Courtyard At Seasons

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 9.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 39.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to safely serve food in a manner to avoid possible contamination and food borne illnesses. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility who received food from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one (Resident #36) who received no nutrition by mouth. The facility census was 42 residents.Findings include:Observation on 09/03/25 at 12:05 P.M of trays being assembled revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #10 donned gloves, grabbed a tray off the cart, reviewed the tray ticket, and picked up a sandwich off the steam table. DA #10 placed food on the plate using serving utensils and removed and replaced the lid to the heated serving compartment with gloved hands. DA #10 then picked up the next tray, reviewed the ticket, picked up a chicken breast with gloved hands and placed it on a plate. Interview on 09/03/25 at 12:10 P.M. with DA #10 at 12:10 P.M. confirmed he had donned gloves and residents' food (sandwich and chicken breast) directly with his gloved hands after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during direct care for residents with orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for EBP. The facility also failed to take preventative measures to minimize the risk of legionella per the facility's water management plan. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 42 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/26/25 with diagnoses including but perforation of intestine, colostomy status, and hypertension.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #50 revealed an order dated 08/26/25 for the resident to be on enhanced barrier precautions related to presence of an ostomy. Observation on 09/03/25 at 8:21 A.M. of colostomy care for Resident #50 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 and Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike atmosphere for residents dining in the skilled nursing dining room. This affected six (Residents #3, #12, #15, #21, #27, #38) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility with the exception of one facility-identified resident (#36) who did not receive nutrition by mouth. The facility census was 42 residents. Findings include:Observation on 09/02/25 at 4:53 P.M. of dinner in the skilled nursing dining room revealed staff served residents on trays directly from the serving cart. The staff did not remove the plates from the meal trays. Interview on 09/02/25 at 4:55 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #104 confirmed resident meals were served on trays and staff did not remove the plates of food, utensils, and beverages from the tray. Observation on 09/03/25 at 12:34 P.M. of lunch in the skilled dining room revealed staff served residents on trays directly from the serving cart. The staff did not remove the plates from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident code status was correctly noted in the medical record This affected three (Residents #9, #28, and #31) of 16 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 42 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/08/24 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cardiomyopathy. Review of the paper chart for Resident #28 revealed a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form dated 12/18/24 indicating the resident's code status was DNR Comfort Care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #28 dated 06/17/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the active physician orders for Resident #28 in the electronic health record revealed an order dated 08/18/25 for the resident to be a full code status. Interview on 09/03/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, facility failed to ensure staff provided the appropriate level of supervision during mealtime. This affected one (Resident #38) of six facility-identified residents who required supervision with meals. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 08/28/24 with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis, dysphagia, and depression. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #38 revealed an order dated 11/01/24 for a regular diet, pureed texture and nectar fluids consistency.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 06/05/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision from staff with eating.Review of care plan for Resident #38 dated 06/09/25 revealed the resident was at severe nutritional and hydration risk. The goal of the care plan was for resident to be able to safely and effectively chew and swallow a pureed diet with nectar thick liquidsReview of the physician's orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated upon opening. This affected one (Resident #31) of six residents who had orders for insulin. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded. This affected one (Resident #54) of 42 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 42 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Observation on 09/03/25 at 3:54 P.M of medication storage with Registered Nurse (RN) #76 revealed the Lantus insulin pen for Resident #31 had not been dated upon opening. Interview on 09/03/25 at 3:55 P.M. with RN #76 confirmed Resident #31's Lantus insulin pen had not been dated upon opening. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #54, revealed an admission date of 08/26/25 with diagnoses including myoneural disorder, rhabdomyolysis, and type two diabetes.Review of the active…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received dental services. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 09/15/23 with diagnoses which included hereditary idiopathic neuropathy, peripheral venous insufficiency, arthritis, and depressionReview of the admission packet for Resident #43 dated 07/19/23 revealed the resident signed the admission packet which noted the facility would arrange for physician visits as authorized under the agreement for ancillary services prescribed by a physician. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #43 revealed an order dated 08/22/23 for resident to receive ancillary services as needed including dental services.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #43 dated 05/20/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered appropriate pneumococcal immunizations. This affected one (Resident #42) of eight residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 42 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 11/09/22 with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and hyperlipidemia.Review of the immunization record for Resident #42 revealed the resident received Pneumovax 23 (PPSV23) on 11/10/22.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 08/15/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and the resident's pneumococcal immunizations were completed.Interview on 09/04/25 at 12:20 P.M with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not offer Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV)15, PCV20, or PCV21 vaccines to Resident #42 due to accidentally marking his pneumococcal immunizations as complete.Review of the facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-07-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation of tray line and a test tray, resident, family, and staff interview, review of the resident council meeting minutes, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and acceptable palatability. This had the potential to affect 40 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#37) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 41. Findings include; Interview on 07/05/22 at 10:28 A.M. with Resident #141 stated the facility's food was often served cold and this issue was ongoing. Interview on 07/05/22 at 11:15 A.M. with Resident #142 stated the food was served cold. Resident #142 stated this was really the only concern or complaint regarding the facility's food. Interview with Resident #4's spouse on 07/05/22 at 12:29 P.M. stated there were times the hot food was served cold. Observation on 07/06/22 at 11:34 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #500 placed a food thermometer in a pan of mixed vegetables without sanitizing the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 40 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#37) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Observation and interview during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 07/05/22 at 8:12 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #362 was standing in the kitchen area without a hair net covering her hair. The dining room manger (DRM) #322 was standing at the counter with no hair net covering her hair. DM #362 confirmed the findings. DM #362 provided a tour of the kitchen and confirmed an employee lunch was located inside the facility's refrigerator. A pound cake was observed on a shelf in the refrigerator with no label or date. DM #362 confirmed a large bag of open frozen cookies with no label or date. DM #362 opened the free standing ice cream cooler and revealed four three gallon tubs of ice cream with no lids. DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

32 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH