Majestic Care of Bryan
1104 Wesley Avenue, Bryan, OH 43506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (419) 636-5071 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $74,055 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.5% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.0% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.58 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.85 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.2%CMS range 30.9–49.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.3–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 5.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 17.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.0–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 82 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of investigation statements, review of interdisciplinary investigation notes, staff and resident interviews, review of a mechanical lift owner's manual, review of a mechanical lift sling owner's manual, review mechanical lift safety inspections, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #02 was safely transferred using a mechanical lift resulting in an avoidable fall. This resulted in Actual Harm on 08/07/25 when Resident #02 was not safely transferred resulting in a mechanical lift tipping and the resident suffering an avoidable fall sustaining a right hip fracture requiring surgical repair. This affected one (#02) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure safe sling utilization while using a mechanical lift to transfer a resident, which placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm. This affected one (#12) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Furthermore, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered labs were followed-up on and completed timely to identify a urinary tract infection (UTI) for Resident #110 who had a urinary catheter. Actual harm occurred on 12/07/23 when the facility failed to properly obtain a urine specimen for Resident #110 who was symptomatic of a urinary tract infection. Between 12/07/23 and 12/14/23 no additional testing or interventions to treat a urinary tract infection were provided. On 12/14/23 Resident #110's family transported the resident to the hospital where the resident was admitted and required intravenous (IV) antibiotics for treatment of a urinary tract infection. The resident was hospitalized for four days. This affected one resident (#110) of three residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/31/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility corrective action documents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified at risk for pressure ulcer development did not develop an in-house acquired stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss) and received timely interventions to promote healing. Actual harm occurred when Resident #61 was discovered with a stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum one day after being assessed with intact skin integrity and no documented intervention was implemented to promote healing or further tissue damage until three days following discovery. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and treatment. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely copies of their medical records. This affected two (#75 and #77) of three residents reviewed for medical record requests. The facility census was 64.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 with diagnoses of heart failure, anxiety, edema, depression, and hypertension. Resident #75 discharged to the community on 04/02/26. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/30/26, revealed Resident #75 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the comprehensive admission MDS assessment, dated 10/2025, revealed Resident #75 had intact cognition. Interview on 06/24/26 at approximately 4:00 P.M. with Licensed Social Worker #306 revealed she completed the cognitive assessment for Resident #75 on 01/30/26 and Resident #75 refused to participate with the assessment; therefore, LSW #306 had to mark the results accordingly. Review of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This affected two (#80 and 81) of nine residents reviewed for self-reported incidents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were timely assessed after alleging abuse. This affected one (#80) of nine residents reviewed for self-reported incidents. The facility census was 64. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Former Resident (FR) #80 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge with family on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral ischemia, heart disease, anxiety, and malaise.Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed FR #80 had impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for all mobility, and required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, and dressing. Further review revealed FR #80 had no hallucinations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and fall interventions were reviewed and revised as needed, and failed to accurately document the use of fall interventions. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding post-fall procedures when a fall was reported by family. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for falls. Finally, the facility failed to show evidence of investigations into a fall with injury. This affected two (#31 and #76) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 64. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 10/10/22 with diagnoses of cerebellar ataxia, dysphagia, traumatic brain injury, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/28/26, revealed Resident #31 had impaired cognition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and failed to use proper technique during foley catheter care. This affected one (#51) resident out of one resident observed for foley catheter care. The census was 64. Findings include: Observation on 06/23/26 at 10:04 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #101 was assisting with wound care for Resident #51. After removing her gloves, LPN #101 immediately donned a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. LPN #101 verified that hand hygiene had not been performed at the time of the observation.Observation on 06/23/26 at 10:17 A.M. revealed LPN #100 was completing peri care along with Foley catheter care for Resident #51. LPN #100 placed a dirty, soapy washcloth into the wash basin containing clean water, then removed another washcloth from the same basin to wipe the resident's perineal area. LPN #100 verified water in basin was contaminated at the time of observation.Observation on 06/23/26 at 10:20 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility menu with spread sheets, the facility failed to ensure residents on a mechanically altered diet received the same portions as the residents who received a regular diet. This had the potential to affect the 24 residents (#9, #10, #11, #13, #15, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #27, #30, #35, #38, #39, #53, #54, #57, #60, #63, #64, #66, #76 and #84) who received mechanically altered diet. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Observations on 12/09/25 at 11:17 A.M. of the texture modification process for the pureed turkey meat found ten, three ounce (3 oz) #10 scoops of turkey were added to the food processor. Dietary Staff (DS) #235 then added turkey gravy and slices of bread to thin, blend, and thicken the processed meat. Observations on 12/09/25 at 11:22 A.M. of the food temperatures and portion sizes found a 3 oz scoop was used for the pureed turkey and the mechanical soft turkey while a four ounce (4 oz) scoop was used for the residents who received a regular textured diet. Coinciding interview with the Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were in place for a resident's wounds upon admission. This affected one resident (#83) of four residents reviewed for wound care and treatment. The facility census was 77.Findings Include: Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/01/25 and a discharge date of 12/08/25. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, type II diabetes, chronic pain, nicotine dependence, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #83's admission Skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 had a sacrum area crusted measuring 5 centimeters (cm) by 4 cm into the second layer of skin and a right gluteal fold area 1.5 cm by 1 cm into the second layer of skin. The assessment indicated the physician was notified however, no treatment orders were found. Further review of Resident #83's medical record found no evidence of an admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were identified as at risk for constipation had interventions implemented when they went longer than three days without a bowel movement. This affected one Resident (#5) of three residents reviewed of constipation. The facility census was 77. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/14/21. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, history of stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, bipolar disorder, fibromyalgia, constipation, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 was dependent on staff for toilet use, bathing, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. Resident #5 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #5 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and resident, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to timely implement physician's orders for Resident #3's pressure ulcer dressing change and failed to ensure the physician/provider was notified regarding the presence of eschar to Resident #7's heel ulcer and the potential need to change the treatment plan. This affected two (#3 and #7) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The current census is 77.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #3 include pressure ulcer stage 4 on right buttock, pressure ulcer stage 3 on left buttock, heart disease, diabetes type two, spondylosis of lumbosacral region, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #3's admission orders dated 11/03/25 for wound care revealed the staff were ordered to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply Hydrogel to wound, and cover with gauze. Review of Resident #3's wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure catheter drainage bags were maintained below the level of the bladder to allow proper gravity drainage for one resident (#54) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 77.Findings Include:Record review for Resident #54 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia, diabetes mellitus (high sugar), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (inability to urinate normally due to blockage).Record review for Resident #54 revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with indwelling catheter care.Review of physician orders for Resident #54 revealed order dated 07/24/25 for a suprapubic (catheter inserted directly into the bladder with surgery) catheter. Review of the care plan dated 12/03/25 directed staff to keep the suprapubic catheter drainage bag and tubing below the level of the bladder for gravity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's diet orders were followed as written. This affected one (Resident #9) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 77.Findings Include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/25. Diagnoses included abnormal weight loss, anxiety disorder, asthma, heart failure, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Resident #9 required moderate assistance with toilet use, bathing, parts of dressing, and transfer. Resident #9 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #9 received a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #9's care plan revised 10/17/25 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, risk for alteration in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation of medication administration, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a seizure medication was administered as ordered which resulted in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #20) of nine residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 77.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and unspecified convulsions.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact and displayed no behaviors at the time of the review.Review of admission paperwork for Resident #20 revealed a past medical history including seizures.Review of physician orders for Resident #20 revealed an order dated 11/04/25 for 300 milligrams (mg) of oxcarbazepine to be administered by mouth every evening at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of Self-Report Incidents (SRI), review of open and closed medical records, review of facility incident reports, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected two (#8 and #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/25/24. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/22/24, revealed Resident #8 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Self-Reported Incident #253805, dated 11/07/24 at 10:12 A.M., revealed at approximately 8:45 A.M. Resident #9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing interventions were implemented to promote discharge from the facility were provided. This affected one (#4) of four sampled residents reviewed for discharge opportunity. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, quadriplegia, cervical spinal cord injury, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, history of urinary tract infection, depression, colostomy, and urostomy. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #4 was assessed with intact cognition, dependent on staff for activities of daily living including bed mobility, rejection of care four to six days during assessment period, received a therapeutic diet, had no identified weight loss, and admitted with a stage IV pressure ulcer. Review of the baseline care plan documentation dated 04/13/24 Resident #4 had an discharge goal to assist resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions and monitoring were provided to a resident following difficulty consuming meal. This affected one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for meal time assistance in a facility census of 82. Findings include: Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vascular dementia, repeated falls, chronic kidney disease, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, depression and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had moderately impaired cognition, required set-up or clean-up assistance with eating, substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and received a mechanically altered diet. Review of nursing progress notes revealed on 08/03/24 at 6:56 P.M. at lunch today, resident struggled to eat a burrito that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility bowel and bladder management policy, the facility failed to provide and implement interventions to address specific resident incontinence needs. This affected one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for incontinence maintenance. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 2. Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia affecting left side, traumatic hemorrhage right cerebrum, hypertension, morbid obesity, dysarthria, anarthria, hypothyroidism, and dysphagia. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #1 had intact cognition, limited range of motion to upper and lower extremities of one side, utilized a wheelchair for mobility propelled by staff, required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, dependent on staff for transfer to and from bed, and was always incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of staffing schedules, the facility failed to ensure staffing included the services of a registered nurse (RN) in-house for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affected all 90 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of facility staffing schedules between 06/01/24 and 06/30/24 identified three dates lacking RN coverage for eight consecutive hours. The were no RN hours on 06/09/24, 06/20/24, and 06/27/24 during a 24-hour period. On 07/02/24 at 11:20 A.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) during review of the facility staffing schedules verified three days the facility did not have an RN scheduled in the facility during a 24-hour period. The DON confirmed there was no RN hours on the 06/09/24, 06/20/24, and 06/27/24 staffing schedules for a 24-hour period. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00154646 and Complaint Number OH00154464.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility wound care policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound dressings and preventative interventions were implemented as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for skin integrity and wound prevention in a facility census of 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, cervical spinal cord injury, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, history of urinary tract infection, depression, colostomy, and urostomy. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #1 was assessed with intact cognition, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living including bed mobility, received a therapeutic diet, was identified with no weight loss, and was admitted with a stage three (full-thickness skin loss) and a stage four (full-thickness skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility administration and documentation of medication policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were provided as ordered by the physician. This resulted in a significant medication error when a resident was not administered an antipsychotic medication as prescribed. The affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for medications in a facility census of 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, seizure disorder, major depressive disorder with recurrent severe psychotic symptoms, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, delusional disorders, hypertension, and visual hallucinations. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 with intact cognition, a depressed mood two to six days during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent for care received showers as scheduled or per request. This affected one (#14) of four residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included fracture of right lower leg, spinal stenosis and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/26/24, revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition, did not reject care, and was dependent for transfers and showers. Review of the shower task documentation for the previous 30 days revealed Resident #14 was scheduled for routine showers on Mondays and Thursdays and received showers 05/02/24, 05/06/24, 05/16/24, and 05/27/24. Further review revealed Resident #14 refused a shower on 05/20/24. There was no evidence Resident #14 received showers on 05/09/24, 05/13/24 or 05/23/24 as scheduled or on 05/24/24 as requested. Interview on 05/29/24 at 2:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to remove molded foods from the refrigerator, store food off the floor, and discard expired foods. This had the potential to affect all 100 residents who received food from the kitchen. There was one resident (#84) identified by the facility as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/18/24 from 6:20 P.M. through 6:45 P.M. during the initial kitchen tour with [NAME] #310 revealed a partially aluminum foil covered metal pan approximately 11 inches by 15 inches filled with slider type sandwiches, 15 boxes of frozen food items sitting on the floor of the walk-in freezer, 15 boxes of produce items sitting on the floor in the walk-in cooler, four boxes of bread and buns sitting on the floor next to the bread cooler, and two containers of molded strawberries in the walk-in cooler. Cook #310 verified the partially covered sliders, the boxes of frozen food items in the walk-in freezer sitting on the floor, the boxes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident funds records and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's funds were maintained under the Medicaid limit. This affected three residents (#02, #25, and #47) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #02's personal funds revealed a balance of $,3390.68 as of 03/20/24. The balance on 09/30/23 was $2,937.52. The facility had sent a Resident Fund Balance Notification on 01/03/24 to the resident's representative indicating they were to notify the Social Worker within the next seven days to discuss ways to assure continuance of Medicaid benefits. No record of discussion with the representative was located in the medical record. 2. Review of Resident #25's personal funds revealed a balance of $6,790.21 as of 03/20/24. The balance on 09/30/23 was $7,481.77. The facility had sent a Resident Fund Balance Notification on 01/03/24 to the resident's representative indicating they were to notify the Social Worker within the next seven days to discuss ways to assure continuance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely address the resident's skin impairments and failed to implement physician orders routinely to address the resident's skin conditions. This affected two (#21 and #68) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had intact cognition. Resident #68 required set-up assistance from staff with activities of daily living, had no refusal of treatment, was independently mobile utilizing a walker or wheelchair, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no current skin breakdown. Review of the physician order dated 11/01/23 revealed an order to apply (Tubigrips)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physician which resulted in a significant medication error for one (#94) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 08/23/23. Diagnosis included pulmonary hypertension (medical condition where the heart and lungs do not pump effectively and can cause significant fluid build up in the pulmonary system, the lungs. This can cause significant difficulty in breathing.) Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024 revealed Resident #94 was ordered sildenafil 20 milligrams (mg) every six hours for pulmonary hypertension. Review of the care plan, revised 11/27/23, revealed Resident #94 was care planned for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely pharmacy response for medication refill requests. This affected one #40) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 105. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 05/21/23. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/23, revealed Resident #40 had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), had a metabolic diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and received insulin on a daily basis. Review of the care plan, revised 11/27/23, revealed Resident #40 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included for diabetes medication to be provided as ordered, monitor and document side effects and effectiveness of the medications, fasting blood sugar as ordered, and monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the pharmacy services provider agreement, the facility failed to ensure medication prescribed to assist with lowering blood sugar was available and administered as ordered. This affected one (#40) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 05/21/23. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/23, revealed Resident #40 had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), had a metabolic diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and received insulin on a daily basis. Review of the care plan, revised 11/27/23, revealed Resident #40 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included for diabetes medication to be provided as ordered, monitor and document side effects and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept secure at all times. This affected one (#97) of one residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 11/12/23. Diagnoses included chronic osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus, type II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, heart failure and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/16/23, revealed Resident #97 was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #97 had the following medications ordered for morning administration: • Ascorbic Acid 500 milligrams (mg), one tablet • Cholecalciferol 5000 units, one tablet • Daily-Vite multivitamin, 400 micrograms (mcg), one tablet • Lasix 20 mg, one tablet • Metoprolol Succinate extended release 25 mg, one tablet • Sertraline 50 mg, two tablets and Sertraline 180 mg, one tablet • Tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory services were completed in a timely manner. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included a displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg, hypertension, osteoarthritis, heart failure, retention of urine, morbid obesity, spinal stenosis, cor pulmonale, dilated cardiomyopathy, and lymphedema. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/23, revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and was dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated, 10/15/23, revealed Resident #18 was on diuretic therapy related to hypertension and heart failure. Interventions included to administered medications as ordered and report pertinent laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely physician notification of laboratory (lab) results. This affected one (#110) of three residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 10/31/23. Diagnoses included spina bifida with hydrocephalus, anxiety disorder, pseudobulbar affect, and a tongue abscess. Resident #110 had a history of frequent urinary tract infections. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 had moderate cognitive impairment and had an indwelling catheter and a colostomy. Review of the care plan for Resident #110, dated 11/06/23, revealed Resident #110' had a suprapubic catheter related to a diagnosis of spina bifida and was at risk for developing urinary tract infections and trauma related to the catheter. Interventions included staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during wound care. This affected three (#9, #40 and #85) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 04/26/22. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/23, revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan for Resident #9, revised on 10/06/23, revealed a potential for skin impairment related to fragile skin. Interventions included to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, monitor and document location, size, and treatment for skin injury. Review of Resident #9's current physician orders revealed an order written on 12/29/23 for a skin tear to the left elbow to be cleansed with wound cleaner, have xeroform applied, cover with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of facility corrective action documents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically restrained. This affected one (#57) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/24/23. Diagnoses included frontotemporal neuro cognitive disorder, dementia, motor neuron disease, aphasia, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/23, revealed Resident #57 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, was independent with mobility and required supervision with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) after set up. Review of a plan of care focus area, initiated 10/16/23, revealed Resident #57 demonstrated inappropriate behavior related to dementia, could be verbally and physically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one (#56) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 10/04/22. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, and Zenker's diverticulum. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/23, revealed Resident #56 was cognitively intact, was at risk for developing skin injury, and required the application of non-surgical dressings. Review of current physician orders revealed Resident #56 had an order dated 11/12/23 for the abdomen to be cleansed with normal saline, patted dry, followed by an application of Mesalt and to cover with dry sterile dressing every day and every eight hours as needed if gastrostomy site was leaking. Review of a wound care note date 11/15/23 revealed the gastrostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of facility policy and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#90) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 02/11/14. Diagnoses included hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, heart failure, vascular dementia, atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and aphasia following a cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/06/23, revealed Resident #90 was cognitively intact. Review of a physician order, dated 11/02/23, revealed Resident #90 was ordered Victoza Solution (used to treat type II diabetes), per pen-injector, 18 milligrams (mg) per three milliliters (ml), inject 1.8 mg subcutaneously each morning. Observation on 11/21/23 at 8:30 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 prepare to administer insulin to Resident #90 revealed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences for showers were honored. This affected one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for bathing/showers. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 had an admission date of 10/05/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 07/10/23 revealed Resident #6 had intact cognition. The resident required the extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility. The resident was independent for transfers and toilet use. The resident required supervision for walking and personal hygiene. The resident was independent for bathing requiring set-up help only. Review of the activities of daily (ADL) plan of care last revised 12/22/22 revealed Resident #6 required set up and clean up assistance for bathing. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #5 was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident trust account records, review of receipts, review of a withdrawal record document, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure funds were withdrawn from the appropriate resident account. This affected two (#12 and #123) of three residents reviewed for resident trust accounts. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the resident trust account for Resident #12 revealed a handwritten receipt for a withdrawal of $55.00 on 06/06/23. Review of the itemized statement for Resident #12 dated between 01/03/23 and 08/23/23 revealed no corresponding withdrawal for $55.00 on 06/06/23. Review of a withdrawal record dated 06/06/23 revealed $55.00 was withdrawn from Resident #123's trust account. Interview on 08/31/23 at 11:20 A.M. with Receptionist #361, who verified she was responsible for managing withdrawals from resident trust accounts, confirmed Resident #12's trust account had no corresponding withdrawal for the handwritten receipt on 06/06/23 for $55.00. Follow-up interview on 08/31/23 at approximately 12:30 P.M. with Receptionist #361…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility investigation, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected two (#12 and #105) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/02/20 with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had intact cognation and was independent for transfers and walking. Review of a progress note dated 07/19/23 in Resident #12's medical record revealed a report to staff that Resident #12 was outside smoking with a female resident when Resident #12 pulled his pants down in front of the female resident, and Resident #12 asked the female resident if she could pull her shirt up. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident received adequate assistance with eating. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed for assistance with meals. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 02/14/23 with diagnoses of left femur fracture, type II diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had impaired cognition and required supervision with setup for meals. Review of the current care plan for Resident #61 revealed she had an activities of daily life deficit due to Alzheimer's disease. Interventions included encouraging the resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. Observation on 08/30/23 at 8:09 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #200 provided Resident #61 with her breakfast tray. STNA #200 used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for incontinence received timely and adequate incontinence care following an episode of urinary incontinence. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The census was 109. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, left femur fracture, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage III, Alzheimer's disease, vitreous degeneration, depression, dysphagia, dementia, history of urinary tract infection, transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and hygiene, was incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to obtain weights per the plan of care and per the facility policy to assess residents for unplanned weight loss. This affected one (#61) of one residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 109. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 02/14/23 with diagnoses of left femur fracture, type II diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and transfers. Further review revealed Resident #61 exhibited no rejection of care. Review of the progress notes dated between 05/02/23 and 08/30/23 revealed no concerns related to facility staff obtaining weights for Resident #61. There was no documentation of Resident #61 refusing to be weighed. Review of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote dignity by ensuring a resident (#27) was provided with grooming and clean clothing and a dignified experience when responding to a resident's (#42) request for incontinence care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure seven (#12, #14, #18, #32, #42, #49, #61) were provided with eating assistance in a dignified manner. This affected eight (#12, #14, #18, #32, #27, #42, #49, #61) of 21 residents observed for the promotion of resident dignity. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed admission date of 01/14/22, with the diagnoses including: history of urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, weakness, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record reviews, policy reviews, interviews with resident representative, residents and staff, the facility failed to provide adequate staff to meet the residents needs. This affected twelve (#7, #12, #14, #18, #22, #27, #32, #42, #49, #61, #69) of 91 residents discovered to experience the lack of care and treatment related to insufficient nursing service staffing levels. The census was 91. Findings include: Review of the Resident Census and Condition of Residents Form 672, dated 04/05/22 the facility identified the resident level of care needs as follows; 66 residents require assistance from staff with bathing and 21 are dependent, 85 residents require assistance with dressing and one is dependent, 60 residents require assistance with transferring and 26 are dependent, 80 residents require toileting assistance and two are dependent, 88 residents require assistance with eating and three are dependent. The facility listed 72 residents frequently incontinent of bladder, 48 residents frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility census review, meal ticket reviews, food menus and spreadsheet review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate food servings sizes to residents who received the regular and pureed main lunch meal. This affected 25 (#4, #7, #9, #19, #25, #30, #31, #39, #40, #44, #47, #51, #53, #55, #58, #59, #63, #67, #68, #78, #79 #80, #83, #88, and #441) residents on the 100, 300, and 500 hall. In addition, the facility failed to honor Resident #10's food choices. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:15 A.M., with Dietary Manager #500 prior to serving resident meals verified using 6-ounce scoop for the pureed baked ziti and regular baked ziti. Observation on 04/06/22 at 11:18 A.M., revealed Dietary Manager #500 serving residents the main dish of the baked ziti with four cheeses with a 6 ounce scoop. Dietary Manger #500 served all meals to residents in halls 100, 300, and 500. Interview on 04/06/22 at 11:48 A.M., with Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner in the unused kitchen, main kitchen, and unit refrigerators. The facility identified one resident (#13) that does not receive food from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure residents were provided with eating assistance in a manner to prevent food borne illness, infection, or cross contamination. This affected five residents (#12, #14, #18, #32, and #61) observed during meals. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation on 04/04/22 at 6:29 P.M., of the main kitchen freezer revealed a box of garlic breadsticks, potato fries, and a bag of snap peas on the freezer floor. Observation on 04/04/22 at 6:36 P.M., of the stand alone refrigerator revealed two trays of prepared drinking cups with chocolate milk, white milk, juice, and tea were undated and unlabeled. Interview on 04/04/22 at 6:45 P.M., with Dietary Aide #502 verified packaged food directly on the freezer floor and undated and unlabeled drinks in the stand alone refrigerator. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of exterminator invoices, the facility failed to effectively ensure there were no gnats in the facility. This affected 38 of 38 residents residing on the 500, 700, and 800 hall. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation on 04/05/22 at 11:18 A.M., revealed a gnat was flying around a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview with Resident #86 on 04/05/22 at 11:18 A.M., verified there have been gnats in the facility for a long time. Interview on 04/05/22 between 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M., gnats were flying around the nursing station located between the 700 and 800 hallways. Observations on 04/05/22 at 2:00 P.M., revealed gnats were observed in the 500 hallway. Review of the exterminating reports dated 12/22/21 stated treatment for insects was completed in the common areas, kitchen 1&2 and rooms. Review of the exterminating reports dated 01/27/22 stated treatment for insects was completed in the common areas Kitchen 1&2 and rooms and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were provided to residents to alert staff to needs. This affected two (#41 and #60) of 91 residents in the facility. The facility census was 91. Finding included : Observation on 04/05/22 10:20 A.M., upon entering Resident #41 and 60's room, revealed two soft touch call lights lying on the floor in between Resident #41 and Resident #60 bed. Resident #60 asked the surveyor where her call light was because she wanted the staff to be repositioned her in bed. Interview on 04/05/22 at 10:22 A.M., with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #580 and STNA #628, upon entering the room, verified both residents were in bed with their call lights on the floor. Review of the policy titled, Answering the Call Light, dated April 2018, stated when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair the staff should be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's requests to get out of bed were honored. This affected one (#7) of one residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review Resident #7's medical record revealed and admission date of 05/14/21. Diagnoses included: traumatic spondylopathy, spinal stenosis, pain in thoracic spine, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, spastic hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy other cervical disc degeneration, abnormal posture, fibromyalgia, central pain syndrome, bipolar disorder, and other intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/11/22, revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact and required two person assistance of total dependent for transfer. Review of the safety smoking screen, dated 01/26/22, revealed Resident #7 was safe to smoke without supervision. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, personal funds account review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation. This affected one (#6) of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/15/20, with diagnoses that included: diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was alert, oriented, cognitively intact and required supervision for activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #6 on 04/04/22 at 7:00 P.M., revealed concerns regarding personal funds. Resident #6 stating he had around $1100.00 in his account and when he went to get cash in early March, he was told he only had $98.00 in his account. Review of Resident #6's personal funds account on 04/06/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, personal funds account review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely report the potential misappropriation of property to the appropriate state agency. This affected one resident (#6) of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/15/20, with diagnoses that included: diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was alert, oriented, cognitively intact and required supervision for activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #6 on 04/04/22 at 7:00 P.M., revealed concerns regarding personal funds. Resident #6 stating he had around $1100.00 in his account and when he went to get cash in early March, he was told he only had $98.00 in his account. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, personal funds account review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete an investigation of possible misappropriation of personal funds. This affected one (#6) of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/15/20, with diagnoses that included: diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidem and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was alert, oriented, cognitively intact and required supervision for activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #6 on 04/04/22 at 7:00 P.M., revealed concerns regarding personal funds. Resident #6 stating he had around $1100.00 in his account and when he went to get cash in early March, he was told he only had $98.00 in his account. Review of Resident #6's personal funds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident representative and staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely and adequate bathing. This affected three (#7, #32, and #69) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility identified 66 residents that required assist of one or two staff for bathing and 21 residents who were dependent with bathing activities. The census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/16. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, transient cerebral ischemic attack, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, muscle weakness, supraventricular tachycardia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 02/01/22 revealed Resident #32 had severely impaired cognition and was assessed to require physical help with part of the bathing activity with a two-plus persons assistance. Review of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess and treat an existing pressure ulcer, implement care planned and physician ordered pressure relieving interventions, and accurately document wounds. This affected two (#22 and #61) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified a total of four residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/19/22, with diagnoses including gangrenous hernia with obstruction resulting in colostomy placement, anemia, contractures of knees legs. Resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], with readmission to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed moderate cognitive deficit, required total assistance of two staff for bed mobility and extensive assistance of two staff members for all other activities of daily living. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected two (#14 and #42) of six residents reviewed for the provision of incontinence interventions and assistance. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/13/19, with the diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, major depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, anemia, malignant neoplasm of breast, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, macular degeneration, hypothyroidism, cardiac murmur, and osteoarthritis. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #14 with severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility, transfer, incontinent of bowel and bladder, utilizes a wheelchair propelled by staff, receives mechanically altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#61) of four residents reviewed for the provision of nutritional interventions. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Resident #61 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, thoracic aortic aneurysm, chronic kidney disease, contracture to right and left knee, dementia with behavior disturbance, hypertension, constipation, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], identified the resident with severe cognitive impairment, dependent on staff for completion of activities of daily living including bed mobility, transfer, incontinent of bowel and bladder, utilizes a wheel chair propelled by staff, at risk for skin breakdown with no current skin concerns. Review of a nursing plan of care revealed the plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident on a fluid restriction had the fluid restriction noted on their meal ticket and properly communicated with staff providing meals. This affected one (#10) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident receiving dialysis. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/04/21. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, emphysema, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #10 was receiving dialysis at the time of the review. Resident #10 was on a mechanically altered diet and a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #10's care plan revised 01/05/22 revealed Resident #10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#23) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 91. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/25/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, idiopathic hypotension, major depression, other psychotic disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and anxiety. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/27/22 revealed Resident #23 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 10/26/21 revealed Resident #23 was ordered the blood pressure medication hydralazine 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times daily with instructions to hold the medication if Resident #23's systolic blood pressure (pressure on the heart while it is beating) was less than 150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or if Resident #23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure lost dentures were replaced timely for a resident. This affected one (#86) of one resident reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/01/21, with diagnoses including: congestive heart failure, diabetes type II and morbid obesity. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with re-entry to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/22/22 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and did not display any behaviors. She had no significant weight loss. She was assessed with being edentulous without ill fitting or broken dentures. Review of the plan of care dated 03/22/22 stated the resident has a potential risk for altered nutrition/hydration. There is no mention of dentures in the resident's plan of care. Review of the Transfer Sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received a meal served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature. This affected two (#33 and #61) of 90 residents identified to received food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #623 on 04/05/22 at 8:55 A.M., revealed the STNA was assigned to the resident's remaining in their rooms for meals. STNA #623 stated he was unable to assist in the Alzheimer's unit dining room due to residents with heavy needs on the unit requiring care and assist with breakfast. STNA #623 verified Resident #61 and #33 have not been provided with breakfast yet. Observation on 04/05/22 at 9:15 A.M., revealed STNA #623 was observed to provide Resident #33 with complete eating assistance providing bites and drinks by hand with bare hands. At 9:39 A.M, without washing hands STNA #623 proceeded to Resident #61 bedside, handled the resident with bare hands without handwashing, and sat the resident in the seated up right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed as required for State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs). This affected two (#572 and #576) of three STNAs whose personnel files were reviewed and had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #572 revealed a hire date of 03/17/21. Review of the employee personnel file revealed the annual performance evaluation for 2021-2022 had no been completed. Review of the personnel file for STNA #576 revealed a hire date of 01/20/21. Review of the employee personnel file revealed the 2021-2022 annual performance evaluation had not been completed. Interview on 04/06/22 at 3:30 P.M., interview with Human Resources Director #543 verified 2021-2022 annual performance evaluations for STNA #572 and STNA #576 had not been completed.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$74,055 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $65,407 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
- $8,648 — penalty dated 2023-09-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-09 for 28 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365830. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.