Willow Ridge Of Mennonite Home Communities Of Ohio

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 17.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.41 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain and evaluate appropriate treatment, and removed an old dressing in a manner to prevent pain and tissue damage for one (#14) resident. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #14's ordered dressing was adhering to her open wound and was removed by the nurse without any interventions to loosen the dressing before removal. Resident #14 was noted to squeeze her eyes shut, grimace, tense her upper body, grab hold of the armrest with her hand, and pull her leg away when the dressing was removed. The wound was noted to be opened and actively bleeding following the immediate removal of the adhering dressing. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive wound assessment which including measurements of the wound for one (#14) resident out of one resident reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 18. Findings Include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough baseline care plan was created for one (Resident #172) of one reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 20. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #172 revealed an admission date of 07/01/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including aftercare following knee joint prosthesis, Parkinsonism, and hypertension. Review of the 07/01/24 admission skin assessment revealed documentation of a surgical wound with 31 staples and two sutures. Review of Resident #172's baseline care plan revealed no interventions or goals in place for the resident's surgical wound. Interview and observation on 07/08/24 at 10:47 A.M. revealed Resident #172 had thigh high compression hose on bilaterally. An Abdominal (ABD) pad was observed over his right knee. Upon questioning, Resident #172 stated he had right knee replacement surgery and was at the facility temporarily for therapy. Interview on 07/12/24 at 2:15 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified there was no baseline care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the advance directive code status in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) matched the signed advanced directive form. This affected two (Resident #5 and #18) of three reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 20. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a physician order in the EMR dated 04/27/24 revealed Resident #5's advanced code status was Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care (DNR-CC). Review of the DNR Order Form dated 04/29/24 revealed Resident #5's advanced code status was Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA). Interview on 07/11/24 at 2:16 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Self Reported Incidents (SRI), staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete thorough investigations related to resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected three residents (#16, #15, #7) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 20. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/09/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, stroke, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, and hypertension. The resident remained at the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for toileting and supervision for eating, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #16 had a history of being drawn to various females by doting affection, asking for dates and wanting companionship. Interventions included to educate family members…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough comprehensive care plan was completed for two (Residents #19, #5) of three reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 20. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/15/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety, depression and senile degeneration of the brain. She was admitted to hospice on 05/16/24. The resident remained at the facility. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had severely impaired cognition. She required moderate assistance with eating, substantial assistance for bed mobility, and was dependent for toileting, hygiene, and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed no goals or interventions in place for hospice care. An interview on 07/11/24 at 2:15 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no hospice care plan for Resident #19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented. This affected two (Residents #5 and #18) of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 20. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance for eating and oral hygiene, supervision assistance for ambulation, partial assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 04/27/24 for an advance directive of Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care (DNR-CC), an order dated 04/27/24 for Apixaban (blood thinner) Oral Tablet 2.5 Milligram…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly assess a surgical wound upon admission. This affected one (Resident #172) of one reviewed for wound assessments. The facility census was 20. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #172 revealed an admission date of 07/01/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including aftercare following knee joint prosthesis, Parkinsonism, and hypertension. The resident remained at the facility. Review of the 07/01/24 admission skin assessment revealed documentation of a surgical wound with 31 staples and two sutures. There was no further description and no measurements of the surgical wound in the document. Interview and observation on 07/08/24 at 10:47 A.M. revealed Resident #172 had thigh high compression hose on bilaterally. An Abdominal (ABD) pad was observed over his right knee. Upon questioning, Resident #172 stated he had right knee replacement surgery and was at the facility temporarily for therapy. Interview on 07/10/24 at 1:59 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #414 verified there were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, pharmacist interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications that should not be crushed were not crushed. This affected one (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 20. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 05/27/24 with diagnoses of fracture of other parts of pelvis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #18 was independent for eating and required partial assistance for bed mobility and substantial assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, transfers, and for wheelchair mobility over 150 feet. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 06/13/24 for Aspirin Oral Tablet Delayed Release 81 Milligrams (mg) (Aspirin), give 81 mg by mouth one time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their Legionnaires policy. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents at the facility. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, Legionnaires Policy, revealed the policy applied to all water systems which included, but not limited to shower heads and hoses, ice machines and infrequently used equipment, cold water would be heated to 140 degrees Fahrenheit by water heaters in each house and relevant procedures and record keeping related to the program would be kept, maintained and reviewed as necessary. Interview on 07/11/24 at 2:59 P.M. with Maintenance Director #509 revealed the provided policy and water testing by an outside testing facility for Legionella and intermittent room water temperatures were the only documentation available for Legionella. He verified in the seven months he had been employed, he did not test the temperature of the water heaters and there was no documentation the shower heads had been treated or when a resident room was empty,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent possible transmission of COVID-19 infection by failing to ensure the thermometer used for screening was properly disinfected between use by different persons. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents in the facility. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Observations on 01/18/22 through 01/22/22 revealed surveyors had to self screen upon entrance into the facility on a sheet of paper. The surveyors used a hand held thermometer to obtain their temperatures upon entrance. The facility staff did not disinfect thermometer between uses nor was there disinfectant available to disinfect the thermometer between uses. Interview on 01/19/22 at 2:40 P.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #430 verified she did not disinfect the thermometer after use.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review the Dish Machine Temperature Log, the facility failed to ensure dishes were properly sanitized in the dishwashers in the 101 House. This affected all nine residents (#2, #6, #7, #10, #12, #13, #268, #269, and #270) who resided in the 101 House. The facility census was 18. Findings Include: Observation on 01/18/22 at 1:26 P.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #415 found her running the dishwasher following the lunch meal in the 101 House. The dishwasher was noted to be a low temperature, chemical sanitization machine using chlorine for sanitation. The observed wash temperature was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and rinse temperature of 129 degrees F. STNA #415 completed a test strip for chlorine sanitation levels and found the level were 25 parts per million (ppm). STNA #415 verified the proper level for sanitation was at least 50 ppm and dishwasher was not at the proper level of chlorine for sanitation. Observation on 01/18/22 at 1:38 P.M. of a second cycle of the dishwasher found the chemical sanitation level continued to be 25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in OH