Calcutta Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 53% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the ambulance run report, review of hospital records, review of death certificate, interviews with staff, physicians and resident power of attorney (POA), and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and timely identification of an acute change in condition to prevent a delay in treatment for Resident #98. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm (subsequent death) beginning on 11/23/25 at approximately 1:40 A.M. when Resident #98, who had a known history of oral phase dysphagia, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, use of antiplatelet therapy and was care planned for aspiration risk, and bleeding risk related to antiplatelet therapy, began to have brown emesis which continued throughout the midnight shift without proper assessment by the assigned nurse who proceeded to administer medications (on 11/23/25 RISE) via oral route without evidence of checking the oral cavity, completing a physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance and supervision for two dependent residents (Resident #8 and Resident #52) with activities of daily living (ADL's) resulting in preventable thermal burn injuries.Actual harm occurred on 12/09/24 when Resident #52, who had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and dementia and was assessed to require physical assistance from staff for meal set-up and assistance with ambulation in his wheelchair, spilled two cups of hot coffee (provided to him by dietary staff), sustaining second degree burns to his left thigh, right thigh, and abdomen. The resident required pain medication, wound care and oral antibiotics to aide in healing of the burns.Additionally, on 02/06/25 Resident #8, who was assessed to have severe cognitive impairment and required physical assistance from staff with eating /meals.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications were educated on the risks/benefits associated with the use of psychotropic medications and failed to obtain informed consent from the resident and/or their representative prior to use. This affected four residents (Resident #2, #5, #11, and #106) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 70 residents who received psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/08/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, excoriation disorder, and localized edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/24/26, revealed Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order, dated 06/10/26, revealed the order for risperidone 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth twice daily for dementia. This was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, review of the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, observation of the pureed food preparation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the robot coupe blender was clean and dry prior to preparing pureed foods for meal service. This had the potential to affect seven residents who were ordered pureed diets, Residents #5, #16, #21, #75, #81, #88, and #96. The facility census was 87. Findings Include: Observation and interview on 06/10/26 at 10:43 A.M. during the puree preparation of the lunch meal revealed dietary cook (DC) #145 placed the robot coupe (a blender used in industrial kitchens to puree foods) bowl onto the robot coupe with water droplets noted on the lid and inside of the bowl. DC #145 then began to pour the roast beef into the bowl to puree and was stopped by surveyor to verify that there were water droplets in the bowl and on the lid. DC #145 verified there was water still in the bowl and on the lid and she was unsure of who had put the bowl away when it was wet and it would have been washed after the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive baseline care plans and failed to ensure copies of baseline care plans were maintained in the medical record. This affected four residents (Resident #4, #12, #51, and #90) of 10 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 87.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/26 with diagnoses including fracture of left femur, osteoporosis, fracture of first lumbar vertebra, seizures, pressure ulcer of right heel, retention of urine, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the Resident #51's baseline care plan revealed only a scanned face sheet (admission record) and active physician orders. There was no signature of the resident and/or resident representative to indicate if the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident and/or resident representative. Interview on 06/10/26 at 4:55 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #196 verified Resident #51's baseline care plan was not comprehensive, only including the face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to notify the designated medical power of attorney and primary emergency contact of a change in condition of Resident #6. The affected one (Resident #6) of one record reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 87.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses including epilepsy (seizure disorder), anoxic brain damage (damage caused by lack of oxygen for an extended period of time), high blood pressure, stage three pressure injury ulcer, dementia (confusion) with anxiety, colostomy status, and history of urinary tract infections.Review of the most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 05/26/26 for revealed Resident #6 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15 meaning severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff to complete all personal care, toileting hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/08/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, excoriation disorder, and localized edema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/24/26, revealed Resident #11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident did not have hallucinations, delusions, physical or verbal behaviors, or rejection of care. A diagnoses of dementia was indicated in the assessment and the resident received an antipsychotic medication. Review of a physician order, dated 06/10/26, revealed the order for risperidone 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth twice daily for dementia. This was an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to identify and report injuries of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses including vascular dementia, osteonecrosis (bone disease that occurs when blood flow to a part of a bone is disrupted, leading to bone death and collapse), and fracture of the left patella. A nursing note dated 01/12/26 at 8:04 A.M. revealed Resident #2 had been complaining of left knee pain. The physician was made aware and a new order was received for a X-ray for the left knee due to pain and swelling. Mobile x-ray was made aware of the order. A nursing note dated 01/12/26 at 3:00 P.M. indicated the left knee x-ray revealed no acute fracture or dislocation, no definite joint effusion and no infiltrative or destructive process. The x-ray indicated moderately severe degenerative joint disease (DJD). Review of a nursing note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for a resident who was identified with bruising and a patellar fracture without identifiable cause for the injuries. This affected one (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for abuseReview of Resident #2's medical record revealed diagnoses including vascular dementia, osteonecrosis (bone disease that occurs when blood flow to a part of a bone is disrupted, leading to bone death and collapse), and fracture of the left patella. A nursing note dated 01/12/26 at 8:04 A.M. revealed Resident #2 had been complaining of left knee pain. The physician was made aware and a new order was received for a X-ray for the left knee due to pain and swelling. Mobile x-ray was made aware of the order. A nursing note dated 01/12/26 at 3:00 P.M. indicated the left knee x-ray revealed no acute fracture or dislocation, no definite joint effusion and no infiltrative or destructive process. The x-ray indicated moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical records, review of the facility infection control logs, facility policies, observation of incontinence care and hand hygiene practices, interviews and review of information from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC), the facility failed to prevent the recurrence of urinary tract infections for Resident #6. The affected one (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 87.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed admission not facility on 07/07/25 for diagnoses including epilepsy (seizure disorder), anoxic brain damage (damage caused by lack of oxygen for an extended period of time), high blood pressure, stage three pressure injury ulcer, dementia (confusion) with anxiety, a colostomy (bag secured to the abdomen over an surgically created opening of the bowel used to collect stool/feces), and history of urinary tract infections (UTI's)Review of the UTI care plan dated 05/04/2026 revealed Resident #6 was diagnosed with a UTI/cystitis related to E.Coli (common bacteria found in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure expiration dates on stock medications were clearly legible and failed to ensure expired stock medications were disposed of. Expired medications were located in one of four medication storage rooms and a medication without a clearly labeled expiration date was located in one of three medication carts observed. The facility had one resident (Resident #106) who resided on the ortho hall and received the medication without a clear expiration date. On 06/10/2026 at 10:24 A.M.#191 observations of the ortho wing medication cart and medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #191 revealed one open bottle of ferrous sulfate in the medication cart with no expiration date found and a cabinet which contained one unopened bottle of vitamin B complex which expired March of 2026 and one unopened bottle each of lanthanum carbonate and bisacodyl tablets which expired May 2026. LPN #191 stated she did not know who was responsible for monitoring the stock meds in the cabinet to ensure they were not expired. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the physician was thoroughly informed and timely notified of a change of condition for Resident #98 in order to identify and authorize proper treatment. This affected one resident (#98) of six residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 11/17/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to weakness, difficulty walking, oral phase dysphagia, muscle wasting, protein-calorie malnutrition, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, asthma, cardiac implant and viral meningitis. Resident #98 was emergency transferred from the facility to the hospital emergency room on [DATE] and expired in the hospital on [DATE].Review of physician orders dated 11/17/25 revealed Resident #98 had a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) order indicating standard care and life extending measures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$49,705 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $24,210 — penalty dated 2026-06-17
• $25,495 — penalty dated 2026-04-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH