No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Morris Nursing Home

322 South Charity Street, Bethel, OH 45106 · For profit - Corporation · 18 certified beds · (513) 734-7401 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 734-7401 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Dec 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
210 N Union St · (513) 734-9050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
545 W Plane St · (513) 734-9010 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
545 W Plane St · (513) 734-0605 · Call to confirm hours
Park
304 S Ash St · (513) 734-4099 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.4%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.2%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%12.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.6%CMS range 43.9–71.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.7–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 4.7–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.07
RN hoursweekends
70.4%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 18 beds and averages 15.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.42 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.57 to 1.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-24)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage, the facility failed to initiate enhanced barrier precautions as required. This affected one resident (#22) of two residents reviewed for EBP. The facility also failed to ensure the separation of clean and dirty linen. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 14.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare for right below the knee amputation, indwelling urinary catheter for neurogenic bladder, hypertension, severe sepsis, and alcohol dependence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition and was always continent of bowel and had an indwelling catheter in place for the bladder. Review of physician orders for Resident #22 revealed an order dated 12/17/25 for an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care conferences occur quarterly with the Interdisciplinary Team and included the resident and/or resident representative. This affected seven residents (#1, #3, #4, #10, #12, #13, #16) out of seven residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 14. Findings include: 1.Record review for Resident #16 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had severe cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review for Resident #16 revealed the only care conference held in 2025 was in October. 2. Record review for Resident #3 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Bipolar Disorder, Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a performance review for every nurse aide was conducted at least once every twelve months. This affected four (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #33, CNA #38, CNA #25, and CNA #40) out of six nurse aides reviewed. The facility census was 14.Findings Include:Record Review of employee files on 12/23/25 at 3:00 P.M revealed CNA #33, CNA #38, CNA #25, and CNA #40 did not have an annual performance evaluation.Interview on 12/24/25 at 8:30 A.M with the Administrator confirmed CNA #33, CNA #38, CNA #25, and CNA #40 did not have an annual performance evaluation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Nurse aides had at least 12 hours of annual continuing education for four (Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #33, CNA #38, CNA #25, and CNA #40) out of six nurse aides reviewed. The facility census was 14.Findings Include: Record Review on 12/23/25 at 3:05 P.M revealed CNA #37, CNA #33, CNA #25, CNA #40, and CNA #23 did not have 12 hours of annual continuing education.Interview on 12/24/25 at 8:35 A.M with the Administrator confirmed CNA #37, CNA #33, CNA #25, CNA #40, and CNA #23 did not have 12 hours of annual continuing education.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review facility policy, the facility failed to promote dignity while dining. This affected two (#1 and #13) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 14. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral ischemia, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, dementia, and auditory hallucinations. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severe cognitively impaired and required supervision with eating. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dysphagia oral phase, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, and depression. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision for eating. Observations on 12/23/2025 at 12:27 P.M. revealed Resident #1 and Resident #13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper notice was provided to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility was discontinuing Medicare services. This affected one resident (#23) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility census was 14.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left (non-dominant) side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, aphasia, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change of Status assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision for eating, maximal assistance for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing and dressing, and was dependent for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incident and investigation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged violation. This affected one (#3) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 14. Findings include:Record review for Resident #3 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and type two diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the self-reported incident dated 11/12/25 revealed Resident #3 reported physical abuse by a staff member. Review of the investigation revealed no documentation of assessing any like residents in the facility for abuse from a staff member.Interview on 12/24/25 at 9:10 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed no additional residents were assessed for the investigation.Review of the facility policy titled Abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital and failed to provide the bed hold policy to the resident representative in writing. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 14. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, dysphagia, transient ischemic attack, generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #19 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #19 progress note dated 10/09/25 revealed resident left facility at approximately 11:30 PM via stretcher. There was no evidence the resident or resident representative was provided the bed hold policy in writing or the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer. Interview on 12/23/25 at 10:32 A.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#12) out of five residents who received insulin. The facility census was 14.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus, cerebral Infarction, and morbid obesity.Review of the medication orders revealed Insulin Degludec FlexTouch Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/milliliter (ML), inject 80 units subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime. Review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #12 revealed on 12/05/2025, 12/07/2025, 12/11/2025, 12/12/2025, 12/17/2025, and 12/22/2025 the morning dose of Insulin was not documented as being administered. Interview on 12/23/2025 at 1:05 P.M. with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the morning scheduled doses of insulin were not documented as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the resident medication list, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and labeled properly. This had the potential to affected two (#3 and #10) out of 14 residents with medications stored in a medication cart. The facility census was 14. Findings Include: Observation on 12/24/25 at 2:35 P.M with Registered Nurse (RN) #14 revealed in medication cart #1 there were 20 famotidine pills with an expiration date of November 2025. Also, in the medication cart #1 there was one bottle of bisacodyl with an expiration date of July 2025. Interview on 12/24/25 at 2:40 P.M with RN #14 confirmed in medication cart #1 there were 20 famotidine pills with an expiration date of November 2025 and one bottle of bisacodyl with an expiration date of July 2025. Review of the facility medication list by order revealed Resident #3 and Resident #10 had orders for bisacodyl and Resident #3 had orders for famotidine. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Handling and Administration Rules revealed medication must have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family and staff interviews, bed manual review, policy review, and review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, the facility failed to ensure the resident's side rails did not present an entrapment hazard and consent to utilize the side rails was obtained. This affected four (#5, #9, #163 and #164) of 15 residents identified as having side rails. The facility census was 17. Findings included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Resident #9's diagnoses included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, constipation, hemorrhoids, occlusion and stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries, chronic kidney disease, myalgia, obesity, polyosteorarthritis, encephalopathy, Vitamin D deficiency, pure hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertrophic osteoarthropathy multiple sites, pulmonary hypertension, panlobular emphysema, hyperosmolality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely revise care plans to accurately reflect dental and fall prevention needs. This affected two (#10 and #165) of sixteen residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 17. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record review admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including: type II diabetes, unspecified persistent mood disorder, unspecified psychosis, unspecified hallucinations, and unspecified cerebral infarction. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, was delusional, had no behaviors, did not wander, and rejected care one-to-three out of seven days per week. Resident #10 was independent with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and required supervision and setup assistance. Review of admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had full lower dentures and an upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOUSER, ANNIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2011
HOUSER, JOHNIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/1999
HOBBS, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2024
QURAISHI, SABIRIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$153K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 35%Medicare 10%Other / private 55%

This home reported $153K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,055per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366233. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next