The Enclave at Barnesville
400 Carrie Avenue, Barnesville, OH 43713 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (740) 425-3648 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $334,135 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 37.6% | 12.9% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.82 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.77 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review including review of facility payroll records and facility billing/financial information, review of the facility assessment, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility Resident [NAME] of Rights, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent the potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility and failed to have adequate and effective systems in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hired agreement and payroll schedule. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 06/07/24 when the identified lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospital, displacement due to potential interruption in staffing regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, including review of the facility payroll records, review of facility billing/financial information, review of email communication, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility. The facility also failed to have an effective system in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hired agreement and payroll schedule. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 02/16/24 when the lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospitalization, displacement due to potential interruption in staffing and/or outside service providers. This had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review including review of facility payroll records, review of facility billing/financial information, review of the [NAME] County Treasurer report, review of the facility assessment, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility admission agreement, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility and failed to have adequate and effective systems in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hired agreement and payroll schedule. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 10/13/23 when the identified lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospital, displacement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of facility policies, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized and adequate pressure ulcer interventions to prevent the development of a pressure injury/ulcer for Resident #55. This affected one resident (#55) of one resident reviewed for facility acquired pressure injuries. The facility census was 52. Actual harm occurred on 03/26/26 when Resident #55, who was assessed to be dependent on staff for personal care including turning and repositioning in bed, had multiple hospitalizations placing her at high risk for development of pressure injuries, was not provided necessary and appropriate interventions to prevent the development of a pressure injury and subsequently developed an unstageable pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) to her right buttock gluteal fold resulting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records, observation of kitchen and meal service, and interview with staff, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner and the drainpipes were maintained to prevent sewage odor in the kitchen. This had potential to affect 52 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 52.Findings Include: 1.Observations on 05/04/26 between 8:10 A.M. and 8:34 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour revealed the dry storage pantry had a strong sewage smell coming from an open drainpipe in the floor. Dietary Manager (DM) #209 verified the odor and reported it had been that way for several months and both administration and maintenance were aware of the concern. Observation and interview on 05/05/26 at 4:20 P.M. with DM #209 revealed the odor in the dry storage area was no longer present. DM #209 reported the Maintenance Director from one of the other facilities came earlier that day and snaked the drain and poured vinegar and baking soda down the drain as well. DM #209…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident assessment data accurately reflected the residents' status. This affected four residents (Resident #8, #29, #30 and #55) of 46 resident records reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The census was 52. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, Parkinson's disease, spinal stenosis, major depression, and high blood pressure. Review of the most recent minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive initial assessment completed on 03/30/26 for Resident #8 revealed item N0350 answered 01 indicating that Resident #8 received insulin injections. Review of the physician order for Resident #8 revealed no insulin orders. Review of the medication administration records for March and April of 2026 for Resident #8 revealed no insulin injections provided. Interview on 05/06/26 at 10:41 A.M. with the MDS coordinator, Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility dietary manual, observation, tasting of the pureed dinner items, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared to an appropriate puree consistency. The had the potential to affect nine residents (Residents #3, #12, #17, #22, #27, #32, #56, #57, and #58) the facility identified as receiving a puree diet. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Observations on 05/05/26 between 1:12 P.M. and 1:50 P.M. of the pureed food preparation revealed dietary cook (DC) #231 had prepared beets, fruit cocktail, and grilled chicken for the dinner meal. All foods were processed in the robot coup (a specialized blender utilized to make pureed foods) for the puree process. DC #231 pureed nine premeasured servings of beets in the robot coup and then after visualizing the pureed beet consistency, began to place the beets into serving dishes for the dinner meal. The surveyor requested to taste the pureed beets to ensure were of pureed consistency. DC #231 stated she had never tasted pureed foods for consistency or taste. Tasting of the pureed beets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accommodate Resident #26 personal preferences of having a nightstand and personal toiletries in her bathroom. This affected one (Resident #26) out of two reviewed for accommodation of need. Facility census was 52.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 12/03/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 4, hypertension, bilateral hearing loss, and arthropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting hygiene, shower/bathing and personal hygiene. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan revised 06/17/25, revealed Resident #26 requires assistance for ADL's in regard to advanced age, active wounds and requires an assistive device. Interventions included encourage and allow resident to complete self-care as able. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised to reflect the preference of the resident's family for the resident to not wear any splints, braces, or other orthotics as part of the resident's contracture management. This affected one (Resident #17) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting his left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, and mood disorder with depressive features. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had adequate hearing and unclear speech. He was usually able to make himself understood and was usually able to understand others. His cognition was severely impaired and he was not known to display any behaviors or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, physical therapy records review, and interviews the facility failed to provide a timely implement a functional management program for Resident #29. This affected one (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed for restorative therapy services. The census was 52. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, depression, hyponatremia (low salt level in blood), gastrointestinal bleed, anemia, high blood pressure, and hepatic encephalopathy (water on the brain leading to confusion).Review of the Resident #29 medical record revealed a physician's order on 04/10/26 for physical therapy treatments dated 04/10/26 through 04/25/26.Review of the most recent minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment completed on 04/13/26 revealed Resident #29 had no hearing or visual deficits and was able to communicate with and understand others. Further review of the MDS 3.0 indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents identified at risk for elopement and resided on a secured memory care unit did not exit the facility without staff knowledge, failed to ensure interventions for residents identified at risk for elopement were timely implemented and failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place. This affected three residents (Resident #39, #54 and #17) of six residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/03/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, epilepsy, Parkinsonism, intermittent explosive disorder, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had severely impaired cognition and was unable to complete the interview. Resident #39 was assessed to ambulate independently. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, review of facility investigation, observations, interviews, facility assessment review and policy review the facility failed to provide comprehensive, resident centered dementia care to prevent resident to resident physical abuse. This affected two residents (Resident #14 and #32) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings include:a. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission to facility on 03/01/24 for diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (impaired short term memory and ability to communicate), gastric reflux, Dementia (confusion and forgetfulness) with moderate behavior disturbances, post traumatic stress disorder, depression, and spinal stenosis (narrowing of canal the spinal cord is in the spinal vertebra). Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 resided on the locked memory care unit.Review of the most recent minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated for Resident #14 revealed a brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered medication parameters were followed for use of a narcotic pain medication and a heart rate was monitored as ordered prior to administration of medication. This affected two (#30 and #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and medication review. The facility census was 52.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 07/31/25 with diagnoses including repeated falls, low back pain, spinal stenosis, lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, and intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region with discogenic back pain only. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) had intact cognition. The resident was assessed to frequently have pain. Review of the plan of care last revised 08/18/25 revealed Resident #33 is at risk for developing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The facility had three errors out of 33 opportunities for a medication error rate of 9%. This affected two (Resident #25 and #31) of four residents reviewed during medication administration observations. Findings include: 1. On 05/06/26 at 8:10 A.M., a medication administration observation was completed for Resident #25 of medications administered by Registered Nurse (RN) #227. The nurse was observed to administer the morning medications that were scheduled for the resident on that day. The resident received six medications to include Amlodipine 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) as ordered once daily, Plavix 75 mg po as ordered once daily, Isosorbide Mononitrate ER 60 mg po as ordered once daily, Multiple Vitamin with Minerals po as ordered once daily, Senna Plus 8.6 mg- 50 mg po as ordered once daily, and Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg po as ordered twice daily. Review of Resident #25's physician's orders revealed, in addition to the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a nurse followed appropriate hand hygiene practices after administering eye drops to one resident (Resident #31) and before preparing medications for another resident (Resident #11). The facility's census was 52. Findings include: On 05/06/26 at 8:15 A.M., a medication administration observation for Resident #31 noted her medications to be prepared and administered by Registered Nurse #227. Among the medications administered was Artificial Tears Opthalmic solution 0.2- 0.2-1%. The nurse was observed to enter the resident's room to give the resident her morning medications. She gave the resident her pills first, followed by the eye drops, administering one drop into both the resident's eyes before leaving the room. She was not observed to wash her hands with soap and water or to use hand sanitizer when leaving the room, or before returning to the medication administration cart to begin preparing Resident #11's medications for administration. On 05/06/26 at 8:24 A.M., an interview with RN #227…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit the required staffing information for the fourth quarter of July 1st 2024 through September 20th 2024 to the payroll based journal (PBJ) data. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 46. Findings included: Review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing report for the fourth quarter (July 1st 20024 through September 30th 2024) revealed the facility failed to submit data for the quarter, one star staffing rating, excessively low weekend staffing, no registered nurse (RN) hours, and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day. Interview on 02/13/25 at 7:55 A.M. with the Administrator revealed that corporate submits the staffing data, she has reached out to cooperates a few times this week for their proof of submitting the staffing data for the fourth quarter (July 1st 2024 through September 30th 2024). She stated corporate had not given her proof of submission. Interview with Administrator on 02/13/25 at 11:33 A.M. confirmed corporate was unable to provide evidence the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices. This had the potential to affect 26 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #19, #21, #23, #25, #26, #28, #32, #35, #36, #44, #47, and #152) of 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 02/11/25 at 2:53 P.M. revealed a male resident walked up to the ice chest next to the nurses' station and helped himself to some ice, with no evidence of practicing hand hygiene. The ice scoop was left inside the ice chest. Two aides were at the nurses' station at the time of the observation. Interview on 02/11/25 at 2:56 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #128 confirmed the observation and stated residents typically do not and should not help themselves to ice, but should ask for assistance.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were accurately completed. This affected three residents ( #3, #40, and #43) of three reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident current orders dated 02/2025 revealed the resident received Quetiapine (anti-psychotic) 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for major depressive disorder. The target behaviors included agitation and aggression. Review of Resident #40's PASARR dated 02/23/24 revealed the resident had no mental illness. Interview on 02/11/25 at 5:18 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident had major depressive disorder and PTSD that were not reflected on the PASARR on 02/23/24. 2. Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with interventions for oxygen therapy and antipsychotic medication treatment. This affected two residents (#7, #46) of seven residents reviewed for respiratory care and unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant melanoma, heart failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Review of Resident #7's physician order, dated 01/18/24, revealed the order for oxygen to be administered at four liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously for low oxygen saturation. Review of Resident #7's care plan revealed it was not individualized and did not reflect the resident's treatment order for oxygen therapy. Interview on 02/11/25 at 2:01 P.M., the Registered Nurse (RN)/Minimum Data Set (MDS) #101 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's blood glucose level reading was obtained prior to administering insulin and failed to timely identify Resident #26's edema. This affected two residents (#33, #26) of three residents reviewed for change in condition and edema. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 11/15/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, encephalopathy, angina, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 04, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #33 required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of physician order, dated 12/20/24, revealed the order for Degludec Subcutaneous Pen-Injector 100 units/milliliter (ml) inject 20 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes mellitus. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for an alternating air mattress was followed for a resident at risk for developing pressure ulcers. This affected one resident (#32) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage three chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, dementia, and osteoarthritis. Review of a care plan last updated on 08/19/22 revealed Resident #32 had the potential for impairment to skin integrity related to dermatitis, use of Plavix, neuropathy, edema, and obesity. Interventions included keeping body free of moisture, cut fingernails, follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, monitor for bruising related to Plavix, pressure reducing mattress to bed, and provide incontinence care after each incontinence episode. Review of an order dated 05/16/24 revealed Resident #32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for non-skid strips was followed. This affected one resident (#32) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage three chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, dementia, and osteoarthritis. Review of an undated fall care plan revealed Resident #32 was at risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance, unaware of safety needs, essential tremors, bilateral knee replacements, behaviors, medication use and a history of wandering. Interventions included but were not limited to call light in reach, ensure non-skid footwear is in use, and non-skid strips to right of bed. Review of an order dated 03/22/23 revealed Resident #32 should have non-skid strips in front of her bed. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) completed on 12/05/24 revealed Resident #32 had severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions for weight loss after a significant weight loss in one month of 5.45%. This affected one resident (#19) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, urinary tract infection, and type II diabetes. Review of orders revealed Resident #19 had a consistent carbs diet with regular texture dated 12/13/24. There were no additional orders for nutrition. A nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had good intakes of meals. Review of a care plan dated 12/16/24 revealed Resident #19 had altered nutrition and/or hydration status related to therapeutic diet, type II diabetes, dementia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, above knee amputation, depression, psychotic disorder, and acute kidney injury. Interventions included administering medications per order, honor food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen humidifier bottle was changed timely. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified six residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, dementia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant melanoma, heart failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Review of Resident #7's physician order, dated 01/18/24, revealed the order for oxygen to be administered at four liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously for low oxygen saturation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident had a comprehensive assessment and plan of care for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#40) of one reviewed for behavioral/emotional. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #40's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed there was a section titled trauma. The first question was does the resident have a history of any of the following mental health diagnosis? Staff checked depression but did not check the box for PTSD. The second question of the assessment was Does the resident have a history of one or more of the following including all types of abuse, veteran, homeless, imprisonment, loss, trauma, or other. Staff indicated none. The next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an unnecessary antibiotic. This affected one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for unnecessary antibiotic. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease without angina, chronic kidney disease stage 3A, urinary incontinence, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Worksheet and Culture and Sensitivity dated 08/05/24 revealed Resident #44 had a culture revealing klebsiella in her urine and the culture and sensitivity showed the infection was resistant to Cipro (antibiotic). Review of a UTI Worksheet and Culture and Sensitivity dated 09/11/24 revealed Resident #44 had a culture revealing klebsiella and aerococcus urinae in her urine. The culture and sensitivity revealed the infection was resistant to Klebsiella. Resident #44 received Bactrim for treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnoses for psychotropic medication and failed to have supporting evidence for declining gradual dose reduction recommendations and increasing dose of psychotropic medication. This affected two residents (#43 and #46) of six resident reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #43's orders dated 06/04/24 to 02/1/25 revealed on 06/13/24 the resident was ordered Abilify 5 milligram (mg) daily for psychosis related to psychosis. The targeted behaviors were agitation and paranoia. On 10/17/24 the Abilify was increased to 7.5 mg daily for cerebrovascular disease and psychosis. The resident targeted behaviors were fearful and tearful.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, facility assessment review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/18/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. An interview on 12/05/23 at 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed, at that time, there were 14 employees who did not receive paychecks on 10/13/23 as their checks were returned due to insufficient funds. At the time of the survey, the Administrator did not provide any additional information as to why payroll was not met for these employees on this date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/18/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. An interview on 12/05/23 at 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed there were 14 employees who did not receive paychecks on 10/13/23 as their checks were returned due to insufficient funds. At the time of the survey, the Administrator did not provide any additional information as to why payroll was not met for these employees on this date. This payroll issue was in addition to the identification of other vendors/suppliers with past due balances,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, facility assessment review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/18/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. An interview on 12/05/23 at 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed there were 14 employees who did not receive paychecks on 10/13/23 as their checks were returned due to insufficient funds. At the time of the survey, the Administrator did not provide any additional information as to why payroll was not met for these employees on this date. This payroll issue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/18/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. An interview on 12/05/23 at 2:25 P.M. an interview with the Administrator revealed there were 14 employees who did not receive paychecks on 10/13/23 as their checks were returned due to insufficient funds. At the time of the survey, the Administrator did not provide any additional information as to why payroll was not met for these employees on this date. This payroll issue was in addition to the identification of other vendors/suppliers with past due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, facility assessment review, and interviews, the facility failed to establish an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/18/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. An interview on 12/05/23 at 2:25 P.M. an interview with the Administrator revealed there were 14 employees who did not receive paychecks on 10/13/23 as their checks were returned due to insufficient funds. At the time of the survey, the Administrator did not provide any additional information as to why payroll was not met for these employees on this date. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the provided QAPI documentation, beginning 10/01/23, revealed an identified problem of vendors not being paid promptly. The root cause revealed invoices were not being entered electronically when received. Review of invoices and calls with the Administrator and Business Office Manager were to be completed weekly. The QAPI did not identify any type of ongoing systemic monitoring and mechanisms to ensure there was no disruption of employee payroll responsibilities and to ensure all staff were paid on the agreed payroll date. a. During the onsite investigation, the facility provided a list of nine employees who had paychecks returned from payroll on 01/19/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to establish an effective governing board, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Governing Body policy revealed the Governing Body had a fiduciary duty, duty of care, and duty of loyalty to act in the best interests of the Facility. The governing body should be comprised of the operator (s), c-suite level executives, and other individuals who were legally responsible for the establishment and implementation of policies regarding management and operations of the facility. The Governing Body member responsibilities included to be active, engaged, and involved in the affairs of the facility and to have direct access to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly, kitchen equipment was clean, the kitchen environment was clean, kitchen staff's hair was properly restrained, kitchen staff washed hands after touching trash can lids and prior to donning (putting on) gloves, and the Robot Coup was sanitized and dried between uses. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 44. Findings included: 1. Observation on 09/11/23 at 8:32 A.M. of bread on the bread rack revealed the following: three full loaves which were sealed but had no date on them, three partial loaves which were not sealed (the end of the bag was open) and did not have a date on them, one pack (eight count) of hotdog buns which were sealed but had no date on them, three packs (12 count) of hamburger buns which were sealed but had no date on them, one pack (nine count) of hamburger buns which were not sealed (the end of the [NAME] was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 09/11/23 at 5:45 P.M. of the two dumpsters behind the facility revealed multiple pieces of trash (multiple straws, plastic spoons, rubber gloves, and container caps) on the ground. Observation on 09/12/23 at 4:24 P.M. of the two dumpsters behind the facility revealed multiple pieces of trash (multiple straws, plastic spoons, rubber gloves, and container caps) on the ground. Interview on 09/12/23 at 4:25 P.M. with the Regional Dietary Manager #465 verified there were multiple pieces of trash outside the two dumpsters behind the facility and trash around a dumpster wound tend to draw in pests and vermin. Review of the facility policy titled, Trash Handling, undated, revealed outside dumpsters and the surrounding area are to be kept clean and free of debris.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine drain had an air gap to prevent potential backflow of drain contents into the ice machine. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 09/12/23 at 7:23 A.M. of the facility ice machine, which was located in the hallway outside of the kitchen, revealed there was no air gap between the ice machine and the drain. Interview on 09/12/23 at 7:25 A.M. with the Maintenance Director #432 verified there was no air gap between the ice machine and the drain. He verified that microorganisms could backflow into the ice machine since there was no air gap which could lead to contaminated ice and illness for the residents.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, MedScape online drug reference app review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately. This affected five (Resident #4, #5, #13, #26 and #27) of 15 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission of 07/24/20 with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, mitral valve prolapse, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 08/11/23 revealed bed rails used as a restraint. No other restraint use was indicated on the MDS assessment. Further review of the medical record including physician's orders and care plans revealed no evidence of any restraint use including bed side rails. Review of the physician's orders revealed no evidence of any type of current restraint use. Observation of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a written summary of their baseline care plan. This affected four Resident (#4, #11, #38 and #42) of four residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 44. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism, unspecified dementia and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed she was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #4's Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/01/23, revealed it was developed to care for the immediate needs of the resident within 48 hours of admission. However, there was no documentation to support the resident/resident representative was educated on the baseline plan of care or provided a written summary. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, spread sheet review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the spread sheet was followed and residents received the correct portion of food. This affected the 23 residents receiving the regular line meal (#1, #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #15, #19, #23, #24, #25, #29, #31, #32, #35, #37, #39, #41, #43, #44, and #301) and the 11 residents receiving the mechanical soft meal (#4, #12, #17, #20, #26, #27, #28, #33, #34, #42, and #45) for the lunch meal observation. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Review of the documentation titled, Daily Production dated Tuesday 09/12/23, revealed for lunch, residents receiving the regular line meal were to receive four ounces of saffron rice, six ounces of pork and mushroom stir fry, and four ounces of oriental blend vegetables and residents receiving a mechanical soft diet meal were to receive four ounces of saffron rice with four ounces of mechanical soft pork and four ounces of green beans. Observation on 09/12/23 at 11:32 A.M. of [NAME] #483 plating food for lunch. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed food in the proper form. This had the potential to affect all seven residents (#3, #13, #16, #21 #22, #36, and #38) who were receiving pureed meals. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Observation on 09/12/23 at 10:04 A.M. of [NAME] #483 placing one cup of chicken broth in the Robot Coup bowl followed by seven servings of pork. [NAME] #483 started to Robot Coup and let it run for approximately two minutes. She looked at the pureed pork and reported it was ready to be served. This surveyor asked [NAME] #483 to taste the pureed pork to confirm the pork was the correct consistency and she did. [NAME] #483 reported it was the correct puree consistency to serve to residents. This surveyor then tasted the pork puree and had to chew the pork. Regional Dietary Manager #465 tasted the puree after this surveyor and confirmed the pork was not the correct consistency and needed to be chewed. [NAME] #483 then continued to puree the pork stopping two more times when Regional Dietary Manager #465 tasted the pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of orders for laboratory tests. This affected one (Resident #101) of two residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, fracture of the right femur, anxiety disorder, ulcerative colitis, generalized muscle weakness, hypertension, heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 was severely cognitively impaired. A nursing note dated 01/10/23 at 3:40 P.M. indicated Psychiatrist #450 visited and new orders were received for laboratory tests (B 12 level, folate, thyroid stimulating hormone, and rapid plasma [NAME]) to be obtained 01/13/23. There was no indication Resident #101's power of attorney/resident representative was notified. On 09/14/23 at 12:32 P.M., Clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #101) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's closed medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction with paralysis affecting the left non-dominant side, anxiety disorder, generalized muscle weakness, heart disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 was severely cognitively impaired. No behavioral symptoms or rejection of care was noted. Review of a skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed no documentation of impairment/bruises. A skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 had a group of five bruises measuring 6 centimeters (cm) x 6 cm x 0 cm to the right upper extremity. Review of progress notes for the period between 01/06/23 and 01/09/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected one (Resident #101) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's closed medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction with paralysis affecting the left non-dominant side, anxiety disorder, generalized muscle weakness, heart disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 was severely cognitively impaired. No behavioral symptoms or rejection of care was noted. Review of a skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed no documentation of impairment/bruises. A skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 had a group of five bruises measuring 6 centimeters (cm) x 6 cm x 0 cm to the right upper extremity. Review of progress notes for the period between 01/06/23 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide written transfer notification to the resident and/or representative when a resident was transferred to the hospital. This affected two (Resident #49 and #4) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/23 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and atherosclerotic heart disease. Further review of the medical record revealed on 07/22/23 Resident #49 was transferred to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE] for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of written notification of transfer provided to the resident or resident representative following admission to the hospital. Interview on 09/13/23 at 10:45 A.M., with social services designee (SSD #406) revealed no written transfer notification was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives admitted to the hospital were provided bed hold notification. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/23 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and atherosclerotic heart disease. Further review of the medical record revealed on 07/22/23 Resident #49 was transferred to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE] for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of written notification of bed hold days remaining provided to the resident or resident representative following admission to the hospital. Interview on 09/13/23 at 10:45 A.M., with social services designee (SSD #406) revealed no notification of bed hold days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening/Resident Review (PAS/RR) assessment was accurate upon admission and failed to ensure an updated PAS/RR was submitted to determine if a resident would benefit from specialized services. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for PAS/RR. 16 residents were screened for need for PAS/RR reviews. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 01/21/13. Review of the medical diagnoses record revealed diagnoses relevant on admission included dysthymic disorder (mood disorder), dementia, and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 02/07/17 a diagnosis of psychotic disorder was added. On 01/13/18 a diagnosis of recurrent major depressive disorder was added. Review of the PAS/RR dated 01/18/13 indicated Resident #3 did not have a documented diagnosis of dementia, had no diagnosis of any mental disorders including mood disorders or other psychotic disorders. The assessment indicated Resident #3 had a severe,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as per the resident's plan of care. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 44. Findings include: A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a fracture of an unspecified part of the neck of the left femur (07/24/23), history of repeated falls, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, unspecified intracapsular fracture of the right femur (02/21/22), presence of an artificial right hip joint, aphasia following CVA, HTN, and dizziness and giddiness. A review of Resident #27's quarterly fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as a moderate risk for falls. Her risk factors included cognitive impairment, the use of medications that increased her risk for falls, and diagnoses that predisposed her to falls. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, inter-department email communication review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary recommendations were communicated effectively. This affected one (Resident #31) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/20 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dementia and hypertension. Review of Resident #31's weights revealed a 6.6% weight loss in the last 30 days that was identified on 09/04/23. Review of the dietary progress revealed a progress note on 09/10/23 which indicated a significant weight loss that was identified on 09/04/23. The dietician recommended to increase Resident #31's nutritional supplement. Review of Resident #31's nutritional supplements revealed on 08/02/23 the resident was ordered the use of 8 ounce sugar free house supplement daily. No evidence was found of any increase as recommended by the dietician on 09/10/23 as indicated in dietary notes. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed prior to the use of bed side rails and she was properly care planned for bed side rails. This affected one Resident (#38) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus without complications, dysphagia, encounter for palliative care, cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #38's admission Minimum Date Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/23/22, revealed she was cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on the help of two persons to physically assist with bed mobility. Review of Resident #38's significant change MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 07/20/23, revealed she was rarely or never understood, was totally dependent on the help of one person to physically assist with bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were only used when there was an adequate indication for use and a resident did not receive antibiotics administered via an intramuscular (IM) injection unless warranted for the treatment of an infection. This affected one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 44. Findings include: A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances, chronic pain syndrome, adult onset diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. She was hospitalized on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed there was an order for the resident to be sent to the hospital for an evaluation on 08/02/23. There was another physician's order dated 08/07/23 for the resident to receive ceftriaxone (Rocephin) 250 milligrams (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure anti-psychotic medications were utilized only when medically necessary. This affected one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed diagnoses including post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dementia, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder, dysthmic disorder, and mood disorder with depressive features. Review of a psychiatrist note dated 03/14/23 indicated risperdal (antipsychotic) (order for 0.5 milligram at bedtime for repetitive behavior and delusions related to dementia) would be decreased 0.25 milligrams (mg). An order was written for risperdal 0.25 mg every day for delusions. A psychiatrist note dated 04/11/23 revealed the risperdal would be discontinued. A psychiatrist note dated 05/09/23 indicated Resident #3 was doing well with the discontinuation of the risperdal. A nursing note dated 05/14/23 at 9:41 A.M. indicated Resident #3 was yelling out all hell was breaking loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, tray card review, menu review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored when providing beverages. This affected three Residents (#2, #15, and #23) of three residents reviewed for beverage of choice. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Observation on [DATE] at 8:42 A.M. of three and one half gallons of 2% white milk in the milk cooler. There were no other types of milk (whole or chocolate) noted in the cooler. An interview at the time with [NAME] #483 verified there was only one type of milk, 2%. Observation on [DATE] at 7:10 A.M. of one and one half gallons of 2% white milk in the milk cooler. There were no other types of milk (whole or chocolate) noted in the cooler. An interview at the time with Cook/Dietary Aide #479 revealed the chocolate milk had expired and the facility discarded it. She verified there was no chocolate milk for all three meals on [DATE] or breakfast on [DATE]. She reported the facility order was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices by not ensuring a resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag was kept off the floor. This affected one (Resident #13) of one residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic pain syndrome, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, and difficulty walking. A review of Resident #13's physician's orders revealed she had the use of an indwelling urinary catheter to continuous drain. The order originated on 09/10/23. A review of Resident #13's care plans revealed she had a care plan in place for the potential for complications related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention. The care plan was initiated on 09/11/23. The goal was for the resident to be free from catheter-related trauma through the review date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's infection control log, review of infection reports, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure antibiotics were not used unnecessarily. This affected two (Resident #4 and #42) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances, chronic pain syndrome, adult onset diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. She was hospitalized on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed there was an order for the resident to be sent to the hospital for an evaluation on 08/02/23. There was another physician's order dated 08/07/23 for the resident to receive Ceftriaxone (Rocephin) 250 milligrams (mg) IM every day until 08/13/23 for a diagnosis of a UTI and Diflucan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-11 · tag F0628 — widespreadProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided appropriate notices when transferred to the hospital and the State's local Ombudsman was notified of all transfers/ discharges from the facility as required. This affected three (Resident #45, #51, and #53) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations and/ or planned discharges. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was hospitalized on three separate occasions, during his stay in the facility, with the hospitalizations occurring between 02/23/26 and 03/03/26, 03/31/26 and 04/02/26, and again on 04/10/26, in which he did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #51's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 02/23/26 at 11:01 P.M. that indicated the resident was found in bed with his tracheostomy tube out at 9:45 P.M. 911 was called and the resident was transferred to a local hospital to have the tracheostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$334,135 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $121,951 — penalty dated 2024-06-21
- $131,360 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- $80,824 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-14 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPITAL HOLDINGS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 54% | since 06/15/2025 |
| LAMPERT, AHARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/15/2025 |
| JB EAST END INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| BASCH, JOSHUA | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| COHEN, SHLOMO | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| EPSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| REISS, MORRIS | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| WEINSTOCK, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| ZAKS, MENACHEM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| BLOCH, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| RAND, MALKA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/16/2025 |
| STERN, JACOB | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| CCH HEALTHCARE OH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| KELLEY, KALYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| PATCHA, HIMALAYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| BARNESVILLE SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $228K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.