No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kimes Nursing and Rehab LLC

75 Kimes Lane, Athens, OH 45701 · For profit - Individual · 61 certified beds · (740) 593-3391 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$68,432 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $68,432 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (87%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
65 Hospital Dr · (614) 262-6772 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
(740) 594-3092 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
305 W Union St · (740) 594-2238 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8493 Dairy Ln · (740) 592-3325 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%5.3%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.3%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.341.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.341.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.64U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.4%CMS range 43.7–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.2%CMS range 6.4–16.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
87.2%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 56.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-17)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) run report, review of the facility's incident and accident log for the past six months, review of a facility investigation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 followed proper medication administration procedures when preparing and administering medications to Resident #42 resulting in a significant medication error. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on [DATE] at 8:23 P.M., when Resident #42 was erroneously given medications that included Xanax 2 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po), Oxycodone 10- 325 mg po, and Gabapentin 800 mg po during an evening medication administration pass that were physician ordered and intended for his roommate (Resident #15). Due to the significant medication error, Resident #42 had a serious change/deterioration in his condition (altered mental status and decreased level of consciousness). After it had been made known to the facility by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of billing information, review of the facility assessment, review of the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) job descriptions, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently. This affected 56 of 56 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 56. Findings include:1.The annual recertification and complaint survey was initiated on 05/17/26.Review of an undated governing body and facility organizational chart revealed the governing body consisted of: two owners, a holding company which is wholly owned by the facility owners, then the administrator who oversees department heads.Review of a tax bill prepared on 01/30/26 revealed property taxes would be due on 03/06/26 for the first half of the year, totaling $21,451.50.Review of a statement dated 05/14/26 from Gas provider revealed the facility owed $1,011.39 which needed to be paid immediately otherwise, shut-off was scheduled for 06/01/26. Additionally, $672.88 was due on 05/29/26.Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was at risk for falls and had a history of falls, had their fall prevention interventions implemented as per their plan of care and failed to ensure facility staff who are knowledgeable of resident transfers attended an appointment with a resident. This affected two residents (#21, #44) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1 .Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. Review of an MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had severely impaired cognition, had no behaviors, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, was dependent on staff for transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of a care plan dated 04/21/26 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for falls related to difficulty in walking and weakness. Goals were to minimize risk of falls and fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-09 · tag F0844 — widespread
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the state agency regarding a change in administration. This affected all 59 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the enhanced information dissemination and collection (EIDC) website revealed the current Administrator and the interim Administrator from November (2025) through January (2026) were not listed. Interview on 03/04/26 at 1:01 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility had failed to notify the state survey agency with changes in administrators including the current Administrator. This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2735791

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-09 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain and effective training program for staff. This affected all 59 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59. Findings include:1.Review of personnel files revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #183 was hired on 12/19/25.Further review of the file revealed CNA #183 did not having training for compliance and ethics, quality assurance program, effective communication, and behavioral health.2.Review of a personnel file revealed CNA #150 was hired on 10/08/25.Further review of the file revealed CNA #150 did not have training for compliance and ethics, quality assurance program, and behavioral health.Interview on 03/04/26 at 3:04 P.M. with Human Resources (HR) #158 confirmed required training was not completed for CNAs #183, #150.This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2735791.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was timely identified, properly correlated to a suspected medication error, and promptly reported to the physician for necessary medical intervention. This affected one resident (#42) of three residents reviewed for medication administration errors. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia, neurocognitive disorders with Lewy Bodies, unspecified mood disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, congestive heart failure, hypertension, cirrhosis of the liver, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, and insomnia. Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. He was not known to display any behaviors and was not indicated to have received any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a grievance investigation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation were reported. This affected one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and hypertension.Review of the resident's care plan revealed no documented evidence of Resident #10 having impaired cognition or behaviors including making false allegations.Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10's cognition remained intact and she had no behaviors.Review of a grievance report dated 02/24/26 revealed on the afternoon of 02/24/26, Resident #10's son reported he dropped off five lottery tickets to Resident #10 on 02/22/26, he was not able to come back on 02/23/26, so he came back to the facility on [DATE]. When he arrived to the facility, Resident #10 reported out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were not able to carry out of activities of daily living independently were provided with showers. This affected three residents (#35, #53, and #62) of five residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 59. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and muscle weakness.Review of a care plan dated 08/27/25 revealed Resident #35 required assistance with self-care, activities of daily living (ADLs), and mobility related to dementia, weakness, diabetes, impaired mobility, and use of an assistive device. The goal was to continue to have needs met on a daily basis through the review date; remaining clean, dry, dressed, groomed, and free of odors. Interventions included but were not limited to showering assist: dependent with one helper.Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 11/18/25 revealed Resident #35 had no behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#62) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure wound care. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes and hidradenitis suppurativa.Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had moisture associated skin damage (MASD).Review of a care plan dated 10/13/25 revealed Resident #62 was at risk for skin impairment related to weakness, cognitive deficit, incontinence, impaired mobility, thin and fragile skin, falls, and autoimmune disease. The goal was to maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to keep skin clean and dry, use lotion on dry skin, do not apply on broken skin; monitor/document location, size, and treatment of skin injury, report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were at risk for falls, had their fall prevention interventions implemented as per their plan of care. This affected two residents (#6 and #19) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include:1.) Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included age related osteoporosis, essential hypertension, hypotension, chronic pain, senile degeneration of the brain, cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #6's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was considered a high risk for falls. Her risk factors included a history of multiple falls, medications and diagnoses that predisposed her to falls, poor memory and recall, frequent bladder incontinence, and gait abnormalities. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a staff nurse donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before entering the room of a resident in transmission based precautions for Covid-19. This affected one resident (#30) of two residents reviewed for medication administration pass. Findings include:On 02/26/26 at 8:26 A.M., an observation during a medication administration pass for Resident #30 on the North hall noted Registered Nurse (RN) #154 to enter the room of the resident to give the resident her morning medications. While the nurse was in the room, Resident #30 had reported to the nurse that it was her last day of being in isolation for being positive for Covid-19. She further went on to tell the nurse that it was her tenth day of being in isolation and was looking forward to it ending. RN #154 entered the room only wearing a N-95 particulate mask all staff were wearing throughout the facility and a pair of gloves. She did not don a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease, including COVID-19. This affected 55 of 55 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: Observations on 01/15/26 at 5:00 A.M. revealed a sign on the entrance door to the facility that stated: Staff and visitors, due to current outbreak of COVID-19, N95 mask is required at all times in the facility. Observations on 01/15/26 between 5:01 A.M. and 5:30 A.M. revealed that four of the five staff on night shift (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #73, LPN #105, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #95, and CNA #81) were not wearing any mask in the facility. Interview with LPN #73 on 01/15/26 at 5:01 A.M. at the nursing desk on the skilled unit, confirmed she was not wearing any mask. She stated that she had one resident (Resident #42) on her unit that currently had COVID-19. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received showers per their preferred shower schedule. This affected three (#5, #8 and #47) of four residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 54.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/23 and diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, hypertension, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of one (1) indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was dependent on the facility staff for bathing/showering needs.Review of Resident #5's care plan revealed an activities of daily living care plan initiated on 09/16/25 that indicated the resident was dependent on one staff member for assistance with her shower. Further review of the care plan revealed the facility was to assist the resident with a shower twice a week.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received appropriate and timely treatment and services to promote wound healing. This affected two (Residents #22 and #58) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 55 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/11/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, diabetes, and stage four kidney disease. Review of readmission notes for Resident #22 dated 03/10/25 revealed the resident returned from the hospital on [DATE] with pressure ulcers to right and left heels. Review of the wound note for Resident #22 dated 04/01/25 revealed the pressure ulcer to the right heel was resolved. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #22 revealed an order dated 05/13/25 to cleanse the left heel with normal saline, apply skin prep, and leave open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident, review of facility witness statements, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported timely and appropriately. This affected one resident (#39) of the three residents reviewed for abuse during the complaint survey. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and psychosis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/15/24, revealed the resident was rarely/never understood and had long and short term memory problems. Review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), dated 12/01/24 and timed 11:44 A.M., revealed on 12/01/24 at 11:09 A.M. Activities Director #500 reported to the Administrator an allegation of abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #111…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, resident vaccination consent forms and staff interview the facility failed to offer each resident a pneumococcal immunization. This affected four (Residents #10, #36, #37 and #46) of five residents sampled for influenza, pneumococcal and COVID-19 immunization review. The census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/21 and diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, hypothyroidism, dementia of unspecified severity, anxiety, depression, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of the immunization record revealed Resident #10 received a dose of an unknown type of pneumococcal vaccine on or around 07/10/19. Review of Resident #10's physicians orders revealed no orders for pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the facility form titled Vaccine Administration Record (VAR)/informed Consent for Vaccinations at LTCF Pharmerica revealed a line where the resident or responsible party could indicate if they wished to receive a COVID-19 vaccination, influenza vaccination or other vaccination.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident and or their resident representative was provided a bed-hold notice as required, when the resident was transferred out to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified intellectual disability, generalized anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, and hypernatremia. Her face sheet indicated the resident's sister was listed as her emergency contact #1 and her mother was her emergency contact #2. Review of Resident #32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was sometimes able to make herself understood and was sometimes able to understand others. She had short and long term memory impairment and her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to to ensure resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate regarding resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 51. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 04/26/19 with pertinent diagnoses of: anxiety disorder on 07/30/21, schizoaffective disorder on 01/25/22 dementia, covid 19, type two diabetes mellitus, localized edema, hammer toe, cognitive communication deficit, macular degeneration, sensorineural hearing loss, reduced mobility, vitamin D deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, hypokalemia, and symbolic dysfunctions. Review of the 08/22/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a walker to aid in mobility. The resident required partial moderate assistance to roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sitting, sit to stand, chair/bed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for Resident #36's anticoagulant use and Resident #10's anxiety care plan was not specific and patient centered. This affected two (Resident #10, and #36) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/07/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, congestive heart failure, acute embolism and thrombosis of right internal jugular vein, acute and chronic respiratory failure, disorder of kidney and ureter, noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypertension, morbid obesity, disorders of lung, malignant neoplasm of prostate, anemia, polyneuropathy, hypoxemia, acquired absence of left leg above knee, and other malaise. Review of the 09/12/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice records were available for continuity of care for one resident. This affected one (Resident #109) of one resident reviewed for hospice. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure compression stockings were applied as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#32) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an initial admission date of 09/23/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of head and neck of right femur, heart failure, dementia, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's comprehensive admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident's prognosis was less than six months and the resident received hospice services. Review of the plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pressure reduction devices were implemented as ordered. This affected two residents (#45 and #109) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an initial admission date of 09/23/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of head and neck of right femur, heart failure, dementia, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a stage I pressure ulcer to the right outer ankle measuring 2.0 centimeters (cm) by 2.0 cm. The resident also had an abrasion to the right hip measuring 3.0 cm by 0.2 cm and an abrasion to the left buttocks measuring 2.0 cm by 0.2 cm. Review of the resident's Braden scale dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as per the plan of care for residents who were at risk for and/ or had a history of falls. This affected two (Resident #33 and #38) of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a history of a left hip fracture and a left rib fracture secondary to a fall at home, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. His diagnoses list was updated to reflect he had a right hip fracture on 08/19/24, after his admission to the facility. Review of Resident #33's care plans revealed he had an active care plan in place for being at risk for additional falls related to having a history of falls resulting in multiple fractures, a history of waking up