Fairlawn Haven

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 91.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to prevent spoilage and spoiled foods were discarded. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen with the exception of one (#244) resident the facility identified that received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Observation on 04/07/25 from 7:50 AM to 8:10 A.M. revealed the walk-in cooler contained four containers of fresh strawberries with a whitish fuzzy growth on them, a bag of baby carrots that were open, unlabeled, and undated, and a tray of pastries and brownies that were uncovered, unlabeled, and undated. The tray of pastries and the tray of browns were thrown away and were hard when they were moved on the tray to throw in the garbage can. Interview on 04/07/25 at 7:56 A.M. with Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) #700 verified strawberries contained mold, and confirmed the opened, unlabeled, and undated bag of baby carrots and the tray of pastries and brownies. ADM #700 further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, resident family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident and the resident representative a written bed-hold notice at the time of hospitalization. This affected one (#44) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 90. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/25. Diagnoses included complication of left knee internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, left artificial knee joint, and multiple sclerosis. Review of Resident #44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition. Review of Resident #44's most recent care plan revealed the resident may need assistance to coordinate community resources for discharge planning. Interventions included to provide written and verbal instructions at the resident's level of understanding, verbally explain instructions to the resident and family prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident family member and staff interview, medical record review, review of staff meeting documents and education materials, facility policy review, and review of a facility job description for certified medication aides (CMAs), the facility failed to ensure staff were working within their scope of practice related to CMAs administering as needed medications. This affected one (#64) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus type two, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #64 revealed she was cognitively impaired. At the time of medical record review for Resident #64 an MDS assessment was in progress for a significant change for admission to hospice services. Review of the care plan initiated April 2025 for Resident #64 revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for pain were maintained to provide effective pain management. This affected one (#86) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 90. Findings included: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/25. Diagnoses included malnutrition and acute renal disease. Review of Resident #86's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact. The resident required scheduled pain medication and opioid use for pain control daily. Review of Resident #86's current care plan revealed she had the potential for pain related to chronic pain, osteoarthritis, and low back pain. Interventions included listening to the resident's concerns, advise the resident to request pain medication before pain becomes severe, and assess complaints of pain and report to the medical doctor. Review of Resident #86's nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to address dementia care and treatment. This affected one (#23) of one residents reviewed for dementia related daily care and stimulation. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, coronary artery disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, osteoporosis, anemia, major depression, type II diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease stage four. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), was continent of bowel and bladder, received a mechanically altered diet, was not at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of a menu, review of a meal ticket, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to offer alternate food choices when the resident did not eat well from the offered meal. This affected one (#42) of three residents reviewed for dining observation. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 04/26/16 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #42 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required set-up for eating. Review of the current physician orders dated April 2025 for Resident #42 revealed she was ordered a fortified regular diet and for staff to check the refrigerator for homemade meals provided from family, and if food was available from family, please offer the homemade food during mealtime. Review of the care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of visitor screening logs, review of resident vaccination status, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices and procedures were followed for visitor screening and source control to prevent the spread of COVID-19 with the potential to affect 13 (#1, #6, #11, #13, #15, #17, #24, #29, #31, #50, #58, #67 and #76) of 13 residents in the Special Care Unit (memory care). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure clean linen was transported in a sanitary manner with the potential to affect 10 (#40, #70, #177, #178, #179, #180, #182, #183, #184 and #187) of 10 residents on the rehabilitation unit. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions for one Resident (#61) of three residents reviewed who had a catheter. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Interview on 08/01/22 at 8:00 A.M. of the Administrator revealed the facility was in COVID-19 outbreak status until 08/07/22. Observation on 08/02/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assisted residents with dining in a dignified manner. This affected three (#2, #21, and #28) of eight residents observed eating in the South dining room. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/26/19. Diagnoses included dysphagia, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, chronic kidney disease, bradycardia, and heart disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 07/12/22, revealed Resident #2 was assessed as cognitively intact and required extensive one person physical assist with eating. Review of a nutritional care plan dated 12/02/19 revealed an intervention Resident #2 needed assistance with eating. 2. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/02/15. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia without behavioral disturbances, dysphagia, hypothyroidism, and essential hypertension. Review of the most recent MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify the physician when a resident experienced a change in condition that required a new treatment. This affected one (#62) of two reviewed for changes in condition. The census was 77. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/01/22. Diagnoses included pressure ulcer of the sacral region, osteomyelitis, quadriplegia, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, anemia, and muscle weakness. Resident #62 was discharged on 07/12/22. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 07/05/22, revealed Resident #62 was assessed with intact cognition, required extensive assistance of at least two staff with bed mobility, was dependent with transfers, and no episodes of rejection of care. Resident #62 was assessed at risk for pressure ulcers and was admitted with three stage four and two unstageable (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcers on admission. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the appropriate use of a restraint and free from use of an unnecessary restraint. This affected one (#53) of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, delirium, and overactive bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had mild cognitive impairment and exhibited no physical, verbal or wandering behaviors. Review of fall risk assessments dated 05/24/22, 07/06/22, and 08/06/22 revealed Resident #53 was at moderate risk for falls. Review of the care plan for Resident #53 revealed the risk for falls due to Resident #53's decreased safety awareness. Interventions for Resident #53 included the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH