The Enclave at Cambridge
8420 Georgetown Road, Cambridge, OH 43725 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (740) 439-4401 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $194,587 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-31)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.8%CMS range 24.9–54.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 42.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.29 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.41 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, including review of the facility payroll records, review of facility billing/financial information, review of email communication, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility. The facility also failed to have an effective system in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hired agreement and payroll schedule. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 02/16/24 when the lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospitalization, displacement due to potential interruption in staffing and/or outside service providers. This had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review including review of facility payroll records, review of facility billing/financial information, review of the [NAME] County Auditor website, review of the facility assessment, review of the employee handbook, review of the facility admission agreement, review of the facility Abuse/Neglect policy and procedure and interviews, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid timely to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the total care needs of all residents admitted to and/or retained in the facility and failed to have adequate and effective systems in place to ensure staff were compensated via payroll benefits based on their hired agreement and payroll schedule. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 10/13/23 when the identified lack of financial solvency placed all facility residents at risk for serious harm, injury, hospitalization,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, care plan review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were in place for all residents. This affected four (#2, #4, #5, and #38) of 16 residents reviewed. The facility census was 35. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #38 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, spondylosis, hypercalcemia, anxiety disorder, anemia, depression, and hyperlipidemia. Review of a care plan dated 11/21/25 and revised on 11/24/25 revealed Resident #38 had a nutrition risk related to adult failure to thrive, muscle wasting, hypothyroidism, hypertension, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease stage three, depression, anemia, malnutrition, and diet textures. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38's cognition remained intact and care area assessments to be included in the care plan should be communication, activities of daily living functional/rehabilitation potential,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to preserve resident dignity while dining by allowing full urinals to remain beside food on the resident's tray table. This affected one (#12) of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 35.Findings include:Review of the resident's medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; hyperkalemia; type two diabetes mellitus; muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0, dated 12/12/25, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of 11 would indicate the resident had moderate problems with thinking and memory. Functionally, the resident used a walker and required partial to moderate assistance for mobility, with one sided impairment of the lower extremity. He is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary adaptive equipment to promote mobility of two residents. This affected two residents (#47, #33) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs/preferences. The facility census was 35.Findings include:1.Review of medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary with angina pectoris, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, convulsions, personal history of transient ischemic attack. Review of a Minimal Data Set (MDS) version 3.0, dated 12/09/25, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 on a 0-15 scale. A score of 13 would indicate the resident had intact cognitive function, or normal thinking/memory. On 12/15/25 at 11:51 A.M., an interview with Resident #47 revealed she had difficulty getting on and off of the toilet because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to report new onset of pain to the medical provider after Resident #10 had a fall. This affected one (#10) of four resident records reviewed for accidents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, bipolar (mood) disorder, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), Alzheimer's Disease, heart failure, degenerative joint disease of thoracic spine, artificial heart valve with use of chronic blood thinner, morbid obesity, and chronic pain.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 09/03/25 revealed Resident #10 had a brief interview for mental status and scored a 13/15 indicating normal cognitive function. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #10 was dependent for all care including bathing, toileting, dressing, and required assistance with wheelchair navigation.Review of the medication list for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) forms, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of which skilled services were being discontinued and residents were given 48 hour notice of end of skilled services. This affected two (#48 and #49) of three residents reviewed for NOMNCs. The facility census was 35. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other specified disorders of muscle and muscle weakness. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48's cognition remained intact and he would like to discharge home. Review of a care plan dated 08/29/25 and revised on 09/09/25 revealed Resident #48's goal was to discharge home. Interventions included but were not limited to discuss with resident/family discharge planning, make referrals to community agencies as needed, and notify physician of discharge plan needs. Review of a NOMNC revealed Resident #48's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on closed medical record review, facility investigation review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#43) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #261920, reported date 06/23/25, was filed with the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) related to misappropriation. Review of the SRI revealed the allegation of misappropriation was made to facility staff on 06/21/25 and an investigation initiated. Resident #43 alleged his wallet with $420.00, identification, and social security card was missing from his nightstand drawer. The resident reported that he had his wallet on Saturday morning and after waking on Saturday afternoon, his wallet was missing. A search of the resident's room was initiated on Saturday evening. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 05/15/25 with diagnoses including infection of internal hip prosthesis, heart failure, anxiety disorder, and chronic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete information of transfer or discharge of residents. This affected one (#12) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 35.Findings include:Review of medical records revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side; hyperkalemia; type two diabetes mellitus; muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) version 3.0, dated 12/12/25, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of 11 would indicate the resident had moderate problems with thinking and memory. Functionally, the resident used a walker and required partial to moderate assistance for mobility, with one sided impairment of the lower extremity. He is occasionally incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents nails were kept at desirable length. This affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 35. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy and spondylosis. Review of an order dated 11/20/25 revealed Resident #38 could have podiatry care, dental care, ophthalmology care, and audiology care as needed. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38's cognition remained intact, she had no behaviors, and required substantial/maximum assistance for completing personal hygiene. Interview on 12/16/25 at 7:44 A.M. with Resident #38 revealed her toenails are bad and she had not seen a podiatrist in a while. Interview on 12/16/25 at 2:19 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #347 revealed the podiatrist had been at the facility the previous week. LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure skin alterations were comprehensively assessed and monitored. This affected three (#1, #8, and #35) of five residents reviewed for skin alterations. The facility census was 35. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, anemia, unsteadiness on feet, osteoarthritis, idiopathic, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, acute osteomyelitis left ankle and foot, and diabetes with foot ulcer. Review of Resident #1's Wound Center (outside provider) note dated 11/21/25 revealed the resident was seen for gangrene of the left great toe as well as traumatic ulceration of the right great toe. The resident reported persistent pain in her left great toe and heel, which she describes as constant. She spends the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a timely comprehensive pressure ulcer assessment and treatment. This affected one (#46) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents as having pressure ulcers. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following amputation, acquired absence of right leg above knee, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic congestive heart failure, and history of cerebral infarction. Review of the Baseline Care Plan, dated 12/09/25, revealed the resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and bowel and had pain of the coccyx and right knee. Review of the Care Plan, dated 12/09/25, revealed the resident has a pressure ulcer with interventions including to administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness; and to monitor dressing to ensure it is intact and adhering. Review of the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of residents, review of medical records and facility policies, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during smoking sessions for residents. This affected two (#5, #47) of two residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility census was 35.Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #5 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke affecting right side, diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety, lung disease, bipolar (mood) disorder, aphasia (difficulty speaking), left above knee amputation, and right below knee amputation. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 09/15/25 revealed Resident #5 had a brief interview for mental status and scored a 6/15 indicating moderate to severe cognitive deficit. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was dependent for all care including bathing and dressing and required assistance for navigation of wheelchair. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident observations, medical record review, and resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to a resident. This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 35.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission to facility on 05/04/22 with diagnoses including diabetes, bipolar (mood) disorder, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), Alzheimer's Disease, heart failure, degenerative joint disease of thoracic spine, artificial heart valve with use of chronic blood thinner, morbid obesity, and chronic pain.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 09/03/25 revealed Resident #10 had a brief interview for mental status and scored a 13/15 indicating normal cognitive function. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was dependent for all care including bathing, toileting, dressing, and required assistance with wheelchair navigation.Review of the MDS assessment also revealed Resident #10 to be incontinent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents had orders for oxygen and a humidification bottle was filled. This affected two (#8 and #12) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 35.Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #8's current orders dated 12/2025 revealed Resident #8 was ordered five liters per milliliters (LPM) continuously. Review of Resident #8's oxygen plan of care dated 04/04/19 and revised 04/22/25 revealed the resident uses oxygen related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and shortness of breath (SOB). Refuses to wear oxygen at times. The resident has SOB upon exertion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess and implement trauma informed care for a resident. This affected one (#2) of one resident reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 35. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety disorder, bi-polar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/13/25, revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of PTSD.Review of the Care Plan for Resident #2 revealed there was not a plan of care in place addressing the cause of PTSD, triggers which may cause re-traumatization, or interventions to reduce the risk of re-traumatization and provide care for PTSD.Further record review for Resident #2 revealed no assessment had been completed to identify the cause of PTSD and to identify potential triggers which may cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with dental services. This affected one (#14) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 35. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and muscle weakness. Review of an order dated 11/18/25 revealed Resident #14 could receive podiatry care, dental care, ophthalmology care, and audiology care as needed. Review of a nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had upper dentures only. Interview on 12/17/25 at 1:44 P.M. with Resident #14 revealed his gums were sore from chewing and no one had offered dental services. Interview on 12/17/25 at 2:13 P.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #400 revealed the nurses add residents to dental list. Interview on 12/17/25 at 2:20 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed residents could be added to the dental list by emailing the in-house dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Preadmission Screening and Resident Review was resubmitted following a new mental health diagnosis added for a resident. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/30/18 with diagnoses that included dementia, cerebrovascular accident and bipolar disorder. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed on 04/30/18. Further review of the medical diagnoses for Resident #2 revealed a new diagnosis of anxiety added on 08/06/21. No evidence of a resubmission of PASARR for a new mental health diagnosis was found. On 08/07/24 at 10:50 A.M., interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 revealed she would contact the local area agency on aging to determine if a PASARR is required to be resubmitted for a new diagnosis of anxiety for Resident #2. On 08/07/24 at 11:10 A.M., follow up interview with LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure therapy recommendation were implemented. This affected one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed for restorative services. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, hip pain, heart disease, and chronic pain. Further review of Resident #5's paper medical record revealed there were Physical Therapy (PT) notes dated 09/26/23 to 11/20/23 that indicated the resident received therapy services. The PT discharge note dated 11/20/23 recommended the resident have a walker with a basket/bag and ambulation program established. The resident was currently able to walk to the dining room, balance was steady, and tier was functional with a Restorative Nursing Program. The resident will be able to walk in the corridor with two assists of two and balance will be steady, by performing the following restorative nursing intervention. Allow resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pest. This affected two residents (#7 and #9) of 16 residents observed. Findings included: Observation on 08/05/24 at 10:56 A.M. of Resident #9's room revealed there were three flies flying around the resident. The resident reported flies have been an issue for five years. The resident had a flyswatter lying on his bed. Observation on 08/05/24 at 11:08 A.M. of Resident #7's room revealed there was one fly sticky strip hanging behind a closet. There were two flies flying around the resident's face. The resident reported flies have been an issue and staff gave him a flyswatter to use and they just took down the fly strips because state was in the building, but they must have missed one. Observation on 08/06/24 at 1:12 P.M., of Resident #7 and #9's room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 confirmed there was flies and gnats flying on and around the residents. Observation on 08/06/24 at 2:00 P.M., of Resident #7's wound care with LPN #17 and #18 revealed flies and gnats were flying around and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, dietary staffing and schedule review and staff interview, the facility failed to employ and maintain sufficient staffing in the kitchen to ensure resident meal service was provided as planned and without potential interruption. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility meal schedule revealed breakfast service was scheduled for 7:30 A.M. and 8:10 A.M. and lunch service was scheduled for 11:10 A.M. and 12:10 P.M. The second time noted was to finish the delivery of resident hall trays (for those residents who ate in their rooms) Upon entrance to the kitchen, on 03/15/24 at 8:30 A.M. Dietary [NAME] #49, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA), STNA #50 and STNA #45 were observed in the kitchen preparing the residents morning meal. The meal service was noted to be finishing at the time of the observation. Interview with [NAME] #49 on 03/15/24 at 9:21 A.M. revealed the dietary aide scheduled to work in the kitchen on this date had walked out after getting her paycheck this morning and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, facility assessment review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/04/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. On 11/16/23 at 8:32 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed some of the employee checks had been returned for insufficient funds but corporate (management located in Florida) had wired money to the employees the same day. Further interview revealed corporate also covered any fees that occurred at the employees' banks. At the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/04/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. On 11/16/23 at 8:32 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed some of the employee checks had been returned for insufficient funds but corporate (management located in Florida) had wired money to the employees the same day. Further interview revealed corporate also covered any fees that occurred at the employees' banks. At the time of the survey, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, facility assessment review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history revealed on 12/04/23 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency. An issue identified at that time was related to employee payroll. On 11/16/23 at 8:32 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed some of the employee checks had been returned for insufficient funds but corporate (management located in Florida) had wired money to the employees the same day. Further interview revealed corporate also covered any fees that occurred at the employees' banks. At the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure continuous evaluations were in place to verify financial obligations were met as planned to prevent a potential disruption in resident care and services through the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee. This had the potential to affect all facility residents.The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the provided QAPI started 10/01/23 revealed the identified problem of vendors not being paid promptly. The root cause revealed invoices were not being entered electronically when received. Review of invoices and calls with administrator and business office manager were to be completed weekly. The QAPI did not identify any type of monitoring or ensuring staff were paid on the agreed payroll date. Review of the plan of correction dated 12/27/23 revealed action plan for ensuring staff received payroll on the agreed payroll date. a. During the onsite investigation, the facility provided a list of 14 employees who had paychecks returned from payroll on 01/19/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of billing statements, and interviews, the facility failed to respond to Resident #29 guardian's request for financial information in a timely manner and to maintain accurate financial records This affected one (Resident #29) out of three reviewed for request of records. Facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, and history of mental and behavioral disorders. Resident #29 had a court appointed guardian of person and estate (Guardian #400) dated 08/23/23. The medical record revealed since 04/02/22, Resident #29's payer source was Medicaid. Review of statements with account #137716 dated 10/01/23, 12/01/23, and 01/01/24 revealed a balance of $194.50 was owed. Interview on 01/29/24 at 9:35 A.M. Guardian #400 verified they had become Resident #29's guardian in August 2023 and had tried to get correct billing information from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, financial statements, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure an overpayment of $4,200.00 from June of 2022 was refunded to a resident and/or family. This affected one (Resident #31) out of three residents reviewed for proper billing and accounting of resident accounts. The facility census was 30. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed former Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation, and glaucoma. Power-of-attorney (POA) papers dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31's daughter was appointed POA in all business, financial, legal, and all other matters. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was private pay from [DATE] until [DATE]. Resident #31's payor source was Medicare A from [DATE] through [DATE]. On [DATE], Resident #31's payor source was hospice-private. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to establish an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Governing Body policy revealed the Governing Body had a fiduciary duty, duty of care, and duty of loyalty to act in the best interests of the Facility. The governing body should be comprised of the operator (s), c-suite level executives, and other individuals who were legally responsible for the establishment and implementation of policies regarding management and operations of the facility. The Governing Body member responsibilities included to be active, engaged, and involved in the affairs of the facility and to have direct access to the administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure functioning equipment was maintained in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents. The census was 31. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 11/16/23 at 8:53 A.M. revealed the walk-in cooler was being used for storage. A freestanding commercial refrigerator was observed to be unplugged and not being used. Dietary Director (DD) #48 verified the walk-in cooler and the freestanding commercial refrigerator were not working. DD #48 stated the walk-in cooler had not worked since sometime in June and the freestanding commercial refrigerator stopped working 11/05/23. DD #48 stated residential refrigerators being used to replace the commercial refrigerators. The facility provided two estimates for the walk-in cooler. The first estimate was dated 07/19/23 for $18,125 with full payment required prior to installation. The second estimate was dated 07/27/23 for $10,568 with 50-percent prior to ordering and the balance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of resident fund information, and interviews the facility failed to notify Resident #19 and/or the resident's responsible party when the account balance was two hundred dollars less than the maximum resource limit. The facility also failed to convey personal funds after Resident #33 and #34 no longer resided at the facility. This affected three (Resident #19, #33, and #34) residents of 13 residents reviewed for resident fund accounts. The census was 31. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral ischemia, dementia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively impaired. Review of the resident fund account revealed Resident #19's payer source was Medicaid. Resident #19's balance since [DATE] had been more than $4,197.94 which exceeded the maximum resource limit of $2,500. Interview on [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen grill hood, stove, and floor were clean and free of grease build up. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents. Facility census was 24. Finding include: Observation on 08/02/23 at 8:48 AM revealed the kitchen hood exhaust system was dirty with what appeared to be grease on the hood and running down the wall. Grease buildup was noted from the top of the stove, down the side of the stove, and on the floor next to the stove. At the time of the observation, interview with Dietary Manager #105 verified the kitchen hood needed cleaned and there was a grease buildup that had run down the side of the stove and was on the floor. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00144874.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served as per the planned menu. This affected all 26 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the meal spreadsheet, dated Spring/Summer 2022 revealed the dinner menu for Monday included pureed soft, cooked vegetables for resident's receiving pureed diets, soft, cooked vegetables for the resident's receiving mechanical soft diets, and lettuce and tomato salad for the resident's receiving regular diets. The spreadsheet revealed the alternative main dish was creamy chicken spaghetti. Review of the meal tickets, dated 07/11/22 revealed no evidence of a pureed or mechanical soft vegetable or lettuce and tomato salad for regular diets, or the alternative main dish of creamy chicken spaghetti. On 07/11/22 at 4:31 P.M. observation of dinner meal revealed no evidence of a pureed or soft vegetable, lettuce and tomato salad, or creamy chicken spaghetti was prepared and available. At the time of the observation, interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure information contained on Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage forms issued to Resident #15, #19, #26 and #330 was accurate. This affected four residents (#15, #19, #26 and #330) of four residents reviewed for liability/beneficiary notices. Findings include: 1. Review of the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage form, revealed Resident #15 was receiving skilled services which were scheduled to end on 02/17/22. The information on the form included the incorrect name and phone number for the Quality Improvement Organization. The form had information for KePro, not the current QIO (Livanta). On 07/12/22 at 12:28 P.M. interview with Social Service Designee #25 verified the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage form had the incorrect information indicating KePro was the QIO not Livanta for Resident #15. 2. Review of the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage form, revealed Resident #19 was receiving skilled services which were scheduled to end on 06/15/22. The information on the form included the incorrect name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and Resident #15's personal funds were deposited in an interest bearing account. This affected two residents (#8 and #15) of two residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, cerebral infarction, retention of urine, major depressive disorder, diabetes, cardiac arrhythmia, hypertension, dementia, anxiety disorder and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/28/22 revealed Resident #8 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the personal fund account documentation for Resident #8 revealed the resident's personal funds account balance was $100.00, had not been deposited in an interest bearing account and had not accrued any interested from 04/12/22 to 07/13/22. On 07/13/22 at 3:10 P.M. interview Business Office Manger #19 revealed there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure communication/notification to Hospice as ordered when Resident #3's blood glucose level was elevated (above 401). This affected one resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease, stage 5. Record review revealed the resident received Hospice services. Review of Resident #3's Hospice plan of care, dated 01/03/22 revealed to notify Hospice nurse of changes. The care plan revealed staff would communicate with Hospice to keep up to date on (resident's) condition. A Hospice certification, dated 06/18/22 revealed the resident was ordered Novolog insulin via a sliding scale. The orders indicated if the resident's blood glucose/sugar was 401 or higher to administer eight units of insulin and call Hospice. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the justified use of a psychoactive medication for Resident #3. This affected one resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a pharmacy recommendation, dated 01/03/22 revealed Resident #3 was receiving the anti-psychotic medication, Quetiapine (Seroquel) for agitation but lacked an allowable diagnosis to support its' use. The recommendation included a list of appropriate diagnoses/conditions listed including refractory major depression. The recommendation noted the facility nurse practitioner chose a diagnosis of refractory major depression on the form. However, there was no evidence of refractory major depression (treatment-resistant depression that doesn't respond to an adequate course of least two antidepressants) listed as a diagnosis for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$194,587 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $124,423 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- $70,164 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-14 for 29 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-29 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPITAL HOLDINGS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 54% | since 06/15/2025 |
| LAMPERT, AHARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 06/15/2025 |
| JB EAST END INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| BASCH, JOSHUA | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| COHEN, SHLOMO | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| EPSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| REISS, MORRIS | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| WEINSTOCK, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| ZAKS, MENACHEM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| BLOCH, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| STERN, JACOB | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| CCH HEALTHCARE OH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| RICHARDS, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
| SHADE, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $228K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.