Morrow Manor Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 23.2 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility staff interview, and review of facility investigation reports, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one resident (Resident #4) who required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing, resulting in a fall with fracture. Actual harm occurred on 03/19/25 when Resident #4 was left unattended in the shower. Resident #4 fell and sustained a fracture to the right humerus (upper arm bone). This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 28. Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/14/25 with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, nondisplaced fracture of surgical neck of right humerus (03/24/25), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, chronic pain syndrome, and personality disorder. Review of Resident #4's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at high risk for falls. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 27 residents of 27 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#29) who ate nothing by mouth.Findings include: Observation on 08/20/25 of the lunch meal from 11:15 A.M. to 11:40 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff #137 serving the meal. Multiple times throughout the service she was observed using the same serving spoon for two pans of vegetables, one was peas, and the other was a capri mix (broccoli, cauliflower, and carrots). Additionally, during meal service the tongs used to serve the chicken (that was covered in sauce) fell in the container and were visibly soiled. The cook continued using these tongs soiling her gloves. She was then observed getting bread to make a sandwich for Resident #17 who had a finger food diet. Using her soiled gloves she reached into the bag and touched the bread and then prepared the sandwich. The cook changed gloves without washing her hands. She continued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident funds were timely dispersed to the resident's representative in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#34) of one reviewed for dispersed funds. The facility census was 28.Findings include:Review of Resident #34's closed medical records revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a deceased date of [DATE].Interview on [DATE] at 2:12 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #145 revealed she had received information a check had been issued in the amount of $6523.67 on [DATE] for Resident #34. BOM #145 stated she was unaware of the date when Resident #34's funds had been issued to her power of attorney (POA) and stated she had only been aware the funds had been dispersed. BOM #145 stated she was unaware of when funds were to be dispersed following a residents passing.Telephone interview on [DATE] at 2:36 P.M. with Corporate Accounts Receivable (CAR) #160 revealed she had created the paperwork for a refund of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, review of Depakote (antiepileptic) prescribing information, and review of facility provided articles, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had the appropriate diagnoses for prescribed psychotropics. This affected one resident (#7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 28.Findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/26/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis.Review of Resident #7's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. She received an antipsychotic, antidepressant, antibiotic and anticonvulsant medication. Review of Resident #7's plan of care dated 07/14/25 revealed the resident was on anticonvulsant therapy related to mood. Interventions included monitoring for side effects and obtaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed timely. This affected one residents (#11) of four residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with agitation (07/30/25), bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, and hallucinations. Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #11's medical record on 08/18/25 revealed the only Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed 04/04/22, prior to the residents admission to the facility. Interview on 08/18/25 at 2:15 P.M. with Clerical Worker #145 revealed she completed PASRR's when she was told a resident had a significant change in condition. She was unaware a PASRR was to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected specific activity of daily living (ADL) needs. This affected two residents (#4 and #6) out of two residents reviewed for care planning. The census was 28.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6, revealed an admission date of 7/29/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to tachycardia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified fracture of right femur, emphysema, unspecified atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require assistance with bathing, hygiene, dressing, toileting and to use incontinent products. Review of Resident #6's care plan revealed there was no focus for ADLs or for oxygen administration. Interview on 08/19/25 at 2:16 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing #117…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facilities policy the facility failed to educate Resident #3 related to his medication refusals and notify the physician of the refusals. This affected one resident (#3) of one resident reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility failed to have hospice orders and detailed care plans in place for Residents #1 and Resident #29. This affected two residents (#1 and #29) of two residents reviewed for hospice. Finally, the facility failed to have a diet order and to have documentation of skilled assessments for Resident #29. This affected one resident (#29) of 18 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 28.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/10/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, other obstructive and reflux uropathy, venous insufficiency, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, chronic pain syndrome, chronic systolic heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's pressure ulcer was timely assessed and appropriately documented. Additionally, they failed to ensure the physician and family were notified of a new pressure ulcer and failed to ensure the appropriate treatment was completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#11) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 28.Findings include:Observation on 08/19/25 at 10:08 A.M. of wound care for Resident #11 with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #117 revealed a dressing that had been completed on 08/19/25. ADON #117 removed the dressing and revealed a small area to her buttocks, ADON #117 reported she was unsure of what the area was and it may have been moisture associated skin damage. ADON #117 verified upon removal of the dressing there was no dressing or calmospetine lotion to the area.Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen signage was used for residents who had oxygen used in their care. This affected one Residents #6, of three reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 28. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #6, revealed an admission date of 07/29/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to tachycardia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified fracture of right femur, personal history of pulmonary embolism, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, emphysema, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #6 was assessed to require assistance with bathing, hygiene and dressing.Review of the current physician orders for August 2025 for Resident #6 revealed an order for oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) at one to four liters per minute (LPM). Observations on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had three medication errors of 28 opportunities for an error rate of 10.71%. This affected one Resident (#29) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 28 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29, revealed an admission date of 08/15/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cancer of the oropharynx (the head and neck area), hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition assessment was still in progress. Resident #29 was assessed to require assistance with bathing, hygiene and dressing. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #29 was ordered metoprolol (blood pressure medication) 50 milligrams (mg) via gastrointestinal tube (G-tube feeding tube) two times a day,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control during the medication administration observation when she touched resident's medications with her bare hands and administered them to residents. This affected two (Residents #8 and #19) of five residents observed during medication administration. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure they initiated and maintained an appropriate Legionella prevention plan. This had the potential to affect all 26 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/26/17. Diagnosis included atrial fibrillation (A-Fib). Review of the resident's physician orders revealed orders for Eliquis 2.5 milligrams twice daily for A-Fib. Observation on 06/22/22 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #133 preparing Resident #19's medications. She dropped the Eliquis medication onto the top of the medication cart and picked up the medication with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $167K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH