No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunnyslope Nursing Home

102 Boyce Drive, Bowerston, OH 44695 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (740) 269-8001 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 269-8001 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0606) — most recent Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
125 Canton Rd NW · (330) 627-7676 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
112 E Main St · (740) 945-3881 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7339 Roswell Rd SW · (740) 269-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.4%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication43.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.6%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.441.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.511.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.7–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.43
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
38.1%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-17)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-03-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a closed record review, review of facility self reported incidents, review of hospital emergency department documentation, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized, and effective behavioral health treatment plans and services to prevent resident to resident altercations. This affected two of three residents reviewed for dementia care (Residents #51 and #50). The facility census was 46.Actual Harm occurred on 11/09/25 when Resident #51 sustained significant facial trauma, including ecchymosis and swelling to the left side of the face, left periorbital area, and ear, as well as a closed head injury and head laceration. These injuries resulted from a resident to resident altercation in which Resident #50 struck Resident #51. Following the incident Resident #51 had difficulty opening his mouth to eat, had decreased oral intake, was more lethargic and then began to self-isolate. Prior to the incident, both residents exhibited wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), abuse policy review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a former employee, who verbally abused a resident, from entering the facility, including resident care areas. This affected one (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, dementia with moderate with agitation, insomnia, anxiety disorder, transient ischemic attack, obstructive sleep apnea and vertigo. The resident received hospice services and expired on [DATE]. Review of SRI #253615, dated [DATE], revealed while on the D Hall nursing station/dining room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #54 verbally abused Resident #26. License Practical Nurse (LPN) #52 had assisted Resident #26 to the dining room to allow the breakfast tray cart to pass up the hallway. Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incident (SRI) including investigation, observations, staff and resident interviews and review of facility Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 42. Findings Include: Review of Resident #26's record revealed a 09/27/24 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, altered mental status, unspecified dementia moderate with agitation, insomnia, anxiety disorder, transient ischemic attack, obstructive sleep apnea, vertigo, myocardial infarction, cardiomegaly, cerebral infarction, congenital renal artery stenosis, and supraventricular tachycardia. Review of a Significant Change in Status minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was invited to attend a care planning conference. This affected one resident (#9) of one resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, depression, and suicidal ideation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/01/24, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with behaviors and rejection of care. The resident required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #9's Care Conference form, dated 07/29/24, did not indicate the family/responsible party attended or was invited to attend the care conference. Interview on 10/15/24 at 1:39 P.M., Resident #9's daughter/power of attorney (POA) #400 revealed she was concerned because…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This affected three residents (#1, #10, and #17) out of 13 records reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, insomnia, paranoid schizophrenia, and dementia. The resident resided on the secure unit. a. Review of Resident #1's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) notification dated 01/12/23 revealed Resident #1 met criteria for serious mental illness and would need specialized services. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident wasn't considered to have a serious mental illness by the PASARR. Interview on 10/17/24 at 10:04 A.M., with the MDS Nurse #61 and Social Worker (SW) #11 confirmed Resident #1's MDS was marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II services were implemented and a comprehensive individualized plan of care was completed. This affected one resident (#1) of four reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, insomnia, paranoid schizophrenia, and dementia. The resident resided on the secure unit. Review of Resident #1's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 01/12/23 revealed Resident #1 met PASARR inclusion criteria for serious mental illness with the diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, insomnia, other systems and signs involving cognitive function and awareness, nicotine dependence, major depression, paranoid schizophrenia, and eating disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were completed accurately upon admission to the facility. This affected one resident (#37) of four residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, bipolar, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #37's admission orders dated 07/12/24 revealed the resident was ordered Mirtazapine 15 milligrams (mg) 1.5 tablets at bedtime for depression, Rivastigmine 6 mg twice a day for dementia, Ativan 1 mg every four hours as needed for anxiety/agitation and Risperdal 0.5 mg twice a day for dementia. Review of Resident #37's PASARR dated 07/12/24 revealed the resident was marked for mental disorder. The box was checked for other for mental disorder and depression was typed in on the line.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen therapy was set to the correct liters per minute. This affected one resident ( #3) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 09/04/15. Diagnoses included asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #3's October 2024 physician orders revealed an order dated 07/31/24 to have oxygen at two to five liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive care plan dated 08/20/24 revealed the resident is at risk for altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing related to shortness of breath. Interventions included to administer medication as ordered, observe need for oxygen therapy, change in respiratory rate or pattern, mental status changes, and oxygen (therapy) at two to five liters a minute to maintain saturation at greater than 90…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for a resident who had a history of falls and was also known to be a fall risk as per the resident's plan of care. This affected one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44. Findings included: A review of Resident #42's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of falls, syncope and collapse (fainting), lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, history of seizures, essential tremors, morbid obesity, adult onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, congestive heart failure and dementia. A review of Resident #42's physician's orders revealed she had an order that she could be up in a recliner or chair as tolerated. The only fall prevention intervention included as part of the physician's orders was for the use of a fall mat to the side of her bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility pharmacist failed to identify medications ordered for a short time period included stop dates for administration. This affected one (Resident #11) of five reviewed for medications. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with admission diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and anxiety. Review of the monthly physician's orders for medications revealed on [DATE], Resident #11 was prescribed the use of hydroxyzine (anti-anxiety medication) 50 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for 14 days for anxiety and agitation. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no stop date was entered for the medication and was continued beyond the 14 days as ordered on [DATE]. The medication should have had an end date of [DATE]. Further review of the MAR revealed the last time the medication was administered was on [DATE], 30 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow medication orders and discontinue an anti-anxiety medication as ordered by the prescriber. This affected one (Resident #11) of five reviewed for medications. The facility census was 44. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with admission diagnoses that include schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and anxiety. Review of the monthly physician's orders for medications revealed on [DATE], Resident #11 was prescribed the use of hydroxyzine (anti-anxiety medication) 50 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for 14 days for anxiety and agitation. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no stop date was entered for the medication and was continued beyond the 14 days as ordered on [DATE]. The medication should have an end date of [DATE]. Further review of the MAR revealed the last time the medication was administered was on [DATE], 30 days after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The medication error rate was calculated to be 5.1% and included two medication errors of 39 observed medication administration opportunities. This affected two residents (#38 and #95) of three residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: 1. On 05/10/22 at 8:00 A.M. observation of medication administration with Registered Nurse (RN) #143 revealed medications administered to Resident #95. The observation revealed Vitamin B12 was not administered as ordered at the time of administration. Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/22 with diagnoses that included dementia and anemia. Review of the physician's medication orders revealed vitamin B12 (vitamin supplement) 500 micrograms (mcg) two tablets every day. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated vitamin B12 was to be administered every day at 8:00 A.M. On 05/11/22 at 9:00 A.M. interview with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-06 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of the facility abuse policy the facility failed to ensure 19 staff members were checked against the State Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered in the State NAR concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel list and personnel files revealed the non-licensed staff including; Laundry Aide (LA) #15, LA #17, Housekeeping Aide (HA) #18, Environmental Director (ED) #20, Dietary Director (DD) #22, Dietary Aide (DA) #24, Activities Aide (AA) #25, admission Director (AD) #26, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #27, DC #30, DC #33 and DC #40, Activities Director (AD) #28, DA #31, HA #37, AA #38, DA #41, Medical records (MR) #46, and HA #52 had not been checked against the State NAR. Interview on 09/04/19 at 10:00 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #53 verified she had no documented evidence the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-06 · tag F0711 — widespread
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the physician failed to document, sign, and date each physician visit. This affected 11 (Residents #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #11, #23, #29, #31, #33, and #39) of 19 resident records reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. The census was 42. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia, hypercholesterolemia, Alzheimer's , hallucination, chronic kidney disease, Parkinson's, hyperparathyroidism, anemia, mood disorder, bipolar, depression, conduct disorder, glaucoma, venous insufficiency, respiratory failure, contractures, absence of right and left leg below knee, and edema. There was no evidence of a signed or dated physician note from 01/2019 to 09/2019. The nurse documented the physician had seen the resident on 01/03/19 and 04/18/19 in the nursing progress notes. 2. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-06 · tag F0712 — widespread
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the physician failed to ensure physician visits were provided timely and at the required frequency for all residents. This affected 11 (Resident #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #11, #23, #29, #31, #33, and #39) of 19 resident records reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, anxiety, insomnia, hypercholesterolemia, Alzheimer's , hallucination, chronic kidney disease, Parkinson's, hyperparathyroidism, anemia, mood disorder, bipolar, depression, conduct disorder, glaucoma, venous insufficiency, respiratory failure, contractures, absence of right and left leg below knee, and edema. There was no evidence of a signed or dated physician note from 01/2019 to 09/2019. The nurse documented the physician had seen the resident on 01/03/19 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of personnel files and policy review the facility failed to ensure administration was effective in regards to checking of non-licensed staff against the nurse aide registry, frequency of physician visits and physician documentation, and thorough implementation of an antibiotic stewardship program. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of personnel list and personnel files revealed the non-licensed (Laundry aide (LA) #15, LA #17, Housekeeping aide (HA) #18, Environmental Director (ED) #20, Dietary Director (DA) #22, Dietary Aide (DA) #24, Activities Aide (AA) #25, admission Director (AD) #26, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #27, DC #30, DC #33 and DC 40, Activities Director (AD) #28, DA #31, HA #37, AA #38, DA #41, Medical records (MR) #46, and HA #52 had not been checked against the State NAR. Interview on 09/04/19 at 10:00 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #53 verified she had no documented evidence the above non-licensed staff were checked against the State NAR to ensure the employee did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-09-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly implement an antibiotic stewardship program. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility infection control program revealed no evidence from May 2019 through July 2019 that the facility had antibiograms for antibiotic susceptibility review or that the consulting pharmacist attended infection prevention and control meetings to help guide antibiotic use. Interview on 09/05/19 at 10:00 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #8 (Infection Preventionist), revealed the facility had not completed antibiograms for review and the consulting pharmacist has not attended any meetings to review antibiotic use. Review of the facility policy, titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Staff and Clinician Training and Roles, dated November 2017, revealed the Infection Preventionist (IP) will monitor over time and report to the Infection Prevention and Control Committee (IPCC) the antibiotic susceptibility patterns (antibiogram data for specific timeframe). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedure relative to abuse prevention was implemented regarding timely reporting of an injury of unknown origin for Resident #41. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Additionally, based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of the facility abuse policy the facility failed to ensure 19 staff members were checked against the State Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered in the State NAR concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property. Findings include: Resident #41 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, age related physical debility, chronic pain, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #41's Health Status Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for restorative nursing programs and the programs were initiated, implemented, monitored, and delivered as planned for Residents #4, #29, #3 and #23 to maintain function and/or prevent further decline. This affected four of five residents reviewed for restorative services. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included brain cancer and cerebral infarct with left sided hemiplegia. The resident was cognitively intact but dependent of staff for ADL's. The resident was discharged from occupational therapy (OT) on 08/06/19 with recommendations for the restorative nursing program to provide active range of motion (AROM) to the right and left upper extremities (UE) and grooming at the sink while seated in the wheelchair. Review of the current restorative program book revealed there was no evidence the resident was receiving restorative nursing services. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in-place per plan of care, fall care plans were revised, residents were transferred properly, and resident smoking was supervised. This affected two (Resident #29 and #31) of two residents reviewed for falls and 10 (Residents #12, #19, #8, #26, #342, #30, #15, #18, #6 and #34) of 11 residents identified by the facility as smokers. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, history of transient ischemic attack, lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis of the knee, right leg pain, abnormalities of gait and mobility, contractures of the right ankle and left knee, syncope and collapse, and a history of falls. Review of Resident #31's fall plan of care revealed a self-releasing seat belt to the chair/wheelchair for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents #4 and #5 were served meals with regular dinner ware and failed to ensure Resident #35 was able to use the telephone when desired. This affected three of six residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with brain cancer requiring chemotherapy (CTX) and cerebral infarct with left sided hemiplegia. The resident had isolation precautions posted. Review of the current care plans revealed there was nothing addressing the use of the plastic silver ware. Review of the nurses note dated 07/18/19 revealed the resident was requesting silverware. The resident indicated he was going to stab the resident who stole his bag of chips. Review of the physician's order dated 07/21/19 revealed the resident was to have plastic silverware for all meals. Review of the behavior note dated 07/21/19 revealed the resident told the nurse if he did not get regular silverware back they would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported timely for Resident #41. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #41 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, age related physical debility, chronic pain, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #41's Health Status Note on 01/06/19 at 11:29 A.M., authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #51, revealed the nurse noticed a bruise on the top of the resident's left hand, about softball-sized. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #10 stated the bruise was first noticed by staff during change of shift report on this morning around 6:00 A.M. STNA #5 stated the resident's left hand appeared swollen and reddened during change of shift report this morning around 6:00 A.M. Witness statements were collected, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation for injuries of unknown origin for Resident #41. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #41 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, age related physical debility, chronic pain, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety disorder. Resident #41's active comprehensive care plan for activities of daily living (ADL) revealed a self-care deficit due to impaired cognition, she was known to become combative during ADL care, and will strike out and become verbally aggressive. Care planned interventions included giving the resident space when she became combative and re-approach when appropriate and safe. Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was severely impaired, she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's comprehensive fall risk plan of care was revised to include all fall interventions. This affected one resident (#33) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, contractures, and the absence of the right and left legs below the knee. Review of the physician's orders, dated October 2019 revealed an order for a fall mat to the right side of the bed for safety and an order for the bed to be in the low position, except during care. Record review revealed a current plan of care, dated August 2019 indicating Resident #33 was at risk for injuries from falls. However, the physician ordered interventions for the bed to be in low position and for a fall mat were not included on the care plan. On 11/06/19 at 9:02 A.M., Resident #33 was observed laying in bed with his eyes closed, his bed was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 received assistance with meals and Resident #4 received nail care. This affected two of three residents received for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 dated 07/19/19 revealed the resident was not interviewable. Review of the current care plan revealed it was not specific to the resident's need for assistance during meals. Further review of the [NAME], a quick reference for the nurse aides, revealed the resident needed encouragement to eat and assistance with meals. Review of the occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident required moderate to maximum assistance for feeding. On 09/03/19 observation during the lunch meal at 12:00 P.M. revealed the resident was sitting at a table without any staff. His mechanical soft meal was delivered and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely follow up on gastric symptoms. This affected one (Resident #3) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, constipation, parkinsonism, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and anemia. Review of Resident #3's current medication list revealed she was on Ranitidine 150 milligrams (mg) for indigestion, Miralax daily for constipation, and Compazine (antiemetic/antipsychotic) 5 mg before meals for nausea and vomiting. Review of Resident #3's progress notes dated 07/20/19 revealed the resident had a brown-colored liquid emesis. There was no evidence the physician was contacted/notified. On 09/01/19 the resident had a large, yellow-colored projectile emesis. Her lunch was held, and the physician was updated. Interview on 09/06/19 at 9:42 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to accurately assess, treat, and develop a plan of care for a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #33) of one reviewed for pressure ulcers. Finding include: Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, hallucinations, chronic kidney disease, Parkinson's disease, anemia, mood disorder, bipolar, depression, venous insufficiency, respiratory failure, contractures, absence of right and left leg below the knee, and edema. 1. Review of Resident #33's skin/pressure ulcer assessments dated 07/29/19 to 09/02/19 revealed: -07/29/19 moisture associated skin Damage (MASD) was acquired to the left buttocks measuring 5.5 centimeters (cm) by 3.0 cm by 0.0 cm. Medi honey (debriding agent) was ordered to treat the area. -08/05/19 MASD continued to the left buttock measuring 3.0 cm by 1.5 cm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had antithrombolitic compression stockings (TED) and setopress compression bandage wrap dressings in place as ordered. This affected one of two residents reviewed for compression stockings. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, muscle wasting, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus. The resident did not get out of bed. Review of the physician order dated 08/30/19 revealed to apply TED stockings, an antithrombolic compression stocking used to guard against or prevent further progression of venous disorders. Then apply setopress wraps, a compression bandage, over the TED stockings bilaterally from the toes to the knees. These were to be put on the in morning and removed each night. On 09/03/19 at 11:50 A.M., 3:27 P.M. and 6:40 P.M., the resident was observed in bed without anything on her lower extremities. On 09/03/19 at 6:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a non-pharmacological interdisciplinary approach with a behavior modification plan was in place for Resident #5's behaviors. This affected one of one residents reviewed for behavior modification. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, depression and difficulty walking. Review of the 03/08/19 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had behaviors including verbal and other behavioral symptoms one to three days and rejection of care four to six days during the reference period. Review of the current care plan, initiated 03/13/19, revealed the resident was disruptive, socially inappropriate, refused care, threw objects in his room and out into hallway and yelling out at staff. Goals included the resident would demonstrate fewer episodes of verbally and/or physically abusive behaviors and would voice anger and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received the lowest effective dose of psychotropic/sedative medication to prevent sedation/lethargy. This affected one (Resident #3) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, constipation, parkinsonism, Alzheimer's, bipolar, schizophrenia, adult failure to thrive, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and anemia. There was no evidence of a signed or dated physician note from 01/2019 to 09/2019. The nurse documented the physician had seen the resident on 01/03/19 and 08/08/19. There was no evidence the physician had visited the resident every 60 days. Review of Resident #3's current medication list revealed the resident was receiving the following scheduled medication that could induce sedation/lethargy; Melatonin 9 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for insomnia, Compazine (antipsychotic/antiemetic) 5 mg before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered for Resident #8 and Resident #33. This affected two (Resident #8 and Resident #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Resident #8's physician orders revealed he received Depakote, 500 milligrams, three tablets by mouth, for mood stabilization. Resident #8's physician orders revealed on 09/14/17 he was ordered laboratory testing for valproic acid (Depakote) levels on the fourteenth day of every month. Review of Resident #8's laboratory results since March 2019 revealed valproic acid level results were found for March, June, July, or August 2019. Interview on 09/04/19 at 2:51 P.M. with Registered Nurse #8 confirmed laboratory testing for Resident #8's valproic acid levels were not completed as ordered. 2. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #39, who needed teeth extracted, was provided the service timely. This affected one of one resident reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis. Review of the dental visit dated 08/27/18 revealed the resident had poor oral hygiene, a build up of plaque, loose and decaying teeth and teeth numbers 14 and 19 needed extracted. There was no evidence this was completed. Review of the significant change minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 dated 08/08/19 revealed the resident was cognitively intact but was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living including brushing her teeth. On 09/06/19 at 9:10 A.M., interview with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 revealed the facility needed to get approval for the teeth extraction from Medicaid and the authorization paperwork was never submitted until June 2019.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$559K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 9%Other / private 21%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $559K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,946per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366249. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next