Lorazepam (a Schedule IV controlled substance-sedative/antianxiety medication) were stored in a removable locked box inside a small refrigerator that was not permanently affixed, which was located in a room with an unlockable door. This involved Resident #32. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Controlled Substances with effective date 12/1/17 documented that refrigerated controlled substances must be stored in a refrigerator that has a locked, affixed narcotic box inside of the refrigerator with a separate lock on the outside of the refrigerator. The refrigerator must be affixed to the floor or wall. The refrigerator and interior narcotic container must remain locked at all times. During a medication storage room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not provide or obtain dental services to meet the resident's needs for one (Resident #84) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, there was no follow up to recommendations for a crown for a chipped tooth. In addition, the care plan was not revised to include Resident #84's chipped tooth. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Dental Services with a revised date 1/28/20 documented routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. The Director of Nursing, or his/her designee, is responsible for notifying Social Services of a resident's need for dental services and coordinate appointments with Medical Records/Unit Clerks. Social Services personnel will be responsible for assisting the resident/family in making dental appointments and transportation arrangements as necessary whenever an outside appointment is requested. The Medical Records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY00321134), the facility did not ensure that the resident's person-centered care plan was implemented to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs for three (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of six residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Residents #1, #2 and #3 were care planned for the use of a stop sign across their room door to deter other residents from entering and they were not provided with one. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plans with a revision date of 2/1/2018 documented an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). The Minimum Data Set (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a complaint investigation (#NY00331620), the facility did not ensure that all alleged allegations of abuse, were thoroughly investigated for two (Resident #1 & 2) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not complete a thorough and accurate investigation into resident-to-resident abuse to include conducting interviews with witnesses and other pertinent staff. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of Residents dated 4/19 documented the Administrator/Director of Nursing (DON/designee will conduct an investigation. Witness reports will be in writing. Witnesses will be required to sign and date such reports. The individual conducting the investigation shall follow the procedure for reporting and investigation when an incident of resident abuse is alleged or suspected. The following should be reported by individuals/employees which include the following: The name of the resident involved,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Compliant #NY00289521) completed on 1/24/24, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for delay of treatment had complained of left hip pain on 1/9/22 and was not sent to the hospital for a confirmation of a broken hip until 1/12/22. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol dated 2/1/2017 documented that all laboratory and diagnostic tests will be scheduled, collected, and tracked timely to ensure the physician receives timely reports to ensure there is no delay when notifying the physician whenever abnormal findings are identified. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of stroke and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 1/22/22 documented Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired, was understood and usually understands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Recertification survey and complaint investigation (#NY00306577) completed on 3/17/23, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for five (North Building: Units B, C, and D & South Building 2nd and 3rd Floor) of five resident units and one laundry room in the North building. Specifically, the issues involved soiled floors, walls, furniture, and doors; garbage on the floors; window blinds in disrepair; stained privacy curtains; personal care supplies directly on the floor; dusty vents and heaters; rusty toilet paper holders; stained ceiling tiles and urine odors. Additionally, the laundry room had piles of visibly soiled linens on the floor next to and in front of washing machines; visibly soiled incontinent wipes on the floor in front of dryers; standing water on the floor, and soiled incontinent briefs on the floor between a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed 3/17/23, the facility did not provide food and drink that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for five (South building: 2nd floor, 3rd floor and North building: B Unit, C Unit and D unit) of five test trays. Specifically, food and beverages during meals were served at suboptimal temperatures and were not palatable. Residents' #62, #77, #89, #128, #155 and #166 were involved. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Food Preparation and Service dated 6/26/18 documented the food service employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. The danger zone for food temperatures is between 41 degrees (°) and 135° Fahrenheit (F). This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness. The longer foods remain in the danger zone the greater the risk for growth of harmful pathogens. Therefore, potentially hazardous foods must be maintained at 40°F or below or at 136°F or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey started 3/12/23 and completed 3/17/23, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (South) of two kitchens. Specifically, the South kitchen had issues with soiled floors, walls, and storage shelves. The dish-room walls and ceiling were soiled with dried food debris, and thick dust hanging from the light fixture. The kitchen commercial hood and mobile heated dish dispenser had a build-up of grease and dust. The walk-in freezer's floor was soiled with spilled frozen food products, there was no thermometer, and had undated/outdated/unlabeled food. The stand-up and walk in cooler had undated/outdate/unlabeled food items. Dietary staff were not wearing face masks positioned appropriately and dietary staff with facial hair were not wearing beard nets. Two (Second Floor, Third Floor) of two nourishment room refrigerators in the South…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement was explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands, including in a language the resident and his or her representative understands; and the resident or his or her representative acknowledges that he or she understands the agreement five (Resident #100, #238, #387, #388 and #389) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, the residents did not understand what an Arbitration Agreement was and did not recall the facility explaining what an Arbitration Agreement was. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Arbitration Agreements with revision date 10/22/22 documented the facility informs residents or their representatives of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration agreement, to inform their decision on whether or not to enter into such agreements. The facility must ensure that the agreement is explained to the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement provides for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the agreement provides for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. Specifically, five (Resident #100, #238, #387, #388 and #389) of five resident's Binding Arbitration Agreements were reviewed and there is no documented evidence the agreement addresses the selection of a neutral Arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. Refer to F 847 E The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Arbitration Agreements with revision date 10/22/22 revealed there was no documented evidence the Binding Arbitration Agreement provides for a selection of a neutral Arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and a venue that was convenient to both parties. The facility's Binding Arbitration Agreement dated 8/21/19 revealed there was no documented evidence the Binding Arbitration Agreement provides for a selection of a neutral Arbitrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 3/17/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for two (Residents #153 and #155) of 8 residents reviewed. Specifically, Residents #153 and #155 had unkempt (long/jagged/dirty) fingernails. Additionally, Resident #155 was unkempt had oily disheveled hair and the presence of unwanted facial hair. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Maintain Abilities dated 2/13/2018 documented the facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The facility will provide care and services for the following ADLs: Hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. A resident who is unable to carry out ADLS will receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 3/17/23, the facility did not ensure that the residents' environment remains as free from accident hazards as is possible. Specifically, three (First Floor, Second Floor, Third Floor) of three resident use floors in one (South Building) of two buildings had issues with water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). This involves Resident #86. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled, Water Temperatures, Safety of, issued 11/9/16, documented tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding of residents. Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/ shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 120 °F. Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility and recording these checks in a maintenance log. During an observation on 3/12/23 at 10:30 AM, the hot water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 3/17/23, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis, received services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #166) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #166 did not receive ongoing monitoring of vital signs upon return to the facility after dialysis. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease revised 9/5/18, documented to monitor for vital signs (VS) especially blood pressure (BP) before and after the dialysis session and as needed. Additionally, the nurse will document pertinent information in the progress notes, 24-hour report and care plan when indicated. The facility P&P titled Dialysis revised 1/19/19, documented post dialysis monitoring: licensed nurse to obtain blood pressure and pulse. 1. Resident #166 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. The Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the Standard survey completed on 5/6/21, the facility did not maintain all essential mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe, operating condition. Specifically, the plumbing system on one (North Building A Wing) of six resident units had open and unsealed toilet and sink waste lines. The findings are: 1) Observations in the North Building A Wing on 4/29/21 from 2:05 PM until 3:30 PM revealed this 36-bed unit was vacant. a. Observation in the North Building A Wing on 4/29/21 at 2:27 PM revealed the bathroom sink in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had an unsealed waste line, with a rag placed at the end of the line. b. Observation in the North Building A Wing on 4/29/21 at 3:28 PM revealed the bathroom toilet in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had an unsealed waste line, with a rag covering it. During an interview on 5/4/21 at 2:45 PM, the Maintenance Director stated the sink and toilet were removed from the vacant A Wing to be used elsewhere in the building,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/6/21, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the Administrator of the facility and to appropriate officials (including the State Survey Agency) for one (Resident #60) of four residents reviewed for alleged abuse. Specifically, an alleged incident of sexual abuse was not reported timely to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) within the two-hour timeframe as required. The finding is: Review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse Prohibition Program revised 11/20/2017 documented facility it is the responsibility of our employees to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse. All alleged violations and results of all investigations shall be reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with New York State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the standard survey completed on 5/6/21, the facility did not provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. One (North Building) of two resident units reviewed for food temperatures during the lunch meal on 5/4/21 had issues involving items that were not palatable and not served at appetizing temperatures. Residents #3, 36, 55, 83, 121, 135 and 143 were involved. Review of an undated facility policy and procedure entitled Meal Distribution Policy revealed food is to be transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance (through the use of a traveling Cambrio (meal cart), which protects against contamination by being covered prior to being placed in the traveling Cambrio) and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. All items will be transported promptly for appropriate temperature maintenance from the South Kitchen to the North dining room by way of A Wing entrance. Proper food handling techniques to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #2637850) the facility did not ensure that, in accordance with professional standards and practices, they maintained medical records on all residents that were complete and accurately documented. Specifically, the controlled substance inventory records, for the nurses shift to shift counts, were not consistently signed off by two nurses on four (4) (South building second floor, and North building B, C and D units) of six (6) units observed.The findings are:The undated policy and procedure titled 4.0 Schedule II Controlled Substance Medication documented an inventory count of all controlled medications stored on each nursing unit shall be performed at each change of shift by both the incoming and outgoing nurse. Both nurses are responsible for the count and must sign the inventory count form.The form titled Controlled Substance Inventory Record dated 10/04/2016 documented all controlled substances are to be counted at the beginning and ending of each shift. Two signatures; that of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-10-28 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during a Standard Survey completed on 10/28/24, the facility did not post in a manor accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives, the pertinent contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program and the State Agency Complaint Hotline number, including a statement that the resident may file a complaint. Specifically, for one (North) of two buildings there was no contact information for the State Agency Complaint Hotline, or the Ombudsman Program posted in the building. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Resident Rights dated 3/1/17, documented Federal and State laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the residents right to: communicate with outside agencies (e.g. local, state, or federal officials, state and federal surveyors, state long-term care ombudsman, protection, or advocacy organizations, etc.) regarding any matter. During a Resident Council meeting with the North building residents on 10/22/24 at 10:32 AM, the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-03-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed 3/17/23, the facility did not ensure MDS (Minimum Data Set - a resident assessment tool) data was electronically transmitted to the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) System within 14 days after the resident's assessment was completed for three (Resident #65, 92, and 151) of three residents reviewed. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) MDS Completion and Submission Time Frames dated 12/2017 documented the facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. The Assessment Coordinator or designee shall be responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS. The following timeframes will be observed by this facility: Assessment Type: Quarterly; MDS Completion Date: ARD (Assessment Reference Date - date of MDS) plus (+) 14 calendar days; Transmission Date: MDS Completion Date + 14 calendar days. 1. Resident #65…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$43,973 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $43,973 — penalty dated 2024-01-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-22 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTTERBEIN, LAURA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 46% | since 03/12/2018 |
| ZACHER, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 46% | since 03/12/2018 |
| GOLDMAN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/18/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335647. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.