Carriage Inn of Cadiz

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility investigation, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 was free from accident hazards. Actual harm occurred on 10/16/23 when Resident #41, who was cognitively impaired, at risk for falls, and dependent on two staff for bed mobility, fell out of bed while State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #112 was providing incontinence care by himself. Resident #41 sustained a fracture to the right hip and hematoma to the back of her head. Resident #41 was transferred to the hospital and received surgical intervention to her right hip. This affected one resident (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #41's list of diagnoses included diabetes, diabetic polyneuropathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, atrial fibrillation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on funds account review, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting of a resident account. This affected one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for Personal Fund Accounts. The facility held funds for 31 current and former residents. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Review of Personal Funds Accounts 05/28/26 with Business Office Manager #100 revealed Former Resident #54's account was closed 05/22/26. The facility was the payee for Resident #54's social security and pension. As of 01/01/26 his personal allowance increased from 50 to 75 dollars. The account had a balance of $100.01 on 01/01/26. Review of the Resident Funds Management Service (RFMS) revealed in January of 2026 the facility allotted a 50-dollar allowance, not the new 75-dollar amount. Resident #54 was hospitalized [DATE] till 02/03/26. In February of 2026 the facility allotted the 75-dollar allowance on 02/03/26 when a social security check for $2791.00 was deposited. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide safe and secure medication storage, including proper labeling and maintaining temperatures of medication storage refrigerators, of all medications. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 51.Findings include:On 12/09/2025 at 9:05 A.M., an observation of the treatment cart in the Kerrozin medication room was performed. The observation revealed Medihoney 1.5-ounce tube which was opened, unlabeled, and undated. The treatment cart observation further revealed a Dermasyn hydrogel wound dressing 3-ounce tube which was opened, unlabeled, and undated. This was confirmed by Registered Nurse (RN) #179 at the time of the observation.On 12/09/2025 at 9:20 A.M., an observation of the medication refrigerator in the medication room of [NAME] Hall revealed the refrigerator held medications and vaccinations for residents. The temperature of this refrigerator was noted to be 60 degrees Fahrenheit (F).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's infection control surveillance logs and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor for patterns of infection and provide oversight to identify the cause of identified patterns of infection. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents.Findings include:Review of the July 2025 infection surveillance logs revealed six residents had urinary tract infections (UTI), with Resident #7 being treated twice for UTI. The surveillance logs did not contain information regarding what microorganisms were involved. Review of the August 2025 infection surveillance records revealed microorganisms were not monitored. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN)/Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) #102 on 12/11/25 at 12:13 P.M., RN #102 verified when tracking for patterns of infection, she did not monitor the microorganisms involved. RN #102 stated there had been an increase in UTIs during the summer. There was no documented plan/course of action. RN #102 stated there had been an increase in fluids provided and staff had been educated regarding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of infection surveillance records, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic orders were thoroughly researched to determine if residents met the criteria for infections, failed to ensure when criteria was not met the prescriber was informed, and failed to provide education and reports regarding antibiotic use to prescribers in accordance with policies. This affected three (Residents #7, #21 and #61) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic use and had the potential to affect any other residents for whom antibiotics were ordered.During review of the August 2025 infection surveillance reports, the following were identified:1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed diagnoses including secondary Parkinsonism, irritable bowel syndrome, and dementia. A nursing note dated 07/21/25 at 11:00 P.M. indicated new orders were received for a Complete Blood Count (CBC) and a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) to be obtained the morning of 07/22/25 and telehealth was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of medical records, activity calendars, activity logs, facility policy, and interviews with staff and residents, the facility failed to maintain an activity program specific to meet the individualized needs of Resident #40. This affected one resident (Resident #40) of one resident reviewed for the activities program. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Record review of Resident #40 revealed admission to facility on 01/23/25 for diagnosis including encephalopathy (fluid on the brain) adult failure to thrive, depression, moderate protein- calorie malnutrition, surgical after care for large tumor removal to abdomen on 7/8/25, insomnia (inability to sleep), anemia (low blood counts), Alzheimer's disease, dementia (confusion and forgetfulness) with moderate mood disturbances.Review of Resident #40 Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment completed on 10/04/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4/15 indicating severe cognitive deficit (impaired memory and confusion). Further review of the MDS revealed inattention and disorganized thinking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, policy review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide routine dental services to one (Resident #53) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 51.Findings Include:Record review revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney disease, enlarged prostate, lung disease, anemia, high blood pressure, reflux, Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, anxiety and depression.Record review of Resident #53 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15/15 meaning the resident was cognitively intact with no impairments. The MDS further noted Resident #53 use of wheelchair for mobility and supervision or minimal assistance with transfers and personal care. The MDS also noted no swallowing disorders and that Resident #53 was following a mechanical soft diet.Record review of dental progress notes dated 01/20/25 written by Dentist #310…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26's medication orders and administration record were accurate. This affected one (Resident #26) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Review of medical record for resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/25/21. The resident had diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease; anxiety disorder, unspecified; unspecified dementia, severe, with agitation; unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition; benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms; essential hypertension; Parkinsonism; schizophrenia; unspecified mood; tremor; other bipolar disorder; specified peripheral vascular diseases; abnormal involuntary movements; vitamin D deficiency; constipation; restlessness; cramp and spasm; encounter for palliative care; anemia; depression; pain in knee; edema; unspecified urinary incontinence; full incontinence of feces; and Alzheimer's disease with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 54 of 55 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified Resident #55 not receiving nutrition by mouth. The facility census was 55. Findings include: On 06/17/24 between 9:45 A.M. and 10:01 A.M. observations of the kitchen revealed Dietary Director #69 and Dietary [NAME] #73 were observed to have beards and a mustache. Upon entrance to the kitchen, Dietary [NAME] #73 had his beard net below his chin and when the surveyor approached the dishwashing station, Dietary [NAME] #73 raised the beard net to cover his beard; however, his mustache remained uncovered. Dietary [NAME] #73 was washing dishes and removing clean dishes from the low temperature dishwasher at the time of the observation. Dietary Director #69 and Dietary [NAME] #73 were both observed with facial hair approximately one inch in length, uncovered at the time of the observation. On 06/17/24 between 11:56 A.M. and 12:08 P.M., observation of the lunch meal tray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, incident log review, procedure review and interview, the facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This had the potential to affect 16 residents (#6, #8, #11, #13, #14, #15, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28 and #30) identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independent with mobility of 34 residents who reside on the 200 and 300 halls. The census was 55. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #6 and #8 were moderately impaired for daily decision-making and resided on the long-term unit (200 hall). Resident #11, #13, #14, #15, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28 and #30 were severely impaired for daily decision-making and resided on the locked Alzheimer's unit (300 hall). On 06/17/24 at 10:15 A.M., observation of the second floor mechanical room with Maintenance Director (MD) #89 revealed two hot water tanks. One hot water tank was set to 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the second tank did not have a temperature display visible. MD #89 verified the first hot water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that witness authorizations were obtained to manage resident funds. This affected five residents (#1, #6, #24, #26, and #56) of five reviewed for personal funds. This had the potential to affect 33 residents whose funds were managed by the facility. The census was 58. Findings include: Review of financial records for Residents #1, #6, #24, #26, and #56 revealed no witness signatures on the Authorization and Agreement to Handle Resident Funds Forms. On 02/06/24 at 2:55 P.M., an interview with the Administrator verified there were no witness signatures on the Resident Fund Management Agreement Forms. On 02/06/24 at 9:40 A.M. an interview with Business Office Manager # 511 verified there were no witness signatures on the Resident Fund Management Agreement Form.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,991 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,991 — penalty dated 2023-11-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-13 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH