No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

McKinley Nursing

800 Market Avenue North Suite 1560, Canton, OH 44702 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (330) 456-1014 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 456-1014 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
220 Market Ave S Ste 602 · (330) 265-2008 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
400 Tuscarawas St W Ste 200 · (330) 451-6164 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
906 Tuscarawas St W · (330) 455-2430 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1500 Tuscarawas St W · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms75.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.921.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.491.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.4–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 2.8–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.11
RN hoursweekends
52.3%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 150.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

77 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 66 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, hospital record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to implement comprehensive and individualized fall/safety interventions to prevent falls including a fall with injury for Resident #200. Actual Harm occurred on 09/27/23 when Resident #200, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility and transfers was transferred to the emergency room per family request due to changes in condition. Record review revealed the resident sustained three falls between 09/25/23 and 09/27/23 without evidence of adequate interventions being in place at the time of the falls. Following a second fall on 09/27/23, the resident was picked up off the floor by Central Supply #808, an employee who was not qualified/trained to provide direct resident care. The resident was subsequently diagnosed with non-displaced left rib fractures and re-injury of a previous pelvic fracture. This affected one resident (#200) of three residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNA) had yearly performance evaluations. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the employee files for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #325, CNA #386 and CNA #425 revealed they had not received yearly performance evaluations. CNA #325 was hired on 03/13/25, CNA #386 was hired on 01/15/25 and CNA #425 was hired on 03/04/25. Interview on 04/28/26 at 1:15 P.M. with Human Resources Director (HR) #307 verified yearly performance evaluations had not been completed as required. HR #307 acknowledged the delay and stated they were behind on evaluations but were working to get caught up.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, lunch meal observations, staff interview, and review of diet spreadsheets, resident council minutes and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate portion sizes were served and all components of the meal were served to meet resident needs and preferences. This affected all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified no residents with a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. The facility census was 151.Findings include:1. Interview on 04/19/26 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #75 revealed the menus were not always posted in common areas and the aides were not taking down alternate choices to the kitchen. Resident #75 reported the portion sizes are child-like and he was not receiving enough food. Interview on 04/19/26 at 10:09 A.M. with Resident #99 revealed there were no food substitutions available. Interview on 04/19/26 at 10:12 A.M. with Resident #124 revealed there were no food substitutions available. Interview on 04/19/26 at 12:47 P.M. with Resident #51 revealed he was not receiving enough food at each meal. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of food committee minutes, the facility failed to serve appealing meals at palatable temperatures. This had potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified no residents with a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet order. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the food committee meeting minutes from 11/25/25, 02/24/26, and 03/31/26 revealed residents complaining of cold food.An interview on 04/19/26 at 11:25 A.M. with Resident #12 revealed the food was not served hot enough and was not appealing. An interview on 04/19/26 at 12:26 P.M. with Resident #91 revealed the food was never hot. An interview on 04/19/26 at 1:16 P.M. with Resident #117 revealed the food was not hot. An observation on 04/22/26 at 12:06 P.M. revealed temperatures taken with [NAME] #462 prior to lunch service using a facility digital thermometer revealed the ham and beans were 187 degrees Fahrenheit (F), turnip greens were 190 degrees F, and cornbread was at room temperature. Observations on 04/22/26 of lunch meal service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at regularly scheduled times. This affected all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified no residents with a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet order. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the Resident Meal Times, undated, revealed breakfast was from 8:15 A.M. to 9:20 A.M., lunch was from 12:30 P.M. to 1:35 P.M., and Dinner was from 5:15 P.M. to 6:20 P.M. Service order was [NAME] Unit, Grant Unit, [NAME] Unit, Presidential Unit, Taft Unit, and [NAME] Unit. Review of Food Committee Meeting minutes from 02/24/26 revealed residents complaining of late lunches and trays being left to sit for 15 minutes after arriving to the unit before staff passed them out. The meeting minutes from 11/25/25 revealed meals were not on time. Observation on 04/19/26 from 1:40 P.M. to 2:37 P.M. revealed the lunch meal was delivered late to each of the six units as followed: Observation at 1:40 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified no residents with a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet order. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 from 8:24 A.M. to 9:05 A.M. of the facility kitchen revealed upon entering the kitchen it was observed that the walk-in refrigerator's temperature gauge was at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Food stored inside was warm to touch.Observation of the dish machine area revealed the floors and walls had dried splatter and debris. There were four rubber floor mats that were sticky with various debris stuck to them. There was noted dust on the walls and ceiling by air vents and lights. There were three fans with dust covering the fans. The dish machine had dried splatters and a white colored build up. There was a dried, soiled rag sitting on top of dish machine. There was a notable sour, spoiled odor in the dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #458 revealed there were multiple dumpsters in an enclosed, indoor space. There was a very strong, pervasive, foul odor in the room. There were various debris including plastic gloves, dried leaves, and a tied black trash bag on the floor. In the dumpster area there was also various equipment including two floor cleaners and a plastic wrapped recliner on a wooden pallet. An interview on 04/19/26 at 9:00 A.M. with DM #458 confirmed the pervasive foul odor and garbage and refuse not being properly disposed. DM #458 stated all staff were responsible for keeping the area clean and free of debris. An interview on 04/28/26 at 1:07 P.M. with Dietitian #468 revealed she was only at the facility every other week for one day. Dietitian #468 stated the rest of her work was completed offsite.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility job descriptions and interview the facility failed to ensure effective administration to manage the facility and identify care concerns, implement appropriate and sustainable corrective actions to prevent reoccurrence and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of all 151 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: Review of the Administrator job description, signed by the Administrator but not dated, revealed the position would establish and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safely meet resident's needs in compliance with state and local requirements. The administrator would develop a monitoring system to assure compliance with federal, state and local requirements. The administrator would establish systems to enforce facility policies and procedures, establish operating procedures for physician responsibilities, participate in the scheduling, planning and procuring of materials and information of staff meetings and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was accurately completed. This had the potential to affect all 151 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the facility assessment revised 08/01/25 revealed Former Administrator (FA) #448 was listed as the current administrator for the facility.Additional review of the facility assessment revealed under the section for 'Staffing Plan,' there was a table listing positions including licensed nurses providing direct care, nurse aides, other nursing personnel, other staff needed for behavioral healthcare and services, dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional, food and nutrition services staff and respiratory care services staff. Under the adjacent column 'Total Number Needed or Average or Range' the area was blank. A second table in this section listed staff including licensed nurses, direct care staff and other staff with a notation 'refer to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) minimum staffing rule.' Both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, review of the job description for social services, and staff interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time Licensed Social Worker (LSW). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the personnel file for Social Services Director (SSD) #373 revealed a hire date of 03/11/25. Review of her employee application as well as her resume revealed she did not have a degree in social services.Review of the personnel file for LSW #360 revealed a progressive discipline action form dated 01/09/26 which revealed he had been terminated on 01/09/26. Review of the personnel file for LSW #451 revealed she was hired by the facility on 02/12/26 and separated from the facility on 02/27/26. Interview on 04/20/26 at 9:39 A.M. with Human Resources Director (HR) #307 verified SSD #373 was the only employee in the social services department. She stated SSD #373 was not a Licensed Social Worker (LSW) nor held a bachelor's degree in a human services field.Interview on 04/20/26 at 10:36…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee was in place to identify and address concerns timely and effectively. This had the potential to affect all 151 residents in the facility. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of the facility QAPI minutes and Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) documentation revealed the following plans without continued corrective action or evidence the plan was revised when necessary or changed once identified to be ineffective:1. Review of QAPI meeting minutes dated 04/24/25 revealed action plans for the physical environment/pest control, care plan revisions, falls, leave of absence and dietary services. The plans indicated the department responsible for the corrective action but did not specify a point person on most of the plans. The columns under monthly progress were blank for most of the plans and if not blank, did not contain dates or other information to show when the plan would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 66 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were maintained during medication administration for Resident #50 and during incontinence care for Resident #24. The facility failed to ensure contact precautions were in place for Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure the infection control policy was reviewed annually. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the Legionella water management program comprehensively assessed risk measures for their elderly population. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151.Findings include: 1.Review of the facility's Legionella risk assessment, undated, revealed the facility had a municipal water source. The assessment evaluated the risk of Legionnaires' disease associated with the facility's water systems and supports compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and American…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, review of the facility assessment, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct mandatory training to all staff on the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This affected five out of 11 personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 151 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #464's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/23/25. There was no documented evidence that CNA #464 had received QAPI training as required.Review of CNA #465's personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/06/26. There was no documented evidence that CNA #465 had received QAPI training as required.Review of CNA #466's personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/26/26. There was no documented evidence that CNA #466 had received QAPI training as required.Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #338's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/16/25. There was no documented evidence that LPN #338 had received QAPI training as required.Review of Human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) had at least 12 hours of in-service training annually as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the employee file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #325 revealed a hire date of 03/13/25. Continued review of the employee file revealed CNA #325 had not received 12 hours of in-service training annually as required. Review of the employee file for CNA #386 revealed a hire date of 01/15/25. Continued review of the employee file revealed CNA #386 had not received 12 hours of in-service training annually as required. Review of the employee file for CNA #425 revealed a hire date of 03/04/25. Continued review of the employee file revealed CNA #425 had not received 12 hours of in-service training annually as required. Interview on 04/29/26 at 2:26 P.M. with Human Resources Director (HR) #307 verified the CNA's had not completed the 12 hours of in-service training annually as required. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to conduct care conferences at least quarterly as required. This affected nine residents (#6, #62, #65, #66, #74, #75, #119, #138, and #139) of nine residents reviewed for care planning. Facility census was 151. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #139's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/05/24 and diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 was cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #139's medical record for the last twelve months revealed one care conference completed on 07/31/25. Telephone interview on 04/19/26 at 11:20 A.M. with Resident #139's guardian revealed she was concerned Resident #139 had not had a care conference since July 2025. Interview on 04/21/26 at 2:45 P.M. with MDS/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #379 during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to timely notify the responsible party and physician of changes. This affected four residents (#2, #56, #138 and #153) of five residents reviewed for notification of change. Facility census was 151. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, type two diabetes, dementia with mood disturbance and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment and had two or more falls since the previous assessment without injury. Review of a fall investigation dated 12/31/25 at 2:45 A.M. revealed Resident #56 tried to transfer herself from her wheelchair to her toilet and fell to the floor. The report indicated the nurse practitioner (NP) was notified. Under the report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRI) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of misappropriation of controlled medications. This affected four residents (Residents #1, #3, #47 and #154) of five residents reviewed for controlled substances. The facility census was 151. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and arthritis. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #1 revealed an order for Oxycodone (opioid medication for pain) 10 milligrams (mg) every four hours dated 03/27/26. The medication was to be administered at 1:00 A.M., 5:00 A.M., 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. daily. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 for Resident #1 revealed Oxycodone 10 mg was administered on 04/27/26 at 1:00 A.M., 5:00 A.M., 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRI) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement and follow their policy for allegations of abuse for residents. This affected four residents (Residents #47, #98, #138, #154) of fifteen residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #154 revealed an admission date 05/13/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the lung (cancer), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and back pain. She was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #154 revealed she had an order for Oxycodone (opioid medication for pain) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain dated 12/01/25. Review of the Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record for Resident #154's Oxycodone 5 mg Rx #206039493 revealed 30 tablets had been received on 12/02/25. The first dose was administered on 12/13/25 at 8:15 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of self-reported incident (SRI) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse, misappropriation and injury of unknown origin for residents. This affected four (Residents #47, #98, #138, #154) of fifteen residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 151. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #154 revealed an admission date 05/13/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the lung (cancer), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and back pain. She was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #154 revealed she had an order for Oxycodone (opioid medication for pain) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain dated 12/01/25. Review of the Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record for Resident #154's Oxycodone 5 mg Rx #206039493 revealed 30 tablets had been received on 12/02/25. The first dose was administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed. This affected five (Residents #5, #9, #15, #35 and #107) of 48 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/25/25 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dementia and obstructive reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that stops urine from flowing). Review of Resident #5's physician's orders from March of 2026 revealed she had an indwelling catheter related to obstructive reflux uropathy dated 12/02/25. Review of the nursing progress notes from 03/01/26 through 03/31/26 revealed Resident #5 had a foley catheter. There was no evidence she had any other indwelling devices. Review of the quarterly modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed under section H that Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter. It was also documented she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to formulate a complete baseline care plan timely after admission. This affected 22 residents (#2, #3, #4, #9, #12, #15, #48, #50, #53, #56, #62, #81, #91, #95, #98, #100, #107, #113, #117, #139, #154 and #160) of 62 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census was 151.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/29/25 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, depression anxiety and Crohn's disease. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #53's medical record revealed no baseline care plan could be found. Interviews on 04/22/26 at 9:16 A.M. and on 04/27/26 at 9:28 A.M. with MDS/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #379 revealed she was not responsible for the baseline care plan as floor nurses created this. MDS/LPN #379 verified she was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to formulate an accurate and comprehensive care plan as required. This affected five residents (#2, #38, #47, #91 and #139) of 62 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census was 151.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #139's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/05/24 and diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 was cognitively impaired and received medications including opioids. Review of Resident #139's physician's orders revealed an order dated 07/22/25 for morphine sulfate solution 20 milligrams (mg)/milliLiter (mL), give five mg by mouth every four hours as needed for pain one to 10 and/or dyspnea and an order dated 03/14/26 for admission to hospice services. Review of Resident #139's care plans revealed no care plan was in place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement effective fall interventions and post fall assessments including neurological checks to ensure resident safety. This affected four residents (Resident #2, #42, #56 and #91) of six residents reviewed for falls. Facility census was 151.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/22 and diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety and schizoaffective disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had moderate cognitive impairment and rejected care one to three days in the seven day look-back period. Review of a fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was up at lib and at risk for falls. Review of a fall investigation for 08/05/25 at 2:56 P.M. revealed Resident #42 was heard yelling out in her room. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were provided as required. This affected five residents (#5, #35, #42, #44, and #53) of 62 residents reviewed for physician visits. Facility census was 151.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/22 and diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety and schizoaffective disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had moderate cognitive impairment and rejected care one to three days in the seven day look-back period. Review of the last 12 months of physician visit documentation revealed Resident #42 was seen on 04/24/25, 08/07/25, 09/11/25, 09/25/25 and 03/05/26. Interview on 05/04/26 at 1:55 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there were no other visits to provide regarding Resident #42 and confirmed she was not seen by the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected four (Residents #1, #4, #47 and #117) of 13 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and arthritis. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #1 revealed an order for Oxycodone (opioid medication for pain) 10 milligrams (mg) every four hours dated 03/27/26. The medication was to be administered at 1:00 A.M., 5:00 A.M., 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. daily. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1's cognition was intact. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 for Resident #1 revealed Oxycodone 10 mg was administered as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical soft diet texture was prepared in a form to meet individual resident needs. This affected 29 Residents (#5, #11, #12, #19, #21, #22, #31, #38, #44, #46, #54, #58, #68, #79, #81, #82, #95, #100, #105, #109, #110, #122, #123, #132, #135, #137, #140, #141, and #147) identified as receiving a mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the Diet Spreadsheet for the Spring/Summer menu, dated 2024, revealed a mechanical soft diet would receive ground ham and beans, soft chopped greens, cornbread with margarine, and soft chopped fruit cobbler.Review of the recipe for Ground Ham and Beans, dated 2026, revealed ham would be ground before adding it to the recipe.Observations on 04/22/26 from 12:06 P.M. to 2:38 P.M. of lunch tray service revealed there was no ground, mechanical soft ham and beans prepared for the mechanical soft diets. The residents identified during tray line as receiving a mechanical soft texture received the regular texture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This affected four residents (#5, #47, #56, and #100) out of 62 records reviewed. The facility census was 151.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, type two diabetes, dementia with mood disturbance and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment and had two or more falls since the previous assessment without injury. Review of Resident #56's physician's orders as of 05/04/26 revealed an order dated 04/11/24 for five nursing observations: bowel, bladder, full body, Braden (skin), and fall every evening shift every three months starting on the first [of the month] for one day. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. This affected six residents (#20, #24, #29, #62, #65, and #75) out of 23 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 151.Findings include: Observation of the facility on 04/21/26 from 2:45 P.M. to 3:55 P.M. with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #399 and Housekeeping Director (HD) #450 revealed the following areas of concern: In Resident #20's room, debris was all over the floor. Resident #20, who was in bed at the time of the observation, stated he could not recall when the floor was last vacuumed. In Resident #24's side of her room, debris including personal care wipes were noted under the resident's bed. In Resident #65's part of the room, a pervasive urine odor was noted. In Resident #75's room, the carpeting had large stained areas and debris was scattered all over the floor. In Resident #29's room, the carpeting had large stained areas that were yellow and red and debris was noted on the floor. Resident #29, who was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure consent of psychotropic medications were in place for Resident #2. This affected one Resident (#2) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 151. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/02/26 and diagnoses including dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, recurrent major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, and suicidal ideations. Review of the physician's order dated 03/12/26 revealed Resident #2 was ordered 2 milligrams (mg) Alprazolam (Xanax) three times per day for recurrent major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. This medication order was adjusted on 04/22/26 to 2 mg Xanax two times per day for anxiety and 1 mg Xanax at bedtime for anxiety. Review of Consent for Psychotropic Medications assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was on 25 mg Zoloft in the morning and 2 mg Xanax three time per day. The assessment indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident account management authorization's were signed and witnessed when setting up accounts managed by the facility for residents. This affected three (Residents #56, #62 and #154) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 151. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, anxiety and depression. Review of the Resident Fund Manage Service authorization and agreement to handle resident funds dated 05/08/24 revealed the facility signed the authorization as they were Resident #56's representative payee. There was no witness to this authorization. Interview on 04/22/26 at 3:22 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #413 verified the authorization was not witnessed. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 09/05/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), alcohol induced persisting dementia, anxiety and depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRI) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and/or misappropriation to the State Agency as required. This affected three (Residents #62, #138 and #154) of fifteen residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #154 revealed an admission date 05/13/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the lung (cancer), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and back pain. She was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #154 revealed she had an order for Oxycodone (opioid medication for pain) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain dated 12/01/25. Review of the Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record for Resident #154's Oxycodone 5 mg Rx #206039493 revealed 30 tablets had been received on 12/02/25. The first dose was administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge for Resident #165. This affected one Resident (#165) of five reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #165 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 and discharge date of 07/01/25. Diagnoses include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, psoriasis, anemia, homelessness, anxiety disorder, recurrent major depressive disorder, and patient's noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen due to financial hardship. Review of Discharge Planning assessment dated [DATE] revealed an anticipated length of stay of three months. Barriers to returning home included health, finances, housing, and lack of support. It was noted Resident #165 had numerous health needs with no finances, support system or housing so discharge would not be considered safe. Review of Social Service History and Initial assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was provided a written transfer notice and failed to ensure the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident discharges for Residents #16 and #165. This affected two Residents (#16 and #165) of five reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #165 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 and discharge date of 07/01/25. Diagnoses include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, psoriasis, anemia, homelessness, anxiety disorder, recurrent major depressive disorder, and patient's noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen due to financial hardship. Review of Discharge Planning assessment dated [DATE] revealed an anticipated length of stay of three months. Barriers to returning home included health, finances, housing, and lack of support. It was noted Resident #165 had numerous health needs with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed when residents had a significant change. This affected one (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/27/25 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizophrenia, depression and anxiety. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #41 revealed on 10/29/25 at 4:00 P.M. she was in another resident's room pushing the television and pushing the other resident on the ground. The physician was updated and nursing had received a new order to send her for psychiatric assessment. On 10/30/25 at 9:30 P.M. she was discharged to a psychiatric facility. Further review of the medical record revealed no indication a new PASARR was completed with the significant change in mental status for Resident #41. Interview on 04/21/26 at 9:49 A.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #373 verified a PASARR was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to revise care plans as needed. This affected three residents (#1, #56 and #81) of 62 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census was 151.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 and diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, type two diabetes, dementia with mood disturbance and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment and had two or more falls since the previous assessment without injury. Review of a physician's order dated 01/20/26 revealed an order for non-slip strips applied to the floor in front of Resident #56's recliner chair. Review of a progress note dated 04/06/26 at 10:43 A.M. revealed the interdisciplinary team met and reviewed the recommendation to encourage [Resident #56]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were monitored for safety and effectiveness. This affected one (Resident #35) of seven residents reviewed for monitoring of medications. The facility also failed to ensure to treat resident skin conditions per the physician's order. This affected two (Residents #75 and #100) of three residents reviewed for general skin conditions. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/23/17 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, anxiety, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #35 revealed she had orders for blood pressure medications without parameters for monitoring the blood pressure. Resident #35 had an order for Propanolol 10 milligrams (mg) one time a day dated 03/13/24 and Clonidine 0.1 mg one time a day dated 03/13/24. She also had an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure skin was assessed appropriately and pressure ulcers were treated timely for residents. This affected one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/27/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, heart failure, hypertension and adult failure to thrive. Review of the braden scale assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #41 revealed she was at moderate risk for skin breakdown. Review of the shower sheet for Resident #41 dated 02/13/26 revealed her skin was intact. Review of the skilled nursing assessment dated [DATE] by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #406 revealed Resident #41 did not have any changes in skin integrity and there was no wound care being performed. Review of the nurse practitioner progress note dated 02/16/26 for Resident #41 revealed there was a right lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient interventions were in place to maintain resident nutritional status. This affected three Residents (#2, #41, and #110) of seven reviewed for nutrition services. The facility census was 151. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/02/26 and diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive, generalized anxiety disorder, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and suicidal ideations. Review of weight dated 03/02/26 revealed Resident #2 weighed 184.0 pounds and was weighed in a wheelchair. Review of weight dated 03/12/26 revealed Resident #2 weighed 175.0 pounds and was weighed while standing. Review of weight dated 03/13/26 revealed Resident #2 weighed 173.0 pounds and was weighed while standing. Review of physician's order dated 03/13/26 revealed order for regular diet with regular texture and thin liquids. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain oxygen tubing in a hygienic manner and per standards of practice. This affected three residents (Resident #11, #32 and #42) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Facility census was 151.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/14 and diagnoses including lupus, chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes, depression, dementia with other behavioral disturbance and anxiety. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment and displayed inattention and disorganized thinking. Review of Resident #11's physician's orders revealed an order dated 02/25/26 for oxygen at two liters as needed to maintain oxygen saturation above 88. Call nurse practitioner if oxygen saturation is below 88. Observation on 04/19/26 at 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide comprehensive pre and post dialysis monitoring. This affected one resident (#160) of one resident receiving dialysis at the facility. Facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of Resident #160's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/26 and diagnoses including end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Review of Resident #160's physician orders as of 04/21/26 revealed an order dated 04/17/26 for dialysis: length of treatment time 3.25 hours, type of dialyzer (blank), parameters of dialysis delivery system: electrolyte composition of dialysate (blank), blood flow rate (blank), dialysate flow rate (blank), anticoagulation (blank) target weight (blank); an order dated 04/17/26 for dialysis: check access site for bruit and thrill, record/report abnormalities immediately every shift record + or = and notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy and job descriptions, the facility failed to ensure residents received sufficient and appropriate social services to meet the residents psychosocial and emotional needs. This affected one resident (Resident #138) of 21 reviewed for social services needs. The facility census was 151. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #138 revealed an admission date of 11/25/24 and diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, chronic kidney disease, generalized anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, and essential hypertension. Resident #138's son was listed as a resident representative. Review of the plan of care dated 12/03/24 revealed Resident #138 had mood problem related to dementia with agitation. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, encourage resident involvement with activities of interest as tolerated, meet with resident one on one to encourage resident to verbalize feelings, concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to administer to residents per the physicians' orders. This affected one (Resident #35) of 13 residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/23/17 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, anxiety, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #35 revealed she had orders for Latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma, one drop in both eyes at bedtime dated 03/13/24; Quetiapine 300 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder dated 03/13/24; Restoril 7.5 mg at bedtime for insomnia dated 03/19/25; and Artificial Tears eye drops three times a day for irritated eyes dated 01/12/25. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated from October 2025 through April 2026 for Resident #35 revealed Latanoprost eye drops were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided timely for residents. This affected one (Resident #12) of six residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 151. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/07/26 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic pain and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the dental visits dated from 04/20/25 through 04/20/26 revealed Resident #12 had not been seen by the dentist including visits dated 02/19/26 and 04/07/26. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #12 revealed an order to be seen by the dentist dated 02/09/26. Resident #12 also had an order for Orajel 2x Toothache and Gum Mouth/Throat dated 03/20/26. The nursing staff were to apply to affected tooth every eight hours as needed for tooth pain. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-07 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with hospice services for residents to ensure safe and person-centered care. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 151.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure and chronic pain. Review of the care plan dated 04/05/24 for Resident #1 revealed the care plan had not been updated to reflect he was receiving hospice services or end of life care.Review of the hospice enrollment form dated 03/31/26 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to hospice for chronic respiratory failure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was receiving hospice services.Review of the facility's general hospice binder revealed Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that medications and showers were accurately documented. This affected two residents (#24, #31) of two residents reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility census was 156. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24, revealed an admission date of 06/13/25. Diagnoses included: other fracture of upper and lower end of left fibula sequela, diabetes, morbid obesity, hypertension, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, diabetic ulcer, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, and idiopathic neuropathy. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. No behaviors were observed during the look back period. The resident was assessed to require a wheelchair for mobility and to be independent with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible. This affected one resident (#25) of 156 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 156. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed admission to facility on 09/06/24 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, morbid obesity, and left lower leg Tri malleolar (ankle) fracture. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment completed on 09/23/25 revealed Resident #25 had delusional and disorganized thinking, used a walker to navigate facility, and required supervision or light touching with activities of daily living and grooming or bathing. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment completed on 09/23/25 revealed Resident #25 had moderate cognitive deficit (forgetful and distractable). Further record review revealed Resident #25 was a high fall risk and had two recent falls at the facility on 10/28/25 and 09/23/25. Observation and interview on 11/05/25 between 1:40 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, review of resident council meeting minutes, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were prepared in advance and updated periodically and failed to ensure residents received the correct portion sizes based on the menus. This had the potential to affect all 154 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 12/31/24 revealed the food committee meeting was not held on this day due to the absence of the Dietary Manager. The council voted to reschedule the food committee meeting as soon as possible. Review of the facility menu (in January 2025) revealed the facility was utilizing the menu for spring and summer 2024. The date on the top of the menu for 01/13/25, revealed the menu was to be used for 07/22/24. It was also noted that residents were supposed to receive eight ounces of spaghetti and meat sauce. Observation on 01/13/25 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #202 had utilized a regular-non measurable serving spoon to place one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed maintain a sanitary kitchen and food storage areas and failed to ensure infection control was maintained while serving the lunch meal. This affected all residents who resided in the facility, as the facility identified all residents as receiving kitchen services. The facility census was 154. Findings Include: 1. Observation of the facility kitchen on 01/13/25 from 9:20 A.M. through 9:40 A.M. revealed the facility kitchen floors were scattered with torn sugar packets, pieces of old discarded food, crumbs, and dark sticky substances were covering parts of the floor. Several walls were noted to have dried up liquids that were previously splashed from food or drinks. Observation of the facility's chemical dishwasher revealed the top to be covered with dust, an abundance of what appeared to be crumbs from food, two dirty wash cloths, and a dried-up dirty sponge. The kitchen also had a large light with the name echo lab used to kill gnats and directly under the echo lab light, the facility was noted to have soup bowls on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents. This affected one resident (Resident #72) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 154. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 11/26/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type one, acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, major depressive disorder, and noninfectious gastroenteritis. Review of Resident #72's care plan dated 01/07/25 revealed the resident displayed behavioral symptoms not directed toward others as evidenced by defecating on the floor and in the trash can instead of utilizing the bedside commode that was provided for him. Review of Resident #72's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required supervision and touch assistance for toileting hygiene and showering and bathing. The assessment indicated the resident utilized a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of pest control customer service reports, the facility failed to eradicate cockroaches from Resident #72's room. This affected one resident (#72) out of three residents reviewed for pest control. The facility census was 154. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 11/26/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type one, acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, major depressive disorder, and noninfectious gastroenteritis. Review of Resident #72's care plan dated 01/07/25 revealed the resident displayed behavioral symptoms not directed toward others as evidenced by defecating on the floor and in the trash can instead of utilizing the bedside commode that was provided for him. Review of Resident #72's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact required supervision and touch assistance for tilting hygiene and showering and bathing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure cinnamon rolls were properly prepared to ensure palatability and an appetizing appearance. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Observation on 03/27/24 at 12:28 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #303 revealed Resident #6 had eaten approximately 10% of his lunch tray. Observation of the uneaten cinnamon roll revealed the roll, still covered with clear plastic, was approximately the size of a 50-cent piece in diameter and the texture was hard and crunchy. During interview on 03/27/24 at 12:29 P.M., STNA #303 revealed residents had complained that they were unable to eat the cinnamon rolls because they were too hard and appeared overcooked. STNA #303 verified Resident #6's cinnamon roll appeared overcooked and was hard throughout. During interview on 03/27/24 at 12:31 P.M. Resident #6 stated he didn't eat his cinnamon roll because it was hard. During interview on 03/27/24 at 12:34 P.M., Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control precautions when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #320 did not properly dispose of a used insulin syringe with needle. This had the potential to affect 31 residents (#3, #7, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40) of 31 residents residing on [NAME] Hall. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Observation on 03/27/24 at 12:40 P.M. revealed a used insulin syringe, with the sheath pulled over the needle, lying on the floor approximately five feet from the nursing station. This surveyor continued observation. At 12:45 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the needle was lying on the floor and then retrieved it, without donning gloves, and walked approximately 20 feet to the location of the medication cart and placed the syringe into the sharps disposal container (rigid,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a timely discharge/transfer and failed to provide the resident or resident representative with required documentation upon discharge. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge/transfer. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/04/20 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, asthma, and the use of anticoagulant therapy. The resident was discharged to another nursing facility on 03/06/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 01/01/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition with delusions, physical and verbal behaviors, and rejection of care noted. a. Review of the medical record revealed the resident's Discharge Planning form, dated 03/06/24 and completed by Social Services Designee #301, revealed there was no resident or resident representative signature. During interview on 03/26/24 at 11:56 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary which included a recapitulation (concise summary) of the resident's stay at the facility, was completed. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/04/20 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, asthma, and the use of anticoagulant therapy. The resident was discharged to another nursing facility on 03/06/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 01/01/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition with delusions, physical and verbal behaviors, and rejection of care noted. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence that the discharge summary was completed at the time of Resident #1's discharge on [DATE]. During interview on 03/27/24 at 10:39 A.M., the DON confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the services of a registered nurse were used for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 150 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of facility staffing schedules revealed on 01/01/24 there was no evidence the services of a registered nurse (RN) were used for at least eight consecutive hours on this date. The schedule reflected there was no RN scheduled for, or present in the building during this entire day. Interview with the Administrator on 03/02/24 at 3:10 P.M. confirmed the facility did not have a registered nurse scheduled or working on 01/01/24. The facility was unable to provide any evidence to support a registered nurse worked in the facility on this date. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00150409.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility menu spread sheets, review of the printed tray cards, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food portions were served to meet the individual needs of Resident #143 who was ordered double portions, and failed to ensure proper food portions were served to all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except Resident #37 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 147. Findings include: 1. Observation of the lunch meal trayline on 12/12/23 from 11:18 A.M. to 12:55 P.M. with Dietary Cook/Supervisor (DC/S) #413 revealed [NAME] #419 used one number-eight, gray handled ( four ounce) scoop to dish out the regular and mechanical soft turkey [NAME] and one number-12, green handled (two and two-third ounce) scoop to dish the puree turkey [NAME] and the puree mashed sweet potatoes. Review of facility Fall and Winter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner when a dietary staff member with artificial nails was observed not wearing gloves during tray line. This had the potential to affect 146 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#37) as not receiving anything by mouth. The facility census was 147. Findings include: Observation of the tray line on 12/12/23 from 11:18 A.M. to 12:55 P.M. with Dietary Cook/Supervisor (DC/S) #413 revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #432 had long, artificial nails with a three dimensional nail charm attached to the right fourth finger. DA #432 was not wearing gloves to cover the artificial nails and was setting up the trays on trayline for the lunch meal service. Interview with the Administrator on 12/12/23 at 3:38 P.M. revealed gloves should be worn by any dietary employee who has artificial nails, and DA #432 should have been wearing gloves to cover the artificial nails while on tray line. Review of undated facility policy Personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to notify Resident #200's family and physician of changes in the resident's condition. This affected one resident (#200) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: Review of Resident #200's hospital documentation dated 09/15/23 indicated the [AGE] year-old female presented with ongoing pain following a fall. The resident fell at home 09/14/23 and was evaluated in the emergency department (ER). She was diagnosed with a left superior pubic ramus fracture and possible left inferior pubic ramus fracture. The resident was neurovascularly intact, alert and oriented, and able to bear some weight but with pain. Review of Resident #200's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including a fracture of the superior rim of the left pubis, weakness and major depressive disorder. A plan of care, created 09/19/23 revealed Resident #200 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, job qualification review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #200 was transferred by an employee who was qualified to do so following a fall. This affected one resident (#200) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #200's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #200 had diagnoses including a fracture of the superior rim of the left pubis, weakness and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #200's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive two person assist for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing as well as limited two person assist for transfers. Review of Resident #200's progress note dated 09/27/23 at 7:29 A.M. indicated at 4:00 A.M. the resident came out of her room and thought it was morning. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, hospital record review, and interview the facility failed to identify and provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to Resident #200 related to a substance abuse disorder to assist the resident to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being following admission for rehabilitation/treatment of a fall with fracture. This affected one resident (#200) of three residents reviewed for safety/falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #200's hospital documentation dated 09/15/23 indicated the [AGE] year-old female presented with ongoing pain following a fall. The resident fell at home 09/14/23 and was evaluated in the emergency department (ER). She was diagnosed with a left superior pubic ramus fracture and possible left inferior pubic ramus fracture. She had a dog at home, and she did not want to leave the dog alone, so she had insisted on going home with pain medication and a walker. She returned with pain that she was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on facility self-reported incident review, record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from staff to resident verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Review of facility self-reported incident (SRI) #237331 revealed on 07/21/23 a verbal altercation occurred between Resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205. The incident was immediately reported to the shift supervisor who notified the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). The incident was reported to Ohio Department of Health on 07/21/23. Further review of the facility SRI and facility investigation revealed a statement from Resident #1 was obtained on 07/24/23 which indicated LPN #205 entered her room with medications, inhaler, and cup of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-01 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of schedules and interview, the facility failed to ensure employees who completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation program successfully completed state testing within the appropriate time frames. This had the potential to affect all 148 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 04/25/23 at 10:25 A.M., review of personnel files with Human Resources (HR) Director #520 verified Helping Hand #528 completed a nurse aide training course on 10/26/22. HR #520 stated Helping Hand #528 had taken part of the state test but had not successfully completed both portions of the two part test. HR Director #520 indicated Helping Hand #528 remained on the schedule as a nursing assistant. On 04/25/23 at 2:13 P.M., HR Director #520 provided the name of a second aide, Helping Hand #541 who completed her nurse aide training classes on 11/22/22 but broke her wrist and was off work from January 2023 to 03/22/23 and was still working as an aide. Review of schedules from 03/25/23 to 04/25/23 revealed the following: Helping Hand #528…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect the 147 residents receiving food from the facility. The facility identified Resident #55 as receiving no food by mouth. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen during the initial tour on 04/24 23 starting at 9:41 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #519 revealed the following concerns: • The tiled floors were discolored with ground in dirt and wax, giving a darkened appearance. The grout between the tiles was also darkened and needing cleaned. • The microwave was dirty with food spills inside • The dish-machine needed to be wiped down. There were crumbs and dust on top with detergent spills down the sides. • The spice table had dried spills down the side. • The stove top was dusty/dirty, and the knobs of the stove were sticky to touch. • The ice machine had a pink gritty substance on the inside of the lid. • There was a large container of cereal not labeled or dated in dry storage and a bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation of the facility's dumpster area on 04/24 23 at 9:41 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #519 revealed the following concerns: a. Three of six dumpster lids were not closed. b. There was a large bag of trash outside the dumpsters with miscellaneous gloves, papers, and other trash on the ground. DM #519 verified the above findings at the time of observation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within resident reach. This affected one resident (Resident #76) of 32 residents observed for call light accessibility. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Observation on 04/24/23 at 10:37 A.M. revealed Resident #76's call light was coiled up and zip tied together, hanging against the wall and out of the resident's reach. Interview at the time of the observation with Resident #76 revealed she did not know how long the call light had been hanging that way. Interview on 04/24/23 at 10:40 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #556 confirmed Resident #76's call light was coiled up and zip tied hanging against the wall, out of Resident #76's reach. LPN #556 verified Resident #76 would not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on self-reported incident review, medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were not misappropriated by staff members. This affected three residents (Residents #68, #99 and #111) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) #230289 with a created date of 12/19/22 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #701 alleged Registered Nurse (RN) #658 was possibly misappropriating resident narcotic medications. Further review of SRI #230289 and the facility investigation found that RN #658 misappropriated narcotic medications from Residents #68, #99 and #111. Further review of SRI #230289 revealed RN #658 was also identified in an SRI for another facility in 2017 with the allegation of misappropriation of resident narcotics. The SRI was substantiated and RN #658 was terminated from the other facility 1. Facility investigation determined RN #658 misappropriated three narcotic medications on 12/17/22 from Resident #68.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received the assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected two residents (Resident #89 and #143) of three residents reviewed for ADLs. The census was 148. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 09/14/22. Diagnoses included the need for assistance with personal care, vitreous hemorrhage (blood in the space between the eye's lens and retina), bilateral cataracts, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and diabetes with neuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/31/23, revealed the resident had moderately intact cognition, severely impaired vision, and minimally impaired hearing. Behaviors included delusions and verbal behavioral symptoms directed at others. The resident required the extensive assistance of two staff for transfers. The resident was totally dependent for locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene. The extensive assistance of one staff was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to monitor resident weights as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #138) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Review of Resident #138's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/12/22 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease with dementia, hypothyroidism and hypertension. Review of the physician's orders dated 11/12/22 revealed to obtain weekly weights for four weeks then monthly. Review of Resident #138's weight records revealed weights were obtained on 11/12/22 and then on 12/02/22. There was no evidence of any additional weights obtained between 11/12/22 and 12/02/22. On 04/27/23 at 11:35 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing verified weights were not obtained per physician's orders following admission. Review of the facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention with a revision date of 08/2008 indicated nursing staff will measure resident weight on admission and weekly for three weeks thereafter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This affected 166 of 167 residents residing in the facility. Resident #78 was identified as ordered nothing by mouth to eat or drink. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen was conducted during the initial tour on 01/12/20 from 8:30 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager #102. The following concerns were observed and verified with Dietary Manager #102 at that time: 1. There was a soiled cleaning cloth hanging on the side of a plastic storage container. Inside the storage container were clean scoops and a zip-lock bag of saltine crackers. The Dietary Manager #102 indicated the container was for resident snacks and verified the soiled cloth should not be there. 2. There was a steel pan with slices of bread covered with plastic wrap which was not dated. Dietary Manger #102 indicated they were drying the bread for bread crumbs but verified the bread should have been dated. 3. There was a drain in front of the ovens with a steel cover which was visibly dirty underneath with food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents on the Taft unit with appropriate water containers. This affected Resident #68 and Resident #316 and affected 25 of 26 other residents on the Taft unit, Residents #10, #29, #30, #33, #42, #43, #52, #61, #83, #85, #86, #88, #89, #95, #96, #104, #105, #117, #126, #135, #136, #146, #160, #162, and #420. Resident #9 received thickened liquids and was not permitted a water pitcher/cup. The facility census was 167. Finding include: Observation on 01/12/20 from 9:58 A.M. through 11:51 A.M. revealed residents on the Taft unit did not have water pitchers or dedicated cups for water in their rooms. No individual water pitchers or large cups were noted in the common areas. A water pitcher with small clear plastic cups was at the nurse's station for residents to get water. Interview on 01/12/20 at 10:32 A.M. with Resident #68 revealed she saved used pop bottles to put water in for her room. An observation at that time revealed Resident #68 had a pop bottle with water on her over bed table. No water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-15 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all state tested nurse aides (STNAs) completed twelve hours of in-service education annually. This affected one of three STNA's reviewed who had been employed greater than one year. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents residing on the Taft unit, Residents #9, #10, #29, #30, #33, #42, #43, #52, #61, #68, #83, #85, #86, #88, #89, #95, #96, #104, #105, #117, #126, #135, #136, #146, #160, #162, #316 and #420. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of the personnel record for STNA #407 revealed a hire date of 04/08/16. There was no documentation found to indicate STNA #407 had received at least 12 hours of continuing education for the last annual period of 04/08/18 through 04/08/19 as required. On 01/15/20 at 1:35 P.M., interview with the Human Resource (HR) Director confirmed STNA #407 did not have any paper documenting of continuing education in the personnel file for the review period. The HR Director said staff also uses the computer based education program called Relias to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to assess, monitor and treat Resident #20's left lower leg scar and wounds. This affected one out of three residents reviewed for skin issues. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, traumatic brain injury following a motor vehicle accident, schizophrenia, dementia, morbid obesity and cognitive communication deficit. An interview with Resident #20 on 01/12/20 at 10:41 A.M. indicated he had sustained an injury to his lower left leg and had developed a clot from a car accident in the past. An observation at the time of the interview revealed Resident #20's left lower leg had a large discolored scarred area (approximately 4 centimeters wide by 6 centimeters long) with two scabbed areas on each end of the scar. The scarred skin had skin that was peeling off in powdery flakes. Review of Resident #20's nursing assessments and physician assessments dated 09/01/2019 to 01/13/20 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #47's and Resident #78's pressure ulcer treatments were provided as ordered by the physician. This affected two out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral vascular accident (stroke)affecting the non-dominant side, respiratory disease, heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident #47's wound assessment dated [DATE] indicated a stage III pressure ulcer (a full-thickness skin loss involving damage or necrosis of subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to underlying fascia and presents as a deep crater with or without tunneling or undermining of adjacent tissue) on the left heel measuring 0.5 centimeters (cm) long by 2.0 cm wide and 0.2 cm deep. The wound assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were dated when opened. This affected one Resident (#110) out of five residents reviewed for insulin storage on the [NAME] unit. The facility census was 167. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #110 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of physician orders for January 2020 revealed Resident #110 was ordered Levemir (insulin) 26 units, injected subcutaneously (SQ), at bedtime, Novolog (insulin) 25 units SQ in the morning, 13 units SQ in the afternoon, and 16 units SQ in the evening. Observation on 01/15/20 at 11:06 A.M. of the medication cart on the [NAME] unit revealed open vials of Levemir and Novolog insulin for Resident #110. There were no dates on these insulin vials to indicate the date they were opened. Interview on 01/15/20 at 11:06 A.M. with Registered Nurse #600 verified Resident #110's Levemir and Novolog insulin vials were open and undated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #110's medical record included documentation the resident was provided wine per the physician order. This finding affected one (Resident #110) of thirty-five resident records reviewed for documentation. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, diabetes and anxiety. Review of Resident #110's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #110's physician order dated 05/13/19 indicated the resident may have a glass of wine with dinner once a day as needed and the family was to provide the wine. Review of Resident #110's medication administration record (MAR) from 01/01/20 to 01/15/20 did not reveal evidence the resident received the wine. Interview on 01/12/20 at 12:39 P.M. with Resident #110 indicated she should have wine every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-15 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #78 and #167 were notified in writing the reason for the discharge in an easily understood language. This affected two (Residents #78 and #167) of four resident records reviewed for hospitalization and had the potential to affect all 168 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aspiration pneumonia, weakness and anemia. Review of Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] confirmed the resident had a memory problem. Review of Resident #78's progress note dated 12/10/19 at 9:45 A.M. indicated the emergency technicians transported the resident to the hospital and a report was given to the resident's significant other. Resident #78's medical record did not contain evidence the resident or family was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-15 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #78 and #167 were provided written notification of the bed-hold policy upon discharge to the hospital. This affected two of four resident records reviewed for hospitalization and had the potential to affect any of the 168 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aspiration pneumonia, weakness and anemia. Review of Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] confirmed the resident had a memory problem. Review of Resident #78's progress note dated 12/10/19 at 9:45 A.M. indicated the emergency technicians transported the resident to the hospital and a report was given to the resident's significant other. Resident #78's medical record did not contain evidence the resident or family were notified in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MCKINLEY HOLDCOOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2024
MCKINLEY OPCOOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF93%since 06/30/2024
ZIMBERG, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL7%since 06/30/2024
LEKOVO DIOR BARKINGSOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2024
KNAPP, ROBERTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2024
MCCLAIN, BRIANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 4%Other / private 2%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$260per resident / day
operating cost
$7,898per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365655. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next