Wood Haven Health Care Senior Living & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 82.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness, side effects, and adverse effects. This affected five (#1, #11, #12, #44, and #62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/18/26. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. Review of resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Additionally, Resident #1 took antianxiety, antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, and hypoglycemic medications. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/28/25 revealed Resident #1 was at risk for side effects of psychotropic medication used for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure routine monitoring was implemented for mechanical lift slings and stand assist devices in the facility. This had the potential to affect 31 (#3, #15, #23, #34, #74, #83, #30, #43, #80, #9, #31, #63, #29, #12, #54, #61, #72, #25 #11, #13, #17, #32, #40, #44, #47, #51, #56, #61, #72, #78 and #81) that the facility identified as requiring the use of a mechanical lift slings or stand assist devices. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Observation on 04/07/26 at 12:59 P.M. of a mechanical lift transfer from wheelchair to bed for Resident #83 completed by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #372 and CNA #390 revealed the sling used was worn and no longer had a tag attached. Concurrent interview with CNA #390 verified the sling utilized to transfer Resident #83 was worn and no longer had a tag attached to the sling. Further interview with CNA #372 and #390 revealed they were not aware of who was responsible for monitoring the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of manufacturer's instructions, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lift slings were monitored and inspected per the manufacturer's instructions. This affected six (#83, #34, #15, #74, #23 and #3) and had the potential to affect 13 other residents (#11, #13, #17, #32, #40, #44, #47, #51, #56, #61, #72, #78 and #81) who the facility identified as requiring the use of a mechanical lift with slings for transfer. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/14/23. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and polyneuropathy.Review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 had a memory problem. Furthermore, Resident #83 required substantial or maximum assistance for chair to bed, bed to chair, and toilet transfers.Review of Resident #83's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed when an allegation of verbal abuse and neglect was reported. This affected one (#95) of one resident reviewed for verbal abuse and neglect. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #95 revealed admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, depression, stroke and dysphasia. The resident was admitted to hospice on [DATE] and died in the facility on [DATE].Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #95 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of five indicating severely impaired cognition. Furthermore, Resident #95 required set up for eating, moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, bed transfers and transfers.Interview on [DATE] at 2:16 P.M. with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II following a new diagnosis of schizophrenia. This affected one (#12) of one resident reviewed for PASRR level II. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 01/31/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, anxiety, adult failure to thrive, and breast cancer.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and was not receiving any anti-psychotic medications.Review of the care plan initiated 06/25 for Resident #12 revealed she was care planned for schizophrenia. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, monitor for changes in the resident's mood, observe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to maintain and inspect resident transfer equipment to ensure safe transfers. This affected one (#80) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #80 revealed admission date of 04/04/23. The resident was admitted with type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, anemia, and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating impaired cognition. Resident #80 required supervision with eating, maximum assistance with toileting hygiene, bed mobility and was dependent upon staff with transfers.Review of the care plan dated 09/26/25 for Resident #80 revealed the resident had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to diabetes mellitus, neuropathy and a mood disorder. Interventions included for the resident to use the mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the correct rate. This affected one resident (#15) reviewed for oxygen. The facility identified 11 residents (#1, #2, #13, #15, #19, #21, #40 #50, #57, #65, and #84) that required the use of oxygen. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/28/21. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, shortness of breath, pulmonary hypertension, and congestive heart failure.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #15 revealed she was cognitively intact and required the use of oxygen therapy.Review of the care plan revised 04/26 for Resident #15 revealed she was care planned for respiratory status and difficulty breathing related to asthma, chronic respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure with intervention in place to administer oxygen as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments were completed. This affected one (#65) of three residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 02/20/25 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, psychotic disorder with delusions, Parkinson's disease, anxiety, depression, dementia, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies.Review of the Nursing admission Assessment completed on 02/20/25 revealed the resident had natural teeth, with missing teeth and no dentures.Review of the Oral Status and Dental assessment completed on 02/21/25 revealed the resident had natural teeth, with missing teeth and no dentures.Review of the Oral Status and Dental assessment completed on 05/22/25 revealed the resident had natural teeth, with missing teeth and no dentures.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/25, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated Resident #65 had no broken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 07/12/25 with diagnoses including, but not limited, to seborrheic dermatitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage three (full thickness to fat), pressure ulcer of right buttock stage three, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage three, and paraplegia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/02/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #19 had two stage three pressure ulcers that were present on admission.Review of the care plan dated 07/16/25 revealed the resident had two stage three pressure ulcers upon admission and dermatitis/fungal infection related to disease processes- paraplegic, non-compliant with care and getting up out of bed. Interventions included administer treatments as ordered, low air loss (LAL) alternating pressure mattress, and weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, and type of tissue and exudate.Review of the weekly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/23. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, psychosis, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #10's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had an intact cognition. No behaviors were documented. Review of Resident #10's most recent care plan revealed he had a history of trauma that carried negative effects. Interventions included to encourage the resident to express feelings, concerns, and thoughts in a safe space and identify items that lessen the effect of trauma and provide comfort. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a nurse's note dated 12/08/24 informing Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 230 Resident #10 was in an activity with another male resident who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH