Mennonite Memorial Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's). This affected 10 (#10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #20, #21 and #22) residents residing on the secured dementia unit. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 04/21/25 with diagnoses including pneumonia, atrial fib and heart failure. The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required supervision for eating, max assist for toileting and moderate assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 09/24/19 with diagnoses including Parkinson's, dementia, stroke, and dysphagia. The resident remained at the facility. Review of Resident #11's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely notify a resident's representative of change of condition in the resident. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 58. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of malignant of cardia, lymph, and lung and diabetes type two. Review of Resident #19 nursing note dated 04/23/25 at 5:20 A.M. revealed Resident #19 was hard to arouse, opens eyes to name but then closes eyes. Finger blood sugar was 150. At 5:23 A.M., nine-one-one (911) for hospital transportation was called, at 5:25 A.M. notification was made to the physician, at 5:26 A.M. emergency squad arrived, at 5:27 A.M. report was called to the hospital and at 5:38 A.M. squad left facility for route to hospital. Husband was not notified due to not having husband's contact information. Review of Resident #19's of nursing note date 04/23/25 at 12:44 P.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired. This had the possibility to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Observation at 10:50 A.M. of the large supply room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #498 revealed the following over-the-counter medications for residents: one bottle of fiber powder dated best by 3/24, one bottle of Calcium D 5 micrograms dated best by 6/24, one bottle of oyster calcium 500 milligrams (mg) dated best by 4/24 and three bottles dated best by 8/24, one bottle of melatonin 3 mg dated best by 10/24, and one bottle of acetaminophen liquid 500 mg in 15 milliliters dated best by 3/24. LPN #498 immediately verified the findings and removed the bottles from the room to dispose of them. The facility failed to produce a policy for medication storage.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during dining when Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) #479 failed to sit while assisting Resident #50 to eat his lunch. This affected one resident (#50) of one needing assistance to eat. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23. Resident #50 was severely cognitive impaired. Observation on 11/12/24 at 11:48 A.M. revealed CNA #479 provided Resident #50 with five coffee cups with thin consistency foods in them. CNA #479 picked up one cup and held the cup to Resident #50's lips and he drank from the cup. Resident #50 picked up a Kennedy cup with a straw and proceeded to drink from the straw. CNA #479 would walk away from Resident #50 to perform other tasks and would return to Resident #50 and pick up the cups and put them to his lips. At no point did CNA #479 sit to assist Resident #50 to eat his food. Interview on 11/12/24 at 12:00 P.M. with CNA #479 stated, Am I supposed to sit? CNA #479…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy for care plans, and staff interview, the facility failed to have a complete care plan relating to a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #34) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care plans. The current census is 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #34 include dementia with Lewy bodies, diabetes type two, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and had no pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #34's MDS significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was documented as having one stage three pressure ulcer which was unhealed. Review of Resident #34's care plans dated 06/19/24 revealed there was no focus addressing the care and treatment of Resident #34's pressure ulcer to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of stay and the resident's final status. This affected one resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/14/24 and a discharge date of 09/09/24. Diagnoses included heart disease, dysphagia, cognitive communication, dementia, and syncope and collapse. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight indicating Resident #58 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #58 required maximal assistance with eating, bathing, transfers, and parts of dressing. Resident #58 was dependent with toilet use, and parts of dressing. Resident #58 displayed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward other one to three days during the review period.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident, staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #601 interviews, the facility failed to properly assess and treat pressure ulcers. This affected two (Residents #34 and #56) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with Lewy bodies, diabetes type two, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition, no open wounds, and had no pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #34's care plans dated 06/19/24 revealed there was no focus areas addressing the care and treatment of Resident #34's pressure ulcer to the coccyx on the baseline care plans. Review of Resident #34's admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed the nurse documented an 'open lesion' to the coccyx,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to put interventions in place in a timely manner to prevent weight loss. This affected one (Resident #55) of three reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 09/07/24. Diagnoses included calculus of bile duct, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #09 had mild cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated no dental concerns and no swallowing or chewing difficulties. Review of the care plan dated 09/13/24 revealed a focus of increased nutrition/hydration risk related to diagnoses of calculus of bile duct in gallbladder, hypertension, history of pulmonary embolism, seborrheic dermatitis, long-term use of anticoagulants, iron deficiency anemia, and overactive bladder. A focus of at risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper oversight of a resident receiving nutrition through enteral tube feed which led the resident experiencing a significant weight loss of seven-point five percent (7.5%) in six months. This affected one (#02) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding nutrition. The census was 57. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 02/26/24. Diagnoses including cerebral palsy, dysphasia, aphasia, gastrostomy, feeding difficulties, abnormal posture, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was dependent with eating. Further review revealed a weight loss of five percent or more in the last month, or a weight loss of 10 percent or more in the last six months. The resident utilized a feeding tube. Review of the physician's orders revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriate diagnosis to the support the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one resident (#261) of six residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #261's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/04/24. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, hearing loss, diverticulitis, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #261's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed an admission MDS was in progress. Review of Resident #261's care plan revised 11/06/24 revealed supports and interventions for forgetfulness, nutrition risk, history of wandering and exit seeking, self-care deficit, risk for pain, risk for falls, and use of antipsychotic medication related to anxiety. Review of Resident #261's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/06/24 for quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic) 25 milligrams (mg) give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH