Astoria Place Of Cincinnati
3627 Harvey Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (513) 961-8881 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $147,294 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-19)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 13.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 36.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 85.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-19 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, an Ombudsman interview, police interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge for Resident #19. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 04/10/25 when Resident #19 was placed at risk for potential serious life-threatening harm, injuries, negative health outcomes and/or death when the facility discharged Resident #19 without providing a safe discharge location or provisions for a wound treatment. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 69. On 04/23/25 at 1:07 P.M., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #200 were notified that Immediate Jeopardy began on 04/10/25 at 3:00 P.M. when Resident #19 was refused access to the facility and the facility issued an emergency discharge based on allegations from two other residents on 04/09/25 that Resident #19 was in possession of a firearm. On 04/09/24, the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place to prevent one resident, identified as an elopement risk and who was assessed with purposeful exit seeking behaviors, from eloping from the facility unknown to staff. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious physical harm and injuries on 04/26/25 when Resident #75 was removed from one-on-one supervision and was subsequently found on the ground outside of the facility after removing a windowpane from the window in his room and dropping two stories to the pavement below, sustaining bilateral ankle fractures which required surgery. This affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for elopement risk. The facility census was 69. On 05/02/25, the Administrator was notified that Immediate Jeopardy began on 04/26/25 at 7:50 A.M. when the facility removed Resident #75 from one-on-one supervision. At 8:10 A.M., staff found Resident #75 on the ground…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of staff witness statements, review of hospital records, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm on 07/01/25 to Resident #38 when Resident #43, a resident with a known history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents, struck Resident #38 in the face causing a nasal fracture. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71 residents.Findings include: 1. 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 05/13/25 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, hepatitis C, and atrioventricular heart block. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38, dated 05/22/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition and ambulated with a cane. Review of the census profile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the survey results notebook in the main receptionist area, review of the Certification and Licensure System (CALS), review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of corrections was maintained in a readily accessible. This affected all 84 residents in the facility. Review of the survey results notebook in the main receptionist area revealed the last facility survey results were dated 08/16/23. Review of the CALS survey history for the facility revealed the facility had surveys on 08/31/23, 09/21/23, 10/24/23, 11/08/23, 12/26/23, 01/23/24, 02/22/24, 03/13/24, 04/09/24, 04/18/24, 06/12/24, 08/12/24, 09/19/24, 10/02/24, 10/22/24, 12/24/24, 05/19/25, 07/10/25, 07/18/25, 08/12/25, 10/22/25, 12/09/25, and 01/22/26. None of these survey results were in the Survey Results notebook located in the main receptionist area. During an interview on 02/18/26 at 1:28 P.M. the Administrator verified the facility survey results notebook had not been updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals delivered to the residents matched the residents ' meal tickets and the daily menu. This affected all residents in the facility as the facility identified all 84 residents received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84.1) Review of medical record of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 12/10/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, left bundle-branch block, unspecified, unspecified mood disorder, acute kidney failure, unspecified, other toxic encephalopathy, and cocaine abuse. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #37's cognitive status was not assessed. The resident was independent for eating, oral hygiene, and ambulation, supervision assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents as the facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the lunch menu for 02/18/26 revealed the residents would be served lemon zest broccoli, chocolate cake with icing, chicken patty on bun, and rice. Observations of puree diets being prepared on 02/18/26 at 11:21 A.M., revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #65 initially added chicken patties, lettuce, tomatoes, mayonnaise, and slices of bread to a blender. After blending, hot water was added to thin the consistency to the desired texture. During an interview on 02/18/26 at 11:28 A.M., DM #605 verified that the mixture was too thick, and he added hot water to create a pudding like consistency. DM #605 verified that the facility had recipe cards for all meals; however, he knows the consistency that he is looking for and does not use the recipe. Observation on 02/18/26 at 11:32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were made to the correct consistency for residents with a puree and mechanical soft diet order. This affected seventeen Residents (#08, #34, #75, #05, #06, #17, #25, #27, #32, #46, #53, #54, #56, #73, #79, #81, and #95) who the facility identified as receiving a puree or mechanical soft diet order. The facility census was 84. Review of the medical records revealed three Residents (#08, #34, and #75) had physician orders for a puree diet. Further review revealed fourteen Residents (#05, #06, #17, #25, #27, #32, #46, #53, #54, #56, #73, #79, #81, and #95) had physician orders for a mechanical soft diet. Review of the lunch menu for 02/18/26 revealed the residents would be served lemon zest broccoli, chocolate cake with icing, chicken patty on bun, and rice. Review of the lunch spreadsheet for 02/18/26 revealed the residents with a mechanical soft diet should receive chopped bite size broccoli and the residents with a puree diet should receive cream of rice. Observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents.Findings include: 1.Observation of the kitchen on 02/17/26 at 9:27 A.M. revealed the soda gun nozzle was dirty and had a build-up of a red substance. Interview on 02/17/26 at 9:27 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #605 confirmed the soda gun nozzle was dirty. Review of the facility policy titled Sanitization dated October 2008 revealed all kitchen equipment should be kept clean. 2.Observation on 02/17/26 at 9:29 A.M. revealed that the white cutting block attached to the front of the steam table was dirty with black residue on the top surface. Interview on 02/17/26 at 9:29 A.M. with DM #605 confirmed the white cutting block attached to the front of the steam table was dirty. Review of the facility policy titled Sanitization dated October 2008 revealed all counters and utensils should be kept clean. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete the facility assessment. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) documents revealed the facility did not have a completed facility assessment document on file. Interview on 02/10/26 at 5:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility had not completed a facility assessment. Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan dated 2001 revealed the facility should develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that identified and addressed systemic noncompliance. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility documents revealed the facility could not provide any documentation of any facility QAPI activities for the entirety of 2025. Interview on 02/10/26 at 5:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have any QAPI activities for the entirety of 2025, including a QAPI Plan, facility assessment, or proof that QAPI meetings were held monthly and/ or quarterly for the entirety of 2025. Review of the policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 2001 revealed the facility should develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to perform any QAPI activities for the entirety of 2025. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility documents revealed there was no documentation of a QAPI Plan, a facility assessment, performance improvement projects, or QAPI meeting minutes for the entirety of 2025. Interview on 02/10/26 at 5:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have documentation the facility QAPI Plan, a facility assessment, performance improvement projects, or QAPI meetings minutes for the entirety of 2025. Review of the policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 2001,revealed the facility should develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing facility-wide QAPI Plan to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were conducted on a quarterly basis. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility documents revealed the facility had no documentation of QAPI meetings conducted monthly and/or quarterly for the entirety of 2025. Interview on 02/10/26 at 5:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not conduct monthly and/or quarterly QAPI meetings for the entirety of 2025. Review of the policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, dated 2001 revealed the QAPI committee should meet monthly to review reports, evaluate the significance of data, and monitor quality-related activities of all departments, services, or committees.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive water management plan was implemented to minimize the risk of waterborne pathogens including Legionella. This had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility documents revealed the facility did not have a water management plan to prevent the growth of Legionella. Interview on 02/18/26 at 3:18 P.M. with Director of Clinical Operations (DCO)#900 verified the facility did not have a water management plan in place to prevent the growth of Legionella. Review of facility policy titled Legionella Water Management Program undated revealed the facility as part of the infection prevention and control program would have a water management program in place. Review of online resources from the CDC at https://www.cdc.gov/control-legionella/php/wmp/wmp-steps.html titled Steps to Develop a Water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the building in a safe and sanitary manner for residents, staff, and the public. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/19/26 at 10:47 A.M. of the facility's laundry area revealed there was a pool of water on the floor directly inside the entrance to the dirty linens area of the laundry area which was approximately three feet wide by six feet long and approximately one-eighth inch deep. Further observation revealed water was being released from a pipe located under a sink next to the pool of water. The wall adjacent to the pool of water on the floor was missing drywall from the bottom two inches of the wall which was in contact with the pooled water. The metal studs inside the wall appeared to be rusted. Interview on 02/19/26 at 10:47 A.M. with Laundry Aides (LAs) #710 and #712 confirmed there was pool of water on the floor just inside the entrance to the dirty linens side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected five Residents (#03, #06, #07, #61 and #49) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 84. 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #03 had intact cognition. Review of care conferences for Resident #03, as provided by the facility, revealed the only documented care conference for Resident #03 was in the third quarter of 2025. There were no documented care conferences at admission and fourth quarter of 2025. During an interview on 02/19/26 at 11:50 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #03 was not provided with an admission care conference or a care conference in the fourth quarter of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to dispose of expired vaccines. This had the potential to affect the forty-six Residents (#01,#02, #03, #06, #07, #09, #10, #11, #15, #16, #20, #22, #25, #28, #29, #30, #33, #34, #35, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41,#47, #49, #50, #52, #54, #57, #58, #59, #61, #62, #64, #69, #71, #73, #74, #77, #78, #80, #85, #94, #95, and #96) housed in the 100 and 300 halls who the facility identified as receiving vaccines. The census was 84.During a medication storage observation on [DATE] at 4:01 P.M., three 0.5 milliliter (mL) single dose Influenza Vaccine Afluria were found to be expired (expiration date [DATE]). Four boxes each containing ten Pneumococcal Vaccine Polyvalent Pneumovax – 23, single dose 0.5 mL syringes were found to be expired (expiration date [DATE]). During an interview on [DATE] at 4:30 P.M., The Director of Nursing ([NAME]) confirmed all the products in the medication storage room on the first floor are intended for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide privacy curtains in resident rooms. This affected five (Residents #30, #96, #10, #80 and #18) of five residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 02/17/26 at 11:21 A.M. revealed the room of Residents #96 and #30 only had one privacy curtain which was not adequate to provide visual privacy to either resident. Interview on 02/17/26 at 11:21 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant #505 verified the one privacy curtain that was in place was not adequate to provide either Resident #96 or Resident #30 privacy during care. 2.Observations on 02/18/26 at 10:34 A.M. and on 02/19/26 at 8:08 A.M. revealed the room of Residents #96 and #30 continued to have only one privacy curtain in place. Observation on 02/18/26 at 12:15 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #309 revealed there were no privacy curtains in Resident #18's room. Interview on 02/18/26 at 12:16 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with regular utensils during meals. This directly affected three Residents (#37, #03 and #61) but had the potential to all affect all 84 residents as the facility identified all residents received Meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1) Review of medical record of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 12/10/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, left bundle-branch block, unspecified, unspecified mood disorder, acute kidney failure, unspecified, other toxic encephalopathy, and cocaine abuse. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a cognitive status was not assessed. The resident was independent for eating, oral hygiene, and ambulation, supervision assistance for toileting, bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional and homelike environment for the residents. This affected three Residents (#10, #49 and #80) of four resident rooms reviewed for a safe, functional and homelike environment. The facility census was 84. 1) Review of the medical record of Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/28/25. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, rhabdomyolysis, encephalopathy, abnormal levels of other serum enzymes, and cocaine abuse. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #10's room on 02/17/26 at 12:39 P.M. revealed the door to the resident's bathroom did not close completely, thus not providing privacy for the resident while using the bathroom adjacent to his sleeping quarters. This was a semi-private room shared with Resident #80. Interview with Resident #10 at the same time expressed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, review of medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed for one (Resident #02) of one resident reviewed for significant change assessments. The facility census was 84.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident with aphasia, diabetes mellitus type II, post-traumatic stress disorder, hypertension and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 had severe cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder. The resident required supervision for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers, and moderate assistance for bathing and dressing, and was independent for oral and personal hygiene. Review of Hospice progress note dated 01/14/26 at 5:27 P.M. revealed Resident #02 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a discreet cover for a resident's catheter bag and ensure appropriate placement of catheter bag. This affected one (Resident #94) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 84. Review of the medical record of Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 02/16/26. Diagnoses included acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, left ankle and foot, complete lesion at T1 level of thoracic spinal cord, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, paraplegia, schizoaffective disorder, and acquired absence of right leg above knee. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #94 was still in progress. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact. Observation on 02/18/26 at 10:44 A.M. revealed Resident #94 was present in the main lobby with his catheter bag sitting on his lap and not covered. During an interview on 02/18/26 at 10:44 A.M., Resident #94 acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement nutritional recommendations made by the Registered Dietitian (RD) for a resident with weight loss. This affected one (Resident #03) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder.Review of weights for Resident #03 revealed on 08/03/25 Resident #03 had a documented weight of 221 pounds and on 02/01/26 Resident #03 had a documented weight of 189.8 pounds. This represented a 14.12 percent (%) weight loss in six months.Review of RD progress note for Resident #03 dated 10/15/25 authored by RD #600 revealed Resident #03 was ordered to receive double portions for all meals.Review of weights for Resident #03 revealed on 11/04/25 Resident #03…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of staff time punches, and policy review, the facility failed to follow abuse policy relating to alleged abuse by staff. This affected one (Resident #15) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/09/23. Diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, vascular dementia, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident#15 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. This resident was independent with activities of daily living (ADL). Interview with Resident #15 on 12/08/25 at 10:06 A.M. revealed he was verbally abused on 12/05/25 by two staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] #13 and CNA #15), who were working on the current shift. When the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of emergency room (ER) records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 06/12/25 with a discharge date of 10/06/25. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes mellitus (DM II), and bipolar disorder.Review of the ER records dated 08/28/25 at 7:01 P.M., revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the ER related to a reported sexual assault. The ER notes indicated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called to the facility for a hyperglycemic related incident. When EMS arrived, they found the resident shaking and sweating and stated his roommate fondled him the bathroom. The resident denied any active pain to his genitals, chest, abdomen, or limbs. The hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of emergency room (ER) records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an alleged sexual abuse allegation. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 06/12/25 with a discharge date of 10/06/25. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes mellitus (DM II), and bipolar disorder.Review of the ER records dated 08/28/25 at 7:01 P.M., revealed Resident #79 was admitted to the ER related to a reported sexual assault. The ER notes indicated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called to the facility for a hyperglycemic related incident. When EMS arrived, they found the resident shaking and sweating and stated his roommate fondled him the bathroom. The resident denied any active pain to his genitals, chest, abdomen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #46) of three reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 04/29/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM II), anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and functional urinary incontinence.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #46 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, substantial assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing, and partial assistance with transfers. Review of Section H (bowel and bladder), revealed Resident #46 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder.Observation on 12/08/25 at 1:38 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing on the 200 unit (Residents #17, #25, #30, #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107,#108, #109, #110, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116). The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include:Observation on 10/21/25 at 9:33 A.M. of the 200-unit medication cart revealed it contained 18 cups of loose pills labeled with the respective names of all of the residents residing on the unit. Interview on 10/21/25 at 9:40 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #505 confirmed she had prepulled all of the medications for the morning med pass for Residents #17, #25, #30, #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116.Interview on 10/21/25 at 9:45 A.M with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed nurses and qualified medication assistants (QMAs) should not pull all the residents' medications at once. Each resident's medication should be prepared, administered, and signed off, before proceeding to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) in a timely manner. This affected one resident (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 01/09/20 with a diagnosis of paraplegia and a discharge date of 04/10/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #45 dated 02/04/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Interview on 10/20/25 at 4:00 P.M with [NAME] #246 confirmed sometime in early April 2025 they reported to the previous Administrator that Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #902 and Resident #45 were having a sexual relationship. Interview on 10/21/25 at 3:23 P.M with Social Worker (SW) #208 confirmed sometime in April 2025 she reported to the previous Administrator that she believed HS #902 and Resident #45 were having a sexual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of residents' personal property. This affected two (Residents #12 and #13) of three residents reviewed for residents' rights. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 reveled an admission date of 07/11/25 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, infective endocarditis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 07/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 3/04/25 with diagnoses including spondylosis, depression, and diabetes mellitus.Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #13 dated 06/06/25 revealed the resident had mild cognitive deficits and required extensive staff assistance with ADLs.Interview on 08/11/25 at 2:49 P.M. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel records, review of staff statements, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 05/06/25 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the personnel file for Business Office Manager (BOM) #58 revealed it contained a disciplinary action form dated 07/24/25 which indicated on 07/22/25 BOM #58 had used vulgar language with another employee. BOM #58 was coached and promised not to do it again. Review of an undated written statement per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of personnel records, review of staff statements, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse/mistreatment of residents. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 05/06/25 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the personnel file for Business Office Manager (BOM) #58 revealed it contained a disciplinary action form dated 07/24/25 which indicated on 07/22/25 BOM #58 had used vulgar language with another employee. BOM #58 was coached and promised not to do it again. Review of an undated written statement per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of maintenance orders, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment for the residents. This affected Residents #20 and #21, the following 18 residents residing on the 100- unit (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18), and the following 14 residents residing on the 400-unit (#58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility . The facility census was 71 residents. Findings include: 1.Observations on 07/07/25 between 9:20 A.M. revealed the handrail next to elevator on the 100-nursing unit was not safely secured to the wall rendering it non-functional. The handrail was missing an end cap and was secured to the wall on one end by one screw and the other end was dangling. There was an end cap and a corner cap missing from the handrail near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing incontinence and wound care and failed to change gloves and perform appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 71 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 05/05/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of bladder, was independent for eating and bed mobility, required set up assistance with oral hygiene, required supervision with toileting, and required moderate assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, bathing, and transfers. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify residents of changes to the menu in a timely manner. This all residents who accepted food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (Residents ##10 and #18) residents who did not receive food form the kitchen. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the menu titled Week-At-A-Glance Cincinnati Fall-Winter 24-25 Week 3 printed 04/14/25 revealed the lunch menu for Wednesday, 04/16/25 included three ounces beef pot roast, two ounces brown gravy, four ounces mashed potatoes, four ounces glazed carrots, and four ounces pineapple tidbits. Observation of meal preparation on 04/16/25 at 11:32 A.M. revealed dietary staff prepared resident lunch trays with beef patties on wheat bread, mashed potatoes with brown gravy, and glazed carrots. During an interview on 04/16/25 at 11:35 AM, Dietary Manager #92 stated he substituted hamburgers on the lunch menu because the pot roast did not finish cooking in time. He stated he did not notify residents of the substitution but it was ok…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were able to control room temperature and failed to maintain sanitary shower rooms. This affected one (Resident #73) of six residents sampled for appropriate room temperature controls. This had the potential to affect all residents on the first floor and in the Women's Secured Unit who used the shower rooms. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified noncompliance with medical treatment and regimen, and cellulitis of right lower limb. During an observation on 04/30/25 at 9:06 A.M., the air conditioning unit under the window was actively blowing cold air into the room. The control panel could be opened and had metal switch to turn fan on or off. The dial for the temperature control was missing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of diagnostic results in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #60) of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified psychosis, and repeated falls. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #60, required supervision/setup assistance for ADLs. Review of the care plan dated 04/17/25 revealed Resident #60 had an unwitnessed fall with shoulder fracture injury related to unsteady gait due to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #64 and #51) of six residents sampled for abuse. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified schizoaffective disorder, unspecified myelodysplastic syndrome, type II diabetes, unspecified heart failure, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis, unspecified bipolar disorder, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had verbal behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident # 64 required supervision with all activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 06/17/24 revealed Resident #64 wandered into other resident's rooms and took their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate screening for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) prior to admission. This affected one (Resident #43) of six residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, uncomplicated opioid dependence, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, dependent personality disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 had no PASRR screening documented in his medical record. During an interview on 05/13/25 at 9:34 AM Social Worker (SW) #135 stated a resident coming from the hospital should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were reassessed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) after new mental health diagnoses and new psychotropic medications were ordered. This affected one (Resident #36) of six residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type II diabetes, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified persistent mood disorder, and chronic systolic heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not assessed for cognition status, had self-directed behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 had physician orders for psychotropic medications including (0)Divalproex sodium 250 mg delayed release tablet, 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received quarterly conferences attended by members of the clinical team. This affected three (Residents #36, #51, and #60) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type II diabetes, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified persistent mood disorder, and chronic systolic heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not assessed for cognition status, had self-directed behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 had a care conference on 12/23/24 with the social worker. There were no additional members of the interdisciplinary (IDT) team represented at this meeting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to timely treat residents with displaced joints. This affected one (Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, major depressive disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified psychosis, and repeated falls. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had verbal behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #60 required supervision/setup assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 04/17/25 revealed Resident #60 had an unwitnessed fall with shoulder fracture injury related to unsteady gait due to her spilling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents attended mental heath appointments as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #75) of seven residents reviewed for mental health services. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was never discharged out of the system. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, suicidal ideations, other uncomplicated psychoactive substance abuse, antisocial personality disorder, uncomplicated nicotine dependence, uncomplicated alcohol dependence, mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance, and mild cognitive condition with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident#75 was cognitively intact. Review of hospital records revealed Resident #75 had a telemedicine appointment on 08/24/25 at 10:00 A.M. with UC Psychiatry Bridge Clinic to ensure needs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as prescribed. This affected three (Residents #38, #45, and #73) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified humerus fracture, type II diabetes, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, essential hypertension, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the brain stem. Resident #38 had physician orders dated 03/26/25 for Carvedilol 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified combined congestive heart failure, interstitial lung disease with progressive fibrotic phenotype, type II diabetes, psychotic disorder with delusions, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances. Resident #45 had physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure information documented in the medical record was accurate. This affected three (Residents #19, #60, and #75) of six residents reviewed for accurate documentation. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 04/10/25. Diagnoses included unspecified paraplegia, stage III pressure ulcer to the left heel, chronic pain syndrome. Unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, unspecified bipolar disorder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Review of the care plan dated 01/28/25 revealed Resident #19 wanted to discharge to home or community. Interventions included encouraging the resident to discuss feelings/concerns about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to store foods safely, and maintain a sanitary kitchen to ensure food service safety. This had the potential to affect 60 of 60 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#21, #49) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings include: Observation on 08/05/24 from 8:19 A.M. through 8:50 A.M. of the facility kitchen and refrigerators on the nursing units revealed the following concerns: There was a four-foot diameter floor fan with gray fuzzy debris blowing from the fan grill across the kitchen area onto the food preparation area, food service area, clean dish storage and food storage areas. The exhaust louvers above the stove cooking surface had gray and blackened debris consistent with the appearance of heavy grease build up. The six ceiling fan louvers throughout the kitchen had a heavy buildup of gray fuzzy debris located over food preparation areas, food service areas and clean dish storage areas. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record reveiw, policy review and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and clean environment for all residents. This affected 13 residents (#3, #5, #6, #8, #14, #30, #31, 34, #38, #44, #48, #52 and #56) of 19 residing on the women's secured unit. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/10/23 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, right eye blindness, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 06/03/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required limited assist with transfer and was independent with ambulation. Observation on 08/05/24 at 2:22 P.M. revealed the wall adjacent to Resident #38's bed and the walls in the bathroom had handwritten statements with letters that were two to three inches high and covered a wall span of approximately six feet. The verbiage of the handwritten statements were vulgar in nature. Interview on 08/05/24 at 2:25 P.M. with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms provided visual privacy for the residents. This affected eight residents (#3, #5, #6, #24, #30, #31, #52, and #56) of 19 women residing on the secured women's unit. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 12/06/17 with diagnoses including diabetes, schizophrenia, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24 dated 07/09/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and was independent with mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 06/23/23 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, diabetes, and anxiety. Review of the MDS assessment for dated 06/12/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and was independent with mobility. Observation on 08/08/24 at 10:37 A.M. revealed Residents #24, #52, and #56 were residing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment. This affected 19 residents (#3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #14, #20, #24, #28, #29, #30, #31, 34, #38, #40, #44, #48, #52 and #56) of 19 residing on the women's secured unit. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 08/05/24 at 2:32 P.M. revealed the women's secure unit shower room had a blackened substance, consistent with appearance of mold, at base of shower stall and adjacent walls. The shower exhaust fan did operate and had a gray fuzzy layer covering the surface. There was a shower privacy curtain which was torn three feet from the top and was not attached to the track and was hanging which prevented complete privacy around the shower area from the door entrance. Interview on 08/05/24 at 2:32 P.M. with MA #34 confirmed the main shower room had blackened areas around the base of the shower and on the walls and needed to be cleaned. MA #34 verified the exhaust fan did not operate and needed to be cleaned. MA #34 verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision. This affected one resident (#23) of six residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 62 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/14/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the optometry note for Resident #23 dated 11/15/23 revealed eyeglasses were recommended and ordered for the resident. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #23 dated 06/06/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 8/06/24 at 9:32 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #73 revealed Resident #23 did not have eyeglasses to wear. Observation on 08/06/24 at 1:33 P.M. revealed Resident #23 was not wearing eyeglasses and was squinting to read a clock on the wall of the second-floor men's unit. Interview on 08/06/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's physician and guardian were notified timely following a fall with injury. This affected one resident (#11) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 09/12/11 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (CP), schizophrenia, convulsion, moderate intellectual disabilities (ID), borderline personality disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, psychosis, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, impulse disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and intermittent explosive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 was rarely understood and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 03/11/24 at 6:00 A.M. On 03/11/24 at 3:25 P.M. review of Resident #11's medical record revealed there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment and timely care and treatment were provided to Resident #11 following an unwitnessed fall with injury. This affected one resident (#11) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 09/12/11 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (CP), schizophrenia, convulsion, moderate intellectual disabilities (ID), borderline personality disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, psychosis, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, impulse disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and intermittent explosive disorder. Review of a fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was a high risk for falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 was rarely understood and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. Review of the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff made timely notification of changes in resident condition to the physician and resident representative. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 08/31/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated 10/19/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set MDS assessment for Resident #78 dated 01/04/24 revealed the resident required partial/moderate assistance with toileting. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #78 dated 01/04/24 timed at 5:44 A.M. per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205 revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #101 notified the nurse at 3:44 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident banking records, review of review of facility grievance logs, review of facility investigative reports, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident fund account record for Resident #78 revealed the resident withdrew 30 dollars in cash from his account on [DATE]. Review of the discharge return anticipated MDS assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident banking records, review of review of facility grievance logs, review of facility investigative reports, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation were reported to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) as required. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident fund account record for Resident #78 revealed the resident withdrew $30.00 in cash from his account on [DATE]. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident banking records, review of review of facility grievance logs, review of facility investigative reports, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a timely and thorough investigation of misappropriation of resident property. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident fund account record for Resident #78 revealed the resident withdrew $30.00 in cash from his account on [DATE]. Review of the discharge return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78 was timely and adequately assessed and provided timely medical intervention following a fall with major injury. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 08/31/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #78 dated 10/19/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the discharge return anticipated MDS assessment for Resident #78 dated 01/04/24 revealed the resident required partial/moderate assistance with toileting and had one fall with major injury since the prior assessment. Review of the nursing progress note for Resident #78 dated 01/04/24 timed at 5:44 A.M. per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205 revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident falls were thoroughly investigated including identification of root cause of the fall, identification of hazards and risks associated with falls and evidence of implementation of appropriate interventions to prevent resident falls. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 08/31/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #78 dated 08/31/22 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and injury related to falls. Interventions included the following: review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls, record root cause of falls, alter and remove any potential causes, follow facility fall protocol. Resident #78's fall care plan was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and vendor interviews, review of facility billing/financial information, and review of facility policy, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance to all the residents and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid in a timely manner to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the needs of all 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of an itemized invoice statement from Prairie Farms (milk delivery) dated 01/10/24, revealed numerous unpaid balances from 10/19/23 through 12/07/23 which totaled $3,847.32 due. Review of a facility check (number 13089) dated 01/10/24, revealed a payment was made to Prairie Farms in the amount of $3,847.32. An observation of the food storage on 01/16/24 at 8:12 A.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM #30) revealed there were only two gallons of milk in the milk cooler. An interview with DM #30 at the same time, revealed he had to go to the grocery store to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure heating equipment was functional to provide warm temperatures in resident rooms. This affected nine residents (#05, #06, #10, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20 and #26) observed/interviewed related to temperatures in the facility. The lack of preventative/routine maintenance on resident individual room heating units had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 01/16/24 at 8:30 A.M. a tour of the facility revealed there was a slight chill inside the facility. An interview on 01/16/24 at 1:07 P.M. with Resident #06 reported her room was so cold she had to wear her coat, a scarf, and gloves to bed the last couple of nights. An observation at the time of the interview revealed there was cold air coming from around the wall heating unit and it was not functioning. The heating unit had individual controls for the heat and fan. Interview with Resident #05 (the roommate of Resident #06) at the same time, revealed the resident reported the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, safe, and homelike environment with (air) temperatures maintained between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This affected 30 residents (#01, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, #10, #11, #12, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #43, #52, #53, #57, #58 and #64) of 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 01/16/24 at 8:30 A.M. a tour of the facility revealed there was a slight chill inside the facility. An interview on 01/16/24 at 1:07 P.M. with Resident #06 reported that her room was so cold she had to wear her coat, a scarf, and gloves to bed on the night of 01/15/24 through 01/16/24. An observation at the time of the interview revealed there was cold air coming from under the wall heating unit and near the floor in the resident's room and it was not functioning. Interview with Resident #05 (roommate of Resident #06) at the same time, revealed the room was cold and she was buried under her blankets as she slept.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-26 · tag F0562 — widespreadProvide immediate access to any resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives had reasonable access to communication with residents by telephone. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Interview: 12/21/23 at 11:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #131 confirmed she could not hear the phone if it rang in the nurses' station unless she was sitting in the nurses' station. If she was on the floor administering medications or addressing a resident's needs, the phone would ring multiple times and would go unanswered. Observation on 12/25/23 at 6:19 P.M. revealed the surveyor called the facility, and the phone rang 15 times and was unanswered. Observation on 12/26/23 at 5:23 A.M. revealed the surveyor called the facility, and the phone rang 10 times and was unanswered. Observation on 12/26/23 at 6:00 A.M. revealed the surveyor called the facility, and the phone rang 10 times and was unanswered. Interview on 12/26/23 at 10:00 A.M. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to residents. This affected one resident, (#2), with the potential to affect all 23 of the 100-hall residents (#1, #3, #11, #12, #13, #16, #17, #20, #23, #27, #31, #32, #36, #40, #42, #43, #47, #53, #55, #56, #58, #69). The current census is 71. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 include cerebral infarction, diabetes, encephalopathy, depression, and non-pressure ulcer of skin. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition, was continent of bowel and bladder, and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Review of Resident #2's care plans dated 09/2023 revealed a focus for self-care performance requiring limited hands-on assistance with daily hygiene and ADLs. Observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-08-12 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information for the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ staffing data report for the first quarter of 2024 revealed the facility triggered for no PBJ staffing data submitted. Interview on 08/06/24 at 4:08 P.M. with Regional Operations Manager (ROM) #200 and Administrator #201 confirmed the facility had not submitted data for the PBJ staffing report for the first quarter of 2024. The Administrator #201 revealed she submitted the first quarter 2024 information to the facility's corporate office in order for them to submit the data to CMS. ROM #200 revealed at the time that the PBJ was due to be submitted, the individual who was responsible for submitting the data to CMS was a contractor who had been given a 30 days' notice to terminate his contract. The contractor did not turn over the log in profile to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-13 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ), the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information for the PBJ report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 63 residents in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the [NAME] PBJ staffing data report for the third quarter of 2023 revealed the facility triggered for no Registered Nurse (RN) hours and no licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day for the entire quarter. Interview with the Administrator on 03/13/24 at 9:00 A.M. confirmed inaccurate data was sent in on the PBJ for the third quarter of 2023. The Administrator revealed she collected data for two facilities and sends the information to corporate. The Administrator revealed she had no access to verify the information was received by CMS.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$147,294 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $121,937 — penalty dated 2025-05-19
- $25,357 — penalty dated 2023-09-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-07 for 78 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-21 for 76 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDZ CONSULTING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 76% | since 11/01/2022 |
| MONTGOMERY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 24% | since 11/01/2022 |
| FELDMAN, ZACHARIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 24% | since 11/01/2022 |
| ZAHLER, JACOB | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 98% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $46K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366150. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.