Hennis Care Centre Of Bolivar

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 106.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to adequate monitor and seek timely medical intervention/hospitalization following a significant change in condition for Resident #31. This affected one resident (#31) of three reviewed for change in condition. Actual Harm occurred on 03/29/24 when Resident #31, who was severely cognitively impaired was transferred to the emergency room where he was intubated and admitted to the intensive care unit for respiratory failure and sepsis. On 03/11/24, Resident #31 was observed unresponsive and having seizure-like activity. He was a full code with no history of seizures. On 03/12/24 the resident's oxygen saturation dropped to 70 percent without oxygen, and he continued to steadily decline until he was eventually sent to the emergency room on [DATE], 19 days after the initial significant change in condition was first noted. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered under staff supervision and not left unsupervised at the resident's bedside. This affected one (Resident #102) of three residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered under staff supervision and not left unsupervised at the resident's bedside. This affected one (Resident #102) of three residents reviewed for medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/23 with diagnoses that included depression, hypothyroidism, hypertension and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed a medication self-administration assessment completed on 02/28/24 that indicated the resident was not approved for self-administration of medication or keeping medications at the bedside. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, observation, interview, and Resident Council Minute review revealed the facility failed to ensure requests for assistance with activities of daily living were provided timely for two dependent residents. This affected two (Resident #23 and Resident #55) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/22/25, revealed Resident #23 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #23 required staff assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the Care Plan, dated 02/28/23, revealed Resident #23 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and medication guideline review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%). Observation of 36 medications administered with three errors revealed a medication error rate of 8.33%. This finding affected two residents (Residents #18 and #74) of four residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including altered mental status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. Review of Resident 74's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #74's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/19/25 for K-Tab oral tablet (potassium) extended release (ER) 20 meq (milliequivalents) give one tablet in the morning related to congestive heart failure (CHF). Observation on 05/12/25 at 9:07 A.M. with Registered Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served the correct diet and diet texture as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident#7) of five residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/2019 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #7's physician orders dated 07/29/2022 revealed the resident was to receive cut all food into bite sized pieces related to dysphagia following cerebral infarction. Observation on 05/14/2025 at 11:20 A.M. during the lunch meal service consisting of pineapple chicken breast and sweet potatoes, Resident #7's plate was prepared in the kitchen and served by dietary staff #174 to Resident #7 while seated at a dining room table. Resident #7's chicken breast was not cut up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures during meal service. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of eight residents who required assistance with eating. The facility census was 101. Findings Include: A review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date 03/13/24 with diagnoses including history of stroke, dysphagia, type two diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of Resident #21's physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/15/24 for LCS (Low Concentrated Sweets) diet Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency, all liquids with small-bore straw. Cut food into bite-sized pieces. A review of Resident #21's care plan for swallowing difficulty dated 03/15/25 with interventions including alternate small bites and sips at meals and use a teaspoon for eating. A review of Resident #21's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility was 107. Findings include: During the kitchen tour on 01/22/24 at 8:30 A.M. the following items were noted to not be labeled or dated. In the walk-in refrigerator, one pan of spaghetti sauce, one pan of cooked pasta, one container of banana peppers, two containers of cherry tomatoes, one bag of cooked hard-boiled eggs, one container of olives, one container of carrots, one container of olives, one container of bacon bits, one container of cucumbers, one container of shredded lettuce, and several individual sized servings of potato salad in Styrofoam bowls with lids. In addition, there was raw meat juice from ribs dripping over packages of ready to eat deli turkey and two trays of raw chicken that were not completely covered. At the time of observation, an interview with Chef #300 verified the above findings. In the walk-in freezer the following items were unlabeled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of restorative nursing documentation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were documented accurately. This affected three residents (#30, #71, and #82) of three residents reviewed and had the potential to affect all 59 residents identified by the facility as receiving restorative nursing services for range of motion and ambulation. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 07/25/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus, rhabdomyolysis, and morbid obesity. Review of the care plan, dated 07/26/23, revealed Resident #30 had limited physical mobility related to weakness, self-care deficit, neurological deficits, cerebral infarction, and rhabdomyolysis. Interventions included restorative active range of motion to bilateral upper and lower extremities for 10 to 15 repetitions two times per day, six to seven…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician notification was completed related to weight changes. This affected one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for weight gain. The facility census was 107. Findings included: Record Review revealed Resident #38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cirrhosis of liver, congestive heart failure, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, chronic kidney disease, and respiratory failure. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #38 had an order dated 10/12/23 to call the physician if Resident #38 has a three-pound weight gain or more (overnight); an order started on 10/08/23 for a 2,000 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction, 360 ml with each meal, 300 ml from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., 360 ml 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and 260 ml from 3:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M.; an order starting on 11/06/23 for Bumex (diuretic) oral tablet two milligrams one tablet in the evening and one tablet in the morning; and an order started on 11/09/23 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-Assessment Screenings (PAS) were accurately completed upon admission for Resident #71 and Resident #81. This affected two (Resident #71 and #81) of three residents reviewed for PAS. The facility census was 107. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #71 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, depression (mood disorder), and congestive heart failure. Additional diagnoses were added on 06/12/23 for dementia with behaviors. Review of a PAS completed on 04/03/23 revealed no indication Resident #71 had a diagnosis of a mood disorder and potential need of review for serious mental illness. 2. Record review revealed Resident #81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including effusion of left knee, dorsalgia, and major depressive disorder (mood disorder). Review of a PAS completed on 06/01/23 revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure glasses were obtained in a timely manner for Resident #81. This affected one (Resident #81) of one residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 107. Findings included: Record Review revealed Resident #81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including effusion of left knee, dorsalgia, and major depressive disorder. Review of a quarterly minimum data set completed on 09/08/23 revealed Resident #81 had adequate vision with corrective lenses and had intact cognition. Review of the care plan initiated on 06/03/23 revealed Resident #81 had impaired visual function related to wearing glasses. Review of the list for an eye doctor visit on 08/31/23 revealed Resident #81 was seen by the eye doctor. Review of vision consult documentation from 08/31/23 revealed Resident #81 was diagnosed with macular degeneration, dry eye syndrome, and astigmatism with a plan to order glasses to wear constantly to improve vision.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH