Anderson, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of information from the Cleveland Clinic regarding hypotension, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff identified a change in condition for Resident #22 when the resident experienced hypotension (low blood pressure) and diaphoresis (sweating especially to an unusual degree as a symptom of disease) and failed to notify the physician of the resident's hypotension and diaphoresis resulting in a delay in care and treatment. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm beginning on 08/03/24 at 3:15 P.M. when Resident #22, who had a history of hypertension (high blood pressure), had a blood pressure of 93/51 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg) which was not reported to the physician and no treatment was provided. Resident #22's family member requested the resident be sent to the hospital for evaluation on 08/03/24 at 7:33 P.M. (four hours after the resident first exhibited a decline in condition)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the posted COVID-19 signage regarding personal protective equipment (PPE), observations, review of the facility policies and procedures, staff interviews, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, the facility failed to implement effective and recommended infection control practices including a system to ensure the availabilty and appropriate use of PPE by staff, a system to ensure staff were donning and doffing PPE when required, and ensuring staff were practicing proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the building. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious negative health outcomes and/or life-threatening harm when 25 residents (#10, #15, #23, #30, #37, #40, #44, #48, #52, #53, #55, #58, #65, #68, #71, #76, #83, #86, #190, #193, #194, #195, #196, #200 and #240) and 13 staff (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #210, #224, #239, #242, #256, #277, and #291, State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #240, #275 and #299, Housekeeper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, resident interview, review of the facility's fall investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff assistance to prevent accidents. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #73 was receiving care by one staff, fell out of bed and fractured her left femur. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received adequate staff assistance during care that resulted in an avoidable fall which resulted in no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm. This affected two (#2 and #73) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #73 revealed she was admitted to the facility from 08/25/21 to 04/10/23, and from 04/14/23 through 10/30/23. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, metabolic encephalopathy, peripheral vascular disease, generalized anxiety, pulmonary hypertension, fibromyalgia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen equipment was kept clean, prepared food stored in the walk-in cooler was labeled and dated, and staff wore effective hair restraints in the kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 91 of 92 residents who received meals from the kitchen.Findings include: 1. Observations in the kitchen on 08/11/2025 at 8:44 AM revealed a dirty toaster with built up grime and crumbs on the tray and conveyor belt wheels. A bulk food storage bin containing rice was dirty with a sticky substance on the lid. During an interview on 08/11/2025 at 8:55 AM, the Kitchen Manager (KM) stated they cleaned bulk food storage bins once a week on Mondays or Tuesdays, so they were due to be cleaned. During an observation on 08/12/2025 at 12:31 PM, the bulk food storage containers continued to appear dirty with a sticky substance on the lid. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0620 — isolated
  Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the admission Agreement, and interview, the facility failed to ensure completion of an admission Agreement for three (#6, #95, and #99) of four sampled residents reviewed for admission agreements.Findings include:Review of the facility admission Agreement, developed 01/14/2020, revealed in the section titled 1 Parties to Contract, included this an Agreement between [Facility Name], nursing home operated by [Corporation Name]. All of the above parties to this contract understand, acknowledge, and agree to all the following terms and conditions without any reservations or exceptions whatsoever, further, the parties acknowledge and agree good and valuable consideration to support each party's obligation. The admission Agreement revealed at Bullet S; The Undersigned: Has read and received the foregoing, certifies the information is correct, and agrees to the terms and conditions of the admission Agreement and addenda material incorporated herein by reference. The admission agreement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This affected one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 88. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, cerebral infarction, and vascular dementia. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted on 05/15/24 revealed Resident #44 alleged an aide hit her on the hand while in the bathroom and told her she should be able to care for herself. Review of the FRI revealed the allegation was unsubstantiated because staff spoke with Resident #44 who stated the aide was a younger aide and she was really good and was not trying to be mean. Additionally, another staff member who entered the room during the alleged incident was interviewed and stated the incident did not occur. Interview on 08/31/24 at 1:25 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she did not have evidence of an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of hospital records, and care plan review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with care resulting in a fall and failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected two residents (#22 and #29) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, weakness, dementia, and hypertension. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) collected on 07/26/24 revealed Resident #22 had mildly impaired cognitive function, no behaviors, required dependent care for bathing, toileting, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of a care plan dated 07/03/24 revealed Resident #22 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance and obesity. Interventions included two staff assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Review of Payroll Based Journal , facility documents, and interview with staff, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal report in first quarter of 2023. The facility censu was 91. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal revealed the facilty had not submitted their report for the first quarter of 2023. Interview on 11/14/23 at 2:50 P.M. with Data Service (DS) #266 stated he did submit the Payroll Based Journal report on the first quarter. DS #266 stated he was not sure why it did not go through. Review of an email date 05/17/23 revealed Data Service (DS) #266 had reached out to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to fix the data that was that not submitted on 02/09/23. DS #266 stated he was stumped on why it was not submitted with success. The deficient practice was corrected on 05/17/23 when the facility implemented the following corrective actions: -On 05/15/23, the second quarter of 2023 Payroll Based Journal data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility documents for residents rights, the facility failed to honor the choice to not be gotten out of bed to be weighed prior to getting up for the day for one resident (#47) out of 21 residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 91. Findings Include: Review of medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date 01/17/23. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac pacemaker, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/15/23, revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Resident #47 required two-person physical assist for transfers. Review of plan of care dated 01/27/23 revealed Resident #47 had fluid overload or potential fluid volume overload related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bilateral edema, and dementia. Interventions inncluded monitor fluid overload, notify changes in edema and weight as needed. Review of physician order dated 09/20/23 for Resident #47…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan. This affected three (#15, #20, and #84) out of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/03/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), COVID-19, chronic kidney disease, stage three, morbid obese, and hypertension. Review of the admission Morse fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was at moderate risk for falls Review of the medical chart revealed Resident #15 had falls on 10/30/23 and 10/31/23. No care plan was initiated to identify the residnet to be at risk for falls and no intervention were put into place to prevent further falls. Interview on 11/14/23 at 10:41 A.M. with Registered Nurse Infection Control Preventionist (RNICP) #235 verified there was no care plan created for Resident #15 related to falls. 2. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete care conferences for two residents (#6, #39) and failed to update the care plan for one (#84) of 21 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 04/29/21. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/30/23, revealed this resident had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed social services reached out to Resident #39's sister, which was his Power of Attorney (POA), through email and voicemail in attempt to schedule a care conference on 11/04/22, 01/09/23, 04/07/23, 06/13/23, and 09/07/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed no care conferences had been completed in the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with bathing. This affected two (#78 and #84) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident (FR) #78 revealed the following admissions to the facility: 05/23/22 to 06/10/22, 06/21/22 to 12/03/22, 12/03/22 to 06/26/23, 06/30/23 to 07/05/23, 07/15/23 to 07/19/23, 07/22/23 to 07/23/23, 07/25/23 to 10/02/23, 10/04/23 to 10/31/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, and emphysema. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/31/23, revealed this resident had intact cognition. This resident was assessed to be dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained per physician order for one resident (#84) and failed to follow physician orders to notify the physician of weight changes within prescribed parameters for one (#47) resident. This affected two (#47 and #84) out of 21 residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, localized edema, hyperkalemia, heart failure, hypomagnesemia, anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/06/23, revealed this resident had intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require limited assistance for transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 10/10/23 for a daily weight. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$112,473 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $66,976 — penalty dated 2024-09-17
• $45,497 — penalty dated 2023-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH