The Pavilion at Edgefield for Nursing and Rehabili
836 West 34th Street NW, Canton, OH 44709 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (330) 492-7131 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 33.4–63.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.8–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for Resident #25 to prevent the development of an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer. The facility also failed to accurately assess the wound as a facility acquired pressure ulcer. Actual Harm occurred on 11/27/23 when Resident #25, who was at risk for pressure ulcers and required staff assistance for bed mobility and incontinence care was found to have an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum without evidence of adequate interventions to prevent the development or timely identify the pressure ulcer prior to it being unstageable. This affected one resident (#25) of three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure snack items were available at all times for residents. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents who received meals/snacks from the kitchen. Findings Include:Observations on 05/11/26 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:41 A.M. during the initial facility tour revealed no snack trays/storage visible anywhere on all three residential hallways.Observation on Monday, 05/11/26, during the kitchen tour at 10:10 A.M. revealed in the dry food stock room the shelf was empty of snack items for the residents.Interview on 05/11/26 at 10:15 A.M. with the Dietary Manager #260 confirmed the shelf in the dry food stock room was empty of snack items. The Dietary Manager #260 stated food ordering was completed on Mondays, and the food delivery was on Thursdays, with the food items being stocked and put away in the kitchen on Thursdays. There were snack items available as of last Friday, though the Dietary Manager stated they were not sure why the shelf was empty of snack items for the residents.Interview on 05/11/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were maintained in three of three linen closets for sanitary linen storage. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:An observation was conducted on 02/17/26 at 10:50 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #329 of the second floor clean storage linen closet. A very large pile of socks was on the ground in the closet with a dirty pair of shoes on top of the socks. Multiple items of clothing, hospital gowns and bedsheets were on the ground, and various items of trash were sitting on shelving units with clean linens. An interview with CNA #329 at the time of the observation confirmed the findings. An observation on 02/17/26 at 11:00 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #382 of the first floor 100 hall clean linen closet revealed there were multiple bedsheets, trash bags and various Styrofoam cups and plastic bags on the ground. There were also Styrofoam cups and plastic bags of trash sitting on the shelves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on observation, medical record review, review of witness statements, review of mechanical lift manual, interview, and review of facility plan of correction documentation, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lift equipment was maintained in a safe and working condition to prevent an avoidable fall for Resident #23. This affected one (Resident #23) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 04/25/16 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, metabolic encephalopathy, obesity, pseudobulbar affect, altered mental status, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain syndrome.Review of the activities of daily living (ADL) care plan revised on 02/02/21 revealed Resident #23 had an ADL self-care performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of kitchen staff education, review the owner's manual for the facility dishwasher, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 09/15/25 at 9:55 A.M. of the dishwasher machine revealed the dishwasher was a low temperature dishwasher. When asked if they check the sanitizer of the dishwasher, the surveyor was told no by Dietary Aide #990. Dietary Aide #990 stated she has never checked the sanitizer for the dishwasher since she started. Dietary Aide #990 stated she had worked at the facility for a few months. Interview on 09/15/25 at 10:00 A.M. with Dietary Aide #200 revealed periodically he will check the sanitizer solution, but not every day. He stated when the dishwasher machine gets built up with calcium then he knows the sanitizer solution is out and needs to be changed. Observation on 09/15/25 at 10:05 A.M. of the three-sink sanitizer water revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure accuracy of code status and educate staff on the location of the resident current code status. This affected six (#01, #10, #12, #15, #27 and #32) of 24 residents reviewed. The census was 63.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed a 05/01/25 admission date with diagnoses including dementia, fracture of left femur, emphysema, severe protein calorie malnutrition, disorders of psychological development, Alzheimer's disease, ataxia, muscle weakness, varus deformity left hip, bradycardia, joint implants, vitamin D deficiency, abnormal findings of lung fields, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cataract, elevated white blood cell count, anxiety, cataracts, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, tremor, insomnia, scoliosis, kyphosis, tremor, history of falling, and hypothyroidism. Review of a 06/26/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment included the resident was severely impaired for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a clean environment free of cigarette butts, trash, damaged drywall, molding, wallpaper and dirty floors. This affected five residents (#5, #12, #13, #27 and #67) of 63 residents residing in the facility. The census was 63.Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/15/25 at 11:20 A.M. of Resident #5's room revealed the molding in the bathroom was coming off the wall by the shower and door. The wall was marred. Observation on 09/18/25 at 9:24 A.M. of Resident #5's room revealed the molding was coming off the wall in the bathroom to the left of the shower and the right wall walking in. There was a plastic surface on the wall that was coming off and taped with thick silver duck tape. The wall was plastered white and not painted to the left of the medicine cabinet. The lower wall sink side was scraped up. The wall was also damaged and scraped up with the paint off. Interview on 09/18/25 at 9:44 A.M. with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide required and complete bed hold and Ombudsman notifications for transferred and/or discharged residents. The affected four (#04, #56, #79, and #81) of four residents reviewed for bed hold and ombudsman notifications. The facility census was 63.Findings include:1.Review of medical record of Resident #04 revealed admission to facility on 11/07/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, lung disease, contracture (deformity) of right hand, heart disease, anemia (low blood count), chronic back pain, high blood pressure, degenerative joint disorder of cervical (neck) and lumbar (mid back) regions. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed transfer and admission to the hospital on [DATE], 07/26/25, and 08/24/25. Further record review revealed notification of bed hold status provided to the resident's representative and Resident #04 via certified mail for the hospitalization on 05/24/25 and 08/24/25. Review of the Bed Hold Days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for a dependent resident. This affected one (#10) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 63.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/24/25, revealed the Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident's mobility device was a wheelchair. Observation on 09/18/25 at 1:26 P.M. revealed Resident #10 was lying in bed. The resident's call light was observed draped over his recliner and not within reach of the resident. Observation on 09/18/25 at 3:28 P.M. revealed Resident #10 was lying in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide education on psychotropic drug use, risk, benefits, and side effects to residents. This affected one (#01) of the five residents reviewed for psychotropic drug use. The facility census was 63.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record of Resident #01 revealed admission to facility on 06/25/25 with diagnoses including pneumonia related to inhalation of food and vomit, diabetes, vascular disease, heart disease, kidney disease, fatty liver, high blood pressure, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, overactive bladder, anxiety, fibromyalgia (chronic pain to nerve endings), and anemia (low blood count).Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed a general psychotherapies consent signed on admission to facility on 06/25/25 by Resident #01. The consent stated medication management may involve the risk of physical side effects, which may increase over time and/or persist after the conclusion of my treatment. I understand that I am encouraged to talk to my treating clinician(s) about any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the transfer and discharge of a resident was documented in the medical record. The facility also failed to communicate appropriate information to the receiving facility. This affected one (#81) of four residents reviewed for inappropriate discharge. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was admitted from home with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of unspecified bronchus, secondary malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, left hip arthritis, history of pulmonary embolism, acquired absence of lung, and anxiety disorder. At the time of admission, Resident #81 was a hospice patient. Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed a care plan dated 06/09/25. The care plan did not address discharge planning for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive resident specific care plans and include resident and resident representative involvement in the care planning process. for Residents #04 and #15. The affected two (#04, #15) of 27 residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The facility census was 63.Findings include:1.Review of medical record of Resident #04 revealed admission to facility on 11/07/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, lung disease, contracture (deformity) of right hand, heart disease, anemia (low blood count), chronic back pain, high blood pressure, degenerative joint disorder of cervical (neck) and lumbar (mid back) regions. Review of the Minimum Data Sets 3.0 (MDS) assessment tool revealed completion of MDS 3.0 quarterly assessment on 12/24/24, quarterly assessment 03/24/25, annual assessment on 06/04/25, and quarterly assessment on 08/12/25. Review of Resident #04 Care Conference Summary Sheet 2.0 dated 01/07/25 revealed Resident #04's family and Resident #04 were not in attendance;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide personal hygiene care to a resident dependent on staff for provision of care. This affected one (#13) of six residents reviewed for personal hygiene care. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed a 11/25/23 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypertension and anxiety. The resident had a 11/25/23 activity of daily living self care performance deficit plan of care related to Alzheimer's, anxiety, dementia, and psychoactive drug use. Interventions included the resident will accept assistance during bathing and/or showering. The resident had an 11/21/24 order for placement on secured memory care unit for therapeutic environment. Review of the 07/16/25 Quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. Review of nurse notes May 2025 through September 2025 revealed no bathing or nail care refusals. Review of showers revealed no documented refusals of showers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44's bilateral lower leg (BLL) wraps were applied as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#44) of two residents reviewed for edema and non-pressure skin conditions. The facility census was 63.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 02/13/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, left bundle branch block, lymphedema, edema, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/08/25, revealed Resident #44's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 08, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the Care Plan, dated 3/11/25, revealed Resident #44 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to edema and fragile skin with the intervention to apply ACE wraps to bilateral lower extremities in the morning and to be removed in the evening, Review of physician order, dated 3/12/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. This affected on (#22) of two residents reviewed for communication and sensory issues. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, multiple fractures of ribs, left side, seizures, mild cognitive impairment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-Cell type in remission, small cell B-Cell lymphoma, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, essential tremor, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia unspecified without behavior disturbance, personal history of healed traumatic fracture, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of care plan for Resident #22 revealed he had impaired communication related to anxiety, cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe from accidents, hazards and adequate supervision was provided as needed to residents. The facility failed to properly secure Resident #22 in his wheelchair during transportation and failed to provide safety measures and neurological checks for Resident #15 following a fall. This affected two (#15, #22) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 63.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/20/17. Diagnoses included but were not limited to atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, multiple fractures of ribs, left side, seizures, mild cognitive impairment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-Cell type in remission, small cell B-Cell lymphoma, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, essential tremor, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia unspecified without behavior disturbance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents who required supplemental oxygen with the needed support. This affected one (#34) of one resident who was reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census 63. Findings include: Review of the open medical records for Resident #34 revealed a readmission date 10/26/25. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion and shortness of breath. Review of the physician orders for September 2025 revealed continuous oxygen at four liters via nasal cannula every shift. Review of the plan of care dated 04/15/24 revealed Resident #34 had an impaired respiratory status related to hypoxia, respiratory failure, shortness of breath and sleep apnea. Interventions included oxygen via nasal cannula at four liters continuously and treatments as ordered by the physician. Observation on 09/15/25 at 3:04 P.M. of Resident #34 revealed she was lying in bed with her oxygen nasal cannula tubing on. Observation of the oxygen concentrator revealed the oxygen concentrator was not on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to recognize and address pain promptly when there was a change in condition. This affected one (#73) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 63. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 04/24/25 . Diagnoses included but were not limited to acute diastolic heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute pulmonary edema, ulcerative pancolitis without complications, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis right shoulder, mood disorder, and dementia in other diseases.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. A score of 13-15 would indicate cognitive intactness. The resident was assessed to have no behavioral issues or wandering behaviors. The MDS revealed him to be occasionally incontinent.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical provider follow-up to monthly pharmacist recommendation for gradual dose reduction (GDR). This affected three (#01, #03, and #04) of five residents reviewed for GDR. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #01 revealed admission to facility on 06/25/25 with diagnoses including pneumonia related to inhalation of food and vomit, diabetes, vascular disease, heart disease, kidney disease, fatty liver, high blood pressure, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, overactive bladder, anxiety, fibromyalgia (chronic pain to nerve endings), and anemia (low blood count).Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) of Resident #01 revealed monthly pharmacy reviews completed on 06/26/25, 07/09/,25, 08/05/25, and 09/02/25 with recommendations made by pharmacist on 06/26/25, 07/09/25, and 09/02/25. Further review revealed detailed recommendations made by the pharmacist to the medical provider on 06/26/25 for Resident #01. There was no documentation of the specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with lost or damaged dentures for dental services, or provide documentation of why a referral did not take place within three days. The facility also failed to provide a policy identifying those circumstances when the loss or damage of dentures is the facility's responsibility and may not charge a resident for the loss or damage of dentures determined in accordance with facility policy to be the facility's responsibility. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/20/2017. Diagnoses included but were not limited to atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, multiple fractures of ribs, left side, seizures, mild cognitive impairment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-Cell type in remission, small cell B-Cell lymphoma, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, essential tremor, major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food choices related to needs and preferences were honored. This affected two (#27, #1) of two residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb, chronic ulcer of right lower limb, chronic heart failure, multiple sclerosis, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #27, dated 08/21/25, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment revealed the resident required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 09/22/25 at 12:55 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed she did not have a good lunch because she orders omelets every day for lunch and hasn't had one for two days. The resident stated she complained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ice water was provided to residents between meals. This affected one (#10) of two residents reviewed for hydration/nutrition. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/24/25, revealed the Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 09/18/25 at 1:26 P.M. revealed Resident #10 was lying in bed with no ice water or other drink located on his bedside table. Observation on 09/18/25 at 3:28 P.M. revealed Resident #10 was lying in bed, tearful and requesting to be pulled up in his bed. Further observation revealed there was no ice water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record in the area of behaviors. This affected one (#12) resident of 27 resident records reviewed. The census was 63.Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a 05/17/25 admission with diagnoses including dementia, cerebral infarction, attention and concentration deficit, chronic kidney disease stage 2, abscess of breast and nipple, leiomyoma of uterus, restlessness and agitation, hypothyroidism, anemia, hypercholesterolemia, cognitive communication deficit, Vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, difficulty in walking, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, insomnia, muscle weakness, and chronic pain.Review of the 08/08/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making, inattention continuously, behaviors continuously present for disorganized thinking and altered level of consciousness. Wandering behavior occurs daily. The resident resided on the secure locked unit.On 09/16/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care communication between Resident #10's hospice provider and the facility. This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for hospice care. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/24/25, revealed the Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of physician order, dated 09/16/25, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to hospice services. Interview on 09/18/25 at 2:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #10's electronic medical record (EMR) did not contain any hospice communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the infection preventionist attended quarterly Quality Assurance meetings. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The census was 63.Findings include: Review of the Quality Assurance (QA)meeting sign in sheets revealed meetings were held 10/08/24, 01/07/25, 04/05/25, and June 2025. There was no evidence the facility's Infection Control Preventionist participated in the QA meetings other than in June 2025. Interview on 09/23/25 at 1:00 P.M. with Registered Nurse #500 revealed she has been the facility Infection Preventionist since 2019. She verified she was not attending the quarterly QA meetings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene and glove use when providing incontinence care for a resident. This affected one (#04) of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 63.Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #04 revealed admission to facility on 11/07/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, lung disease, contracture (deformity) of right hand, heart disease, anemia (low blood count), chronic back pain, high blood pressure, degenerative joint disorder of cervical (neck) and lumbar (mid back) regions.Review of Resident #04's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment tool dated 08/12/25 revealed the resident is dependent on staff for personal care, needs meal set-up for eating, has moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, requires wheelchair use for mobility and is always incontinent of bladder and bowels.Observation on 09/17/25 at 2:15 P.M. of Resident #04 receiving incontinence care revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #520…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of the infection control log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics. This affected one (#44) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 02/13/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, left bundle branch block, lymphedema, edema, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #44's physician order, dated 07/18/25, revealed the order to Nitrofurantoin Mono-Mac 100 milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth in the morning and at bedtime for seven days for E. coli urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the July 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was started on Cefdinir 300 mg on 07/19/25. Review of the Infection Control Log, dated July 2025, revealed Resident #44 was ordered Nitrofurantoin Mono-Mac 100 milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth in the morning and at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures while administering medications. This affected two residents (#26 and #53) of four residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnosis of cerebral infarction and chronic pain syndrome. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident had intact cognition. Observation on 06/25/25 at 9:39 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #286 revealed she did not perform hand hygiene before preparing nine medications for Resident #53. LPN #286 placed all medications in the medicine cup and at 9:44 A.M. applied gloves without performing hand hygiene. LPN #286 then entered the resident room and removed the Lidocaine patch from Resident #53's left shoulder area and applied a new Lidocaine patch. LPN #286 at 9:47 A.M. removed her gloves and did not perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37's wheelchair was in good repair. This affected one resident (Resident #37) out of three residents reviewed for wheelchairs in good repair. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/25/16 and diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, obesity, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact and required supervision of staff with set up help only for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Resident #37 used a wheelchair. Review of Resident #37's care plan revised, 06/07/21, included Resident #37 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to confined to a chair all or most of the time, depression, edema, impaired cognition, incontinent of bladder, pain, venous ulcers, and morbid obesity. Resident #37 refused to sleep in bed at times, slept in his wheelchair. Observation on 11/14/22 at 12:09 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident's #31 and #232 had physician orders for oxygen administration. This affected two resident's (Resident's #31 and #232) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen orders. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #232's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/11/22 and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, centrilobular emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation. Review of Resident #232's admission Evaluation dated 11/11/22, revealed Resident #232 was lethargic and oriented to person and place. Further review of the admission Evaluation revealed Resident #232 had shortness of breath and used oxygen at four liters via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #232's progress notes dated 11/11/22 at 7:30 P.M. revealed the resident arrived to the facility at 7:30 P.M. and was on oxygen therapy at four liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #232's medical record revealed oxygen saturations were documented on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility Hospice Visit Notes, the facility failed to ensure Hospice services were thoroughly documented to maintain sufficient communication between the facility and Hospice to meet the needs of Resident #45. This affected one Resident (#45) of two reviewed for Hospice services. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 08/29/18. Resident #45's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, drug induced secondary Parkinsonism, paraplegia, acute respiratory failure, diabetes, chronic congestive heart failure, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, schizoaffective disorder, hallucination, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #45's physician orders revealed she was admitted to Hospice on 07/15/22 for a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of Hospice Aide Visit Notes revealed no notes were completed for Resident #45. Review of Hospice Interdisciplinary Team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of the facility cleaning schedule for the kitchen the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 74 of 75 residents currently residing in the facility who received meals prepared in the kitchen, with the exception of Resident #49, who did not take food by mouth. Findings include: Observations conducted on 01/13/20 from 10:28 A.M. to 11:52 P.M. of the general kitchen environment revealed the fire suppression hood and metal vents were covered with a moderate to thick amount of black dust. Food preparation, including including mushroom soup, Brussel sprouts, and hot dogs occurred directly under the dust covered hood and metal vents during the observation period. An interview was conducted on 01/15/20 at 12:53 P.M. with the Director Manager (DM #505) who verified the above findings. DM #505 explained that he was not sure about the last time the hood and vents were cleaned but would clean them that day. Review of the daily complete kitchen cleaning assignments for all positions in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice Form (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055, was provided to Resident #77. This affected one of one resident reviewed for liability notices. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Resident #77 was readmitted to the facility under skilled traditional Medicare part A services on 09/12/19. The facility issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form (NOMNC) for a last skilled Medicare day of 10/15/19 to Resident #77 on 10/11/19. Review of the facility provided forms revealed a SNF ABN form was not provided at the time the NOMNC was issued. The facility completed SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form stated a SNF ABN form was not issued secondary to Resident #77 being a long-term resident and having Medicaid coverage. Staff interview with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #500 on 01/13/20 at 2:38 P.M. revealed a SNF ABN form was not given to Resident #77 secondary to LSW #500's belief a SNF ABN form was not required if a resident also had Medicaid coverage. LSW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure written notification of transfer to the hospital was provided to Resident #68 and Resident #76. This affected two of two residents reviewed for transfers and had the potential to affect all 75 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/10/19 with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy, end stage renal disease, chronic congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nurses notes revealed on 08/21/19 at 11:06 A.M. Resident #68 sent was to a hospital for treatment of chronic renal failure and was admitted . Resident #68 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 08/22/19 and was then re-admitted to the facility. The medical record lacked evidence of written notification of the transfer provided to Resident #68 or their representative. 2. Resident #76's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/05/19 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete and submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #48. This affected one of one resident reviewed for PASARR assessments. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #48's hospital paperwork revealed a Hospital Exemption form, JFS 07000, dated 11/18/19, which stated the anticipated length of Resident #48's skilled nursing facility stay was anticipated as less than 30 days. The Hospital Exemption form stated Resident #48 had a diagnosis of mental retardation and did not evidence of a severe mental illness. Review of the PASARR assessment completed 12/12/19 by Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #500 revealed Resident #48 had a diagnosis of developmental disability. The diagnosis manifested before the age of 22, and did not result in functional limitations prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was not given an antibiotic (Tetracycline) which she was allergic to. This affected one resident (Resident #48) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, urine retention, type two diabetes, and depression. Review of the resident's electronic record revealed the resident profile listed Tetracycline (an antibiotic) as an allergy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 revealed Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated mild cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance with care. Review of the progress notes dated 12/26/19 revealed Resident #48 had a change in condition at 12:58 A.M. Resident #48 was short of breath, using accessory muscles for breathing, and her oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of a physician's order and administered medications Resident #48. This affected one resident (Resident #48) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, urine retention, type two diabetes, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 revealed Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated mild cognitive impairment, the resident required extensive assistance with care, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the progress notes dated 12/26/19 revealed Resident #48 had a change in condition at 12:58 A.M. Resident #48 was short of breath, using accessory muscles for breathing, and her oxygen saturation was 89 percent (below normal range of 90 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper technique for infection control during tracheostomy care. This affected one (Resident #45) of one resident with a tracheostomy who was reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: Observation on 01/15/20 at 3:09 P.M. of tracheostomy (an surgically created opening in the front of the neck for the purpose of facilitating breathing) care for Resident #45 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #507 failed to maintain proper aseptic (sterile) technique during care. LPN #507 applied her sterile glove and proceeded to remove Resident #45's dirty inner cannula from the tracheostomy. LPN #507 then applied clean (non-sterile) gloves and continued tracheostomy care using sterile gauze to clean the tracheostomy. LPN #507 then removed the sterile inner cannula from the package, with the same dirty gloves, and inserted it into the tracheostomy opening. Interview on 01/15/20 at 3:45 P.M. with LPN #507 verified that she handled the new/sterile inner cannula with dirty gloves. LPN #507 verified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary area around the dumpsters and failed to ensure facility trash was placed in the dumpsters. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observation on 05/11/26 at 10:40 A.M. revealed a fenced area with two large dumpsters inside the fence. There were multiple full clear trash bags around the outside base of the two dumpsters laying on the ground and partially under the dumpsters. There was also a small couch sitting next to the dumpster fence that was not wrapped in plastic.Interview on 05/11/26 at 10:45 A.M. with the Dietary Manager #260 confirmed the multiple clear trash bags on the ground around and under the dumpsters and the small couch which was not wrapped in plastic. The Dietary Manager #260 stated the dietary staff and the housekeeping staff monitor the dumpster area and clean up around it as needed.Review of the facility's policy titled Grounds dated 09/2008 revealed facility grounds shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $920K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.