St Luke Lutheran Community-Portage Lakes

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 81% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, review of facility policy, and review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) investigation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from staff to resident physical abuse. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 38. Actual harm occurred on 09/09/24 when Resident #7 was physically abused by a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) during care resulting in large areas of bruising to both of the resident's arms. Bruising to the left upper arm measured 4.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 3.0 cm width and was described as purple to dark red in color. Bruising to the right upper arm measured 15.0 cm in length by 6.0 cm with and was described as deep purple and dark red with intact skin. A facility SRI dated 09/09/24 indicated Resident #7 reported pain as a result of in incident, however the type or level of pain was not described. An interview with Resident #7 by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/09/24 about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan for wounds and wound care for Resident #1. This affected one resident (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/05/16. Diagnoses included dementia, cerebral infarction, ataxia, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, seizures, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance for eating, substantial to maximal assistance for bed mobility, and was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the facility document titled Provider Consultation, dated 12/05/24 and authored by WCNP #807 revealed the WCNP #807 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed timely and per physician orders for Resident #41. This affected one resident (Resident #41) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The faciltiy census was 40. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/13/24 and a discharge date of 12/21/24. Diagnosis included cellulitis of right lower extremity, sepsis, fracture of right tibia, type two diabetes, atrial fibrillation, rash, head laceration, wedge compression fracture of T4, ulcerative colitis, age related osteoporosis, nicotine dependency, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #41's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had intact cognition. They required supervision or touching assistance for eating, set up or clean up assistance for bed mobility, and partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, showers, dressing and personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents medical record was complete and reflected treatment orders put in place for wound care. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/05/16. Diagnoses included dementia, cerebral infarction, ataxia, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, seizures, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance for eating, substantial to maximal assistance for bed mobility, and was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the facility document titled Provider Consultation, dated 12/05/24 and authored by WCNP #807 revealed the WCNP #807…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the correct Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) information to residents who were completing therapy. This affected three (Resident #145, Resident #146 and Resident #147) of three reviewed for liability notices. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #145's medical record revealed they were readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter revealed services were ended on 09/26/24. The letter did not provide the correct QIO information. Interview on 11/27/24 at 11:45 A.M. with the Administrator and Social Service Designee #240 verified the letters to the residents did not provide the correct QIO information. 2. Review of Resident #146's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter revealed services were ended on 08/31/24. The letter did not provide the correct QIO information.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of shower documentation and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received adqueate assistance with activities of daily living to completed showers as scheduled. This affected three residents (Resident #15, Resident #25 and Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for showers. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/22/22. Diagnoses included complete lesion at T-7 through T-10 level of thoracic spinal cord, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and hypotension. The resident was cognitively intact. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was dependent for showers. Review of the shower sheets for the last 60 days revealed showers were offered or given on 09/09/24, 09/11/24, 11/07/24 and 11/25/24. Interview on 11/25/24 at 10:06 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed he did not getting showers as scheduled. Interview on 11/26/24 at 6:30 P.M. with the Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 received meals as scheduled to meet their dietary needs. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for meal service. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/01/24. Diagnoses included radiculopathy of lumbar region, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. He was on a regular diet with thin liquids. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. Interview on 11/25/24 at 11:37 A.M. with Resident #29 revealed he was not served breakfast one day and lunch another day but couldn't recall the dates. Interview on 11/26/24 at 4:00 P.M. with the Food Service Director #213 revealed she was off the day Resident #29 was admitted and therefore there was no diet card created for him. She stated she believed he missed at least two meals from the kitchen. Interview on 11/26/24 at 6:30 P.M. with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of call light audits, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a resident call system that adequately communicated resident calls directly to a staff member or to a centralized location to alert staff to a resident in need. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Observation of the call lights from the centralized common area (between all four halls) on 09/24/24 from 9:36 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. revealed the following: • room [ROOM NUMBER]: At 9:36 A.M. the call light was on. It was not observed what time room [ROOM NUMBER]'s light was triggered. This light was answered at 9:46 A.M. for a total of 10 minutes. • room [ROOM NUMBER]: At 9:38 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s light was noted to be lit above the room door. Staff responded to the call light at 9:55 A.M. for a total of 17 minutes observed. • room [ROOM NUMBER]: At 9:38 A.M. the light at the end of the North hallway was on, indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, review of facility policy, and review of facility self-reported incident (SRI) investigation, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated, thereby preventing further similar instances of abuse involving the same resident. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 07/27/24 with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, asthma with status asthmaticus, dementia with agitation, depression, type two diabetes mellitus, pulmonary fibrosis, left eye cataract, dizziness, and insomnia. Review if the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 08/02/24 revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Resident #7 was always continent of urine but required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, personal hygiene, chair to bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan as resident needs and required interventions changed. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of three residents whose care plans were reviewed for timely and appropriate interventions. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 02/29/24 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, dysphagia, hemiplegia or hemiparesis of the left dominant side following a cerebrovascular accident, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 09/03/24 revealed Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, impaired range of motion on one side and was dependent for eating. The MDS also revealed Resident #10 was not on any mechanically altered or therapeutic diet. Review of the physician orders revealed the following meal related orders: • An order dated 02/29/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to accommodate Resident #13's preference in regard to transferring out of bed. This affected one (Resident #13) of three residents revealed for mechanical lift transfers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/26/23 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, alcoholic fatty liver, morbid obesity, diabetes, restlessness and agitation, and depression. Review of the of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was moderately cognitively impaired, required substantial/maximal assistance with rolling left and right in bed, was totally dependent on staff for transferring from the bed to the chair and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the self-care deficit care plan updated 09/26/23 revealed Resident #13 had a self-care deficit related to status post cerebral vascular accident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH