Bayley Place

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 102.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.553 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.42 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.95 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of the 2022 United States Food and Drug Administration Food Code, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore appropriate hair (beard) covers while in the food preparation area. This had the potential to affect 104 of 104 residents who received meals from the kitchen, excluding Resident #1. The facility census was 105. Findings included: Observation on 08/11/25 at 11:16 A.M., during the initial tour, [NAME] #9 was observed in the food preparation area with long, facial hair that was approximately an inch in length, uncovered. Food Service Supervisor (FSS) #8 was also observed walking around the food preparation areas and counters, with facial hair approximately an inch in length, uncovered.Interview on 08/11/25 at 11:16 A.M., with the Director of Dining Services (DDS) stated they did not use the beard restraints unless the beard was especially long and drawn out. He gave no precise measurements on what the threshold would be. He confirmed the staff had just completed the lunch service.Interview on 08/14/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055. This affected one (#125) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 105.Findings included:Based on interview, record review, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055. This affected one (#125) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 105.Findings included:Review of Resident #125's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/23/25. Resident #125's medical diagnoses included non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unspecified convulsions.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/30/25, revealed Resident #125 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) level 1 was updated and resubmitted following the onset of a new mental illness diagnosis. This affected one (#13) of one residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 105.Findings included: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Resident #13's medical diagnoses included psychotic disorder with delusions (onset date [DATE]), major depressive disorder (onset date [DATE]), and anxiety disorder (onset date [DATE]). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had active diagnoses to include depression and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #13's Care Plan Report included a problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 medication errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a 7.69% medication error rate. This affected one (#96) of 11 residents reviewed during the medication task. The facility census was 105. Findings included:Review of Resident #96's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/15. Resident #96's medical diagnoses included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).Review of Resident #96's Order Summary Report, dated 08/13/25, contained a physician order dated 03/18/24 for simethicone (an anti-flatulent) 80 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times a day.Observation of medication pass on 08/12/25 at 3:58 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 administered simethicone 125 mg by mouth to Resident #96.Interview on 08/15/25 at 1:20 P.M., with LPN #2 stated she did not realize the brand of simethicone had changed and was a different dose than what was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and physician interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory test as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#13) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings included: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/21/21. Resident #13's medical diagnoses included vascular dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/28/25, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #13's Care Plan Report, included a problem statement revised 06/05/25, that indicated the resident was at nutritional risk with potential for dehydration related to dementia, hypertension, acute ischemic cerebrovascular accident with left-sided weakness, altered labs, and decreased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, review of personal files, and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Covid-19. The facility identified six residents who had tested positive for COVID-19 in the past two weeks and four residents who were in isolation precautions for positive COVID-19 on the day of entrance. The facility failed to ensure newly hired employees had their first and second step tuberculosis skin test (PPD) as required. This affected two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #95 and #170 out of five newly hired staff reviewed. The facility also failed to ensure that individuals were safely removing their personal protective equipment (PPE) before leaving resident rooms where isolation precautions were in place to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. This affected three residents (#55, #200, and #247) of 32 residents reviewed for infectious diseases and had the potential to affect all residents residing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were reported to the state agency for Resident #09, failed to ensure resident-to-resident altercations were reported to the state agency for Residents #18, #92, #26 and #146, and failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported to the state agency for Residents #18 and #65. This affected six Residents (#09, #18, #26, #65, #92, and #146) out of 32 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, encephalopathy, malignant neoplasm of the colon, complete traumatic metacarpophalangeal amputation of the right ring finger, malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, anxiety disorder, repeated falls, incisional hernia, hypertension, fall, weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, abnormal levels of serum enzymes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were investigated for Resident #09, failed to ensure resident-to-resident altercations were investigated for Residents #18, #92, #26, and #146, and failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were investigated for Resident #18 and #65. This affected six Residents (#09, #18, #26, #65, #92, and #146) out of 32 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, encephalopathy, malignant neoplasm of the colon, complete traumatic metacarpophalangeal amputation of the right ring finger, malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, anxiety disorder, repeated falls, incisional hernia, hypertension, fall, weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, abnormal levels of serum enzymes, disorientation, altered mental status, acquired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to update a resident's care plan after the development of a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#91) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, dysphagia hypertension, and tachycardia. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #91 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #91 was assessed to require one-person extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, and bathing, supervision with eating, and two-person extensive assistance with toileting. Review of the care plan dated 06/04/22 revealed Resident #91 had impairment to skin integrity related to immobility, weakness, and open area on sacrum. Interventions included encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of the facility shower schedules, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled. This affected two (#34 and #59) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), venous insufficiency, epilepsy, heart failure, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had intact cognition. Resident #59 was assessed to require one-person limited assistance with transfers, two-person extensive assistance with dressing, supervision with eating, and one-person extensive assistance with toileting and bathing. Review of the care plan dated 06/21/22 revealed Resident #59 had ADL functional rehabilitation potential related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH