Anna Maria Of Aurora

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 329 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 173 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance/supervision and develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective fall prevention program for Resident #91 to prevent falls with injury and failed to ensure the resident was adequately and timely assessed post fall. Actual harm occurred beginning on 09/27/24 when Resident #91, who was at high risk for falls, had a history of multiple falls and was cognitively impaired with poor safety awareness, sustained a witnessed fall resulting in injury in the rehab gym when Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #432 walked away from Resident #91 during treatment to get equipment and the resident fell while being left unattended. On 09/30/24 (three days after the fall), Resident #91's wife alerted staff to bruising to the resident's rib area. An x-ray was ordered revealing multiple rib fractures. On 10/05/24 Resident #91 sustained a fall when he stood up from his wheelchair while being left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for Resident #195. This affected one (Resident #195) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 88.Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #195 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, type II diabetes mellitus, urinary retention requiring an indwelling urinary catheter, and protein-calorie malnutrition.Record review of the resident's care plan revealed care plans initiated on 06/30/25 addressed Resident #195's activities of daily living, nutrition, urinary catheter, fall prevention, cardiovascular status, and chronic medical conditions. The care plan included interventions to monitor changes in condition, notify the physician of changes in condition, administer medications as ordered, obtain laboratory studies as ordered, and provide Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to administer physician ordered medications as prescribed for one resident (Resident #194) of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility did not ensure that admission medications ordered for the evening of 12/18/25 were administered as required, resulting in a delay in treatment for Resident #194. This affected one (Resident #194) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 88.Findings include: Review of Resident #194's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an Acute Care Hospital Rehabilitation following spinal reconstruction surgery. Pertinent diagnoses included post-laminectomy syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, hypothyroidism, hypertension, asthma, depression, and chronic pain requiring ongoing medication management.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the kitchen cleaning logs, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean sanitary manner. The facility also failed to ensure the unit refrigerators for resident use were maintained as required. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility indicated there were no residents who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Initial kitchen tour on 12/15/25 at 8:45 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #700 revealed the following concerns:A. In the walk-in refrigerator there was:-a metal container of leftover egg salad with a use by date of 12/10/25-a metal container of leftover cranberry sauce with a use by date of 11/10/25-a metal container of leftover pumpkin puree with a use by date of 11/24/25-a Ziploc bag of leftover sliced turkey lunchmeat with a use by date of 12/12/25B. No thermometer was found in the walk-in freezerC. Scoops were located inside both the flour and sugar rolling bin carts sitting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster/refuse area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Observation during the initial kitchen tour completed on 12/15/25 at 9:16 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #700 revealed the dumpster lid was open, the dumpster was overflowing, and there were four bags of garbage on the ground surrounding the dumpster. Interview at the time of the observation with DM #700 confirmed the dumpster was supposed to emptied daily, was not covered, and garbage bags should not have been lying on the ground.Review of the undated facility policy called; Sanitation Policy under the section waste disposal and pest control stated trash must be removed frequently but did not specify any specifics as to the frequency trash was to be taken out or how often the dumpster would be emptied.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain clean medication storage in the North and South medication carts. This affected 50 residents (Residents #01, #04, #05, #07, #09, #11, #13, #17, #18, #20, #22, #23, #27, #29, #32, #35, #37, #38, #40, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #53, #54, #59, #63, #64, #68, #69, #70, #74, #76, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #85, #86, #87, #88, #99, #100) out of 50 residents on the North and South medication carts, and had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Observation on 12/16/25 at 7:55 A.M. of the North medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #720 revealed 18 unidentified pills on the bottom of the first and second drawers collectively, and powdered pill residue along the bottom and corners of the first and second medication cart drawers. Interview on 12/16/25 at 8:02 A.M. with LPN #720 for the North medication cart verified the number of loose medications, and the pill residue in the first and second medication cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure assistive hearing devices were in place to maintain hearing abilities. This affected one resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for assistive devices. The facility census was 87.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and chronic kidney disease.Review of the physician orders dated 06/01/25 revealed an order to place Resident #20's bilateral hearing aids in ears and lock hearing aids in medication cart as needed per request.Review of the care plan dated 09/16/25 revealed Resident #20 had potential for impaired communication and/or disorientation related to hard of hearing and wearing bilateral hearing aids. Interventions included assistance with the use of hearing aids as needed and place bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the proper delivery of oxygen and accurately document its administration according to the physician orders and the resident's comprehensive care plans. This affected two residents (Resident #01 and Resident #17) out of four residents reviewed for oxygen/respiratory therapy. This had the potential to affect 15 additional residents (Residents #06, #07, #08, #22, #25, #37, #43, #49, #52, #53, #56, #62, #69, #80, and #82) with orders for oxygen. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Resident #01 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), shortness of breath (SOB), and anemia. Review of the comprehensive care plan dated 08/29/25 for altered respiratory status related to a diagnosis of COPD, and SOB when lying flat at times. Intervention dated 10/02/25 included oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medical records contained accurate documentation. This affected three (Residents #1, #17, and #45) out of 22 residents for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 87.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder and wounds to his left medial ankle and heel. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition and had one vascular wound. Review of the November 2025 and December 2025 Physician Orders revealed Resident #45 had the following orders: an order dated 09/20/25 to irrigate his left medial ankle with normal saline and apply anacept gel (a clear antimicrobial gel that kills bacteria and assists with debridement) to the wound. The order to his left medial ankle was discontinued and changed on 12/05/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure droplet infection control precautions (infection control measures to stop germs spreading by respiratory droplets from coughing, sneezing and/or talking that travel short distances about three to six feet) were followed for Resident #82. This affected one (Resident #82) of one resident with a physician order for droplet precautions. The facility census was 87.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 11/22/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and hypoxia, COVID-19, chronic congestive heart failure, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the nursing note dated 12/11/25 at 10:42 A.M. and completed by Registered Nurse (RN)/ Minimum Data Set (MDS) #812 revealed Resident #82 tested positive for COVID-19 and was on droplet precautions. Review of the physician order dated 12/11/25 revealed Resident #82 had a physician order for droplet precaution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on staff interviews, resident interview, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation did not occur for Resident #50. This affected one resident (#50) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 06/04/24. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, chronic congestive heart failure, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition, required partial/moderate assistance from staff for transfers, and used a walker for ambulation. Review of the self-reported incident (SRI) tracking number 248730 dated 06/17/24 revealed Resident #50's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH