Canton Christian Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility investigation, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident, review of hospital records, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program to ensure Resident #45's safety and supervisory needs were addressed timely resulting in a fall with major injury. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent additional falls/injury. Actual harm occurred on 01/17/25 when Resident #45, who required a mechanical lift for transfers, was at high risk for falls, and had moderately impaired cognition, was hospitalized after sustaining right and left tibial fractures following an unwitnessed fall. Prior to the unwitnessed fall, a nursing assistant observed the resident yelling for help with her legs hanging out of bed and walked past her room without responding to the resident's calls for help. This affected one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, review of a facility investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly transferred by mechanical lift. This affected two residents (#22 and #44) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 53. Actual Harm occurred on 05/05/24 when two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA's) were transferring Resident #22, who had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers, via mechanical lift to her wheelchair and failed to operate the mechanical lift properly, resulting in Resident #22 falling and sustaining a spiral femur fracture requiring surgery and hospitalization. The resident was assessed to exhibit severe pain with leg movement following the incident and signs/symptoms of pain/distress throughout the morning of 05/06/24 before being transferred to the hospital. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, self-reported incident (SRI) review, review of the police incident report, personnel file review, interviews facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was treated with dignity while care was being provided. This affected one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 07/16/25. Diagnoses included hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, adult failure to thrive, hypertensive chronic kidney disease and personal history of urinary tract infections.Review of the 10/01/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #43 revealed intact cognition. The resident required maximum assistance from staff for transfers and was dependent upon staff for toileting.Review of Resident #43's care plan with a revision date of 10/09/25 revealed an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance and mobility deficits related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed as required for Resident #52. This affected one (Resident# 52) of nine residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 49.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 10/01/25 and a discharge date of 10/17/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to sepsis, morbid obesity, stage IV chronic kidney disease and liver cell carcinoma.Review of the 10/07/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #52 revealed intact cognition. Resident #52 was noted to require moderate assistance to being fully dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADL).Interview on 12/10/25 at 3:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she was unable to provide evidence of a baseline care plan for Resident #52. Review of the 11/22/16 facility policy titled: Resident Directed Care Planning Policy and Procedure revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of the medical record, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided and documented as requested and required for Resident #29. This affected one (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease, obesity, dementia and generalized anxiety disorder.Review of the 11/04/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #29 revealed intact cognition. Resident #29 was noted to require moderate staff assistance with bathing and shower transfer.Review of the 11/15/25 bathing assessment for Resident #29 revealed she preferred a tub bath twice a week on day shift.Review of the care plan for Resident #29 revealed it was last reviewed on 11/17/25. Resident #29 was noted to have activities of daily living (ADL) performance and mobility deficits related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the treatment to Resident #8's right heel was completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #8) out of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic pain, protein calorie malnutrition, and anxiety. A plan of care dated 08/29/25 revealed Resident #8 had a pressure ulcer to right heel. Interventions included but not limited to treatments to be administered as ordered and to monitor for effectiveness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15 which indicated cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #8 had an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI) tracking #264837, interviews, observations and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #61 was not outside the facility without adequate supervision. This affected one (Resident #61) out of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 09/16/25 with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation, dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, insomnia, restlessness and agitation, and chronic pain.A care plan dated 01/01/23 revealed Resident #61 was at risk for injury related to dementia. Resident #61 wanders looking for wife, has impaired safety awareness, and short attention span. Interventions included wander management system to wrist or leg and checked every shift, attempt to redirect when focused on leaving the facility unassisted or without supervision, if the resident attempts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standard infection control precautions during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #16) of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility also failed to maintain proper infection control practices while providing wound care for Resident #8. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25 with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #16 for December 2026 revealed she had an orders for Buspirone 10 milligrams (mg) three times a day for anxiety dated 10/16/25, Gabapentin 300 mg twice daily for nerve pain dated 10/16/25, Memantine 10 mg twice daily for dementia dated 10/16/25, Senna Plus 8.6-50 mg two tablets twice daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespread
  Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of list of COVID positive staff, review of robo call report, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, their representatives, and families were notified timely after confirmation of staff testing positive for COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents in the facility. Findings included: Review of list of COVID positive staff undated revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #319 tested positive for COVID-19 on 03/13/23 and STNA #337 on 03/16/23. Review of robo call report dated 03/20/23 revealed residents, their representatives, and families were not notified until 03/20/23 at 10:36 A.M., of the positive staff member from 03/15/23 and 03/16/23. The message reported the facility had two staff member test positive for COVID in the last week. Review on facilities policy titled Confirmed COVID-19 cases Notification revised 09/2022 revealed all families, residents, and staff would be notified by utilizing the robo-calling, skype, 1:11 phone calls, letters, memos, and direct communication within 72 hours of the known infections.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on self reported incident review, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity by staff members. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the facility self reported incident (SRI) #213229 revealed on 10/21/21 State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #359 was witnessed by staff members speaking to Resident #7 forcefully and pointing her finger at the resident telling Resident #7 to not bother her for assistance when she is with a different resident. Further review of the facility SRI investigation revealed statements obtained by staff witnesses STNA #327, STNA #361 and STNA #322. All STNAs indicated they witnessed STNA #359 talking disrespectfully to Resident #7 when Resident #7 was asking for assistance. Staff indicated STNA #359 pointed her finger and told Resident to not bother her when she is working with another resident. A statement obtained from Resident #7 indicated she was waiting for ambulation assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility self-reported incidents, staff interview, and review of the facility policy on abuse, the facility failed to ensure the results of all abuse allegation investigations were reported in a timely manner. This affected three (#3, #15, and #25) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the open medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 10/27/20. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the progress note dated 02/11/22 at 6:34 A.M. revealed Resident #25 was brought to the nurse's station with a report that she had left the building. Review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) #217752 revealed it was created on 02/10/22 and completed on 03/31/22. On 03/23/23 at 10:25 A.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility self-reported incidents, staff interview, and review of the facility policy on abuse, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse. This affected two (#3 and #13) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the open medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 11/13/20. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder, history of falling, history of transient ischemic attack, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/18/23, revealed Resident #3 had no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) #203299, dated 03/09/21, revealed Resident #3 stated she was thrown into bed and this resulted in a skin tear to her left forearm. There were no named witnesses, no named alleged perpetrators,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH