Phoenix Of Fairlawn

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were in place to prevent falls for Resident #11, Resident #53, Resident #37 and Resident #20. Actual harm occurred when Resident #11 and Resident #53 suffered a fall with a fracture nose and right femur respectively and were admitted to the hospital. This affected four residents (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #37, and Resident #53) out of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 57. Findings include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia with behaviors, delusional disturbances, iron deficiency anemia, constipation, aortic valve stenosis, congestive heart failure, fracture of the right femur, asthma, unsteadiness, difficulty walking and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he needed extensive assistance of two staff members for bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure smoking safety was followed on facility grounds per facility policy. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents of the facility. The census was 55. Findings Include: Observation on 04/28/25 at 9:57 A.M. of the facility parking lot with Maintenance Director (MD) #511 revealed cigarette butts disposed of in mulch beds. The mulch bed nearest the facility dumpsters contained 17 cigarette butts. The mulch bed nearest the wooden [NAME]-cochere (a covered porch where vehicles can pick up and drop off people) at the main entrance contained 10 cigarette butts. The trash can under the [NAME]-cochere was observed to have ash marks on the sides of it from cigarettes being extinguished and the inside of the trash can was observed to contain flammable materials. The mulch bed nearest the 300 Hall entrance contained three cigarette butts. Interview on 04/28/25 at 10:08 A.M. with MD #511 confirmed the presence of cigarette butts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and review of a bid quote for work from a local construction company, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment. This affected 18 (#4, #6, #8, #10, #15, #17, #18, #19, #22, #23, #25, #36, #37, #38, #39, #42, #46, and #50) of 55 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 55. Findings Include: 1. Interview with Resident #19 in the facility's outdoor smoking area on 04/22/25 at 9:50 A.M. revealed the resident did not feel safe in the smoking area and felt it was only a matter of time before the wooden [NAME] structure surrounding the smoking area was going collapse around the residents. Observation of the smoking area on 04/22/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the area was covered by a wooden [NAME]. The wood on the structure beams were noted to be visibly rotting to various degrees all throughout the area. The center beam of the [NAME] had an over five and one-half feet long hole in the wood that had been made by a large termite…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transported in the facility in a dignified and respectful manner. This affected one (#37) of one residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 55. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cocaine abuse, sepsis, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance of one staff person for completing his activities of daily living including bathing. Observation of Resident #37 on 04/21/25 at 11:44 A.M. revealed Resident #37 was sitting on a shower chair being pulled by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #608 to his room. Resident #37 was observed to be wearing no clothing except for a thin hospital gown with a package of deodorant and an adult incontinence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representatives with the name and telephone number of the appeal agency. This affected two (#5 and #8) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a NOMNC letter revealed skilled services ended on 04/14/25. The letter did not contain the name or the telephone number of the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) for appeal purposes. 2. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a NOMNC letter revealed skilled services ended on 03/15/25. The letter did not contain the name or the telephone number of the QIO for appeal purposes. Interview on 04/28/25 at 11:20 A.M. with Chief Clinical Officer (CCO) #509, during review of Resident #5 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly assessed for use of a restraint. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for restraints. The census was 55. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, and depression. Review of the plan of care dated 11/29/24 revealed Resident #18 had the potential for pressure ulcer development related to a skin tear to the right fifth digit. Interventions included garden gloves at all times except while sleeping with instructions to remove at night for washing and to check skin integrity dated 04/17/25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the progress note dated 04/09/25 at 12:35 P.M. revealed the nurse discussed options with the legal representative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were updated and accurate. This affected one (#52) of two residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility census was 55. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, schizophrenia, high cholesterol, and retention of urine. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was severely cognitive impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff person for completing his activities of daily living. Review of the PASARR assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility did not indicate the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia for the the question on the PASARR assessment, Does the individual have a diagnosis(es) of any of the mental disorders listed below?, with a listing of significant mental health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of narcotic count sheet, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available as ordered to treat pain. This affected one (#19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 55. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, angiodysplasia of the stomach and duodenum with bleeding, urinary tract infections, skin cancer, necrotizing fasciitis, polyneuropathy, mild protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes, chronic kidney, mood disorder, suicidal ideations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain syndrome, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertension, congestive heart failure, depression, sleep apnea, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had intact cognition and had almost constant pain. Review of the April 2025 physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, pharmacy recommendation review, and staff interview, the facility failed to act upon pharmacist recommendations that were agreed to by the residents physicians as required. This affected two (#51 and #54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 55. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, and depression. There were no other mental health or behavioral related diagnoses present in the medical record. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living, and had no verbal, physical, or other behaviors. Review of Resident #51's admission physician's orders from October 2024 revealed an order dated 10/16/24 noting that Resident #51…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications and/or diagnoses were in place for residents receiving antipsychotic medication. This affected one (#51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 55. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, and depression. There were no other mental health or behavioral related diagnoses present in the medical record. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living, and had no verbal, physical, or other behaviors. Review of Resident #51's admission physician's orders from October 2024 revealed an order dated 10/16/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure a resident was given insulin as ordered. This affected one (#19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 55. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, angiodysplasia of the stomach and duodenum with bleeding, urinary tract infections, skin cancer, necrotizing fascitis, polyneuropathy, mild protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes, chronic kidney, mood disorder, suicidal ideations, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain syndrome, cirrhosis of the liver, hypertension, congestive heart failure, depression, sleep apnea, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had intact cognition and received insulin. Review of the April 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #19 had an order for Novolog Flexpen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-28 for 39 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH