No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Astoria Place Of Silverton

6922 Ohio Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45236 · For profit - Partnership · 98 certified beds · (513) 793-2090 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 793-2090 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,887 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,887 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7451 Montgomery Rd · (513) 363-5480 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Aviva Rx0.9 mi
8016 Plainfield Rd · (513) 376-9650 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6647 Montgomery Rd · (513) 512-1408 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(513) 936-6235 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.0%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine0.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
76.5%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 70.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-04-14)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2019-12-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interviews, review of employee timeclock punch reports, review of the local police report, review of witness statements, review of an employee personnel file and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one cognitively impaired resident (#20) was free from physical abuse by facility staff. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious physical injuries and psychosocial harm for Resident #20 when on 12/10/23, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #800 was witnessed by Activities Aide #400 to physically restrain Resident #20 in his wheelchair and then slapped the resident on the left side of his head/face causing the resident's glasses to fall off and the lenses came out of the frame. This affected one (#20) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 62. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for residents. This affected two (Residents #12 and #68) of 18 residents sampled. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were stocked with paper towels. This affected two (Residents #11 and #68) of 18 residents sampled. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/13/26 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 05/19/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 06/22/26 at 12:21 P.M of Resident #12's room revealed there was a wooden handrail propped up against the wall which was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care in a timely fashion. This affected one (Resident #11) of 18 residents sampled. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/22/26 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, traumatic brain injury, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 05/29/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the weekly skin assessment for Resident #11 dated 05/22/26 revealed upon admission the resident had the following areas of impaired skin integrity: a skin tear to the groin, a laceration to the front right lower leg, a laceration to the rear right lower leg, lacerations to the left toes. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment of pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #11) of two resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 05/22/26 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, traumatic brain injury, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 05/29/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the weekly skin assessment for Resident #11 dated 05/22/26 revealed upon admission the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer to his sacrum. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 05/31/26 to cleanse the pressure ulcer with normal saline, apply triad paste and leave open to air every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #68) of 18 residents sampled. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/10/26 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, epilepsy, type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #68 dated 05/19/26 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of physician's orders for Resident #68 revealed an order dated 05/24/26 for cefuroxime 250 milligram (mg) tablet give one tablet via gastrostomy tube (g-tube) two times a day for five days for pneumonia until 05/29/26 and an order for azithromycin 500mg tablet give one tablet via g-Tube at bedtime for pneumonia util 05/26/26. Review of Medication Administration Report (MAR) for Resident #68 dated May 2026 revealed the resident did not receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) while providing wound care. This affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during meal service. This affected six (Residents #71, #8, #10, #20, and #23) of 18 residents sampled. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1.Review of medical record for Resident #56 reveled an admission date of 12/02/25 with diagnoses including gastrostomy status and traumatic brain injury. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #56 revealed an order dated 06/16/26 for the resident to be on EBP due to gastrostomy tube (g-tube) and an order for wound care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #56 dated 06/16/16 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance activities of daily living (ADLs.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of dishwasher logs, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained in working order. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen on 03/04/26 at 10:39 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #64, revealed the dishwasher was not operational. DM #53 stated there had been problems with the dishwasher since February and the facility had been using disposable dishware and utensils for all meals. DM #64 stated it gets fixed, and will work for a few days, and then break again. DM #64 stated the dishwasher was dispensing chemicals at the incorrect time throughout the wash cycle and dishes were not coming out clean. DM #64 stated the facility had technicians out frequently to make repairs on the dishwasher. Observation at the same time with DM #53, revealed a technician was working on the dishwasher. During an interview on 03/05/26 at 11:19 A.M., Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #300 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by providing disposable cutlery and dishware during meal services. This affected 67 residents as the facility identified three residents (#42, #56 and #73) who were nothing by mouth (NPO) and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 70. Findings include: During an observation of the kitchen on 03/04/26 at 10:39 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #64, revealed the dishwasher was not operational. DM #53 stated there have been problems with the dishwasher since February and the facility has been using disposable dishware for all meals. DM #64 stated it gets fixed and will work for a few days and then break again. DM #64 stated the dishwasher was dispensing chemicals at the incorrect time throughout the wash cycle and dishes were not coming out clean. DM #64 stated the facility has had technicians out frequently to make repairs on the machine. Observation at the same time as the interview with DM #53 revealed a technician was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of care plans, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to have call lights within reach. This affected four Residents (#33, #53, #55, and #58) reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 70.Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/09/26 as AMA. Diagnoses included chronic viral hepatitis c, polyneuropathy, dementia, manic episode without psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, depression and venous insufficiency. The resident had no Guardian at the time of discharge. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #107 had moderately impaired cognition, independent with eating, partial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and set up for personal hygiene. On 02/09/26, the resident was reassessed to have a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, review of Controlled Substance Records, review of hospice notes, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. This affected four Residents (#117, #53, #54, and #55) of the the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include:1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/25/25. Diagnoses included mood disorder, bipolar disorder, cauda equina syndrome, catatonic schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #117 had severely impaired cognition, supervision with eating, substantial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and partial assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the physician order for Resident #117 dated 12/01/25, revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to store and destroy controlled substances appropriately. This affected four Residents (#117, #132, #119, and #118) but had the potential to affect 56 residents who the facility identified as being independently mobile. The facility census was 70.Findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Clinical Director #205 on 03/12/26 at 10:48 A.M. inside the DON's office, revealed an observation of numerous narcotic medication bottles lying on the desk. The bottles include: 1) One package of lorazepam (anti-anxiety) oral concentrate 30 milliliter (mL) bottle (two milligram (mg)/ per mL) for Resident #117 with a fill date of 12/01/25 and 29 mL left in the bottle.2) One package of morphine sulfate (a rapid-acting, potent opioid analgesic used to treat severe acute or chronic pain) oral solution 30 mL bottle (100 mg per five mL) for Resident #117 with fill date of 12/02/25 and 12 mL left in bottle.3) Three bottles of morphine sulfate oral liquid 30 mL (100 mg per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, review of the menu, review of the substitution log, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure they had an adequate supply of food to follow the menu. This affected 67 residents as the facility identified three Residents (#42, #56 and #73) who were nothing by mouth (NPO) and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 70. Findings include:Observation of the dry stock area of the kitchen on 03/04/26 at 11:30 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #64, revealed the facility had a low stock of food. Interview with DM #64 at the same time verified there was a low stock of food and stated the facility received a truck delivery with food once a week and if the facility ran out of food, she would go to the local store and get food. DM #64 verified that there was not an emergency stock of food available. Observation of today's lunch menu on 03/05/26 at 11:32 P.M., revealed the residents would receive beef and noodles, broccoli florets, and two baked cookies. Observation of the food line on 03/05/26 at 12:28 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected 67 residents as the facility identified three Residents (#42, #56 and #73) who were nothing by mouth (NPO) and did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 70. Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 03/04/26 at 9:45 A.M. with [NAME] #67, revealed an air vent in the ceiling leaking water, with droplets falling onto the floor below. Immediately adjacent to this location was a food preparation table that was actively being used. Below the preparation table, clean dishes were stored and water droplets were splashing off the floor and onto the dishes. Interview at the time of the observation with [NAME] #67 verified that the air vent was leaking next to the preparation area and near the clean dishes. During an interview on 03/02/26 at 9:47 A.M., Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #91 stated the air vent was connected to the air conditioning unit and it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted. This affected two Residents (#107 and #117) of the three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 70.Findings include:1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/09/26 as Against medical Advice (AMA). Diagnoses included chronic viral hepatitis-c, polyneuropathy, dementia, manic episode without psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, depression and venous insufficiency. The resident had no Guardian at the time of discharge. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #107 had moderately impaired cognition, independent with eating, partial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and set up for personal hygiene. On 02/09/26, the resident was reassessed to have a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Medical Director/ Provider of residents leaving the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). This affected two Residents (#105 and #107) of the three reviewed. The facility census was 70.Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/09/26 as AMA. Diagnoses included chronic viral hepatitis c, polyneuropathy, dementia, manic episode without psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, depression and venous insufficiency. The resident had no Guardian at the time of discharge. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #107 had moderately impaired cognition, independent with eating, partial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and set up for personal hygiene. On 02/09/26, the resident was reassessed to have a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were following when administering medications to residents. This affected three Residents (#53, #54, and #55) of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominate side, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for Resident #53 dated 07/01/25, revealed the resident was ordered to receive a Pain Relief Maximum Strength external topical pain patch (Lidocaine) to be applied at 9:00 P.M. (bedtime), diclofenac Sodium external gel (pain relief) one percent four times daily (8:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M., 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 70 out of 71 residents in the facility. One resident (#67) was unable to consume food from the kitchen per diet order. The census was 71.Observation on 07/07/25 at 10:15 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the floor of the walk-in refrigerator had a pooling of water with a brownish tint. Interview on 07/07/25 at 10:15 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #710 verified the pooling of water on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator. DM #710 stated she was newer to the position and had no information regarding the issue in the walk-in refrigerator. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1308977.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and homelike environment. This affected one resident (#72) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 71.Findings include:1. Observation on 07/07/25 at 8:24 A.M. revealed an area of the handrail on the 200 hall was missing. There was a wooden box between the two sections of handrail that was half-way secured to the wall. At the time of the observation, Maintenance Director (MD) #990 verified the missing section of handrail. MD #990 stated there was a water fountain that was removed from the wall, and the wooden box contained some plumbing parts. MD #990 expressed the plan was to remove the plumbing parts and replace the handrail. 2. Observation on 07/07/25 at 9:55 A.M. revealed a broken handrail on the 400 hall. The front portion of the handrail was cracked and separated from the rest of the handrail and had a sharp edge, which was verified by State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care and services to prevent falls were implemented timely and appropriately. This affected one resident (#13) of 23 residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 71. Record review for Resident #13 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and hypertension. Review of the facility Fall Risk Assessment, dated 04/15/25, revealed the resident was assessed to be at moderate risk for falls. Review of the facility incident log revealed Resident #13 experienced a fall in the facility on 05/10/25. Review of the plan of care for Resident #13 revealed a plan of care and interventions to reduce the risk of falls had not been implemented for the resident until 05/14/25, four days after the resident experienced a fall at the facility. Interview with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse #390 on 07/08/25 at 3:08 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and review of the medication administration policy the facility failed to provide medications while adhering to proper infection control procedures during administration. This affected one resident (Resident #53) out of three observed during medication administration. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Record review of Resident #53 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, seizures, depression, dysphagia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and benign prostatic hyperplagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment completed on 06/05/25 revealed this resident had minimal cognitive impairments. Review of Physician Orders revealed this resident was receiving the following medications observed during administration: Vitamin B12 100 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet, Zinc 50 mg 1 tablet, Sertraline 50 mg 1 tablet, Multivitamin 1 tablet, Folic Acid 800 mg 1 tablet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence of a refund being issued within thirty days of discharge. This affected one (110) of the two residents reviewed for personal accounts. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 06/26/24. The resident passed away in the facility on 08/12/24. Diagnoses included lung cancer and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 04/07/25 at 3:54 P.M., Resident #110's daughter stated she had not received a refund from the funds paid in advance for August 2024. Resident #110's daughter stated she had reached out to the facility multiple times and had not received any answers as to why she had not been refunded approximately $3900.00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to allow a resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident without justification and proper documentation. This affected one (#61) resident out of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 05/27/21 and a discharge date of 08/20/24. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and alcohol use, unspecified with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/24, revealed Resident #61 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #61 was assessed to be independent for eating, oral hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to give proper notice before a transfer or discharge. This affected one (#61) resident out of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 05/27/21 and a discharge date of 08/20/24. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and alcohol use, unspecified with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/24, revealed Resident #61 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #61 was assessed to be independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide palatable food to meet resident nutritional needs. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 55 residents. Findings include: Review of the menu for lunch dated 06/27/24 revealed the menu items included the following: creamy Maryland chicken with mushroom sauce, egg noodles, yellow squash, chilled peach, choice of cold beverage. Observation on 06/27/24 at 11:44 A.M. of the test tray revealed the meal included creamy Maryland chicken with mushroom sauce, penne noodles, yellow squash, and peaches. The squash was sliced and green in color and was mushy to the touch with no taste or flavoring. The creamy Maryland chicken had pieces of cut up chicken breast in a crem sauce over noodles. There was a hard substance which appeared to be a chicken bone mixed in with the sauce and pieces of chicken. The chicken dish was bland and had no flavor. Observations on 06/27/24 from 11:50 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately and timely document resident wound treatments. This affected one (Resident #48) resident of three residents reviewed for treatments. The facility census was 55 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 02/08/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cellulitis, lymphedema, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan for Resident #48 dated 02/15/24 revealed the resident had actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions included staff were to perform wound treatments with documentation to include measurements, type of tissue, and any exudate noted. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48 dated 05/17/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision with bathing. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #48 revealed an order dated 06/04/24 to cleanse the bilateral lower extremities (BLE) with normal saline,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided at the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Interview on 05/29/24 at 4:00 P.M. with Resident #35 revealed the facility has had an on-going issue with various bugs. Resident #35 stated she observed several bugs in her room recently. Interview with Resident #42 on 05/29/24 at 11:40 P.M. revealed she has observed various bugs in her room recently. An interview with an unknown Visitor #51 on 05/29/24 at 11:22 A.M. revealed she was very upset with the conditions of the facility. Visitor #51 took out her phone and showed Surveyor several pictures of large bugs she had observed in the facility. Interview with Resident #47 on 05/29/24 at 11:28 A.M. revealed she had large bugs in her room. Observed at the same time revealed a dead, large, black hard-shelled bug approximately one inch inside her door frame and a live one underneath the resident's sink. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a written discharge notice with provision of the discharge was provided to resident upon discharge to the community. This affected one resident (#56) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Record review for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 05/14/24. His diagnoses included, spondylosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery dissection, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hypertension, and alcohol abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #56, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #56 was dependent on facility staff for medication administration and independent with all other activities of daily living. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #56 dated 05/14/24 at 4:12 P.M. revealed the resident was discharged to a local hotel's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge. This affected one resident (#56) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Record review for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 05/14/24. His diagnoses included, spondylosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery dissection, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hypertension, and alcohol abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #56, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #56 was dependent on facility staff for medication administration and independent with all other activities of daily living. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #56 dated 05/14/24 at 4:12 P.M. revealed the resident was discharged to a local hotel's address with all of his personal belongings, a courtesy bag, a list of medications and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and sanitary environment. This directly affected three residents (#14, #25, and #42) but had the potential to affect all 18 residents (#01, #02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #25 and #42) who resided on the memory care unit. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1) Record review for Resident #14 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, diabetes mellitus (DM)2, Alzheimer's disease, depression, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had impaired cognition. Observation of Resident #14's room on 05/29/24 at 11:20 A.M. revealed the following: a. The cove base around the outside of the bathroom wall was hanging off the wall. b. There was white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility staff failed to perform hand washing/hand hygiene after providing incontinence care and before applying barrier cream, repositioning, and clothing adjustments. This affected two (#4 and #26) of three residents review for incontinence care. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, excoriation (skin-picking) disorder, and functional urinary incontinence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #26, dated 03/13/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required partial assistance with toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 01/16/24 to apply barrier cream as needed. Observation of incontinence care on 04/29/24 at 10:00 A.M., on Resident #26, was provided by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #256. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided a clean, functional, homelike environment. This affected two residents (#37 and #40) and had the potential to affect 34 residents (#18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, and #53) of 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation was conducted in the facility on 03/28/24 from 8:42 A.M. to 9:10 A.M. revealed: • The 100-hall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] had bugs and dust in the ceiling light. Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], there were bugs and dust in the ceiling lights and the shield was broken. Outside of rooms [ROOM NUMBER], there were bugs, dust, and lights burned out. Throughout the 100-hallway, the walls and handrails had scuff marks. On the entrance to the 100-hall, there was a missing strip of flooring. • The bathroom on the 100-hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temperature and water temperatures in the kitchen were maintained in manner to promote kitchen sanitation. This affected 54 of the 54 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation of Maintenance Director #72 taking water temperatures in the facility on 02/07/24 at 10:51 A.M. revealed the handwashing sink in the kitchen was 72 degrees Fahrenheit, the dishwasher registered 71 degrees Fahrenheit for the wash and rinse, and the three-compartment sink was 87 degrees Fahrenheit. Dietary Aide #13 was actively washing pans in the three-compartment sink. Interview with Maintenance Director #72 on 02/07/24 at 10:51 A.M. verified the handwashing sink in the kitchen was 72 degrees Fahrenheit, the dishwasher registered 71 degrees Fahrenheit for the wash and rinse, and the three-compartment sink was 87 degrees Fahrenheit. Maintenance Director #72 also verified Dietary Aide #13 was actively washing pans in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, safe, and homelike environment by ensuring the residents had water. This affected 23 (#01, #03, #05, #07, #10, #12 #14, #16, #19, #24, #27, #29, #32, #33, #34, #37, #38, #39, #40, #44, #45, #46 and #52) of the 54 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #05's chart revealed Resident #05 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance or anxiety, anemia, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Review of Resident #05's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #05 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, showering, personal hygiene, and transfers. Review of Resident #07's chart revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment to provide hot water to the residents. This directly affected 23 (#01, #03, #05, #07, #10, #12 #14, #16, #19, #24, #27, #29, #32, #33, #34, #34, #34, #37, #38, #39, #40, #44, #46 and #52) of the 54 residents reviewed for safe and comfortable hot water temperatures. This also had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 02/07/24 at 9:35 A.M. with Housekeeper #42 revealed the water was cold in the facility. Interview on 02/07/24 at 9:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #66 revealed the center unit was the only unit with hot water in the facility. RN #66 stated all other units did not have hot water. Interview with Resident #07 on 02/07/24 at 9:39 A.M. revealed the water at the facility was cold and she wanted a warm shower. Interview on 02/07/24 at 9:46 A.M. with Resident #05 revealed the water in the facility was cold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 12/27/23 from 8:47 A.M. to 9:03 A.M. revealed the following: a) The high temperature dishwasher temperature gauge was stuck at 90 degrees Fahrenheit, the clear covering on the gauge was cracked, and the gauge was broken. There was white and brown debris on the top of the dishwasher and all around the openings of the dishwasher. b) The reach in refrigerator's seal around the door was broken. The reach in refrigerator did not have a thermometer inside and the temperature gauge outside the refrigerator was broken and stuck at 17 degrees Fahrenheit. c) There were two packages of expired buns in the dry storage room that were dated 12/13/23. One of the packages of buns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment. This affected 23 residents (#03, #09, #12, #14, #16, #19, #27, #32, #34, #36, #37, #40, #41, #42, #45, #48, #50, #52, #53, #57, #60, #62, and #63) of 61 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/10/23 and 04/11/23 from 11:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., revealed the hallway railings had dark brown and black particles of dirt and crumbs on them. There was a slice of bread from a mealtime left on the hallway railings. There was toilet paper, an empty milk container, bread and paper fragments were in between the wall and the hallway railings. The hallway railings had chipped paint exposing the wood and the white painted railings were dirty and dingy in appearance. The vent in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was caked with dirt and debris and the turning knob of the vent was missing. Interview on 04/11/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the correct grievance official during monthly resident council meetings and aware of the designated grievance official. This directly affected six (#13, #18, #22, #31, #37, and #48) residents interviewed during the resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 61 residents in the facility. The Facility census was 61. Findings include: Interviews during the resident group meeting on 04/12/23 12:59 P.M., revealed Residents #13, #18, #22, #31, #37, and #48 expressed a concern they were reporting their grievances to the Activity Director (AD) #43 during council meetings and outside of council meetings and don't believe anything was being done. The residents were not aware of a posting which revealed the Grievance Official in the center, back, and or front of the facility. Interview on 04/12/23 at 1:38 P.M., revealed AD #43 reported residents can come to her about a grievance. She took those concerns to the department heads to address the concerns. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and representatives had the opportunity to participate in care conferences. This affected one resident (#09) out of one resident reviewed for care conferences participation. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Medical record revealed Resident #09 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, paranoid schizophrenia, peripheral vascular diseases, and chronic kidney disease stage two. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #09 had intact cognition and required supervision of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The record review revealed no evidence of residents participating in care conferences. Further record review revealed no documentation from other interdisciplinary team members was invited. There is no documentation whether resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals served were palatable. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The census was 82. Findings include: Observation on 12/16/19 at 2:15 P.M. revealed dietary services preparing to serve dinner that consisted of diced chicken and dumplings, diced carrots, wheat bread and [NAME] dump cake. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #20 was cooking the chicken dumplings which consisted of diced chicken, frozen dumpling pieces, concentrated chicken flavored base, pepper and garlic powder. DC #20 placed canned apples in the pan and placed cinnamon on top along with melted butter. DC #20 sprinkled yellow cake mix on top of the apples. During interview on 12/16/19 at 2:16 P.M., DC #20 and Dietary Assistant Manager (DAM) #23 was unable to find the recipe for the dinner menu. DC #20 reported she has never used a recipe when cooking meals. During interview on 12/16/19 at 2:30 P.M., Dietician (DT) #87 stated a copy of the dinner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to label, date, and discard expired food items from the walk-in refrigerator and freezer. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents. The census was 82. Findings include: On 12/15/19 at 8:05 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Assistant (DA) #23, the following was observed: 1. In the refrigerator there was a large bowl of mixed salad was covered with no preparation date or use by date; two 20 pound portions of ground beef and two 34 pound hams were thawing on a cookie sheet, one shelf up from the bottom; two dozen eggs were stored one shelf up from the bottom; a container of country steak and a container of corn were dated 12/14 and a container of sliced potatoes with a date of 12/6, but it was not specified if this was an open date or use by date; three large pans of macaroni and cheese with no opened date or use by date; three large storage bags of shaved ham with no date; a plastic container beef with no opened date or use by date; and a large pan of green beans with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep rooms clean and in proper repair. This affected one resident on the 400 hall (Resident #45), and 11 (Resident #14, #21, #23, #37, #38, #44, #52, #53, #59, #60, and #281) residents on the dementia unit. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/15/19 at 2:56 P.M. of Resident #45's room, the string to turn on the resident's room light was broken; the assist rails in the bathroom were loose; the wall was separated from the air vent used for heat in the bathroom; and there was a handrail that was detaching from the the wall, which was being used as a shelf. A tour on 12/17/19 at 4:04 P.M. with the Maintenance Director #79 verified the above observations. 2. On 12/15/19 at 11:05 A.M., an observation of Resident #52 and #281's room revealed paint peeling over Resident #281's bed and the toilet was clogged with feces. 3. On 12/15/19 11:27 A.M., an observation of Resident #21's and Resident #38's room revealed the call light in bathroom was broken. 4. On 12/15/19 at 11:48 A.M., an observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were being held. This affected four (Residents #17, #26, #33 and #57) of six residents reviewed for care planning conferences. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/23/14. Review of care plan conference sheets revealed Resident #26 had two conferences at the family request on 04/15/19 and again on 08/26/19. There were no other care plan conference records provided for the resident for the year. Interview on 12/15/19 at 3:29 P.M. with Resident #26's mother and sister revealed they did not recall any care conferences being offered recently. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident # 57 revealed an admission date of 03/28/14. Review of care plan conference sheets revealed Resident #57 had one conference at the family request on 09/08/19. There were no other care plan conference records provided for the resident for the year.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy for abuse by not reporting to the State Agency or investigating an allegation of abuse. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 82. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes, bipolar II disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, insomnia, encephalopathy, hypertension, benign neoplasm of pituitary gland, depression, personality disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, vitamin D deficient, anemia, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, thrombocytopenia, post traumatic stress disorder, and accidental overdose. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 has no cognitive deficits, requires limited assist with bed mobility, transfers, extensive assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, is frequently incontinent of urine, and always continent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes, bipolar II disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, insomnia, encephalopathy, hypertension, benign neoplasm of pituitary gland, depression, personality disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, vitamin D deficient, anemia, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, thrombocytopenia, post traumatic stress disorder, and accidental overdose. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 has no cognitive deficits, requires limited assist with bed mobility, transfers, extensive assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, is frequently incontinent of urine, and always continent of bowel. During interview on [DATE] at 11:33 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This affected one (Resident #1) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 82. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes, bipolar II disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, insomnia, encephalopathy, hypertension, benign neoplasm of pituitary gland, depression, personality disorder, chronic viral hepatitis C, vitamin D deficient, anemia, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, thrombocytopenia, post traumatic stress disorder, and accidental overdose. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 has no cognitive deficits, requires limited assist with bed mobility, transfers, extensive assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, is frequently incontinent of urine, and always continent of bowel. During interview on [DATE] at 11:33 A.M., Resident #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program designed to meet the interests and total care needs of the residents on the dementia unit. This affected two (#21 and #49) out of 29 residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's care plan, dated 10/08/19, revealed Resident #21 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs and would attend/participate in activities of choice two to three times weekly. Review of Resident #21's activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's current interests included newspapers, magazines, listening to music, puzzles and participation in religious services was very important. Review of Resident #21's Daily Participation Record for October 2019, November 2019 and December 2019 revealed Resident #21 was not offered to play bingo, puzzles or participate in music any time it was scheduled. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident call lights were in working order. This affected three (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) of 26 resident rooms. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Observation made on 12/15/19 at 10:01 A.M. revealed call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not in working condition. Observation made on 12/15/19 at 2:12 P.M. revealed call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not in working condition. Observation made on 12/15/19 at 4:07 P.M. revealed call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not in working condition. A tour conducted on 12/17/19 at 3:49 P.M. with Maintenance Director #79 verified call lights were not functioning.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, test tray trial, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a palatable manner This had the potential to affect all 85 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Census was 85. Findings include: Interviews were conducted on 11/13/18 throughout the day with 10 residents, who wished to remain anonymous. The residents complained about the taste of the food. Observation on 11/14/18 from 5:15 P.M. to 5:55 P.M., revealed dietary services served dinner that consisted of Hungarian goulash, buttered noodles, Capri vegetables and peanut butter cookies. Several residents sent the served meal back to the kitchen and requested for the substitution dinner which consisted of hamburger, fries and soup. There were white noodles with brown meat on top of the noodles, and next to the noodles was a mixture of cauliflower, broccoli and one or two carrot slices. At 5:45 P.M., after all the residents received their meal trays, the surveyor, Dietary Manager (DM) #31 and Dietary [NAME] (DC) #47 tasted tested the meal. The surveyor tasted the food and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to label, date, and discard expired food items from the walk-in refrigerator and freezer. The facility also failed to serve food in a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents. Facility census was 85. Findings include: On 11/13/18 from 9:22 A.M. to 9:45 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Registered Dietician (RD) #42. During the observation the following concerns were observed and all the concerns were verified by RD #42. a) In the refrigerator there was a container of chili was covered but had no date or use by date. b) In the refrigerator there was a 12-pack of assorted donuts with one donut missing and had no opened date or use by date. c) In the refrigerator there were seven ½ pints of milk dated 11/10/18 and five containers of 4.0 fluid ounces of reduced fat free milk dated 11/06/18. d) In the refrigerator there were two-gallon bags of Ziploc baggies that consisted of bologna with no date and no used by date. e) In the freezer there were rib…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of monitoring measures, interview and policy review the facility failed to have appropriate Legionella monitoring. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the facility's Monitoring Control Measures to Prevent Growth and Spread of Legionella revealed no evidence of water temperatures being done in rooms or water heaters, no evidence of flushing of resident rooms/unused rooms, and no evidence of wash basins aerators or shower heads being cleaned or replaced. Interview on 11/15/18 at 5:12 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #36 verified there was no evidence of water temperatures being done in rooms or water heaters, no evidence of flushing of resident rooms/unused rooms, and no evidence of wash basins aerators or shower heads being cleaned or replaced. Review of the facility's policy entitled Legionella Hazard Risk Analysis (not dated) revealed all resident rooms and other areas in the facility that have not had use in the past week will have the appropriate output devices flushed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview and review of pest control records the facility failed to provide an environment free of insects in the kitchen and in the residents' rooms. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents. Facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 11/13/18 from 9:22 A.M. and on 11/15/18 at 8:28 A.M., revealed gnats in the kitchen near the dry storage area, near the stove, near the dishwasher, near the serving table and around the trash can. Interview on 11/13/18 at 10:58 A.M., Resident #4 complained about gnats and ants in his room and in the dining area. Interview on 11/14/18 at 10:28 A.M., Dietary Manager (DM) #31 stated the kitchen had some problems with gnats about two months ago, but it was getting better. DM #31 verified there were still gnats in the kitchen. Interview on 11/14/18 at 6:30 P.M., Maintenance Director (MD) #36 reported the exterminator sprays the facility twice a month for bugs. MD #36 reported some residents had reported gnats in their rooms. Review of local pest control company records revealed the company was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Observation on 11/13/18 at 12:01 P.M. revealed scrapes to the wall, the entire length of Resident #62's bed, the laminate was peeling off the front of the sink counter leaving exposed wood, and the bottom of the corner wall, next to the sink. Resident #72's bed, was crumbling with a visible hole. Observation on 11/15/18 at 2:30 P.M. with MD #36 verified the scrapes to the wall and reported they were the result of Resident #62's bed being raised and lowered during care. MD #36 also verified the exposed wood to the front of the sink, reported the laminate was sliding down, and the crumbling lower corner wall near Resident #72's bed was a five inch area of exposed drywall where the cove base was off. The measurement was obtained by MD #36. 4. Observation on 11/13/18 at 3:54 P.M. revealed Resident #28's bathroom ceiling was cracked, peeling, with a large piece hanging down. Observation on 11/15/18 at 2:26 P.M. with MD #36, measured and reported it was a 13 inch by seven inch piece of peeling paint hanging off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review,review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) and witness statements, interviews, and review of facility Abuse Prevention Program and Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policies the facility failed to ensure abuse policies were implemented for allegations of abuse including injuries of unknown origin. This affected four (#22, #33, #69, #83) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Closed medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/01/18. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and schizophrenia. Review of admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, limited assistance was required with eating, personal hygiene, a cane and walker were utilized for mobility. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to have an operational call light system. This affected 10 rooms (#300, #314, #410, #412, #414, #416, #422, #423, #424,and #425) out 21 rooms reviewed for operational call lights. This had the potential to affect 16 Residents (#1, #6, #21, #22, #24, #25, #28, #31, #33, #37, #51, #52, #58, #63, #75, and #184) identified by the facility as residing in the affected rooms. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 11/13/18 at 11:28 A.M. revealed there was no call light button to push to activate the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview on 11/13/18 at 11:31 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #36 verified there was no push button to activate the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A tour conducted on 11/13/18 from 12:10 P.M. to 12:28 P.M with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #34 revealed the following: rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] the call light did not activate when pushed, rooms [ROOM NUMBER] the bathroom call light did not activate when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide required beneficiary notices in writing to residents when skilled Medicare Part A services were discontinued. This affected two (#31 and #285) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review provided by the facility revealed the resident received skilled Part A services, and the last covered day of services was 10/26/18. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident remained in the facility after skilled services were discontinued. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) revealed the facility contacted the resident's representative on 10/18/18 by telephone to inform of skilled services ending and the content of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) and written statement reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse. This affected three Residents (#22, #33, & #69) of five reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia, hypertension, dysphagia, constipation, magnesium deficiency, impulse disorder, depression, psychosis, mood disorder, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had moderate cognitive deficits. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebrovascular disease, schizoaffective disorder, diabetes, abuse of non-psychoactive substances, traumatic brain injury, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder, hypertension, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident #50 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interviews, and review of facility Abuse Prevention Program and Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policies the facility failed to report to the state agency a resident to resident altercation and an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#83) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/01/18. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and schizophrenia. Review of admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, limited assistance was required with eating, personal hygiene, a cane and walker were utilized for mobility. Review of nursing progress note dated 06/13/18 at 7:47 P.M. revealed Resident #7 self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interviews, and review of facility Abuse Prevention Program and Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policies the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and resident to resident altercation and an injury of unknown origin. This affected one(#83) of five Residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/01/18. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and schizophrenia. Review of admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, limited assistance was required with eating, personal hygiene, a cane and walker were utilized for mobility. Review of nursing progress note dated 06/13/18 at 7:47 P.M. revealed Resident #7 self propelled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice or notify the ombudsman office of a facility initiated discharge. This affected one (#85) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, diabetes, and asthma. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed intact cognitive skills for daily decision making, Resident #85 was independent with transfers, mobility, supervision was required with eating, limited assistance was required with toileting and personal hygiene. A cane or crutch was utilized for mobility. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed a self care deficit with decline expected related to cognitive deficit. Alterations in mood and behavior related to anxiety, cognitive decline/deficit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly prepared for a safe and orderly discharge. This affected one (#85) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, diabetes, and asthma. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed intact cognitive skills for daily decision making, Resident #85 was independent with transfers, mobility, supervision was required with eating, limited assistance was required with toileting and personal hygiene. A cane or crutch was utilized for mobility. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed a self care deficit with decline expected related to cognitive deficit. Alterations in mood and behavior related to anxiety, cognitive decline/deficit, and signs/symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a minimum data set (MDS) assessment was completed and submitted upon discharge from the facility. This affected one (#83) of one resident reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and schizophrenia. Review of admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, extensive assistance was required with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, limited assistance was required with eating, personal hygiene, a cane and walker were utilized for mobility. The medical record did not contain any completed MDS assessments after [DATE]. Review of nursing progress note dated [DATE] at 3:15 P.M., revealed nine-one-one (911) was called to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) extension was requested timely. This affected one (#85) of one Resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, diabetes, and asthma. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed intact cognitive skills for daily decision making, Resident #85 was independent with transfers, mobility, supervision was required with eating, limited assistance was required with toileting and personal hygiene. A cane or crutch was utilized for mobility. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed a self care deficit with decline expected related to cognitive deficit. Alterations in mood and behavior related to anxiety, cognitive decline/deficit, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care was planned with the input of the resident. This affected one resident (#4) of one reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, pancreatic steatorrhea, dysphagia, hypertension, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact for making decisions, independent with bed mobility, but extensive assist with one person for transfers and toilet use. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was his own responsible party/representative. Review plan of care dated 02/13/17 revealed advanced care planning wishes will be respected and coordinated with resident upon his choices. Review of care conference meetings revealed none were offered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a splint was applied per physician's order. This affected one Resident (#28) of three reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure, dementia, voice and resonance disorder, intellectual disabilities, anemia, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hemiplegia, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had moderate to severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assist with activities of daily living, impairment on right upper side extremity, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of physician order dated 09/28/18 revealed that Resident #28 was to wear right hand splint eight hours daily as tolerated. Further review of the record revealed no evidence the resident was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to store oxygen safely and appropriately. This affected one Resident (#62) of two reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including early onset Alzheimer's, dysphagia, restlessness, agitation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had moderate impaired cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. Observations on 11/13/18 at 12:09 P.M. and 11/14/18 at 9:00 A.M. revealed there were two canisters of oxygen in Resident #62's room. The observations also revealed no signage indicated that oxygen was in use in the room. Interview on 11/14/18 at 9:14 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62 verified there was no sign to indicate the use of oxygen in the residents room. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed on a weekly basis according to physician orders. This affected one Resident (#28) of two reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure, dementia, voice and resonance disorder, intellectual disabilities, anemia, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hemiplegia, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoaffective disorder, and depression. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had moderate to severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assist with activities of daily living, had impairment on right upper side extremity, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of physician order dated 01/21/17 revealed an order to change oxygen tubing/mask every week on Sunday on night shift. Further review of the medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have a stop date for an as needed antipsychotic medications. This affected one Resident (#21) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including altered mental status, psychosis, ataxia, mood disorder, diabetes, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and idiopathic peripheral neuropathy. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had severe cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, supervision with the remaining activities of daily living, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of physician order dated 10/30/18 revealed to give Haldol (antipsychotic) one milligram (mg) tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for agitation with no end date. Interview on 11/14/18 at 3:42 P.M. with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to have ordered laboratory tests completed and drawn as ordered. This affected one Resident (#33) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia, hypertension, dysphagia, constipation, magnesium deficiency, impulse disorder, depression, psychosis, mood disorder, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had moderate cognitive deficits, required extensive assistance with toileting, supervision with remaining activities of daily living, was occasionally incontinent of bladder, and always continent of bowel. Review of physician order revealed an order dated 01/28/17 for serum magnesium, complete metabolic panel, valproic acid serum, complete blood count, liver function test every six months on the fourth Monday in January/July. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, test tray trial, and review of resident council meetings, the facility failed to follow the prepared menus and failed to provide meal preferences for the residents. This affected two Residents (#4 and #19) of three reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medial record revealed Resident #4 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, pancreatic steatorrhea, dysphagia, hypertension, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had intact cognition for decisions. Further review revealed Resident #4 took supplements for every meal. Interview on 11/13/18 at 10:58 A.M., Resident #4 indicated he had reported concerns to the dietary manager that the food did not taste well and he was tired of eating sandwiches for lunch and dinner. Resident #4 reported the facility served bologna…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-04-14 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to display the state agency survey results where residents and visitors could visibly access them. This directly affected six residents (#13, #18, #22, #31, #37, and #48) of six residents interviewed during the resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 61 residents in the facility. The facility census was 61. Finding include: Interviews during the resident group meeting on 04/12/23 12:59 P.M., revealed residents #13, #18, #22, #31, #37, and #48 expressed a concern they were unaware of the posting of the health survey results. Observation on 04/12/23 from 1:50 P.M. to 2:35 P.M., revealed the center, the back and the front of the facility had no visible signs posted to identify where the survey results were located. Interview on 04/12/23 at 2:35 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Activity Director (AD) #43 verified the survey results were not posted in every section of the facility to be visible by every resident. The DON reported she would inform the Administrator and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,887 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,887 — penalty dated 2024-01-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BH VENTURES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 06/29/2018
BRANDMAN, GITTELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST40%since 06/29/2018
GOLDBERG, YEHUDITIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/29/2018
NUDELL, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 06/29/2018
BANK LEUMI USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/29/2018
WEINSCHNEIDER, RAPHAELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/11/2019
BRANDMAN, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/29/2018

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-27.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$50K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 98%Medicare 1%Other / private 1%

About 98% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $50K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$283per resident / day
operating cost
$8,590per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$223per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365476. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next