The Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.11 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, hospital documentation review, resident and staff interview, review of a personnel file, review of a disciplinary action document, review of an investigation, policy review, and review of facility initiated corrective action, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and assistance was provided to prevent a resident fall. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #104 was transferred by a mechanical (Hoyer) lift using only one staff member to assist, and subsequently fell, causing a facial laceration requiring sutures and a fractured right leg which required hospitalization and surgical intervention. This affected one (#104) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on infection control tracking, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship practices in prescribing antimicrobials. This affected 17 (Resident #6, #7, #9, #21, #27, #40, #51, #55, #69, #57, #70, #73, #76, #78, #83, #101, and #107) of 57 resident entries for antimicrobial treatments initiated in May and June 2024. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of infection control tracking for May 2024 revealed there were 32 antimicrobial (antibiotic and antifungal) treatments tracked for the month. The treatments were prescribed from a variety of sources that include from the hospital upon admission, emergency room prescribers, hospice prescribers, and the facility's prescribers. Of the antimicrobial treatments tracked in May 2024, 21 were prescribed by the facility's prescribers. Of the antimicrobial treatments prescribed by the facility's prescribers in May 2024, nine did not meet criteria for use and the antimicrobial was not discontinued. Review of infection control tracking for June 2024 revealed there were 25 total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) forms contained all the necessary information. This affected one (#65) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/06/24. Medical diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), dementia, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and a history of falls. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) provided to Resident #65's representative, dated 02/19/24, revealed the resident's skilled services would be ending on 02/21/24. The NOMNC did not list what specific type of skilled service would be ending. Review of the SNF ABN provided to Resident #65's representative, dated 02/19/24, revealed the resident's skilled services were being discontinued as the resident no longer required skilled services. The noticed contained no specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a splinting program to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM). This affected one (#23) of one resident reviewed for ROM. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed and admission date of 03/05/20. Diagnoses include aphasia, metabolic encephalopathy, contracture of the muscle of multiple sites, unspecified epilepticus, and contracture the right hand. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had severe cognitive impairment and was fully dependent on staff for toileting, eating, and transferring. Review of a therapy note dated 11/30/23 revealed Resident #23 was to have a rolled splint applied to the right hand and a resting splint should be used for the left hand to promote digit extension. The therapy note revealed pictures were printed and instructions were provided for staff. Review of nurse aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, policy review, and review of facility incident reports, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were appropriate and resident-centered, and failed to ensure residents with Wander-guards had current physician orders for the security devices. This affected two (#65 and #45) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), dementia, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and a history of falls Review of Resident #65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with severely impaired cognition. The resident had no recorded behaviors or rejection of care. The resident was identified to have two or more falls without injury and one fall with a minor injury since the prior assessment. Resident #65 was required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation through the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine had a physician order in place with specified settings for the machine. This affected two (#09 and #59) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 119. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #09's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/24/21. Medical diagnoses included asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and morbid obesity. Review of Resident #09's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and had no recorded behaviors or rejection of care. Review of Resident #09's physician order dated 01/04/23 revealed the resident was to have a CPAP machine that was to be applied per home settings nightly at bedtime and as needed. The order did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dental care in a timely manner. This affected one (#28) of one residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type II diabetes, anxiety, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Review of a dental note dated 03/15/24 revealed Resident #28 had the potential need for a consultation with an oral maxillofacial surgeon. Resident #28 potentially had extractions that were surgical in nature. Resident #28 had ankylosed (fusion between tooth/teeth and underlying bony support tissues) teeth that would need to be surgically removed by an oral surgeon. Resident #28 was ordered Peridex (used to treat gum inflammation) twice a day for seven days and amoxicillin (antibiotic) 500 milligrams every six hours. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to use the proper cleaning chemicals were utilized in a resident room with isolation precautions. This affected one (#365) of one residents in contact isolation. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #365 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left lower leg, Clostridium difficile (C. diff), and dementia. Review of the plan of care dated 07/15/24 revealed Resident #365 had an infection and had the potential for complications related to infection and the treatment of infection. Resident #365 was on the antibiotic vancomycin for C. diff until 07/21/24. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and use the appropriate precautions. Observation on 07/16/24 at 12:47 P.M. revealed Resident #365 was sitting on the side of the bed and Housekeeper #556 was mopping the floor in Resident #365's room. Interview on 07/16/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from the medications carts and medication storage rooms. This affected three of six medication carts and two of three medication storage rooms. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of Windsor medication cart on 03/01/22 at 7:55 A.M. revealed a bottle of CoQ 10 was found with an expiration date of 01/2022 and a bottle of aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) was located in the cart with an expiration date of 11/2021. Observation of the Windsor [NAME] Hall medication room on 03/01/22 at 8:22 A.M. revealed the following medications expired: Melatonin (sleep aid) 3.0 mg expired 10/2021, Loperamide (anti-diarrhea) 2.0 mg expired 11/2021, B6 vitamins 100 mg expired 11/2021, Geri Dry diphenhydramine (antihistamine) expired 11/2021, and cetirizine hydrochloride (antihistamine) 10 mg which had expired on 07/2021. Observation of the [NAME] hall cart on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents were assisted with showers routinely and timely as scheduled. This affected two (Residents #27 and #65) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility identified all 92 residents required assistance or were dependent on staff for assistance with bathing. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/16/18. Diagnoses included tremors, congestive heart failure, asthma, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/21/21, revealed the resident had a high cognitive function. Resident #27 required a one person physical assist with hygiene and was a total dependence on staff for bathing. Review of Resident #27's shower schedule revealed the resident was to have a bath every Monday and Friday. Review of Resident #27's shower documentation electronic records revealed she received a shower/bath on Wednesday…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's policy, observation, record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate activities for Resident #9. This affected one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 01/09/21. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/24/21, revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition. Resident #9 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #9 considered doing things with groups of people to be somewhat important and participating in her favorite activities to be very important. Review of the plan of care, dated 10/16/21, revealed Resident #9 had the potential for alteration in scheduled/self-initiated events. Interventions included encouraging the resident to participate in activities, offering invites and encouragement, and providing assistance to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $470K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH