Woodbury Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
378 Syosset Woodbury Road, Woodbury, NY 11797 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 606 certified beds · (516) 921-3900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $117,712 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-12)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.1% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.4% | 5.8% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.1% | 19.5% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.8% | 13.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.5% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.9% | 13.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.2% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.2% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.28 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.36 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.9%CMS range 36.5–51.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.8–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 606 beds and averages 277.6 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 328 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00322869) initiated on [DATE] the facility failed to ensure that each resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #1). Specifically, on [DATE] at 6:05 PM Resident #1 experienced respiratory distress. At 7:55 PM Nurse Practitioner #1 assessed the resident and ordered the resident to be transferred to the hospital. Registered Nurse #1 did not follow the order to call for emergency medical transportation, instead Registered Nurse #1 called a non-emergency ambulance service. The company reported that it would take 2 hours for the ambulance to arrive. The resident's family intervened at approximately 9:00 PM and demanded that emergency services (911) be called. The Registered Nurse #1 did not call for emergency transportation via emergency services until 9:20 PM, causing a 1 hour and 33-minute delay in emergency transport treatment. Subsequently,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00334107), the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of unsafe smoking and was found by facility staff smoking unsupervised outside of the designated time on four occasions. The facility staff were aware of the resident's noncompliance with smoking; however, there were no interventions put in place to maintain the resident's safety. Resident #1 utilized supplemental oxygen therapy for the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough). Subsequently, on 2/22/2024, Resident #1 sustained a burn to their face (upper lip and on either side of the nose) while smoking unsupervised with oxygen via a nasal cannula. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #1, that is Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00310476) initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #738) of four residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #738 was admitted to the facility with an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacral region which deteriorated to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident was identified as a high risk for pressure ulcer development. On 8/1/2022 Resident #738 was identified with a new Stage 3 pressure ulcer (pressure injuries that extend through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but do not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) to the left shoulder and on 8/29/2022 with a new Stage 4 pressure ulcer (pressure injuries that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to each resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was identified for one (Resident #116) of two residents reviewed for Pain Management. Specifically, Resident #116 with diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS-a chronic disease of the central nervous system) had a Physician's order to receive Baclofen (a muscle relaxant) 10 milligrams (mg), give two tablets 20 mg every 12 hours at 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM for muscle spasms. Resident #116 did not receive the 6:00 PM dose of Baclofen on 7/22/2023. The resident reported their pain level was 9 out of 10 because the Baclofen was not administered. Additionally, the facility staff did not monitor or assess resident's pain level on 7/22/2023 during the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift. This resulted in actual harm to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. This was identified 1) on nine of nine units during the dining task observations and 2) for seven (Resident #169, Resident #341, Resident #285, Resident #5, Resident #267, Resident #337, and Resident #204) of seven residents interviewed during the resident council meeting. Specifically, 1)during the dining task observations, residents on all nine units were served their breakfast and lunch meals on disposable plates with disposable utensils. 2) On 10/16/2024 at 2:30 PM, all seven residents who attended the resident council meeting verbalized dissatisfaction about meals being served on disposable dishes with disposable utensils because of the broken dishwasher. The finding is: 1) During the dining meal observation of the Breakfast and Lunch meals for all nine resident units on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified for one unit (Woodcrest one) of nine units observed during the Dining Facility Task. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the temperature of cold food items served to residents in the Woodcrest One Unit during a lunch meal observation on 10/16/2024. The cold food temperature served during the lunch meal measured between 50-60 degrees Fahrenheit (normal range: below 41 degrees Fahrenheit). The finding is: An undated facility policy and procedure titled Food Temperatures documented that the temperatures of the food items will be taken and properly recorded for each meal. All cold food items must be maintained and served at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Temperatures should be taken periodically to ensure cold foods stay below 41 degrees Fahrenheit during the portioning, transporting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, during a kitchen tour with the Food Production Manager on 10/16/2024 the mechanical dishwashing machine was not in working order. Record review and interviews indicated that the dishwashing machine has been out of order since January 2024. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure dated 4/20/2023 titled Dishwashing, documented the Nutritional Services Department shall maintain a file of written procedures for cleaning and maintaining all equipment in the department. The Dietary Aide will report to the Food Production Manager, Supervisor, or Director of Dietary any problems with the dishwashing machine. Upon receipt of the report of problems with the machine, the Plant Operations is called and a routine work request is prepared. The Plant Operations supervisor will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024 the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #79) of six residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #79 was self-administering the Nasal Moisturizing Spray and the facility staff was aware. A review of the resident's medical records indicated no documented assessment to determine if the resident could safely self-administer the medication and there was no physician's order to self-administer the Nasal Moisturizing Spray. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Self-Administration of Medication, last revised on 6/3/2024 documented to permit each resident to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that the resident can securely store, safely/accurately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was identified for one (Unit Seacliff 1) of nine units observed during the environmental task. Specifically, Resident #246 's privacy curtain was ripped and had brown stains. The finding is: The facility's policy for Resident Room Cleaning, dated March 2022, documented meaning and sanitizing to improve sanitation and ensure the highest level of cleanliness throughout the facility. To control cross-contamination, and the spread of bacteria and infection to maintain the outward experience of the facility. Complete high and low dusting of all flat surfaces, wall surfaces, corners and edges, windows, drapery, pictures, and ceiling features. The policy did not include when to change or wash the curtains. The Facility's policy for Resident Room-Homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. This was identified for one (Resident #262) of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #262 did not accurately indicate that the resident was receiving comfort care. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Completion of the RAI Process last reviewed 3/16/2023, documented that assessments will be completed within the guidelines outlined in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, including the care planning processes to lead to the development of a plan of care to address and monitor each resident's needs and function, and to track changes in the resident's status. Staff may utilize information in the medical record to assist with the completion of the Minimum Data Set. Resident #262 was admitted with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/24/2024, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was developed to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #331) of four residents reviewed during the Infection Control Task. Specifically, Resident #331 had a physician's order to place Resident #331 on contact precautions since 5/22/2024. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to reflect Resident #331 was on contact precaution until 10/16/2024. The finding is: The Comprehensive Care Plan Policy dated 2/01/2021 documented that residents of the facility will have a Comprehensive Care Plan completed per Federal and State requirements. An individual Comprehensive Care Plan will be developed for each problem, strength, or need, measurable objectives, and timetables to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during a recertification survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/24/2024, the facility did not ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility meet the current professional standards of quality. The was identified on one (Woodcrest 2 unit) of nine units observed for medication storage task. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #9 pre-poured medications in a medication cup and stored the medication cup in the medication cart without appropriate labels. Licensed Practical Nurse #9 then attempted to administer the medications to the wrong resident (Resident #100) without properly identifying the resident. The finding is: The Medication administration policy dated 9/07/2023 documented Medication administration will be conducted according to each resident's individualized care plan and physician's orders. Medication administration times will be strictly adhered to, and medications will be administered at the prescribed intervals. Before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #176) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #176 had a physician's order for an alternating air mattress due to multiple pressure ulcers. The resident's most recent weight was 86 pounds. The air mattress weight setting was set to a firm setting which corresponds to a resident who weighs between 360-400 pounds; however, the air mattress was observed to be deflated and was not functioning as intended. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Management of Pressure Ulcers, revised on 2/18/2022, documented that pressure ulcer care requires an interdisciplinary approach that addresses the following areas to promote healing of tissue: reduce or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. This was identified for one (Resident #243) of six residents reviewed for Accident Hazards. Specifically, Resident #243's room was observed with an unsecured, free-standing oxygen E-Cylinder tank (the most common and largest portable oxygen tank) next to the resident's bed. The E-Cylinder tank was not secured in a rolling cylinder stand as per the facility's policy. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Oxygen safety, last revised on 5/4/2024 documented that safety is the responsibility of all staff, residents, visitors, and the public. Hazards or other conditions that could develop into a hazard must be reported to a supervisor or Maintenance Director as soon as practical. Anyone may report a hazard or potential hazard. When small-size (A,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure a system of records and accounts of all controlled drugs were maintained, and the facility did not ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility meet the current professional standards of quality. This was identified for three (Resident #207, Resident #301, and Resident #340) of three residents reviewed during the medication storage task and 2) one (Woodcrest 2 Unit) of nine units observed during the medication storage task. Specifically, 1) Resident #207 and Resident #301 Controlled Substance Disposition Record were not accurately reconciled after the medications were administered to the residents. -A Blister Pack containing 12 Marinol 10 milligram capsules (Scheduled III drug) was observed stored in the locked box in the medication refrigerator; however, there was no Controlled Substance Disposition Record maintained for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were maintained and stored under proper temperature control. This was identified during a Medication Storage and Labeling Task on one ([NAME] 2 Unit) of nine Nursing Units observed. Specifically, [NAME] 2 Nursing Unit medication refrigerator temperature was observed to be at 60 degrees Fahrenheit. There were two unused/unopened Insulin injection pens and a box of Trulicity (used for Diabetes) injection pens observed stored in the medication refrigerator. Both unopened medications were supposed to be stored in the refrigerator at a temperature between 36 degrees Fahrenheit to 46 degrees Fahrenheit as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The finding is: The facility's Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration policy and procedure revised on 7/24/2024 documented that the facility will ensure all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure laboratory services were obtained in a timely fashion to meet the needs of each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #108) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, a Lipid Profile (a blood test to determine different types of fat in the blood) was ordered for Resident #108 in response to a pharmacist medication regimen review. The blood test was ordered in the electronic medical record on 9/27/2024 and 10/11/2024 but was not communicated to the laboratory and therefore was not done. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Diagnostic Tests and Results, dated 3/22/2022 documented it is the policy of the facility to identify diagnostic tests and results that are needed for the management of resident's care and delineate the timeframe in which the tests and results are expected to be performed or available. Further, the facility will ensure that the results of these tests are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during a Recertification Survey initiated on 10/16/2024 and completed on 10/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that medical records were maintained for each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #184) of one resident reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #184 was observed receiving oxygen therapy via a nasal cannula on 10/16/2024, 10/17/2024, and 10/21/2024 as per their Physician's order; however, there was no documented evidence that the resident was administered oxygen therapy on 10/16/2024, 10/17/2024, and 10/21/2024. The finding is: The facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Administration Record dated 4/2008 and last revised 5/2023 documented unit licensed nurses are provided with a resident medication profile to ensure medications and treatments are given as ordered. The licensed nurses must adhere to policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a complaint investigation survey NY00337265, the facility did not ensure each resident was free from misappropriation of the resident's property and exploitation. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's bank card was used by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 to withdraw money totaling 1,000 dollars without the resident's authorization. The findings are: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Prohibition and Prevention: Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated 9/1/2016 and last revised on 10/24/2022, defined misappropriation of resident property as the theft, unauthorized use or removal, embezzlement, or intentional destruction of the Resident's personal property, including but not limited to money, clothing, and other possessions belong to the resident, without regard to monetary value. The Facility's Non-Fraternization Policy documented that fraternizing among the employees and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance)/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee failed to monitor interventions and implement an appropriate plan of action for an identified quality deficiency regarding smoking noncompliance. This failure resulted in non-compliance in regulations related to smoking safety and noncompliance during an abbreviated survey. Findings included: The policy entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement dated 05/03/2023 documented The facility will develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. On 02/29/2024 at 4:06 PM an Immediate Jeopardy was called regarding smoking noncompliance for one resident (Resident #1). An extended survey was completed on 03/04/2024. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee notes dated 06/01/2023 and 08/30/2023 documented Random Administrative Supervision at Smoking Sessions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during a complaint investigation, Complaint # NY00332067 initiated on 2/8/2024 and completed on 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately to the New York State Department of Health. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, the facility did not report an allegation of physical abuse to the New York State Department of Health within 24 hours when Resident #1 complained that Certified Nursing Aide #1 handled the resident roughly during care and it was reported to the nursing supervisor. The resident stated Certified Nursing Assistant #1 grabbed the resident's left arm, twisted, and pushed to turn the resident. The findings are: The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition and Prevention Accident Investigation Report dated 11/16/2023 documented that if there is belief or suspicion of abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00304799 and NY00320391) initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure nursing services are provided by sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident, as determined by resident assessment and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Additionally, the facility did not provide services by sufficient number of licensed nurses and nurse aides (assistants) on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans. Specifically, 1) 10 of 10 Residents in the Resident Council meeting held on 8/2/2023 reported chronic understaffing on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility was not effectively administered to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to promote the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Facility Assessment did not include the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure that each resident's needs were being met. Additionally, the Administrator did not monitor and enhance the quality of care and services by repeating the same deficiencies including: F656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F658 Services Provided meet Professional Standards, F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices and F840 Use of Outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure that the facility assessment included what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility assessment did not include the overall number of facility staff needed to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff required to meet each resident's needs. The facility assessment did not consider a review of individual staff assignment and systems for coordination and continuity of care for resident's within and across these staff assignments. Additionally, the facility assessment did not include the need for the respiratory care clinicians on the ventilator unit. The finding is: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], in its entirety, revealed that there was no overall number of facility staff needed included in the assessment to ensure that each resident's needs were being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident is treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for one (Resident #224) of one resident reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, during a lunch meal observation on 8/1/2023 at time 1:05 PM Registered Nurse (RN) #13 was observed standing over Resident #224 while feeding the resident. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Assisting with Feeding dated 10/26/2022 documented to provide assistance with feeding to residents who require it as part of their care plan in the nursing home. This policy aims to ensure that residents receive proper nutrition and hydration, maintain their overall health, and experience a comfortable dining experience. Staff will respect residents' preferences and dignity while assisting with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00309550) initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure that residents and/or their Designated Representatives participated in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care. This was identified for one (Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, there was no documented evidence in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that Resident #43 had a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) meeting held since [DATE]. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that the resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP)/Designated Representative was invited to a CCP meeting since [DATE]. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Care Plan Scheduling and Meeting dated [DATE] documented to provide each resident with an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care. Scheduling of the CCP Review and Meetings will be generated by the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00310476 and NY00309550) initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's Physician and/or notify the resident's Designated Representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status. This was identified for two (Resident #738 and Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, there was no documented evidence in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that 1A) Resident #738's Designated Representative was informed when the resident developed a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to their left shoulder on [DATE], 1B) Resident #738's Physician was not notified when the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 identified a significant change in Resident #738's condition from [DATE] to [DATE], and 2) Resident #43's Designated Representative was informed when the resident became positive for COVID-19 infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior on two of three nursing units in the Woodcrest Building. Specifically, on 8/4/2023 on the Woodcrest 1 unit there was an upholstered couch used by residents in the common area that was soiled and stained; and on Woodcrest 3 unit there were two upholstered chairs used by residents in the common area that were soiled and stained. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Cleaning Furnishings, dated 6/1/2022, documented to create a clean and hygienic environment for residents, staff, and visitors, promoting infection prevention and overall well-being. Nursing home staff will conduct routine cleaning of all furnishings in common areas, resident rooms, and other designated spaces, as per the established cleaning schedule. Routine cleaning will include dusting, vacuuming, and spot-cleaning of stains to maintain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that all residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was identified for one (Resident #455) of one resident reviewed for restraints. Specifically, Resident #455 was observed in their bed with the right side of the bed placed against the wall. On the left side of the bed three pillows were observed folded in half and wedged between the mattress and bed frame which caused the mattress to curve upward and prevented the resident for exiting the bed. There was not a physician's order or an assessment for the use of pillows to prevent the resident from exiting the bed. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Restraints dated 1/25/2008 and last reviewed 4/2015 documented that the facility shall promote and encourage a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was identified for one (Resident #91) of one resident reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, there was no Dialysis or Renal care plan created for Resident #91, who received bedside dialysis in the facility. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 2/1/2021, documented residents of the facility will have a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) completed in accordance with Federal and State requirements. The CCP will include the resident's problems, strengths, and needs. An individual CCP will be developed for each problem, strength, or need, measurable objectives, and timetables in order to meet the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified from the Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that services were provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, to meet professional standards of quality. This was identified for two (Resident #91 and #422) of 27 residents observed during the initial tour on Seacliff 1 unit. Specifically, Resident #91's and #422's tube feeding bottles were not labeled with the resident name, date, or start time. The findings are: 1) Resident #422 was admitted with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, Respiratory Failure, and Epilepsy. The 7/2/2023 annual MDS assessment documented no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, as the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident was also non-verbal and ventilator dependent. The Physician's order as of 8/1/2023 documented to administer Jevity 1.5, 65 milliliter (ml) per hour, start time 4 PM, 1500 ml per 24 hours. On 8/1/2023 at 10:08 AM Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident who is unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for one (Resident#343) of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, on 8/1/2023 Resident #343 was observed lying in bed in a hospital gown with a towel over their chest and abdomen. Coffee had spilled onto the towel, the resident's call bell was behind the resident on the head board and the resident's fingernails were observed to be long, untrimmed, and dirty on both hands. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living - General, dated 5/1/2021, documented to ensure residents receive all necessary care including activities of daily living. This policy aims to promote resident independence, dignity, and well-being while ensuring their safety and comfort. This policy applies to all residents in the nursing home who require assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was identified for 1) one (Resident #318) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions and 2) for one (Resident #455) of one resident reviewed for Restraints. Specifically, 1) Resident #318 did not receive the physician ordered wound treatment to the resident's bilateral legs on 8/6/2023. 2) Resident #455 with diagnoses including crushing injury of the head and traumatic hemorrhage of the cerebrum (brain), had a physician's order to utilize a helmet at all times and on six occasions Resident #455 was observed without wearing the helmet. Additionally, the physician's order was discontinued on 8/3/2023 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 without notifying the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible. This was identified for one (Resident #39) of four residents observed for medication administration. Specifically, during the medication pass observation conducted on 8/2/2023 Resident #39 was observed with a bottle of Tylenol PM (pain medication also used to assist with sleeping), antacid tablets, and a tube of Icy-Hot pain cream at the resident's bedside. There was no Physician's order for the Tylenol PM, antacid tablets, or tube of Icy-Hot pain cream and the resident was not assessed to self-medicate. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Preventing Accidents, dated 6/24/2022, documented staff will provide appropriate supervision and monitoring of residents, especially those at higher risk of accidents due to cognitive impairment or mobility issues. Staff will closely observe residents during activities and assist as needed to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that medications were administered within one hour of the ordered administration time. This was identified for 1) one of three units in the [NAME] building on 8/1/2023; 2) one of three units in the Sagamore building on 8/6/2023; and 3) the facility did not ensure that an account of controlled drugs was maintained on each unit for one of three units in the Woodcrest building. Specifically, 1) on 8/1/2023 on the Woodcrest 3 unit during the 7:00 AM-3:00 PM shift, 13 residents ( Resident #200, #358, #120, #341, #45, #639, #319, #210, #366, #241, #387, #303, #169) did not get there 9 AM medications within one hour of the physician-ordered administration time; 2) Five (Resident #4, #261, #379, #426, and #442) of 30 residents on Sagamore 2 unit received medications beyond one hour of the scheduled administration time on 8/6/2023 during the 7:00 AM-3:00 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00299549) initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident was free from any significant medication errors. This was identified for one (Resident #638) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Specifically, on 7/18/2022 Resident #638 received two doses of Ambien (hypnotic for sleep which is a controlled substance), 10 milligrams each, for a total of 20 mg. The physician order documented a maximum daily dosage of one tablet (10 mg). The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Medication Administration, dated 5/14/2020, documented to promote medication safety, prevent medication errors, and to ensure that residents receive their prescribed medications in a timely and appropriate manner. Medication administration will be conducted according to each resident's individualized care plan and physician's orders. Medication administration times will be strictly adhered to, and medications will be administered at the prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that each controlled-substance storage box was separately locked as per the state and federal guidelines. This was identified for one of two medication carts on Seacliff 1 unit on 8/8/2023. Specifically, on 8/8/2023, a controlled substance box in a medication cart on Seacliff 1 unit did not have a lock. The unlocked box was observed with narcotic controlled substances. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Medication Storage, dated 5/1/2021, documented all controlled substances, as defined by federal and state regulations, will be stored in a double-locked area within the medication cart or cabinet. The double locking will include both a locked drawer or compartment and a lock securing the medication cart or cabinet itself. On 8/8/2023 at 2:07 PM on Seacliff 1 unit a medication cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. The narcotic box (controlled substance storage box) within the medication cart did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023, the facility did not ensure outside services were provided to resident timely as per their Physician's orders. This was identified for one (Resident #97) of one resident reviewed for Psychotropic Medication Side Effects. Specifically, Resident #97, with a medical diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease was on a psychotropic medication, Zyprexa, as per their Physician's orders. A Physician's order for a Neurology consult due to increased shakiness was put in place on 5/12/2023. The resident has not been seen by the Neurologist as of 8/10/2023. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Consults dated 2/21/2021 documented to provide residents with consultation services in accordance with their plan of care and as ordered by a physician. The physician will order the consult. The nurse generates the Consultation Request form. If the facility has the consultant in-house, the consult request will be sent directly to the consultant for review and scheduling. Once completed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey initiated on 8/1/2023 and completed on 8/10/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside. This was identified 1) one (Resident #343) of eight residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and 2) one (Resident #259) of three residents reviewed for the communication-sensory care area. Specifically, 1) On 8/1/2023, Resident #343's call light was wrapped over the head of the bed frame while the resident was in bed. The call bell was not in view or within reach of the resident. 2) Resident #259, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Muscle weakness was observed on three occasions without access to their call bell. The findings are: The facility's policy, titled Call Light, dated 1/10/2023, documented every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021, the facility did not ensure that a thorough investigation was conducted for one of three residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #471 had two Accidents/Incident (A/I) reports with injuries without an investigation to determine whether the call bell was functioning, was within the resident's reach, and if the call bell was activated prior to the incident. The finding is: The Facility Policy titled Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure dated 12/2017 documented it is the policy of the facility that all reports or allegations of abuse, mistreatment, neglect and/or misappropriation of resident belongings be promptly and thoroughly investigated. Resident # 471 was admitted with diagnosis that include Schizophrenia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated the resident had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021 the facility did not ensure that each resident had a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) developed to meet each resident's individualized care needs. This was identified for one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for Behavior and for one (Resident #279) of one resident reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). Specifically, 1) Resident #12, who had a history of accusatory behavior, did not have a CCP developed addressing the need for a two person approach during care 2) Resident # 279 did not have a CCP developed for the use of an Antibiotic to treat a UTI. The findings are: 1) Resident #12 has diagnoses which include Cerebral Infarction and Hypothyroidism. The resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident was understood and was able to understand. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during a Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021 the facility did not ensure that for one (Resident #360) of four residents reviewed for medication administration, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 followed the Physician's order as written. Specifically, the LPN crushed the medication Clozaril (Antipsychotic) 100 milligrams (mg) two tablets and placed the crushed medication in Resident #360's food without a Physician's order to crush the medication. The finding is: Resident #360 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses that include Schizophrenia and Anxiety Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS also documented that the resident had delusions. The resident received Antipsychotic and Antianxiety medication 7 of 7 days during the look-back period. The Physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021 the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards. This was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident # 249, who was identified as an elopement risk and wore a wander guard, entered an elevator and was able to reach the facility lobby on 1/23/2021. The elevator door did not function as intended with the use of the wander guard. The Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) did not report the elevator door malfunction. Subsequently, on 3/1/2021 Resident #249 entered the elevator and was able to reach the facility lobby again. 2) Resident #36 was using a wheelchair with a broken removable right arm rest which was identified on 5/21/2020 and was not addressed by the facility staff until 5/24/2021. The findings are: 1) The facility policy entitled Wandering Residents Security system dated 12/2004 documented that an elevator alarm system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021, the facility did not ensure that each resident is free from unnecessary medications. This was identified for one (Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #60 was prescribed Haldol (an antipsychotic medication), which was increased from 10 milligrams (mg) twice daily to 20 mg twice daily without documented evidence of the justification for the increase of the Haldol. The finding is: Resident #60 has diagnoses that include Dementia superimposed on Schizoaffective Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had no verbal or physical behavior problems identified on the MDS. On 05/17/2021 at 3:50 PM the resident was observed sleeping in bed. The physician's order dated 2/14/2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-24 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021, the facility did not ensure that outside professional services were furnished in a timely manner for one (Resident #472) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #472 had a Physician's order for a Psychiatry consult dated 4/25/2021 and the Psychiatry consult was not completed as of 5/24/2021. The findings is: Resident #472 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances. A Progress Notes dated 4/25/2021 at 2:38 PM , written by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) documented the NP was asked to see resident for behavior, and that the resident placed themselves on the ground and was laying on ground refusing to get up. A Nursing Note (NN) dated 04/25/2021 at 5:19 PM documented the resident attempted to kick/punch staff and was removing the suprapubic (hollow flexible tube inserted directly to the bladder to drain the urine)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 5/24/2021 the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccination and that each resident's medical record documented whether or not the resident received the immunization. This was identified for 1 (Resident # 13) of 5 residents reviewed for Influenza and Pneumococcal immunizations. Specifically, Resident #13's medical record lacked documented evidence of whether the resident received or declined the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines. The finding is: The facility's undated policy titled Conducting the Vaccination Program documented within 5 days of Admission/readmission the admitting nurse will complete the admission vaccine assessment, noting the resident's Influenza/Pneumococcal vaccine status. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$117,712 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $117,712 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID, ROCHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 13% | since 07/08/2014 |
| FARKOWITZ, ESTHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 07/08/2014 |
| FRIEDMAN, LEAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 13% | since 07/08/2014 |
| LEIFER, JOEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 07/08/2014 |
| PHILIPSON, AVI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 24% | since 07/08/2014 |
| SIMPSER, JOSEF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $8.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335555. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.