No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility

61 11 Queens Boulevard, Woodside, NY 11377 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 280 certified beds · (718) 205-0288 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (718) 205-0288 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jun 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 36% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
57-18 Woodside Ave · (718) 639-3600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
58-01 Queens Blvd · (718) 779-6431 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4302 58th St
Park
Roosevelt Ave &, Woodside Ave · (718) 651-6862 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
41-25 58th St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.9%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms86.2%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.3%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.8%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.4%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.801.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 415 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.57U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 237 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.8%CMS range 57.6–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 7.5–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.1–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.02
RN hours/ resident / day
0.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
39.8%
Total nursing turnover
45.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 268.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for 2 (5th and 6th floor) of 2 units observed during dining observation. Specifically, food served during lunch meal service were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Communal Dining with a revision date of 04/10/2024 documented the purpose of the policy was to enhance the quality of life through the provision of nourishing, palatable, attractive meals that meet the residents' daily nutritional needs in a communal dining experience. The policy documented that the dietary department would bring meals to the floors via food trucks as quickly as possible to maintain temperatures, where nursing staff will be ready to receive and distribute meals. Temperatures for hot meals must be maintained at 140 degree…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident was assessed using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every 3 months. This was evident for 1 (Resident #107) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #107's quarterly assessment was not completed. The findings are: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 October 2023 documented that the Federal requirement mandates facilities to encode and electronically transmit Minimum Data Set 3.0 data. The Manual also stated that Assessment Completion refers to the date that all information needed has been collected and recorded for a particular assessment type and staff have signed and dated that the assessment is complete. The undated facility policy titled Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality. This was evident for 2 (Resident #85 and #20) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #85 was observed with oxygen via nasal cannula with no physician's order. 2.) Resident #20 had physician's order to notify the physician when Resident's finger stick blood sugar (method of drawing drops of blood from the finger for testing the blood glucose level) result is less than 70 milligrams per deciliter or more than 400 milligrams per deciliter. The licensed nurse failed to notify the physician when Resident #20's finger stick blood sugar was higher than 400 milligrams per deciliter on 7 occasions from 06/09/2024 through 06/18/2024. In addition, Resident #20 was administered 7 units of Novolin R insulin (a short acting insulin that lowers blood sugar) on 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00340566) from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #164) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that an investigation was conducted for Resident #164, who complained of being roughly handled by a Certified Nursing Assistant during care. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property with a last reviewed date of 10/31/2023 documented that residents will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while residing at the facility. No abuse or harm of any type will be tolerated, and residents and staff will be monitored for protection. It is the policy of the facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated. The investigation is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 05/18/22 to 05/25/22, the facility did not ensure a resident was provided information to formulate advanced directives (AD). This was evident for 1 (Resident #417) of 1 resident reviewed for ADs out of a sample of 37 resident reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #417 received education and formulated ADs. The findings are: The facility policy titled Advance Directives dated October 21, 2008, documented the Social Worker (SW) will discuss and distribute to all new resident and/or Designated Representatives, information about Advance directives; and document that information was given. Resident #417 was admitted to the facility 05/17/2022 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 05/23/22 at 12:27 PM, Resident #417 was interviewed and stated they were admitted to the facility approximately one week ago and no one has educated them regarding ADs. On 05/23/22 at 12:56 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN) # 1 was interviewed and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 5/18/22 to 5/25/22, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #65) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, the MDS did not document Resident #65's evaluation for Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of psychotropic drugs. The findings are: The facility undated policy titled MDS 3.0 documented the facility will ensure MDS Coordinators work with floor Nurses to ensure accurate documentation. Resident #65 had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. The MDS dated [DATE] and 02/09/2022 documented Resident #65 was severely cognitively impaired, received antipsychotic and antidepressant medication within 7 days prior to the MDS date, and a GDR had not been attempted or documented physician (MD) as clinically contraindicated. Psychiatric Evaluation Progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 05/18/2022 to 05/25/2022, the facility did not ensure the development of a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (CCP) consistent with the resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident in 1 (Resident #264) of 1 resident reviewed for constipation. Specifically, Resident #264 was receiving psychotropic and constipation medication, and related CCPs were not developed. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary documented the comprehensive care plan will facilitate the inclusion of the resident and/or RR and will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs. Resident #264 had diagnoses of constipation and anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #264 was cognitively intact. The Physician Order as of 5/23/2022 documented Resident #264 received Celexa 40 mg once daily for anxiety. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during a Recertification and Complaint (NY00294185) Survey from 05/18/2022 to 05/25/2022, the facility did not ensure that a resident's representative (RR) was involved in revision of a resident's person-centered plan of care (CCP) with the interdisciplinary team (IDT). This was evident in 1 (Resident #48) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not involve Resident #48's RR in revision of the resident's CCP to address Resident #48's ongoing refusal to be transferred out of bed and to receive showers. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary documented the comprehensive care plan will facilitate the inclusion of the resident and/or RR and will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs. Resident #48 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired, was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/18/22 to 5/25/22, the facility did not ensure a residents environment remained free of hazards. This was evident for 1 (#516) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, a large Oxygen Cylinder (OC) at Resident #516's bedside was not properly secured. The finding includes: The facility policy titled Oxygen Administration/Therapy dated 07/20/2021 documented when using oxygen cylinders, secure oxygen cylinders at the bedside by using a tank holder/chain. Tighten around the cylinder's base or placing the cylinder carrier vertically, making sure the cylinder is strapped or chained to the carrier and the wheels on a carrier are folded flat against the cylinder. On 05/18/2022 at 11:59 AM, 05/19/2022 at 10:10 AM, and 05/20/2022 at 9:58 AM, a large OC was observed on the right side of Resident #516's bed. The large OC was not secured in a carrier or chained to the wall. Resident # 516 was admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 05/18/2022 to 05/25/2022, the facility did not ensure residents with respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #516) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #516 was observed several times being administered oxygen therapy via nasal cannula (NC) without a Medical Doctor Order (MDO). The findings are: The facility policy titled Care of Oxygen Equipment dated 07/15/2020 documented the licensed nurse implements oxygen delivery orders per MDO and according to the plan of care. Resident # 516 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses asthma and acute embolism/thrombus. On 05/18/2022 at 11:59 AM, 05/20/2022 at 9:58 AM, and 05/20/2022 at 9:58 AM, Resident # 516 was observed with oxygen 2 liters per minute (lpm) via NC running from a concentrator to the resident's nose. On 05/20/2022 at 1:55 PM, Resident # 516…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 5/18/2022 to 5/25/2022, the facility did not ensure a resident was adequately equipped to call for assistance through a communication system. This was evident for 1 (Resident #29) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, there were multiple observations of Resident #29 without an operating Call Bell (CB) next to their bed. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Call Lights/Bells dated 9/2005 documented the CB system is the primary means of communication between residents and nursing staff. CBs will be operable, accessible, and within resident's reach. Resident #29 had diagnoses of heart failure, blindness of the right eye, and hearing loss. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #29 had mild cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers and personal hygiene, and required limited assistance of one person for dressing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ensure a resident received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of ulcers. Specifically, pressure relieving devices were not put in place for a resident with bilateral heel wounds. This was evident for one (1) of four (4) residents investigated for Pressure Ulcer Care Area (Resident #344) out of a final sample of 35 residents. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Pressure Relief Assistive Devices, (Dated 10/17), documented, If problems are identified that warrant pressure relief, appropriate pressure relief interventions are initiated. Examples of pressure relief interventions include but are not limited to the following: Lower extremity devices such as multipodus boots, heel lifts and heel pads, off loading shoes, abductor rolls. Resident #344 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis include but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CLEMENZA, ANTHONYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/15/2014
CLEMENZA, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/14/2015
MAWERE, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2014
KALPESH AMINOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/26/2024
AL-EBBINNI, EMMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/05/2022
APUHIN, NAOMIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/12/2023
BUFANO, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/12/2024
CASTRO, ALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/30/2011
CAVANAGH, CAROLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/17/2023
CHODKOWSKI, STEFANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/30/2023
CLEMENZA, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/10/2022
GARCIA, NICCOLOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/07/2020
KUI, KAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/30/2016
MATTHIAS, DIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/09/2022
MURRAY, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/06/2023
PEZULICH, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2021
ROCHE, CHARLESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/26/2021
SAMMON, MAUREENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/27/2025
SILVERO, NORRELEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/21/2022
SINGH, KATHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2022
TORRES, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/12/2023
VELEZ, VANESSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/17/2021
ABBATE, ANTHONYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2014
HALLETT, WILLIAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2014
HOWE, KEVINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$40.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$14.5M
Related-party expense36% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 14%Other / private 35%

This home reported $14.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$431per resident / day
operating cost
$13,091per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335791. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next