through out the night confused and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the residents PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected one resident (#37) identified by the facility as having PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Record review of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 01/30/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: post traumatic stress disorder chronic 07/12/23, heart failure, morbid obesity, Alzheimer's disease, need for assistance with personal care, repeated falls, unspecified psychosis, hyperlipidemia, paranoid personality disorder, delusional disorders, abnormal posture, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, tinea unguium, cardiomegaly, mood affective disorder, obstructive sleep apnea,anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, and nightmare disorder. Review of the 09/11/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and used a walker to aid in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to follow infection prevention guidelines when they failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment for enhance barrier precautions when doing would care for Resident #36. This affected one (Resident #36) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Record review of Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/07/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, congestive heart failure, acute embolism and thrombosis of right internal jugular vein, acute and chronic respiratory failure, disorder of kidney and ureter, thrombocytopenia, gout, noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypertension, morbid obesity, disorders of lung, malignant neoplasm of prostate, anemia, polyneuropathy, hypoxemia, acquired absence of left leg above knee, and other malaise. Review of the 09/12/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#21) was not treated with an antibiotic prior to the return of the culture and sensitivity (C&S) results. This affected one (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility census was 51. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an initial admission date of 02/13/23 with the latest readmission date of 04/07/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, mood disorder, hypertension, osteoarthritis, metabolic encephalopathy and osteoporosis. Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/23 revealed the resident had toileting deficits related to dementia, cognitive function fluctuates, short and long term memory deficits, sometimes understood and sometimes understands others, supervision to limited assist with toileting, frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected 46 of 46 residents who utilized the kitchen for meals (Resident #249 received nothing by mouth). The census was 47. Findings Include: Observation on 07/06/23 at 12:36 P.M. revealed [NAME] #163 touching the cornbread from the pan three times with gloves and placed them on the meal plates. Also, she touched one breaded pork chop with the same gloved hand and placed it on the meal plate. In between touching the cornbread and pork chop with the same gloved hands, she touched the counter top, drawer handle for utensils, three different food utensils, multiple plates, and the plate warmer lid to lift it up. Observation on 07/06/23 at 12:44 P.M. revealed [NAME] #163 touching four pork chops with her gloved hand. After touching the pork chops, she took the gloves off, did not wash her hands, and then put a new pair of gloves on. Observation on 07/06/23 at 12:45 P.M. revealed [NAME] #163 touching stuffing after it was served onto the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of infection control records and infection control policies and procedures review the facility failed to appropriately monitor resident infections as per infection control policy and procedures for the month of July, August and September of 2022. In addition the facility failed to implement and perform their Legionella Precautionary Maintenance and Inspections per their Legionella Water Management Program. This affected all residents in the facility. The census was 47. Findings Include: 1. Review of the the facility monthly infection control logs from 07/2022 to 07/2023 revealed for the months of 07/2022, 08/2022 and 09/2022 the monthly infection control log form did not include the resident symptoms, indicate if the resident had a chest x-ray or culture done with results , any type of necessary treatments and if the resident required Isolation. Interview on 07/06/23 11:48 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #142 confirmed the Monthly Infection Log for 07/2022, 08/2022 and 09/2022 was incomplete and did not include the necessary documentation needed to track the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's shower schedule, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's frequency in which they were showered was honored in accordance with their preference. This affected one (Resident #10) of one residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: A review of Resident #10's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, adult onset diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #10's baseline care plan initiated on 08/12/21 revealed the resident was indicated not to have a preference at that time regarding bathing activities and staff may choose for her. They indicated showers would be provided two times per week. A review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was competed for an alleged allegation of abuse. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility and specifically affected Resident #39. Findings Included: Review of the SRI dated 04/01/23 revealed Resident #39 reported Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #210, the agency nurse who worked through the night threw something and hit her in the nose with it and woke her up. The SRI indicated the resident was alert and oriented and was emotionally distressed at the moment, but no physical injuries were present. The Administrator immediately reported LPN #210 to the agency and banned the nurse from returning to the facility in any role. The SRI indicated residents were interviewed and statements were being collected from witnesses. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an initial admission date of 01/30/23 with the diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review ,staff interview, policy and procedure review the facility failed to issue a bed hold notification letter to one resident (#47) out of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations. The census was 47. Findings Include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 4/28/23 with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses include atherosclerosis, muscle weakness, surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, and atherosclerotic heart disease of natives coronary artery without angina pector. Resident #47 was discharged on 05/18/23 to the hospital. Review of Resident #47's medical record nurses progress notes from 05/01/23 to 05/18/23 confirmed resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with no bed hold notification given. Interview on 07/05/23 at 4:09 P.M. with the Administrator verified Resident #47 or the designated resident representative was not issued a Bed Hold Notification Letter when transferred to the hospital . Review of the facility Hold Bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments as required. This affected three (Residents #9, #250, and #40) of 17 resident assessments reviewed. The census was 47. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, repeated falls, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, congestive heart failure, osteoporosis, cerebrovascular disease, kyphosis, anemia, osteoarthritis, atherosclerosis, anemia, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, dermatitis, insomnia, disorder of thyroid, hypertension, delirium, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/22/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #9 MDS assessments revealed her most recent completed assessment was on 02/22/23. Review of her MDS assessments in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 47. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were encephalopathy, type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, acute kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, peripheral vascular disease, hematuria, depression, edema, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, hydronephrosis, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, hypokalemia, difficulty walking, and hyperlipidemia. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/18/23, revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's PASRR document, dated 09/17/18, revealed under Section C, the facility indicated he did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 47. Findings Include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were encephalopathy, type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, acute kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, peripheral vascular disease, hematuria, depression, edema, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, hydronephrosis, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, hypokalemia, difficulty walking, and hyperlipidemia. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/18/23, revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1 PASRR document, dated 09/17/18, revealed under Section C, the facility indicated he did not have a diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer's disease. Also, under Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#40) hospice continuity of care. This affected one of one resident reviewed for hospice. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an initial admission date of 02/22/23 with the admitting diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, anemia, insomnia, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia and depression. Review of the resident's clinical admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with hospice services. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident received hospice services. Review of the plan of care revealed the resident had no care plan addressing the resident's hospice status. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the physician ordered off-loading to one resident's (#15) Stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ ruptured blister.) pressure ulcer. This affected one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an initial admission date of 08/12/21 with the diagnoses including dementia, altered mental status, adult failure to thrive, nonrheumatic aortic valve insufficiency, cardiac murmur, generalized muscle weakness, schizoaffective disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, hypertension, disorder of kidney and ureter, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, insomnia and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of the plan of care dated 09/07/21 revealed the resident was at risk for skin integrity related to diagnoses of dementia with lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for a resident with a known history of falls and considered to be at risk for falls. This affected one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a fracture of the distal end of her right femur following a fall on 06/09/23, repeated falls, difficulty walking, age related osteoporosis, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, need for assistance with personal care, osteoarthritis, hypertension, memory deficit following stroke, and unspecified dementia. A review of Resident #2's fall risk assessment completed on 04/14/23 revealed the resident was assessed to be a moderate risk for falls. Her risk factors included having a history of one to two falls during the past six months, medications that increase the risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary homelike environment. This affected one (#40) of 15 sampled residents. Findings Included: On 07/03/23 at 9:57 A.M., observation of Resident #40's room revealed a strong odor of urine. The resident's bed side chair had peeling leather and a rip in the cushion. The resident's wall behind the headboard was also marred. On 07/05/23 at 1:20 P.M., observation of Resident #40 revealed the resident was quiet at bedrest with eyes closed. No signs of incontinence noted, however the resident's room continued to have a strong odor of urine. On 07/05/23 at 10:45 A.M., interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #142 verified the resident's room had a persistent strong odor of urine and the disrepair of the chair and wall. 07/06/23 at 8:00 A.M., observation of Resident #40's room revealed the room continued to have a strong odor of urine.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications medications were labeled when opened and discarded when expired. This had the potential to affect seven (Resident #2, #4, #5, #11, #35, #36 and #38) of 22 residents of the south hall. The census was 55. Findings include: Observation of the medication cart on the South Hall medication cart and medication room revealed the following: 1. Lantus Solostar 100 unit/ml for Resident #35 with no date as when it was opened and it had been used. 2. Lantus Solostar 100 unit/ml for Resident #4 with no open date as to when it was opened and it had been used. 3. Symbicort 160-4.5 mcg inhaler for Resident #38 states medication expires in 90 days after opening. There was no date as to when it was opened. 4. One bottle of Geri care extra strength pain relief acetaminophen tablets 1000 tablets 500 mg each expired 08/21. This was verified on [DATE] at 11:12 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8. 5. In the medication room two bottles of Geri…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately label and dispose of food items being stored in the facility kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who received meals from the kitchen except Resident #32 who was ordered Nothing by Mouth (NPO). The facility census was 55. Findings include: Observation on 09/08/21 at 11:17 A.M. revealed a plastic container of chicken salad and a plastic container with an open package of bologna which had both been opened and used and were labeled with a date opened of 08/31/21. There was an open bag of frozen chicken fritters in the reach in freezer which were not sealed or labeled with the date they were opened. Interview with [NAME] #51 on 09/08/21 at 11:20 A.M. verified the open bag of chicken fritters in the freezer was not sealed or labeled with the date opened. [NAME] #51 verified the chicken salad and bologna had both been opened and used and stated foods were normally thrown out after a week. Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Food, not dated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for a resident. This affected one (Resident #3) resident of 55 residents observed during dining. The census was 55. Findings include: On 09/07/21 12:17 P.M. observation revealed State Tested Nurses Aide (STNA) #56 standing in front of Resident #3's tray table and feeding her. On 09/07/21 at 12:30 P.M. interview with STNA #56 verified she was standing to feed Resident #3 because she didn't know if she was allowed to sit on the bed and feed her. STNA #56 verified standing and feeding Resident #3 did not provide the resident with a dignified dining experience.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I screen was completed for residents who received a new mental illness diagnosis after their admission to the facility and the completion of their initial PASRR Level I screen. This affected two (Resident #43 and #27) of three residents reviewed for PASRR's. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder. A review of a PASRR Level I screen dated 03/05/19 revealed the resident was screened on that date for indications of a serious mental illness or a developmental disability. The pre-admission screen determination indicated the resident had no indications of a serious mental illness at that time. An in person assessment was not required as a result. Section (D.) of the PASRR assessment required the assessor to identify any indications of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to complete their oral hygiene received assistance. This affected one (Resident #104) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, dehydration, schizoaffective disorder, adult failure to thrive and repeated falls. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was not intact. She required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing. Observations on 09/07/21 at 11:42 A.M. revealed Resident #104 had a build up of white substance on bottom teeth. On 09/08/21 at 10:27 A.M. Resident #104's bottom teeth continue to have a white substance on them. At 2:30 P.M. her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed monitor a skin impairment surrounding Resident #32's gastrostomy tube and did not implement a new order from the wound doctor for the same area. This affected one resident (#32) of five residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 07/06/21 with diagnoses including gastrostomy malfunction, stage two pressure ulcer of sacral region, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, pain, dysphagia, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of tongue. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition. The assessment indicated Resident #32 had a stage two pressure ulcer that was present upon admission. Review of the plan of care dated 08/23/21, revealed Resident #32 had skin integrity deficits related to a leaking gastrostomy tube, weakness, recent weight loss, and having admitted with a stage two pressure area, an abrasion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure reduction interventions were maintained in place. This affected one (Resident #104) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, dehydration, schizoaffective disorder, adult failure to thrive and repeated falls. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was not intact. She required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing. admission Assessment on 08/12/21 identified a 4.8 cm (centimeter) x 2.7 cm, non blanchable redness to right buttock, a 8 centimeters (cm) by 3.8 cm distal to coccyx non blanchable redness and a 2 cm by 1.8 cm purple area in the center (suspect Deep Tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for a range of motion program and orthotic device as recommended by the occupational therapist for Resident #29. This affected one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 10/23/17 with diagnoses including depression, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, other specific joint derangements of unspecified hand, urinary retention, anxiety, dysphagia, and urinary retention. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #29 had impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assist of two persons for bed mobility dressing, and personal hygiene. She was totally dependent for transfers. The resident had no restorative nursing, no splint or brace. Review of the plan of care dated 08/05/21, revealed Resident #29 had self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were maintained in place. This affected three (Resident #30, Resident #48 and Resident #104) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, diabetes, adult failure to thrive, epilepsy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, subarachnoid hemorrhage and aphasia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact, she requires extensive assistance with two or more staff members for bed mobility, extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the fall risk evaluation dated 08/06/21 revealed she was at high risk for falls. Review of plan of care dated 07/01/21 revealed an intervention of a pressure alarm to the bed and the chair at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted with a urinary tract infection (UTI) received the appropriate antibiotic to adequately treat her infection. This affected one (Resident #157) of two residents reviewed for UTI's/ urinary catheters. Findings include: A review of Resident #157's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a UTI. A review of Resident #157's physician's orders revealed she was admitted to the facility with an order to receive Cephalexin (Keflex) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) twice a day (BID) for seven days. The order indicated the Cephalexin was being used to treat a UTI. There was no order given for a follow up urinalysis to be obtained after the completion of the antibiotic. A review of Resident #157's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2021 revealed the resident received her first dose of Cephalexin 500 mg po on 08/24/21 at 8:30 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure liquids were maintained within resident reach and the dietician was informed of a 13.9% weight loss. This affected one (Resident #104) of one resident reviewed for hydration and one (Resident #104) of six reviewed for nutrition. The census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, dehydration, schizoaffective disorder, adult failure to thrive and repeated falls. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was not intact. She required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one staff member for dressing. The MDS stages pressure area to coccyx as a stage one. Observations on 09/07/21 at 3:14 P.M. revealed Resident #104 was in her recliner with no fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen and change oxygen tubing as ordered by the physician. This affected two resident (#37 and #38) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #38 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and morbid obesity. This resident had allergies to adhesive tape and tuberculin (TB) solution. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/19/21, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members with bed mobility, extensive assistance from one staff member for transfers, was independent with set up help only for eating, extensive assist from one staff member with toileting, extensive one assist for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #48) of 20 sampled residents. The census was 55. Findings included.: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, diabetes, adult failure to thrive, epilepsy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, subarachnoid hemorrhage and aphasia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact, she requires extensive assistance with two or more staff members for bed mobility, extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of Pharmacy review dated 10/13/20 revealed Resident #48 was not receiving antiplatelet therapy despite diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, and history of CVA. Please review and consider if beneficial/appropriate to add ASA (Aspirin) 81 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of oxygen tubing changes in a resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#38) reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: Record review for Resident #38 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and morbid obesity. This resident had allergies to adhesive tape and tuberculin (TB) solution. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/19/21, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members with bed mobility, extensive assistance from one staff member for transfers, was independent with set up help only for eating, extensive assist from one staff member with toileting, extensive one for personal hygiene. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #104) of one resident observed during a dressing change. The census was 55. Findings include: On 09/13/21 12:50 P.M. observation of a dressing change to Resident #104's coccyx by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #24 revealed he washed his hands, gathered his supplies and put on gloves. LPN #24 then removed the old dressing, removed his gloves and washed his hands. The area was pink with granulation tissue. LPN #24 then put on new gloves, cleansed the area with wound cleanser and 4 by 4 gauze. With the same gloves, he applied santyl to the area with Q-tip, then a clean dressing, then removed his gloves and washed his hands. At 1:00 P.M. interview with LPN #24 revealed he had not washed his hands and changed his gloves after cleaning the wound.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure a resident admitted with a urinary tract infection (UTI) received the appropriate antibiotic to properly treat her infection. This affected one (Resident #157) of two residents reviewed for UTI's/ urinary catheters. Findings include: A review of Resident #157's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a UTI. A review of Resident #157's physician's orders revealed she was admitted to the facility with an order to receive Cephalexin (Keflex) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) twice a day (BID) for seven days. The order indicated the Cephalexin was being used to treat a UTI. There was no order given for a follow up urinalysis to be obtained after the completion of the antibiotic. A review of Resident #157's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2021 revealed the resident received her first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$68,432 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $68,432 — penalty dated 2026-03-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 16%Other / private 40%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,978per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$291per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366250. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next