Calcutta Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the ambulance run report, review of hospital records, review of death certificate, interviews with staff, physicians and resident power of attorney (POA), and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and timely identification of an acute change in condition to prevent a delay in treatment for Resident #98. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm (subsequent death) beginning on 11/23/25 at approximately 1:40 A.M. when Resident #98, who had a known history of oral phase dysphagia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, use of antiplatelet therapy and was care planned for aspiration risk, and bleeding risk related to antiplatelet therapy, began to have brown emesis which continued throughout the midnight shift without proper assessment by the assigned nurse who proceeded to administer medications (on 11/23/25 RISE) via oral route without evidence of checking the oral cavity, completing a physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2019-07-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, review of the facility's pain management protocol and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive pain assessment and provide interventions to prevent and/or alleviate pain for one resident (Resident #358). Actual Harm occurred for Resident #358 on 07/24/19 at 10:22 A.M. when Resident #358 was grimacing, fidgeting, twisting his trunk around, yelling repeatedly this is terrible, and pulling on the hemi-tray on his wheelchair. This affected one (Resident #358) of one residents reviewed for pain. All 113 residents were screened for signs of unrelieved pain. Findings include: Review of Resident #358's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/13/19. Diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of the brain, memory deficit following a stroke, low back pain, and urinary tract infection. Skin and wound evaluations dated 07/13/19 indicated Resident #358 had unstageable pressure injuries (ulcers with obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) on the coccyx, left buttock and right buttock. The admission nursing assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the physician was thoroughly informed and timely notified of a change of condition for Resident #98 in order to identify and authorize proper treatment. This affected one resident (#98) of six residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 11/17/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to weakness, difficulty walking, oral phase dysphagia, muscle wasting, protein-calorie malnutrition, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, asthma, cardiac implant and viral meningitis. Resident #98 was emergency transferred from the facility to the hospital emergency room on [DATE] and expired in the hospital on [DATE].Review of physician orders dated 11/17/25 revealed Resident #98 had a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) order indicating standard care and life extending measures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interview with staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to adequately monitor and obtain a blood pressure and heart rate prior to the administration of medication for Resident #24. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia of right side following a cerebral infarction, aphasia, convulsions, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, generalized edema, gout, and insomnia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had moderately impaired cognition and he was nonverbal. Review of the March 2025 physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report (PBJ), review of staffing schedules, staff interviews, and review of a Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing ratios were maintained for the 4th Quarter of 2023. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the PBJ report revealed excessively low weekend staffing for the 4th quarter of 2023 was an area of concern. 2. Review of the staffing schedules for the nurses and State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) for October, November, and December of 2023 revealed the facility did not have consistent and adequate weekend staffing. Completion of the staffing tool revealed inadequate staffing levels for the following dates: 10/07/23 was at 2.10, 10/08/23 was at 2.42, 12/02/23 was at 2.37, 12/09/23 was at 2.45, and 12/10/23 was at 2.33. 3. Interview on 06/04/24 at 2:16 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed he was aware that staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, served, and stored under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 89 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#6, #32, #35, and #395) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Observation during the kitchen tour on 06/03/24 from 8:10 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #496 revealed the following concerns: -The floor of the walk-in freezer had a build of dirt and debris under the shelving units and frozen peas were scattered over the floor. -In the walk-in freezer, there was one gallon size storage bag with seven biscuits dated 05/30/24 unsealed and open to air. -In the walk-in cooler, there were two five-pound containers of sour cream with a best buy date of 06/01/24. -In the dry storage area, there was one ten-pound bag of dried angel hair pasta one fourth full open to air and not dated, and there was one two-pound bag of brown sugar opened and resealed with no date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility menu and spread sheets, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and correct portion sizes were served for lunch on 06/04/24 for residents on a mechanical soft diet. This affected 13 residents (#3, #5, #14, #15, #24, #28, #52, #58, #68, #75, #84, #90, and #346) out of the 14 residents who the facility identified as being on a mechanical soft diet. This had the potential to affect 89 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified four residents (#6, #32, #35, and #395) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the resident choice meal for lunch on 06/04/24 revealed pizza pasta casserole, Prince [NAME] vegetable medley, and lemon strawberry fluff dessert would be served. Review of spread sheets for the lunch meal on 06/04/24 revealed both the regular and the mechanical soft consistency diets would receive eight ounces of the pizza pasta casserole, 4 ounces of the Prince [NAME]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility recipe, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and acceptable palatability. This had the potential to affect 89 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility identified four residents (#6, #32, #35, and #395) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/24 from 11:04 A.M. to 11:10 A.M. of Dietary [NAME] #480 taking the temperature of the food items on tray line revealed the pizza pasta casserole was 185 degrees Fahrenheit (F), Prince [NAME] Vegetables was 174 degrees F, the milk was 38 degrees F, and the lemon strawberry fluff dessert was 35 degrees F. Tray service for the dining rooms and hall trays began at 11:15 A.M. As the second to the last cart for 100 hall was finished being loaded, the surveyor requested at 12:20 P.M. a test tray be added at the end of the last cart for 200 hall. The test tray was plated at 12:31 P.M. and placed on the 200 hall cart. The cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #251's right to attend an activity program was honored. This affected one resident (#251) out of 28 residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #251's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/31/24. Diagnoses included nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, difficulty in walking, unspecified fall, acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis (kidney tubules are damaged or destroyed), and type two diabetes without complications, muscle wasting and atrophy (reduced muscle mass) , essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and weakness. Review of Inspira- Activities Initial Review, dated 06/03/24, revealed Resident #251's past activity interests included reading, crocheting, crossword puzzles, solitaire, and bingo, and the resident wished to participate in activities while in the facility. Review of Resident #251's care plan dated 06/03/24 revealed the resident was a new admit to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, review of protocols, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions/orders were implemented to protect resident's skin from injuries. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure skin related impairments. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, stage three chronic kidney disease, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of a care plan initiated 11/24/21 indicated Resident #50 had a potential for alteration in skin integrity related to decreased physical mobility. Skin was fragile, bruised and tore easily. Interventions included applying geri-sleeves to both upper extremities to be on at all times except for bathing and hygiene. Review of a skin and wound evaluation dated 05/31/24 revealed Resident #50 had a skin tear on the right outer forearm which was acquired in the facility on 05/24/24. The skin tear measured 6.1 centimeters (cm) in length and 4.3 cm in width. Review of a physician order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist Resident #1 with applying her splint for her right-hand contracture. This affected one out ( Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/05. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, and neuropathy. Review of Resident #1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment date 03/08/24 revealed the resident is cognitively intact and had an impairment on one side of her upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand). Review of Resident #1's GG Functional Abilities and Goals evaluation dated 03/08/24 revealed the resident is dependent for upper body dressing and lower body dressing. Review of Resident #1's June 2024 physician orders revealed an order dated 05/23/19 to monitor skin integrity of right hand every shift related to splint use. Review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the bag of tube feeding product was properly documented with the time and date of when hung as required. This affected one resident (#35) out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding but had the potential to affect four additional residents (#6, #30, #32, and #148) who received continuous interal (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach through a tube) feedings. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 05/06/21. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disabilities, adult failure to thrive, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, pharyngeal phase dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and abnormal posture. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated 05/06/21 for NPO (nothing by mouth) diet and an order dated 04/19/24 for enteral feeding of Nutren 2.0 at 40 milliliter(ml)/hour continuous with 55 ml water flush continuous. Review of 05/24/21 care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,495 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,495 — penalty dated 2026-04-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH