Logan Acres

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2018-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of standing house orders, the facility failed to monitor Resident #23's bowel status and implement their standing house orders as directed. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #23 did not have a bowel movement for six days and the resident was subsequently hospitalized for an acute large bowel obstruction. This affected one (#23) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, coronary artery disease, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, functional quadriplegia, and dysphagia. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/29/18, revealed the residents brief interview for mental status was not assessed due to being rarely or never understood. Further review revealed the resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, sprain ligaments of the cervical and lumbar spine, hypertension, suicidal ideation, post traumatic stress disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. His functional status is listed as independent set up only. Review of the PASARR dated 06/21/19 revealed Resident #21 had no indications of serious mental illness nor a developmental disability. The resident had not qualified for a PASARR II at that time. Review of Resident #21's diagnosis revealed chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, on his diagnosis list dated 06/14/19. Review of the physician orders dated 01/13/22 revealed aripiprazole tablet 20 mg, give one tablet by mouth, one time a day related to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, family, and resident representative interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and representatives participated in care conference meetings. This affected one resident (#59) out of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 88. Finding include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 05/11/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, dysphasia, dementia, urine retention, tremors, psychotic disorder with delusions, neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, aphasia, hemiplegia, and urgency of urination. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers and mobility. Review of the care conferences dated 12/27/21, 03/15/22, 06/21/22, 09/20/22, and 12/01/22 revealed care conferences had no evidence of the resident or the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for contracture's. This affected one resident (#33) out of one resident reviewed for position and mobility. The facility identified three additional residents (#18, #55, and #14) with contracture's. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed admission date 01/13/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #33 required extensive assistance of two plus persons physical assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident required total dependence of two plus persons for transfers. The resident had functional limitations in range of motion (ROM) in the upper and the lower extremities on both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Fall/Incident Statement, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were timely updated. This affected one resident (#14) out of two residents (#12 and #14) reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Medical Record Review for Resident #14 revealed admission date 06/30/18. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), headache, macular degeneration, stiffness of the right hip, cardiomegaly, history of falling, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition. The Resident required extensive two plus person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The resident required extensive one person assistance for dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and always continent bowel. The resident assessment revealed no falls since admission/entry or reentry. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during a wound/dressing treatment to promote healing and prevent infection. This affected one resident (#76) out of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents (#53, #71, #76, and #82) with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, diabetes type II, hypertension, rheumatic tricuspid valve insufficiency, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 had extensive cognitive impairment. Her functional status was listed as extensive two person assist for all activities of daily living. The assessment also revealed Resident #76 had a stage III pressure ulcer. Observation of the wound/dressing change on 01/24/23 at 1:35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a significant weight loss was timely notified to the Dietician and the resident family. This affected one resident (#71) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/22/22. Diagnoses included pneumonia, dementia, dehydration, unsteadiness, syncope and collapse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff members for mobility and transfers. Review of the baseline care plan dated 12/22/22 revealed Resident #71 was at risk for alteration in nutrition. Review of the physician orders dated 12/22/22 revealed an order for Resident #71 weights daily for seven days then weekly for three weeks then monthly. An order dated 01/07/22 revealed an order for registered dietician (RD) consult for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the pharmacy recommendations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation were timely reviewed by the physician and included an appropriate reasoning for continuing the medication. This affected one resident (#59) out of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 88. Finding include Review of the medical record for the Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 05/11/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, dementia, urine retention, tremors, psychotic disorder with delusions, neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, aphasia, hemiplegia, and urgency of urination. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers and mobility. The MDS also revealed the resident had a urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of a dietary listing and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure pans were appropriately dried to maintain proper sanitation. In addition, the facility failed to store ready to use icing in the refrigerator per label to prevent contamination. This had to the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 91. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/26/18 at 9:00 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed seven stacks of various sized metal storage pans on the shelf. Further observation of Dietary Aide #34 remove pans from each stack revealed condensation on the inside. Two stacks had visible water dripping off the edges. Interview on 08/26/18 at 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Aide #34 confirmed seven stacks of various sized metal storage pans were not dried prior to stacking on the shelves. Further interview revealed the pans were washed and put away the night before. Review of the undated facility policy titled Cleaning Procedure - Pots and Pans revealed to remove the pans from the sanitizing sink and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2018-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of dietary spreadsheets, and staff interview the facility failed to serve bread per the dietician approved spreadsheet to residents receiving puree diets. This affected eight (#6, #8, #17, #43, #49, #61, #64, and #66) of eight residents receiving pureed diets. The census was 91. Findings include: Observation during lunch on 08/27/18 at 11:25 A.M. revealed bread was not served to residents receiving pureed diets. Review of the dietician approved spreadsheet revealed residents receiving pureed diets were to receive a pureed wheat roll for lunch on 08/27/18. Interview on 08/27/18 at 11:35 A.M. with Dietary Manager #109 confirmed bread was not served to residents receiving pureed diets. Further interview revealed the facility stopped serving pureed bread items approximately one year ago due to residents dislike. Interview on 08/28/18 at 11:39 A.M. with Registered Dietician #144 revealed she was aware residents were not receiving pureed bread, but was not aware it was still on the spreadsheet. The facility confirmed eight (#6, #8, #17, #43, #49, #61, #64, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2018-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, list provided by the facility and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to appropriately clean a glucometer after checking a resident's blood sugar. This affected one (#283) out of one resident observed having their blood sugar checked during medication administration and had the potential to affect five (#2, #16,#32, #41 and #282) additional residents identified by the facility as using the same glucometer for blood sugar monitoring. Facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of list provided by the facility identified six (#2, #16, #32, #41, #282 and #283) Residents as using the same glucometer for blood sugar monitoring. On 08/26/18 at 11:36 A.M. an observation was made of Resident #283 blood sugar check with a glucometer device. At this time Registered Nurse (RN) #100 nurse checked the Resident's blood sugar. When she was completed with the blood sugar check she cleaned the glucometer device with an alcohol prep pad and placed it back in the medication cart drawer. On 08/26/18 at 11:38 A.M. an interview with RN #100…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH